


My Atmospheric Science Adventures at Mauna Loa Observatory
Most people know Hawaii is famous for its beaches. But did you know it’s also home to one of the world’s leading stations for monitoring the atmosphere? On this ID The Future, self-taught citizen scientist Forrest Mims talks to host Andrew McDiarmid about the history and significance of the world-famous Mauna Loa Observatory in Hawaii. He also shares some of his own experiences and adventures there over the last quarter century. In this episode, Mims reminds us of his dust-up with Scientific American, a controversy that would ultimately launch his career as an atmospheric scientist. He introduces us to some of the pioneering explorers and scientists who set the stage for atmospheric science in Hawaii, including Archibald Menzies, Charles Wilkes, Read More ›

Forrest Mims on Winning the Rolex Award (And How You Can Too!)

Guillermo Gonzalez and Jay Richards on Science Sensationalism

Live Broadcast of the Science & Culture Update with Stephen Meyer and David Klinghoffer
On this episode of ID the Future, listen in on this special edition of the Science and Culture Update, recorded in front of a live audience in the Medved Show studio. Michael Medved is joined by Darwin’s Doubt author Stephen Meyer and Evolution News & Views editor David Klinghoffer for a discussion about the misuse of science to close minds, rather than open them, in ongoing debates on controversial topics such as evolution and climate change.
Read More ›
The Michael Medved Show Weekly Science & Culture Update: Featuring Jay Richards and Steve Meyer
On this episode of ID the Future, Jay Richards and Stephen Meyer join Michael Medved for a discussion of the phrase “scientific consensus” and how it is used in debates over controversial issues such as Darwinian evolution and climate change.
Read More ›
The Republican Anti-Science Brain
On this episode of ID the Future, David Boze discusses Chris Mooney’s recent article in The Huffington Post entitled Why Republicans Deny Science: The Quest for a Scientific Explanation. Mooney suggests that Conservatives who reject alarmism on climate change or disagree with any aspect of Darwinian evolution are merely denying reality because of the structure of their brains. Listen in and decide — is the political right’s understanding of science crippled by their predetermined inability to process proven facts, or is there actually room for informed dissent?