Official Hackaton of the Department of Computer Science of the Technical University of Munich
Requirements
All teams are requested to upload their project details here.
Make your submission pages attractive for the judges.
You can add screenshots, videos, idea summary, technologies used, link to the deployed prototype, etc.
Please look at some of the previously published submissions for inspiration.
During the pitch sessions, you could use presentation slides to present your ideas to judges.
Further information regarding the time duration and judging process will be communicated over Discord.
Prizes
Overall Winner
Popular Vote
Wildtrack
CHECK24
Huawei
Hubert Burda Media
Interhyp
JetBrains
Optiver
Siemens
Solana
T-Systems
City of Munich
Devpost Achievements
Submitting to this hackathon could earn you:
Judges
Florian Matthes
TUM
Daniel Mayer
Siemens AG
Ben-Noah Engelhaupt
Optiver
Lena Kuhne
CHECK24
Paul Zhang
CHECK24
Felipe Wieman
Interhyp Gruppe
Sebastian Lang
T-Systems
Lukas Steigerwald
Solana / Superteam
Philipp Kemper
CHECK24
Florian Hoppe
JetBrains
Björn Wagner
Solana / Superteam
Dinar Gumirov
JetBrains
Tim Schumacher
Huawei
Thomas Wachter
Huawei
Ole Vester
CHECK24
Judith Blumenschein
City of Munich
Robyn Kölle
CHECK24
Aifen Sui
Huawei
Francisco De las Casas Young
Interhyp Gruppe
Jesko Riesner
Interhyp Gruppe
Ga Young Folk
Interhyp Gruppe
Krassimir Ovcharov
Interhyp Gruppe
Jan Stratmann
Optiver
Simon Staal
Optiver
Michail Chatzipanagiotou
T-Systems
Dominik Weber
Huawei
Tobias Madl
Solana / Superteam
Dmitry Temnov
JetBrains
Wout Werkman
JetBrains
Ralph Kocher
Interhyp Gruppe
Christian Langhirt
Interhyp Gruppe
Osman Agirbas
Interhyp Gruppe
Bastian Behrens
Hubert Burda Media
Uwe Jäger
Hubert Burda Media
Mirna Rodic
City of Munich
Egor Frolov
Hubert Burda Media
Riccardo Carano
Interhyp Gruppe
Aleksandra Charikova
JetBrains
Michael Schafhauser
T-Systems
Janine Wagner
Solana / Superteam
Carlo Abdelnour
Solana / Superteam
Judging Criteria
-
Innovation / Ambition
Was the idea unique, or a different take on an existing/similar app? What was added to the app that made it special or more useful? Was the idea behind the app ambitious? Creative? How well did the app execute upon the theme/category chosen? -
User Interface / User Experience
Does the UI of the app look professional/fun, or is it sloppy? Is the app easy to use? Does the workflow of the app make sense, is it intuitive? -
Overall Quality
Does the app work completely from start to finish? Were any bugs encountered during the presentation? Was the most critical feature successfully implemented? Did the team scope their app's features well given the time frame? -
Quality of the Presentation
How well prepared were the presenters? Were the presenters able to communicate their idea to the audience? How was the overall presentation?
Questions? Email the hackathon manager
Tell your friends
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.