Skip to content

[context] Type definitions aren't consistent. #58

@justinfagnani

Description

@justinfagnani

It looks like I missed updating some of the type declarations in the protocol description in #36

This has caused some interop problems with implementations that used the previous object-based contexts that we decided to change in #19.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions