feat (providers/openai): add support for reasoning summaries#5906
Merged
feat (providers/openai): add support for reasoning summaries#5906
Conversation
Collaborator
|
There are potential issues with multi-turn chats and OpenAI requiring correct ids (e.g. for multi-turn computer use). We could release a snapshot for users to try out. There is also ongoing work on reasoning in the v5 branch that'll conflict here. |
lgrammel
approved these changes
Apr 23, 2025
lgrammel
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 23, 2025
lgrammel
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 23, 2025
samdenty
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 24, 2025
…ining2 * origin/v5: (25 commits) chore(providers/langchain): extract to separate package (#5928) Version Packages (canary) (#5898) fix (docs): fix typo (#5914) (#5919) docs: update chat-with-pdf page to include updated provider information (#5895) (#5917) docs: Added documentation for function call parsing middleware (#5900) refactoring: extract SharedV2Headers (#5912) feat (providers/openai): add support for reasoning summaries (#5906) (#5909) fix (docs): fix OpenRouter code examples (#5876) (#5893) fix(providers/xai): return actual usage when streaming instead of NaN (#5873) (#5891) fix (docs): fix valibotSchema import (#5865) (#5889) fix (providers/fal): improve model compatibility (#5855) (#5892) chore: extract spec types (#5901) chore: remove logprobs (#5896) Version Packages (canary) (#5872) chore (ci): unify jobs & remove unnecessary example builds (#5894) feat (ai): allow using provider default temperature by specifying null (#5890) fix(ai/mcp-stdio): make `createChildProcess` synchronous to prevent spawn race condition (#5852) (#5888) feat (providers/google): add thinking config to provider options (#5842) (#5887) fix (examples): avoid mixed message types in `use-chat-streamdata-multistep` (#5824) (#5886) chore: restructure language model supported urls (#5882) ...
jacobkerber
pushed a commit
to jacobkerber/ai
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 15, 2025
jacobkerber
pushed a commit
to jacobkerber/ai
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 15, 2025
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Background
OpenAI reasoning models now expose "reasoning summary" text per https://platform.openai.com/docs/guides/reasoning?api-mode=responses#reasoning-summaries
Developers would like to be able to surface this content to users.
Summary
Add support for parsing and processing reasoning summary content into the 'reasoning' field for generate and stream output. Fixes #5813.
Tasks
pnpm prettier-fixto fix any formatting issuesFuture Work
Consider adding a separate field for "reasoning summary" separate from "reasoning", or a way to tag this reasoning content as a "summary" variant. For the time being, as this is the only reasoning content made available by the OpenAI API, it seems like a sufficient fit for the existing
reasoningfields.