e-Discovery Case Law Update Winter/Spring 2011 | Fios, Inc.

e-Discovery Case Law Update Winter/Spring 2011 | Fios, Inc.. This webinar is FREE and will be live in a few weeks... don't worry if you miss it... Fios always records their webinars so this will likely be available on demand later. Wednesday April 06, 2011 01:00 PM ET (60 minutes) This quarterly case law … Continue reading e-Discovery Case Law Update Winter/Spring 2011 | Fios, Inc. →

Avoid issues with ESI that will annoy the judge

This opinion provides a very detailed outline addressing production formats. SHIRA A. SCHEINDLIN, District Judge. Once again, this Court is required to rule on an e-discovery issue that could have been avoided had the parties had the good sense to "meet and confer," "cooperate" and generally make every effort to "communicate" as to the form … Continue reading Avoid issues with ESI that will annoy the judge →

Another Scheduling Order & Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting

ORDER SETTING RULE 16(b) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE AND RULE 26(f) PLANNING MEETING via Chipman v. ASPENBIO PHARMA INC., Dist. Court, D. Colorado 2011 - Google Scholar.

ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING/PLANNING CONFERENCE

ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING/PLANNING CONFERENCE via Doyle v. Lowrie, Dist. Court, D. Colorado 2011 - Google Scholar.

Avoiding E-Discovery Heartburn (Michigan Bar Journal)

pdf4article1813.pdf (application/pdf Object). It is possible to reduce ESI anxiety by effectively managing electronic discovery: being proactive in defi ning the scope, understanding preservation obligations and protections, and taking reasonable steps calculated to protect potentially relevant information (PRI). ... Parties to a case in a Michigan state court can (and should) proactively discuss key ESI … Continue reading Avoiding E-Discovery Heartburn (Michigan Bar Journal) →

How you start your case will determine how it ends

article5.pdf (application/pdf Object). Jonathan D. Frieden and Leigh M. Murray, The Admissibility of Electronic Evidence Under the Federal Rules of Evidence, XVII Rich. J.L. & Tech. 5 (2011), http://jolt.richmond.edu/v17i2/article5.pdf. ...considering the significant costs associated with discovery of ESI, it makes little sense to go to all the bother and expense to get electronic information … Continue reading How you start your case will determine how it ends →

Brokaw v. DAVOL, INC., RI: Superior Court 2011 – Google Scholar

Plaintiffs argue that Defendants' refusal to search and produce their archived hard-copy materials and ESI for the years prior to 2004 has resulted in large gaps in document production. via Brokaw v. DAVOL, INC., RI: Superior Court 2011 - Google Scholar.

E-Discovery Today: The Fault Lies Not In Our Rules . . .

hausfeld.pdf (application/pdf Object). THE FEDERAL COURTS LAW REVIEW Volume 4, Issue 2 2011 E-Discovery Today: The Fault Lies Not In Our Rules . . . Milberg LLP and Hausfeld LLP* TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................... 2 II. STATE OF THE UNION ......................................................................... 6 A. The Reality of Electronic Discovery and the Data Deluge ......... … Continue reading E-Discovery Today: The Fault Lies Not In Our Rules . . . →

Attorney-Client Privilege and ESI

2011dltr001.pdf (application/pdf Object). THE ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE AND DISCOVERY OF ELECTRONICALLY STORED INFORMATION ABSTRACT The attorney-client privilege is the most sacred and important privilege in our legal system. Despite being at the center of daily practice, the privilege still remains a mystery for many lawyers. This is primarily because the privilege is not absolute, and there … Continue reading Attorney-Client Privilege and ESI →