Skip to content

Revert "[turbopack] Add bundling support for worker_threads"#88725

Merged
sokra merged 1 commit intocanaryfrom
revert-87746-worker_threads_bug
Jan 19, 2026
Merged

Revert "[turbopack] Add bundling support for worker_threads"#88725
sokra merged 1 commit intocanaryfrom
revert-87746-worker_threads_bug

Conversation

@sokra
Copy link
Member

@sokra sokra commented Jan 19, 2026

Reverts #87746

because of this build error:

> Build error occurred
Error: Turbopack build failed with 1 errors:
./node_modules/.pnpm/thread-stream@3.1.0/node_modules/thread-stream/index.js
non-evaluatable module
Worker thread module must be evaluatable

@nextjs-bot nextjs-bot added created-by: Turbopack team PRs by the Turbopack team. tests Turbopack Related to Turbopack with Next.js. labels Jan 19, 2026
@nextjs-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

nextjs-bot commented Jan 19, 2026

Tests Passed

@nextjs-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Stats from current PR

✅ No significant changes detected

📊 All Metrics
📖 Metrics Glossary

Dev Server Metrics:

  • Listen = TCP port starts accepting connections
  • First Request = HTTP server returns successful response
  • Cold = Fresh build (no cache)
  • Warm = With cached build artifacts

Build Metrics:

  • Fresh = Clean build (no .next directory)
  • Cached = With existing .next directory

Change Thresholds:

  • Time: Changes < 50ms AND < 10%, OR < 2% are insignificant
  • Size: Changes < 1KB AND < 1% are insignificant
  • All other changes are flagged to catch regressions

⚡ Dev Server

Metric Canary PR Change Trend
Cold (Listen) 455ms 456ms ▁▁▁▁▁
Cold (Ready in log) 454ms 453ms ▁▁▁▁▁
Cold (First Request) 926ms 915ms ▃▃▃▃▁
Warm (Listen) 457ms 456ms ▁▁▁▁▁
Warm (Ready in log) 452ms 454ms ▁▁▁▁▁
Warm (First Request) 364ms 365ms ▂▁▁▂▁
📦 Dev Server (Webpack) (Legacy)

📦 Dev Server (Webpack)

Metric Canary PR Change Trend
Cold (Listen) 456ms 455ms ▁▁█▁▁
Cold (Ready in log) 439ms 439ms ▇▆▅▇▇
Cold (First Request) 1.826s 1.817s ▄▄▅▅▅
Warm (Listen) 455ms 457ms ▁▁█▁▁
Warm (Ready in log) 439ms 439ms ▅▅▆▅▅
Warm (First Request) 1.829s 1.833s ▃▃▆▅▅

⚡ Production Builds

Metric Canary PR Change Trend
Fresh Build 4.790s 4.765s ▁▁▁▁▂
Cached Build 4.758s 4.769s ▁▁▁▁▂
📦 Production Builds (Webpack) (Legacy)

📦 Production Builds (Webpack)

Metric Canary PR Change Trend
Fresh Build 14.009s 14.043s ▁▁█▂▂
Cached Build 14.152s 14.148s ▁▁█▁▂
node_modules Size 458 MB 458 MB █████
📦 Bundle Sizes

Bundle Sizes

⚡ Turbopack

Client

Main Bundles: **430 kB** → **430 kB** ✅ -92 B

82 files with content-based hashes (individual files not comparable between builds)

Server

Middleware
Canary PR Change
middleware-b..fest.js gzip 788 B 787 B
Total 788 B 787 B ✅ -1 B
Build Details
Build Manifests
Canary PR Change
_buildManifest.js gzip 451 B 450 B
Total 451 B 450 B ✅ -1 B

📦 Webpack

Client

Main Bundles
Canary PR Change
2086.HASH.js gzip 169 B N/A -
2161-HASH.js gzip 5.41 kB N/A -
2747-HASH.js gzip 4.48 kB N/A -
4322-HASH.js gzip 52.3 kB N/A -
ec793fe8-HASH.js gzip 62.3 kB N/A -
framework-HASH.js gzip 59.8 kB 59.8 kB
main-app-HASH.js gzip 251 B 253 B
main-HASH.js gzip 38.6 kB 38.9 kB
webpack-HASH.js gzip 1.68 kB 1.68 kB
1596.HASH.js gzip N/A 169 B -
2658-HASH.js gzip N/A 51.9 kB -
6349-HASH.js gzip N/A 4.46 kB -
7019-HASH.js gzip N/A 5.43 kB -
b17a3386-HASH.js gzip N/A 62.3 kB -
Total 225 kB 225 kB ✅ -12 B
Polyfills
Canary PR Change
polyfills-HASH.js gzip 39.4 kB 39.4 kB
Total 39.4 kB 39.4 kB
Pages
Canary PR Change
_app-HASH.js gzip 194 B 193 B
_error-HASH.js gzip 182 B 182 B
css-HASH.js gzip 336 B 335 B
dynamic-HASH.js gzip 1.8 kB 1.8 kB
edge-ssr-HASH.js gzip 256 B 256 B
head-HASH.js gzip 352 B 349 B
hooks-HASH.js gzip 385 B 384 B
image-HASH.js gzip 580 B 580 B
index-HASH.js gzip 259 B 258 B
link-HASH.js gzip 2.5 kB 2.51 kB
routerDirect..HASH.js gzip 319 B 317 B
script-HASH.js gzip 385 B 387 B
withRouter-HASH.js gzip 316 B 315 B
1afbb74e6ecf..834.css gzip 106 B 106 B
Total 7.97 kB 7.96 kB ✅ -8 B

Server

Edge SSR
Canary PR Change
edge-ssr.js gzip 125 kB 125 kB
page.js gzip 242 kB 237 kB 🟢 4.95 kB (-2%)
Total 367 kB 362 kB ✅ -4.94 kB
Middleware
Canary PR Change
middleware-b..fest.js gzip 655 B 654 B
middleware-r..fest.js gzip 155 B 156 B
middleware.js gzip 33.1 kB 33.3 kB
edge-runtime..pack.js gzip 842 B 842 B
Total 34.8 kB 34.9 kB ⚠️ +169 B
Build Details
Build Manifests
Canary PR Change
_buildManifest.js gzip 738 B 738 B
Total 738 B 738 B
Build Cache
Canary PR Change
0.pack gzip 3.66 MB 3.67 MB 🔴 +6.97 kB (+0%)
index.pack gzip 99 kB 99.3 kB
index.pack.old gzip 98.8 kB 100 kB 🔴 +1.23 kB (+1%)
Total 3.86 MB 3.87 MB ⚠️ +8.5 kB

🔄 Shared (bundler-independent)

Runtimes
Canary PR Change
app-page-exp...dev.js gzip 304 kB 304 kB
app-page-exp..prod.js gzip 158 kB 158 kB
app-page-tur...dev.js gzip 304 kB 304 kB
app-page-tur..prod.js gzip 158 kB 158 kB
app-page-tur...dev.js gzip 300 kB 300 kB
app-page-tur..prod.js gzip 156 kB 156 kB
app-page.run...dev.js gzip 300 kB 300 kB
app-page.run..prod.js gzip 156 kB 156 kB
app-route-ex...dev.js gzip 68.8 kB 68.8 kB
app-route-ex..prod.js gzip 47.6 kB 47.6 kB
app-route-tu...dev.js gzip 68.8 kB 68.8 kB
app-route-tu..prod.js gzip 47.6 kB 47.6 kB
app-route-tu...dev.js gzip 68.4 kB 68.4 kB
app-route-tu..prod.js gzip 47.4 kB 47.4 kB
app-route.ru...dev.js gzip 68.4 kB 68.4 kB
app-route.ru..prod.js gzip 47.4 kB 47.4 kB
dist_client_...dev.js gzip 324 B 324 B
dist_client_...dev.js gzip 326 B 326 B
dist_client_...dev.js gzip 318 B 318 B
dist_client_...dev.js gzip 317 B 317 B
pages-api-tu...dev.js gzip 41.2 kB 41.2 kB
pages-api-tu..prod.js gzip 31.3 kB 31.3 kB
pages-api.ru...dev.js gzip 41.1 kB 41.1 kB
pages-api.ru..prod.js gzip 31.2 kB 31.2 kB
pages-turbo....dev.js gzip 50.8 kB 50.8 kB
pages-turbo...prod.js gzip 38.2 kB 38.2 kB
pages.runtim...dev.js gzip 50.7 kB 50.7 kB
pages.runtim..prod.js gzip 38.2 kB 38.2 kB
server.runti..prod.js gzip 62.2 kB 62.2 kB
Total 2.69 MB 2.69 MB ✅ -1 B

@codspeed-hq
Copy link

codspeed-hq bot commented Jan 19, 2026

Merging this PR will not alter performance

✅ 17 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 3 skipped benchmarks1


Comparing revert-87746-worker_threads_bug (d3c48f1) with canary (633e274)

Open in CodSpeed

Footnotes

  1. 3 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports.

@iGmainC
Copy link

iGmainC commented Jan 19, 2026

What happened? Why was this PR reverted?

@mischnic
Copy link
Member

I've put the build error we're seeing into the PR description.

@iGmainC
Copy link

iGmainC commented Jan 19, 2026

I've put the build error we're seeing into the PR description.

Okay, I'm actually quite looking forward to the release of this fix.

@sokra
Copy link
Member Author

sokra commented Jan 19, 2026

We will fix it again. It's reverted while we are investigating how to fix that case too...

@sokra sokra marked this pull request as ready for review January 19, 2026 09:47
@sokra sokra merged commit 1bbba2a into canary Jan 19, 2026
283 of 288 checks passed
@sokra sokra deleted the revert-87746-worker_threads_bug branch January 19, 2026 09:48
@iGmainC
Copy link

iGmainC commented Jan 23, 2026

Should this issue be moved back to the backlog?
@sokra @mischnic

lukesandberg added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 23, 2026
lukesandberg added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 24, 2026
lukesandberg added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 24, 2026
lukesandberg added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 26, 2026
lukesandberg added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 26, 2026
#88967)

## What?

This PR reapplies #87746 which adds bundling support for Node.js `worker_threads` in Turbopack.

## Why?

The original PR (#87746) was reverted in #88725 because it broke builds that use packages like `pino` with transports. These packages use dynamic patterns like `join(__dirname, 'lib', 'worker.js')` to resolve worker entry points, which can match non-evaluatable files like `package.json` or `tsconfig.json`.

## How?

This PR reapplies the original changes with the following fixes:

1. **Downgrade errors to warnings in tracing contexts**: When `loose_errors` is enabled (tracing mode) or `in_try` is true, worker entry point validation errors are now emitted as warnings instead of errors. This follows the established Turbopack pattern used in `handle_resolve_error` and other resolve error handling.

2. **Improved error messages**: Error messages for non-chunkable and non-evaluatable worker entry point modules now include:
   - The module identifier (so you can see which file caused the issue)
   - The issue source location (pointing to the `new Worker()` call in source code)

3. **Added regression test**: A new pino-based test case exercises the `thread-stream` worker pattern that caused the original failure. This test runs in `CodeGenerationAndTracing` mode via `test-start-turbo`.

## Changes from original PR

- Added `source` field to `CodeGenerationIssue` to support showing issue source locations
- Added `get_issue_severity()` helper that checks `loose_errors` and `in_try` to determine severity
- Fixed typo: `"SharedbWorker"` → `"SharedWorker"` in `to_string` implementation
- Added pino regression test in `test/e2e/app-dir/node-worker-threads/`

## Testing

- ✅ `pnpm test-dev-turbo test/e2e/app-dir/node-worker-threads/` - all tests pass
- ✅ `pnpm test-start-turbo test/e2e/app-dir/node-worker-threads/` - all tests pass (exercises bundling mode)
- ✅ Verified test fails without the `loose_errors` fix
- ✅ Verified vercel-docs build succeeds with warnings instead of errors
@github-actions github-actions bot added the locked label Feb 6, 2026
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Feb 6, 2026
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

created-by: Turbopack team PRs by the Turbopack team. locked tests Turbopack Related to Turbopack with Next.js.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants