Michiel Borkent
Michiel Borkent
Yes, I think we should take into account the language.
I think we have a similar issue for clj-kondo where we show the language context for .cljc.
Yes. Prior art also available in clj-kondo and calva.
@lread I see that `:data [:no-doc]` is a vector and in other cases a number. I propose to just add bespoke keys for each type for extra data: ``` {:type...
This seems rather unlikely? Also, the var could have become something like `(def foo (partial bar 1))` so in theory it could still be a function.
Although the return type of `partial` is a function so we could still support that in clj-kondo, e.g with `:ifn true` or `:ifn false` or so.
Yeah, this seems nice!
This can be closed I guess?
Oops, sorry, I was mixing stuff up.