Skip to content

feat(provider/google): add support for service tier parameter#13915

Merged
felixarntz merged 5 commits intomainfrom
fa/add-gemini-service-tier
Mar 30, 2026
Merged

feat(provider/google): add support for service tier parameter#13915
felixarntz merged 5 commits intomainfrom
fa/add-gemini-service-tier

Conversation

@felixarntz
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Background

Google Gemini API supports a serviceTier parameter that lets users choose between standard, flex (cheaper/slower), and priority (faster/more expensive) processing tiers.

Also see: googleapis/js-genai@0bfe800

Summary

  • Add serviceTier provider option to the Google Generative AI provider, accepting 'SERVICE_TIER_STANDARD', 'SERVICE_TIER_FLEX', or 'SERVICE_TIER_PRIORITY'
  • Fully backward compatible — the parameter is optional and defaults to omitted

Manual Verification

Run the added examples for generateText and streamText.

Checklist

  • Tests have been added / updated (for bug fixes / features)
  • Documentation has been added / updated (for bug fixes / features)
  • A patch changeset for relevant packages has been added (for bug fixes / features - run pnpm changeset in the project root)
  • I have reviewed this pull request (self-review)

Future Work

N/A

Related Issues

N/A

@tigent tigent bot added ai/provider related to a provider package. Must be assigned together with at least one `provider/*` label feature New feature or request provider/google Issues related to the @ai-sdk/google provider labels Mar 30, 2026
@felixarntz felixarntz added the backport Admins only: add this label to a pull request in order to backport it to the prior version label Mar 30, 2026
@felixarntz felixarntz merged commit 9715ec7 into main Mar 30, 2026
30 checks passed
@felixarntz felixarntz deleted the fa/add-gemini-service-tier branch March 30, 2026 16:56
vercel-ai-sdk bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 30, 2026
## Background

Google Gemini API supports a `serviceTier` parameter that lets users
choose between standard, flex (cheaper/slower), and priority
(faster/more expensive) processing tiers.

Also see:
googleapis/js-genai@0bfe800

## Summary

- Add `serviceTier` provider option to the Google Generative AI
provider, accepting `'SERVICE_TIER_STANDARD'`, `'SERVICE_TIER_FLEX'`, or
`'SERVICE_TIER_PRIORITY'`
- Fully backward compatible — the parameter is optional and defaults to
omitted

## Manual Verification

Run the added examples for `generateText` and `streamText`.

## Checklist

- [x] Tests have been added / updated (for bug fixes / features)
- [x] Documentation has been added / updated (for bug fixes / features)
- [x] A _patch_ changeset for relevant packages has been added (for bug
fixes / features - run `pnpm changeset` in the project root)
- [x] I have reviewed this pull request (self-review)

## Future Work

N/A

## Related Issues

N/A
@vercel-ai-sdk
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

vercel-ai-sdk bot commented Mar 30, 2026

✅ Backport PR created: #13916

@vercel-ai-sdk vercel-ai-sdk bot removed the backport Admins only: add this label to a pull request in order to backport it to the prior version label Mar 30, 2026
vercel-ai-sdk bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 30, 2026
…er (#13916)

This is an automated backport of #13915 to the release-v6.0 branch. FYI
@felixarntz

Co-authored-by: Felix Arntz <felix.arntz@vercel.com>
@vercel-ai-sdk
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

vercel-ai-sdk bot commented Mar 30, 2026

🚀 Published in:

Package Version
@ai-sdk/google 4.0.0-beta.18
@ai-sdk/google-vertex 5.0.0-beta.24

felixarntz added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 13, 2026
…PI (#14393)

## Background

Follow up to #13915 and #14090: Turns out the Vertex API did _not_ apply
the same change the Gemini API did, which originally prompted the #14090
follow-up.

The Vertex API does not support the values `standard`, `flex`, and
`priority` - instead it expects `SERVICE_TIER_{UPPERCASE_VALUE}`.

## Summary

Sanitizes the input value accordingly if the Google provider
implementation is used with Vertex.

## Manual Verification

Run the new examples to verify.

## Checklist

<!--
Do not edit this list. Leave items unchecked that don't apply. If you
need to track subtasks, create a new "## Tasks" section

Please check if the PR fulfills the following requirements:
-->

- [x] Tests have been added / updated (for bug fixes / features)
- [ ] Documentation has been added / updated (for bug fixes / features)
- [x] A _patch_ changeset for relevant packages has been added (for bug
fixes / features - run `pnpm changeset` in the project root)
- [x] I have reviewed this pull request (self-review)
vercel-ai-sdk bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 13, 2026
…PI (#14393)

## Background

Follow up to #13915 and #14090: Turns out the Vertex API did _not_ apply
the same change the Gemini API did, which originally prompted the #14090
follow-up.

The Vertex API does not support the values `standard`, `flex`, and
`priority` - instead it expects `SERVICE_TIER_{UPPERCASE_VALUE}`.

## Summary

Sanitizes the input value accordingly if the Google provider
implementation is used with Vertex.

## Manual Verification

Run the new examples to verify.

## Checklist

<!--
Do not edit this list. Leave items unchecked that don't apply. If you
need to track subtasks, create a new "## Tasks" section

Please check if the PR fulfills the following requirements:
-->

- [x] Tests have been added / updated (for bug fixes / features)
- [ ] Documentation has been added / updated (for bug fixes / features)
- [x] A _patch_ changeset for relevant packages has been added (for bug
fixes / features - run `pnpm changeset` in the project root)
- [x] I have reviewed this pull request (self-review)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

ai/provider related to a provider package. Must be assigned together with at least one `provider/*` label feature New feature or request provider/google Issues related to the @ai-sdk/google provider

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants