Conversation
49629e4 to
ddc2153
Compare
WalkthroughThis update increments the version of the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Poem
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Important
Looks good to me! 👍
Reviewed everything up to ddc2153 in 37 seconds. Click for details.
- Reviewed
73lines of code in4files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
2draft comments. View those below. - Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with 👍 or 👎 to teach Ellipsis.
1. Cargo.toml:21
- Draft comment:
Version bump to 1.9.0 is applied consistently in both the workspace package and the package sections. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:0%<= threshold50%None
2. package.json:3
- Draft comment:
The version field and the postinstall script have been updated to 1.9.0, ensuring consistency. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:0%<= threshold50%None
Workflow ID: wflow_AnmBVajhJqsfLBbV
You can customize by changing your verbosity settings, reacting with 👍 or 👎, replying to comments, or adding code review rules.
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #153 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 92.20% 92.20%
=======================================
Files 13 13
Lines 3068 3068
=======================================
Hits 2829 2829
Misses 239 239 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
CodSpeed Performance ReportMerging #153 will not alter performanceComparing Summary
|
ef5abb3 to
f42fd1a
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Important
Looks good to me! 👍
Reviewed f42fd1a in 1 minute and 4 seconds. Click for details.
- Reviewed
73lines of code in4files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
2draft comments. View those below. - Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with 👍 or 👎 to teach Ellipsis.
1. Cargo.toml:10
- Draft comment:
Consider using relative paths (e.g. "src" instead of "/src") in the 'include' array to avoid potential publish issues. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.
2. package.json:24
- Draft comment:
Postinstall script correctly updates to version 1.9.0. Ensure it remains in sync with the package version on future releases. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:0%<= threshold50%None
Workflow ID: wflow_4EjarbxVUxERLPRX
You can customize by changing your verbosity settings, reacting with 👍 or 👎, replying to comments, or adding code review rules.
f42fd1a to
dc22656
Compare
dc22656 to
99e1f4f
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Important
Looks good to me! 👍
Reviewed 99e1f4f in 43 seconds. Click for details.
- Reviewed
73lines of code in4files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
3draft comments. View those below. - Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with 👍 or 👎 to teach Ellipsis.
1. Cargo.toml:22
- Draft comment:
Version bump to 1.9.0 is consistent across the package and workspace dependencies. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:0%<= threshold50%None
2. Cargo.toml:43
- Draft comment:
The Clippy and lints configuration is very detailed and appears well‐tuned; ensure these settings match your project standards. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:0%<= threshold50%None
3. package.json:2
- Draft comment:
package.json version and postinstall script updated to 1.9.0; metadata and targets look consistent. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:0%<= threshold50%None
Workflow ID: wflow_u9aLDfwx5kv0rCbZ
You can customize by changing your verbosity settings, reacting with 👍 or 👎, replying to comments, or adding code review rules.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Important
Looks good to me! 👍
Reviewed a75a7a2 in 1 minute and 39 seconds. Click for details.
- Reviewed
16lines of code in1files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
3draft comments. View those below. - Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with 👍 or 👎 to teach Ellipsis.
1. CHANGELOG.md:15
- Draft comment:
Consider rephrasing 'add two last android targets' to something like 'add two additional android targets' for clarity. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:33%<= threshold50%None
2. CHANGELOG.md:19
- Draft comment:
Consider hyphenating 'out of box' to 'out-of-the-box' for clarity in the bug fix description. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:33%<= threshold50%None
3. CHANGELOG.md:15
- Draft comment:
Typographical note: The phrase "two last android targets" might be clearer as "last two android targets". - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 0% vs. threshold = 50% The rules state not to make purely informative comments and to only comment if there's clearly a code change required. This is a minor grammatical suggestion that doesn't affect code functionality. While the suggested phrasing might be slightly clearer, it's not important enough to warrant a comment. The suggested phrasing is technically more correct in English. Could improving clarity in documentation be considered important enough to keep? No - the rules explicitly state not to make purely informative comments. The current phrasing is understandable even if not optimal. This comment should be deleted as it's a minor grammatical suggestion that doesn't affect functionality and violates the rule about purely informative comments.
Workflow ID: wflow_bRRUN9nrsMznzhjI
You can customize by changing your verbosity settings, reacting with 👍 or 👎, replying to comments, or adding code review rules.
|
@coderabbitai full review |
✅ Actions performedFull review triggered. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
CHANGELOG.md (1)
19-19: nit: improve bug fix phrasing
Consider updating for clarity:- - try different approach to support web container out of box ([#150](…)) + - Try a different approach to support web container out of the box ([#150](…))🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[uncategorized] ~19-~19: The grammatical number of this noun doesn’t look right. Consider replacing it.
Context: ...- try different approach to support web container out of box ([#150](https://github.com/u...(AI_EN_LECTOR_REPLACEMENT_NOUN_NUMBER)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
Cargo.lockis excluded by!**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
CHANGELOG.md(1 hunks)Cargo.toml(1 hunks)package.json(2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
CHANGELOG.md
[uncategorized] ~19-~19: The grammatical number of this noun doesn’t look right. Consider replacing it.
Context: ...- try different approach to support web container out of box ([#150](https://github.com/u...
(AI_EN_LECTOR_REPLACEMENT_NOUN_NUMBER)
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)
CHANGELOG.md
23-23: Unordered list style
Expected: dash; Actual: asterisk
(MD004, ul-style)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: Codacy Static Code Analysis
🔇 Additional comments (5)
package.json (2)
3-3: Bump package version to 1.9.0
Version updated from 1.8.1 to 1.9.0, consistent with the release.
24-24: Update postinstall script version
Script now invokesnapi-postinstall unrs-resolver 1.9.0, matching the new package version.CHANGELOG.md (1)
10-24: Changelog entry for v1.9.0 is accurate
The features, bug fix, and contributor credit align with the PR summary and version bump.🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[uncategorized] ~19-~19: The grammatical number of this noun doesn’t look right. Consider replacing it.
Context: ...- try different approach to support web container out of box ([#150](https://github.com/u...(AI_EN_LECTOR_REPLACEMENT_NOUN_NUMBER)
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)
23-23: Unordered list style
Expected: dash; Actual: asterisk(MD004, ul-style)
Cargo.toml (2)
19-19: Bump workspace dependency version
Updatedunrs_resolverdependency to version 1.9.0 (path = "."), matching the new release.
23-23: Update package version
Package version set to 1.9.0, consistent withpackage.jsonand the changelog.
🤖 New release
unrs_resolver: 1.8.1 -> 1.9.0 (✓ API compatible changes)Changelog
This PR was generated with release-plz.
Important
Bump
unrs_resolverto v1.9.0 withfile:protocol support, new Android targets, and web container bug fixes.unrs_resolverversion from 1.8.1 to 1.9.0 inCargo.toml,Cargo.lock, andpackage.json.file:protocol paths.postinstallscript inpackage.jsonto use version 1.9.0.This description was created by
for a75a7a2. You can customize this summary. It will automatically update as commits are pushed.
Summary by CodeRabbit
Documentation
file:protocol path, additional Android targets, and a bug fix for web container support.Chores