Religion vs Transcendence

How modern religion has nothing to do with real religion. Belief is not a virtue.

The moment life came into existence we developed a barrier—a membrane between us and the existing world. This layer reduced the immediacy of total entropy between the organism and the whole world, the complete environment.

Our immediate needs of food and reproduction had to be met in the most efficient way possible. No primal organism could see the truth of the reality. A transparent window between us and it, would leave no upward bound to the limits of our entropy. The truth was then irrelevant to survival. The truth is still irrelevant to that end. In fact, the less we see of total reality the better our chances to avoid the infinite distractions from feeding and breeding.

Eventually we developed senses crude enough to master that purpose. We have never developed senses that would surpass that limitation. But occasionally nature slips up and we catch a glimpse that the world “out there” is much more complex than our senses derive. Much more than our headset can see, let alone interpret.

Transcendence is the process of bending that barrier between our senses and reality as it is. That barrier becomes more porous and our perception expanded to capture what evolution missed. Religion is originally a method of that transcendence, but is now a list of rules and regulations to follow—it is a way to control people and rests as a power structure the men of words control.

Western religion is about rules, regulations, and politics. In short, a way to control the masses— and since it offers no transcendence it has to. It has nothing to do with real religion in the origin of the word.

Now belief is a virtue that has humanity absolved of all responsibility, allowing the ridiculous to have equal time with real virtue, which cannot expand by belief. Believing a doctrine is not religion. Believing a doctrine is the barrier to transcendence.

What To Do…About Everything—

To believe or not to believe? I think, therefore I make a mess of things…

Did you exchange, a walk-on part in the war, for a lead role in a cage? —Roger Waters

I figure if all goes well, I have about 35-40 years left as a human being. How do I want to spend it? How do you want to spend it? Anxious for the morrow? Is it productive or even enjoyable to involve oneself in compounding the mess by constantly trying to fix it?

The things that we object about our situation is precisely what we are doing to overcome it. Do you see that? Can you see that?

“It is perfectly obvious that the whole world is going to hell. The only possible chance that it might not is that we do not attempt to prevent it from doing so”—Robert Oppenheimer

While atheism is one step closer to peace, abandoning all sides of all dogmas makes it perfectly clear that beliefs are the cancers that grow more beliefs, to which very little of humanity has any immunity at all.

Be a much better road without the fence

On Doctrine

Understanding the nuts and bolts of Christian longevity

In order to be effective, a doctrine must not be understood, but has rather to be believed in. A doctrine that is understood is shorn of its strength“—Eric Hoffer

A doctrine to be effective must be viewed from the heart, not from the brain, to maintain staying power.

“The devout are always urged to seek truth with their hearts and not their minds

Rudolph Hess, when swearing in the entire Nazi party in 1934, exhorted the hearers: “Do not seek Adolf Hitler with your brains—all of you will find him with the strength of your hearts”.

It is obvious today more than ever that the true believer is just that—a believer that doesn’t understand the doctrine. Everyone else is doing it wrong sounds familiar, and many Christians are now despising Christianity—the outcome of the doctrine.

When we fully understand the doctrine (like we do the nazi party) we can no longer believe in it based on its historical and current condition—we capitulate to self doubt, ride it out, or leave.

Atheism is proof that the doctrine can eventually be understood”. That is evidenced in the current exodus.

Spending a lifetime ironing the contradiction of abrahamic religion is imperative from the beginning that conundrums existed to sustain the longevity of the movement.

If a doctrine is not unintelligible, it has to be vague. If neither unintelligible nor vague, it has to be unverifiable”Eric Hoffer

To secure a lasting movement, Christianity incorporated all three—and the proof is in its longevity.

It’s hard to imagine that this trifecta was accidental, since every single point of doctrine is Alpha and Omega of contradiction.

License plate Jesus home near me

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started