Hi @sfeng33, the pre-commit checks have failed. Please run:

uv pip install pre-commit>=4.5.1
pre-commit install
pre-commit run --all-files

Then, commit the changes and push to your branch.

For future commits, pre-commit will run automatically on changed files before each commit.

# For mypy (substitute "3.10" with the failing version if needed)
pre-commit run --hook-stage manual mypy-3.10

/gemini review

@chaunceyjiang @bbrowning @aarnphm @qandrew

Hi @sfeng33, the pre-commit checks have failed. Please run:

uv pip install pre-commit>=4.5.1
pre-commit install
pre-commit run --all-files

Then, commit the changes and push to your branch.

For future commits, pre-commit will run automatically on changed files before each commit.

# For mypy (substitute "3.10" with the failing version if needed)
pre-commit run --hook-stage manual mypy-3.10

Hi @sfeng33, the pre-commit checks have failed. Please run:

uv pip install pre-commit>=4.5.1
pre-commit install
pre-commit run --all-files

Then, commit the changes and push to your branch.

For future commits, pre-commit will run automatically on changed files before each commit.

# For mypy (substitute "3.10" with the failing version if needed)
pre-commit run --hook-stage manual mypy-3.10

It looks like we got all the parsers updated. All unit tests pass for me locally, and I also ran integration tests under tests/entrypoints/openai/tool_parsers and tests/tool_use and all of those that I could run on my hardware passed. The ones I couldn't run are just related to my resources available, and not to any change here.

So, this looks good to me! It sets us up for the next refactoring but as far as I can tell is completely transparent to the end users.

As you move on to phase 2 of this, another thing I realized to keep in mind is we have some external tool parser plugins. This new parameter is optional in the constructor, so that part should be fine. We'll just need to be mindful about whether we want to break or keep semantics working for external tool parsers as all this gets wired through. Until or unless those external tool parser plugins get updated, we'll have to always handle the case where our list of tools is None defensively.

Thanks for the thorough review and integration testing, Ben! Great point about external tool parser plugins, I'll make sure to handle tools=None defensively in PR 2 so we don't break any out-of-tree parsers.