The Nacha Fraud Monitoring Rules Apply to Every Non-Consumer Originator — Not Just Third-Party Senders

One of the most common questions we hear from financial institutions right now is some version of this: "Do these rules really apply to all of our commercial customers?" The answer is yes — and we're here to help you navigate that. The Nacha Fraud Monitoring Rules are broader in…


Nacha's Fraud Monitoring Rules Reframe the Fight: Your Customer Is Now the Front Door

Fraud in payments hasn't just increased—it has migrated. For years, banks built defenses around the institution: tighter internal controls, better transaction monitoring, stronger back-office processes, and more sophisticated tools at the ODFI and RDFI. Those investments still matter. But Nacha is…


From Guidance to Enforcement: The Real Consequences of Not Preparing for Nacha’s Fraud Monitoring Rules

No bank wants to spend money on a new solution—especially in an environment where budgets are tight, headcount is constrained, and every investment must compete with growth initiatives. That reluctance is understandable. But as the Nacha Fraud Monitoring Rules move from guidance to enforcement,…


What “Risk-Based” Really Means Under Nacha’s Fraud Monitoring Rules

What “Risk-Based” Really Means Under Nacha’s Fraud Monitoring Rules (And What It Doesn’t)   Written by Julie Goff, JD, Head of Operations, Lexalign When Nacha introduced its new Fraud Monitoring Rules, one phrase immediately became central—and, for many banks, confusing: “risk-based”…


The "4 Boxes" to Check for Audit-Ready Compliance

As financial institutions enter 2026, one topic continues to surface in payments, risk, and compliance conversations: Nacha’s new Fraud Monitoring Rules. Most institutions know the Rules are coming. Fewer feel confident they fully understand what the Rules practically require—or whether their…


Fraud Monitoring vs. Transaction Monitoring - Key Distinctions to Know for the New Nacha Rule

Nacha’s new Fraud Monitoring Rule (the “New Rule”) requires risk- and role-based fraud monitoring. It explicitly applies to banks (ODFIs) as well as their non-consumer customers that submit ACH Entries on behalf of themselves or third parties.    Nacha has created a list of vendors that provide…


The Overlooked Risk in Nacha’s New Fraud Monitoring Rule — and How LexAlign Solves It

The Nacha Fraud Monitoring Rule, effective March 2026, is one of the most significant updates to ACH compliance in years. It requires every non-consumer participant in the ACH Network — banks, Originators, and Third-Party Senders — to implement risk- and role-based fraud monitoring procedures. But…


Nacha’s New “Attestation of Proof of Audit” Requirement — What It Means for ODFIs and TPSs

Last month, Nacha signaled another significant change in ACH compliance: in ACH Operations Bulletin 3-2025 (9/11/25), Nacha announced that ODFIs will be required to submit attestation of proof of annual rules compliance audits through Nacha’s  new secure channel, as soon as this month (October…


The Hidden “Gotcha” Within Nacha’s New Fraud Monitoring Rule

Think You’re Ready for Nacha’s New Fraud Monitoring Rule? Think Again.  Your bank has implemented state-of-the-art transaction and behavior monitoring solutions for fraud detection. That’s a great first step. Unfortunately, you’re still about to be dinged under Nacha’s new Fraud Monitoring Rule…


What the Nacha Fraud Monitoring Rule Really Means (and Why Banks Can’t Ignore It)

Nacha’s new Fraud Monitoring Rule is poised to take effect (i.e., becomes enforceable) for your higher-volume Originators/TPS on March 20, 2026, with universal applicability beginning June 19, 2026.  While it’s tempting to focus on what that means for the bank’s internal risk monitoring, the Rule…


Privacy Preference Center