Skip to content

multiple code improvements: squid:S2325, squid:UselessParenthesesCheck, squid:S1149, squid:S1213, squid:S1192#71

Merged
bodewig merged 1 commit into
xmlunit:masterfrom
DevFactory:release/multiple-code-improvements-fix-7
Mar 18, 2016
Merged

multiple code improvements: squid:S2325, squid:UselessParenthesesCheck, squid:S1149, squid:S1213, squid:S1192#71
bodewig merged 1 commit into
xmlunit:masterfrom
DevFactory:release/multiple-code-improvements-fix-7

Conversation

@georgekankava

Copy link
Copy Markdown

This pull request is focused on resolving occurrences of Sonar rules
squid:S2325 "private" methods that don't access instance data should be "static".
squid:UselessParenthesesCheck Useless parentheses around expressions should be removed to prevent any misunderstanding.
squid:S1149 Synchronized classes Vector, Hashtable, Stack and StringBuffer should not be used.
squid:S1213 The members of an interface declaration or class should appear in a pre-defined order.
squid:S1192 String literals should not be duplicated
You can find more information about the issue here:
https://dev.eclipse.org/sonar/coding_rules#q=squid%3AS2325
https://dev.eclipse.org/sonar/coding_rules#q=squid%3AUselessParenthesesCheck
https://dev.eclipse.org/sonar/coding_rules#q=squid%3AS1149
https://dev.eclipse.org/sonar/coding_rules#q=squid%3AS1213
https://dev.eclipse.org/sonar/coding_rules#q=squid%3AS1192
Please let me know if you have any questions.
George Kankava

@coveralls

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 92.488% when pulling 2db617f on DevFactory:release/multiple-code-improvements-fix-7 into a005061 on xmlunit:master.

@bodewig bodewig added this to the 2.1.0 milestone Mar 18, 2016
bodewig added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 18, 2016
…ents-fix-7

multiple code improvements: squid:S2325, squid:UselessParenthesesCheck, squid:S1149, squid:S1213, squid:S1192
@bodewig bodewig merged commit 581e660 into xmlunit:master Mar 18, 2016
@bodewig

bodewig commented Mar 18, 2016

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Thanks again.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants