Skip to content

chore: release v1.6.0#68

Merged
JounQin merged 1 commit intomainfrom
bump/v1.6.0
Apr 19, 2025
Merged

chore: release v1.6.0#68
JounQin merged 1 commit intomainfrom
bump/v1.6.0

Conversation

@JounQin
Copy link
Member

@JounQin JounQin commented Apr 19, 2025

Important

Bump version to 1.6.0 with new deserialization features in CHANGELOG.md.

  • Version Bump:
    • Update version to 1.6.0 in Cargo.toml, Cargo.lock, and package.json.
  • Changelog:
    • Add entry for version 1.6.0 in CHANGELOG.md with features for deserializing preserve_value_imports, imports_not_used_as_values, and target from compilerOptions.

This description was created by Ellipsis for 8d5406e. You can customize this summary. It will automatically update as commits are pushed.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated version numbers to 1.6.0 in project files.
    • Added a new entry for version 1.6.0 in the changelog.

@JounQin JounQin requested a review from Copilot April 19, 2025 21:51
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 19, 2025

Walkthrough

The changes update the project version from 1.5.0 to 1.6.0 across the relevant files. The version bump is reflected in the changelog, the Rust package manifest (Cargo.toml), and the npm package manifest (package.json). No other code, metadata, or public API changes are introduced.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
CHANGELOG.md Added a new 1.6.0 version entry with a comparison link.
Cargo.toml Updated package version from 1.5.0 to 1.6.0.
npm/package.json Updated package version from 1.5.0 to 1.6.0.

Poem

Hopping along, the numbers grow,
From one-five-oh to one-six-oh!
Changelog fresh, the path is clear,
New version’s here—let’s give a cheer!
🐇✨


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8e1a001 and 8d5406e.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • Cargo.lock is excluded by !**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • CHANGELOG.md (1 hunks)
  • Cargo.toml (1 hunks)
  • npm/package.json (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
  • GitHub Check: Test (windows-latest)
  • GitHub Check: Benchmark
🔇 Additional comments (3)
npm/package.json (1)

3-3: Bump npm package version to 1.6.0
The version field has been updated correctly to reflect the new release.

CHANGELOG.md (1)

9-9: Add changelog entry for v1.6.0
The new version header with the compare link is properly placed under the “Unreleased” section.

Cargo.toml (1)

7-7: Update Rust crate version to 1.6.0
The crate version aligns with the npm bump and CHANGELOG entry for consistency.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR prepares the release for version 1.6.0 by updating the Cargo.toml version and adding a corresponding changelog entry.

  • Bump version from 1.5.0 to 1.6.0 in Cargo.toml.
  • Add a changelog section with release notes for version 1.6.0.

Reviewed Changes

Copilot reviewed 3 out of 4 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

File Description
Cargo.toml Updated package version to 1.6.0.
CHANGELOG.md Added a new changelog section for release 1.6.0.
Files not reviewed (1)
  • npm/package.json: Language not supported

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

Copy link

@ellipsis-dev ellipsis-dev bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Important

Looks good to me! 👍

Reviewed everything up to 8d5406e in 31 seconds. Click for details.
  • Reviewed 51 lines of code in 4 files
  • Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
  • Skipped posting 5 draft comments. View those below.
  • Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with 👍 or 👎 to teach Ellipsis.
1. npm/package.json:1
  • Draft comment:
    Version bump to 1.6.0 and napi settings look correct.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Confidence changes required: 0% <= threshold 50% None
2. Cargo.toml:12
  • Draft comment:
    Consider using relative paths (e.g., "src" instead of "/src") in the include array.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Confidence changes required: 33% <= threshold 50% None
3. npm/package.json:48
  • Draft comment:
    Verify that the 'postinstall' script using 'napi-postinstall unrs-resolver check' is intentional.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Confidence changes required: 33% <= threshold 50% None
4. CHANGELOG.md:32
  • Draft comment:
    Typographical error: 'pacakge.json' should be corrected to 'package.json'.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.
5. CHANGELOG.md:411
  • Draft comment:
    Typographical error: It looks like there's a missing closing parenthesis in '(napi)'. Consider correcting it to '(napi)'.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

Workflow ID: wflow_q8kvNgF9RyPY7mbC

You can customize Ellipsis by changing your verbosity settings, reacting with 👍 or 👎, replying to comments, or adding code review rules.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 19, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 93.20%. Comparing base (8e1a001) to head (8d5406e).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main      #68   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   93.20%   93.20%           
=======================================
  Files          13       13           
  Lines        2841     2841           
=======================================
  Hits         2648     2648           
  Misses        193      193           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@codspeed-hq
Copy link

codspeed-hq bot commented Apr 19, 2025

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #68 will not alter performance

Comparing bump/v1.6.0 (8d5406e) with main (8e1a001)

Summary

✅ 3 untouched benchmarks

@JounQin JounQin merged commit 77d3bf5 into main Apr 19, 2025
22 checks passed
@JounQin JounQin deleted the bump/v1.6.0 branch April 19, 2025 21:53
This was referenced Jun 3, 2025
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Jun 11, 2025
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Jun 24, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants