Relevant lines live on lines 154-173

I will take this for a spin later tonight or tomorrow, personally I am preferential to Option 3. Would like to know what the rest of the team thinks.

I will take this for a spin later tonight or tomorrow, personally I am preferential to Option 3. Would like to know what the rest of the team thinks.

For those reviewing this, Option 3 refers to the mock ups I posted here.

Personally Option 3 looks a little confusing to me, but if the team would rather a more muted line instead of coloring the whole background, I can probably improve the design as well.

I will take this for a spin later tonight or tomorrow, personally I am preferential to Option 3. Would like to know what the rest of the team thinks.

For those reviewing this, Option 3 refers to the mock ups I posted here.

Personally Option 3 looks a little confusing to me, but if the team would rather a more muted line instead of coloring the whole background, I can probably improve the design as well.

I was going to say: you like the boxes!? But if you want more muted lines I could understand. That said: I think the most key thing is a very clear visual identifier that shows the indentation or "hierarchy" of the objects in the model, and the box options make that less obvious to me personally. But it seems we are in the same head space.

So we like the line concept, but could make it better, is that the takeaway?

I actually like the lines, but I also wonder if the indents shouldn't be at the level down, i.e. the choices. A left-side rule might be made to span across them. So the p would in effect look like a list header. (Unfortunately we don't have yet another wrapper around the group of choice divs.)

However I am also not inclined to quibble here, as they are all improvements to legibility.