Skip to content

[v8] Accessibility Support for Browserstack app automate sessions#14034

Merged
christian-bromann merged 39 commits intowebdriverio:v8from
nishath-bs:app_a11y_assert_api
Feb 6, 2025
Merged

[v8] Accessibility Support for Browserstack app automate sessions#14034
christian-bromann merged 39 commits intowebdriverio:v8from
nishath-bs:app_a11y_assert_api

Conversation

@nishath-bs
Copy link
Contributor

@nishath-bs nishath-bs commented Jan 7, 2025

Proposed changes

We have added AppAccessibility Scans support for the BrowserStack app automated sessions. Previously the accessibility support was there for Web Automation alone now we have added it for App Automation as well.

Types of changes

  • Polish (an improvement for an existing feature)
  • Bugfix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • Documentation update (improvements to the project's docs)
  • Specification changes (updates to WebDriver command specifications)
  • Internal updates (everything related to internal scripts, governance documentation and CI files)

Checklist

  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING doc
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • I have added the necessary documentation (if appropriate)
  • I have added proper type definitions for new commands (if appropriate)

Backport Request

//: # (The current main branch is the development branch for WebdriverIO v9. If your change should be released to the current major version of WebdriverIO (v8), please raise another PR with the same changes against the v8 branch.)

  • This change is solely for v9 and doesn't need to be back-ported
  • Back-ported PR at #XXXXX

Further comments

Reviewers: @webdriverio/project-committers

@linux-foundation-easycla
Copy link

linux-foundation-easycla bot commented Jan 7, 2025

CLA Signed

The committers listed above are authorized under a signed CLA.

@nishath-bs nishath-bs changed the title App a11y assert api Accessibility Support for Browserstack app automate sessions Jan 7, 2025
@nishath-bs nishath-bs changed the title Accessibility Support for Browserstack app automate sessions [v8] Accessibility Support for Browserstack app automate sessions Jan 14, 2025
@nishath-bs
Copy link
Contributor Author

@christian-bromann Is there anything pending from my side. Can we merge this?

@christian-bromann
Copy link
Member

Is there anything pending from my side. Can we merge this?

I haven't been able to look into the failing e2e tests, I want to make sure to understand what is going on before merging. It would help if you could take a look at this as well. It is probably unrelated to this PR.

@nishath-bs
Copy link
Contributor Author

Is there anything pending from my side. Can we merge this?

I haven't been able to look into the failing e2e tests, I want to make sure to understand what is going on before merging. It would help if you could take a look at this as well. It is probably unrelated to this PR.

@christian-bromann we checked this. But the failures are not due to our changes. And it seems it was failing from before itself

@nishath-bs
Copy link
Contributor Author

@christian-bromann In the previous merges also we have skipped this checks and merged it #13926

@christian-bromann
Copy link
Member

In the previous merges also we have skipped this checks and merged it #13926

This wasn't ideal either. We should not disregard the pipelines.

@nishath-bs
Copy link
Contributor Author

In the previous merges also we have skipped this checks and merged it #13926

This wasn't ideal either. We should not disregard the pipelines.

@christian-bromann Do you want us to look into this? or should we wait till you fix the pipelines

@christian-bromann
Copy link
Member

Do you want us to look into this?

That would be very helpful!

@nishath-bs
Copy link
Contributor Author

Do you want us to look into this?

That would be very helpful!

Actually, we tried debugging that. but we didn't have enough context as the error comes from other parts of the code. That why we reverted to you

@christian-bromann
Copy link
Member

Can your team raise an issue and document its findings? I am happy to provide context.

@rounak610 rounak610 mentioned this pull request Feb 4, 2025
13 tasks
@nishath-bs
Copy link
Contributor Author

nishath-bs commented Feb 6, 2025

@christian-bromann As per this PR we have fixed the tests that are failing. Can you please merge this now?

Copy link
Member

@christian-bromann christian-bromann left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM 👍

@christian-bromann christian-bromann added the PR: Polish 💅 PRs that contain improvements on existing features label Feb 6, 2025
@christian-bromann christian-bromann merged commit 3457cb7 into webdriverio:v8 Feb 6, 2025
8 of 9 checks passed
@nishath-bs
Copy link
Contributor Author

@christian-bromann since its a new feature. Can you tag a release for this

@nishath-bs
Copy link
Contributor Author

@christian-bromann since its a new feature. Can you tag a release for this

@christian-bromann Can you release a version for v8. As we have to release this as a feature

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

PR: Polish 💅 PRs that contain improvements on existing features

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants