Action Research for OpenGov#2397
Action Research for OpenGov#2397stojanov-igor wants to merge 4 commits intow3f:masterfrom stojanov-igor:open-gov-research
Conversation
Noc2
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks for the application. Have you considered applying for treasury funding instead? Ideally something like this is funded via the treasury directly.
|
Hi @Noc2 , We have not considered applying for treasury funds on OpenGov. The RFP was listed in your grants program so we are responding to that request. Please let us know if the Request is no longer valid and if we should apply via OpenGov. Many thanks |
|
Hey @stojanov-igor , |
|
Thank you both for your feedback. I have posted the proposal to OpenGov. You can find it here If you have any further feedback, please share it with us. Many thanks |
|
Our proposal on OpenGov is currently in vote with firm opposition toward conducting this research. (229 Nays vs 4 Ayes). You can review the details here: https://polkadot.polkassembly.io/referenda/1180 Since both the W3F and OpenGov are not interested in the project, I suggest that you remove the request for proposals. (RFP). I saw that other organizations are also responding to the request with very little success. It doesn't make sense to have an open RFP if nobody is interested in funding the proposals. Thanks |
|
Hey @stojanov-igor , thank you for the feedback. With OpenGov not willing to put funding towards this we should really think about removing the RFP. I agree. Sorry to hear that your efforts weren't rewarded. Best wishes. |
With a few teams failing to gather support from the treasury, and the grants program not being fond of funding these projects either, I think it's time to accept that this RFP was a nice idea but seems to be baiting teams to put in effort into both OpenGov and Grant applications destined to fail. References: [referenda #1](https://polkadot.polkassembly.io/referenda/1204) [referanda #2](https://polkadot.polkassembly.io/referenda/1180) #2397
With a few teams failing to gather support from the treasury, and the grants program not being fond of funding these projects either, I think it's time to accept that this RFP was a nice idea but seems to be baiting teams to put in effort into both OpenGov and Grant applications destined to fail. References: [referenda #1](https://polkadot.polkassembly.io/referenda/1204) [referanda #2](https://polkadot.polkassembly.io/referenda/1180) #2397
With a few teams failing to gather support from the treasury, and the grants program not being fond of funding these projects either, I think it's time to accept that this RFP was a nice idea but seems to be baiting teams to put in effort into both OpenGov and Grant applications destined to fail. References: [referenda w3f#1](https://polkadot.polkassembly.io/referenda/1204) [referanda w3f#2](https://polkadot.polkassembly.io/referenda/1180) w3f#2397
Project Abstract
The proposed research project aims to conduct action research on OpenGov systems, particularly focusing on mechanisms of decentralized governance, participatory decision-making, and the application of governance frameworks within the Polkadot and Kusama ecosystems. The objective is to assess the effectiveness of these systems and provide actionable insights to improve the governance processes.
This is a response to the following request for proposal: https://grants.web3.foundation/docs/RFPs/action_research_opengov
Grant level
Application Checklist
project_name.md).@_______:matrix.org(change the homeserver if you use a different one)