…tePluginObject

After llvm#68052 this function changed from returning
a nullptr with `return {};` to returning Expected and hitting `llvm_unreachable` before it could
do so.

I gather that we're never supposed to call this function, but on Windows we actually do call
this function because `interpreter->CreateScriptedProcessInterface()` returns
`ScriptedProcessInterface` not `ScriptedProcessPythonInterface`. Likely because
`target_sp->GetDebugger().GetScriptInterpreter()` also does not return a Python related class.

The previously XFAILed test crashed with:
```
 # .---command stderr------------
 # | PLEASE submit a bug report to https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/ and include the crash backtrace.
 # | Stack dump:
 # | 0.  Program arguments: c:\\users\\tcwg\\david.spickett\\build-llvm\\bin\\lldb-test.exe ir-memory-map C:\\Users\\tcwg\\david.spickett\\build-llvm\\tools\\lldb\\test\\Shell\\Expr\\Output\\TestIRMemoryMapWindows.test.tmp C:\\Users\\tcwg\\david.spickett\\llvm-project\\lldb\\test\\Shell\\Expr/Inputs/ir-memory-map-basic
 # | 1.  HandleCommand(command = "run")
 # | Exception Code: 0xC000001D
 # | #0 0x00007ff696b5f588 lldb_private::ScriptedProcessInterface::CreatePluginObject(class llvm::StringRef, class lldb_private::ExecutionContext &, class std::shared_ptr<class lldb_private::StructuredData::Dictionary>, class lldb_private::StructuredData::Generic *) C:\Users\tcwg\david.spickett\llvm-project\lldb\include\lldb\Interpreter\Interfaces\ScriptedProcessInterface.h:28:0
 # | #1 0x00007ff696b1d808 llvm::Expected<std::shared_ptr<lldb_private::StructuredData::Generic> >::operator bool C:\Users\tcwg\david.spickett\llvm-project\llvm\include\llvm\Support\Error.h:567:0
 # | llvm#2 0x00007ff696b1d808 lldb_private::ScriptedProcess::ScriptedProcess(class std::shared_ptr<class lldb_private::Target>, class std::shared_ptr<class lldb_private::Listener>, class lldb_private::ScriptedMetadata const &, class lldb_private::Status &) C:\Users\tcwg\david.spickett\llvm-project\lldb\source\Plugins\Process\scripted\ScriptedProcess.cpp:115:0
 # | llvm#3 0x00007ff696b1d124 std::shared_ptr<lldb_private::ScriptedProcess>::shared_ptr C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio\2022\Preview\VC\Tools\MSVC\14.35.32124\include\memory:1478:0
 # | llvm#4 0x00007ff696b1d124 lldb_private::ScriptedProcess::CreateInstance(class std::shared_ptr<class lldb_private::Target>, class std::shared_ptr<class lldb_private::Listener>, class lldb_private::FileSpec const *, bool) C:\Users\tcwg\david.spickett\llvm-project\lldb\source\Plugins\Process\scripted\ScriptedProcess.cpp:61:0
 # | llvm#5 0x00007ff69699c8f4 std::_Ptr_base<lldb_private::Process>::_Move_construct_from C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio\2022\Preview\VC\Tools\MSVC\14.35.32124\include\memory:1237:0
 # | llvm#6 0x00007ff69699c8f4 std::shared_ptr<lldb_private::Process>::shared_ptr C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio\2022\Preview\VC\Tools\MSVC\14.35.32124\include\memory:1534:0
 # | llvm#7 0x00007ff69699c8f4 std::shared_ptr<lldb_private::Process>::operator= C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio\2022\Preview\VC\Tools\MSVC\14.35.32124\include\memory:1594:0
 # | llvm#8 0x00007ff69699c8f4 lldb_private::Process::FindPlugin(class std::shared_ptr<class lldb_private::Target>, class llvm::StringRef, class std::shared_ptr<class lldb_private::Listener>, class lldb_private::FileSpec const *, bool) C:\Users\tcwg\david.spickett\llvm-project\lldb\source\Target\Process.cpp:396:0
 # | llvm#9 0x00007ff6969bd708 std::_Ptr_base<lldb_private::Process>::_Move_construct_from C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio\2022\Preview\VC\Tools\MSVC\14.35.32124\include\memory:1237:0
 # | llvm#10 0x00007ff6969bd708 std::shared_ptr<lldb_private::Process>::shared_ptr C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio\2022\Preview\VC\Tools\MSVC\14.35.32124\include\memory:1534:0
 # | llvm#11 0x00007ff6969bd708 std::shared_ptr<lldb_private::Process>::operator= C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio\2022\Preview\VC\Tools\MSVC\14.35.32124\include\memory:1594:0
 # | llvm#12 0x00007ff6969bd708 lldb_private::Target::CreateProcess(class std::shared_ptr<class lldb_private::Listener>, class llvm::StringRef, class lldb_private::FileSpec const *, bool) C:\Users\tcwg\david.spickett\llvm-project\lldb\source\Target\Target.cpp:215:0
 # | llvm#13 0x00007ff696b13af0 std::_Ptr_base<lldb_private::Process>::_Ptr_base C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio\2022\Preview\VC\Tools\MSVC\14.35.32124\include\memory:1230:0
 # | llvm#14 0x00007ff696b13af0 std::shared_ptr<lldb_private::Process>::shared_ptr C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio\2022\Preview\VC\Tools\MSVC\14.35.32124\include\memory:1524:0
 # | llvm#15 0x00007ff696b13af0 lldb_private::PlatformWindows::DebugProcess(class lldb_private::ProcessLaunchInfo &, class lldb_private::Debugger &, class lldb_private::Target &, class lldb_private::Status &) C:\Users\tcwg\david.spickett\llvm-project\lldb\source\Plugins\Platform\Windows\PlatformWindows.cpp:495:0
 # | llvm#16 0x00007ff6969cf590 std::_Ptr_base<lldb_private::Process>::_Move_construct_from C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio\2022\Preview\VC\Tools\MSVC\14.35.32124\include\memory:1237:0
 # | llvm#17 0x00007ff6969cf590 std::shared_ptr<lldb_private::Process>::shared_ptr C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio\2022\Preview\VC\Tools\MSVC\14.35.32124\include\memory:1534:0
 # | llvm#18 0x00007ff6969cf590 std::shared_ptr<lldb_private::Process>::operator= C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio\2022\Preview\VC\Tools\MSVC\14.35.32124\include\memory:1594:0
 # | llvm#19 0x00007ff6969cf590 lldb_private::Target::Launch(class lldb_private::ProcessLaunchInfo &, class lldb_private::Stream *) C:\Users\tcwg\david.spickett\llvm-project\lldb\source\Target\Target.cpp:3274:0
 # | llvm#20 0x00007ff696fff82c CommandObjectProcessLaunch::DoExecute(class lldb_private::Args &, class lldb_private::CommandReturnObject &) C:\Users\tcwg\david.spickett\llvm-project\lldb\source\Commands\CommandObjectProcess.cpp:258:0
 # | llvm#21 0x00007ff696fab6c0 lldb_private::CommandObjectParsed::Execute(char const *, class lldb_private::CommandReturnObject &) C:\Users\tcwg\david.spickett\llvm-project\lldb\source\Interpreter\CommandObject.cpp:751:0
 # `-----------------------------
 # error: command failed with exit status: 0xc000001d
```

That might be a bug on the Windows side, or an artifact of how our build is setup,
but whatever it is, having `CreatePluginObject` return an error and
the caller check it, fixes the failing test.

The built lldb can run the script command to use Python, but I'm not sure if that means
anything.

…e defintion if available (llvm#71004)"

This reverts commit ef3feba.

This caused an LLDB test failure on Linux for `lang/cpp/symbols/TestSymbols.test_dwo`:

```
make: Leaving directory '/home/worker/2.0.1/lldb-x86_64-debian/build/lldb-test-build.noindex/lang/cpp/symbols/TestSymbols.test_dwo'
runCmd: expression -- D::i
PLEASE submit a bug report to https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/ and include the crash backtrace.
Stack dump:
0.	HandleCommand(command = "expression -- D::i")
1.	<user expression 0>:1:4: current parser token 'i'
2.	<lldb wrapper prefix>:44:1: parsing function body '$__lldb_expr'
3.	<lldb wrapper prefix>:44:1: in compound statement ('{}')
Stack dump without symbol names (ensure you have llvm-symbolizer in your PATH or set the environment var `LLVM_SYMBOLIZER_PATH` to point to it):
0  _lldb.cpython-39-x86_64-linux-gnu.so 0x00007fbcfcb08b87
1  _lldb.cpython-39-x86_64-linux-gnu.so 0x00007fbcfcb067ae
2  _lldb.cpython-39-x86_64-linux-gnu.so 0x00007fbcfcb0923f
3  libpthread.so.0                      0x00007fbd07ab7140
```

And a failure in `TestCallStdStringFunction.py` on Linux aarch64:
```
--
Exit Code: -11

Command Output (stdout):
--
lldb version 18.0.0git (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project.git revision ef3feba)
  clang revision ef3feba
  llvm revision ef3feba

--
Command Output (stderr):
--
PLEASE submit a bug report to https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/ and include the crash backtrace.
Stack dump:
0.      HandleCommand(command = "expression str")
1.      <lldb wrapper prefix>:45:34: current parser token ';'
2.      <lldb wrapper prefix>:44:1: parsing function body '$__lldb_expr'
3.      <lldb wrapper prefix>:44:1: in compound statement ('{}')
  #0 0x0000ffffb72a149c llvm::sys::PrintStackTrace(llvm::raw_ostream&, int) (/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/lldb-aarch64-ubuntu/build/lib/python3.8/site-packages/lldb/_[lldb.cpython-38-aarch64-linux-gnu.so](http://lldb.cpython-38-aarch64-linux-gnu.so/)+0x58c749c)
  #1 0x0000ffffb729f458 llvm::sys::RunSignalHandlers() (/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/lldb-aarch64-ubuntu/build/lib/python3.8/site-packages/lldb/_[lldb.cpython-38-aarch64-linux-gnu.so](http://lldb.cpython-38-aarch64-linux-gnu.so/)+0x58c5458)
  llvm#2 0x0000ffffb72a1bd0 SignalHandler(int) (/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/lldb-aarch64-ubuntu/build/lib/python3.8/site-packages/lldb/_[lldb.cpython-38-aarch64-linux-gnu.so](http://lldb.cpython-38-aarch64-linux-gnu.so/)+0x58c7bd0)
  llvm#3 0x0000ffffbdd9e7dc (linux-vdso.so.1+0x7dc)
  llvm#4 0x0000ffffb71799d8 lldb_private::plugin::dwarf::SymbolFileDWARF::FindGlobalVariables(lldb_private::ConstString, lldb_private::CompilerDeclContext const&, unsigned int, lldb_private::VariableList&) (/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/lldb-aarch64-ubuntu/build/lib/python3.8/site-packages/lldb/_[lldb.cpython-38-aarch64-linux-gnu.so](http://lldb.cpython-38-aarch64-linux-gnu.so/)+0x579f9d8)
  llvm#5 0x0000ffffb7197508 DWARFASTParserClang::FindConstantOnVariableDefinition(lldb_private::plugin::dwarf::DWARFDIE) (/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/lldb-aarch64-ubuntu/build/lib/python3.8/site-packages/lldb/_[lldb.cpython-38-aarch64-linux-gnu.so](http://lldb.cpython-38-aarch64-linux-gnu.so/)+0x57bd508)
```

…ooking options for a custom subcommand (llvm#71975)

…ooking options for a custom subcommand. (llvm#71776)"

This reverts commit b88308b.

The build-bot is unhappy
(https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/186/builds/13096),
`GroupingAndPrefix` fails after `TopLevelOptInSubcommand` (the newly
added test).

Revert while I look into this (might be related with test sharding but
not sure)

```

[----------] 3 tests from CommandLineTest
[ RUN      ] CommandLineTest.TokenizeWindowsCommandLine2
[       OK ] CommandLineTest.TokenizeWindowsCommandLine2 (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] CommandLineTest.TopLevelOptInSubcommand
[       OK ] CommandLineTest.TopLevelOptInSubcommand (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] CommandLineTest.GroupingAndPrefix
 #0 0x00ba8118 llvm::sys::PrintStackTrace(llvm::raw_ostream&, int) (/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-armv7-global-isel/stage1/unittests/Support/./SupportTests+0x594118)
 #1 0x00ba5914 llvm::sys::RunSignalHandlers() (/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-armv7-global-isel/stage1/unittests/Support/./SupportTests+0x591914)
 llvm#2 0x00ba89c4 SignalHandler(int) (/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-armv7-global-isel/stage1/unittests/Support/./SupportTests+0x5949c4)
 llvm#3 0xf7828530 __default_sa_restorer /build/glibc-9MGTF6/glibc-2.31/signal/../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/arm/sigrestorer.S:67:0
 llvm#4 0x00af91f0 (anonymous namespace)::CommandLineParser::ResetAllOptionOccurrences() (/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-armv7-global-isel/stage1/unittests/Support/./SupportTests+0x4e51f0)
 llvm#5 0x00af8e1c llvm::cl::ResetCommandLineParser() (/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-armv7-global-isel/stage1/unittests/Support/./SupportTests+0x4e4e1c)
 llvm#6 0x0077cda0 (anonymous namespace)::CommandLineTest_GroupingAndPrefix_Test::TestBody() (/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-armv7-global-isel/stage1/unittests/Support/./SupportTests+0x168da0)
 llvm#7 0x00bc5adc testing::Test::Run() (/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-armv7-global-isel/stage1/unittests/Support/./SupportTests+0x5b1adc)
 llvm#8 0x00bc6cc0 testing::TestInfo::Run() (/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-armv7-global-isel/stage1/unittests/Support/./SupportTests+0x5b2cc0)
 llvm#9 0x00bc7880 testing::TestSuite::Run() (/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-armv7-global-isel/stage1/unittests/Support/./SupportTests+0x5b3880)
llvm#10 0x00bd7974 testing::internal::UnitTestImpl::RunAllTests() (/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-armv7-global-isel/stage1/unittests/Support/./SupportTests+0x5c3974)
llvm#11 0x00bd6ebc testing::UnitTest::Run() (/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-armv7-global-isel/stage1/unittests/Support/./SupportTests+0x5c2ebc)
llvm#12 0x00bb1058 main (/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-armv7-global-isel/stage1/unittests/Support/./SupportTests+0x59d058)
llvm#13 0xf78185a4 __libc_start_main /build/glibc-9MGTF6/glibc-2.31/csu/libc-start.c:342:3
```

…lvm#73463)

Despite CWG2497 not being resolved, it is reasonable to expect the
following code to compile (and which is supported by other compilers)

```cpp
  template<typename T> constexpr T f();
  constexpr int g() { return f<int>(); } // #1
  template<typename T> constexpr T f() { return 123; }
  int k[g()];
  // llvm#2
```

To that end, we eagerly instantiate all referenced specializations of
constexpr functions when they are defined.

We maintain a map of (pattern, [instantiations]) independent of
`PendingInstantiations` to avoid having to iterate that list after each
function definition.

We should apply the same logic to constexpr variables, but I wanted to
keep the PR small.

Fixes llvm#73232

…lvm#85653)

This reverts commit daebe5c.

This commit causes the following asan issue:

```
<snip>/llvm-project/build/bin/mlir-opt <snip>/llvm-project/mlir/test/Dialect/XeGPU/XeGPUOps.mlir | <snip>/llvm-project/build/bin/FileCheck <snip>/llvm-project/mlir/test/Dialect/XeGPU/XeGPUOps.mlir
# executed command: <snip>/llvm-project/build/bin/mlir-opt <snip>/llvm-project/mlir/test/Dialect/XeGPU/XeGPUOps.mlir
# .---command stderr------------
# | =================================================================
# | ==2772558==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: stack-use-after-return on address 0x7fd2c2c42b90 at pc 0x55e406d54614 bp 0x7ffc810e4070 sp 0x7ffc810e4068
# | READ of size 8 at 0x7fd2c2c42b90 thread T0
# |     #0 0x55e406d54613 in operator()<long int const*> /usr/include/c++/13/bits/predefined_ops.h:318
# |     #1 0x55e406d54613 in __count_if<long int const*, __gnu_cxx::__ops::_Iter_pred<mlir::verifyListOfOperandsOrIntegers(Operation*, llvm::StringRef, unsigned int, llvm::ArrayRef<long int>, ValueRange)::<lambda(int64_t)> > > /usr/include/c++/13/bits/stl_algobase.h:2125
# |     llvm#2 0x55e406d54613 in count_if<long int const*, mlir::verifyListOfOperandsOrIntegers(Operation*, 
...
```

…oint. (llvm#83821)"

This reverts commit c2c1e6e. It creates
a use after free.

==8342==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: heap-use-after-free on address 0x50f000001760 at pc 0x55b9fb84a8fb bp 0x7ffc18468a10 sp 0x7ffc18468a08
READ of size 1 at 0x50f000001760 thread T0
 #0 0x55b9fb84a8fa in dropPoisonGeneratingFlags llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/VPlan.h:1040:13
 #1 0x55b9fb84a8fa in llvm::VPlanTransforms::dropPoisonGeneratingRecipes(llvm::VPlan&, llvm::function_ref<bool (llvm::BasicBlock*)>)::$_0::operator()(llvm::VPRecipeBase*) const llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/VPlanTransforms.cpp:1236:23
 llvm#2 0x55b9fb84a196 in llvm::VPlanTransforms::dropPoisonGeneratingRecipes(llvm::VPlan&, llvm::function_ref<bool (llvm::BasicBlock*)>) llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/VPlanTransforms.cpp

Can be reproduced with asan on
Transforms/LoopVectorize/AArch64/sve-interleaved-masked-accesses.ll
Transforms/LoopVectorize/X86/pr81872.ll
Transforms/LoopVectorize/X86/x86-interleaved-accesses-masked-group.ll

Builder alerted me to the failing test, attempt #1 in the blind.

…e exception specification of a function (llvm#90760)

[temp.deduct.general] p6 states:
> At certain points in the template argument deduction process it is
necessary to take a function type that makes use of template parameters
and replace those template parameters with the corresponding template
arguments.
This is done at the beginning of template argument deduction when any
explicitly specified template arguments are substituted into the
function type, and again at the end of template argument deduction when
any template arguments that were deduced or obtained from default
arguments are substituted.

[temp.deduct.general] p7 goes on to say:
> The _deduction substitution loci_ are
> - the function type outside of the _noexcept-specifier_,
> - the explicit-specifier,
> - the template parameter declarations, and
> - the template argument list of a partial specialization
>
> The substitution occurs in all types and expressions that are used in
the deduction substitution loci. [...]

Consider the following:
```cpp
struct A
{
    static constexpr bool x = true;
};

template<typename T, typename U>
void f(T, U) noexcept(T::x); // #1

template<typename T, typename U>
void f(T, U*) noexcept(T::y); // llvm#2

template<>
void f<A>(A, int*) noexcept; // clang currently accepts, GCC and EDG reject
```

Currently, `Sema::SubstituteExplicitTemplateArguments` will substitute
into the _noexcept-specifier_ when deducing template arguments from a
function declaration or when deducing template arguments for taking the
address of a function template (and the substitution is treated as a
SFINAE context). In the above example, `#1` is selected as the primary
template because substitution of the explicit template arguments into
the _noexcept-specifier_ of `llvm#2` failed, which resulted in the candidate
being ignored.

This behavior is incorrect ([temp.deduct.general] note 4 says as much), and
this patch corrects it by deferring all substitution into the
_noexcept-specifier_ until it is instantiated.

As part of the necessary changes to make this patch work, the
instantiation of the exception specification of a function template
specialization when taking the address of a function template is changed
to only occur for the function selected by overload resolution per
[except.spec] p13.1 (as opposed to being instantiated for every candidate).

…ined member functions & member function templates (llvm#88963)

Consider the following snippet from the discussion of CWG2847 on the core reflector:
```
template<typename T>
concept C = sizeof(T) <= sizeof(long);

template<typename T>
struct A 
{
    template<typename U>
    void f(U) requires C<U>; // #1, declares a function template 

    void g() requires C<T>; // llvm#2, declares a function

    template<>
    void f(char);  // llvm#3, an explicit specialization of a function template that declares a function
};

template<>
template<typename U>
void A<short>::f(U) requires C<U>; // llvm#4, an explicit specialization of a function template that declares a function template

template<>
template<>
void A<int>::f(int); // llvm#5, an explicit specialization of a function template that declares a function

template<>
void A<long>::g(); // llvm#6, an explicit specialization of a function that declares a function
```

A number of problems exist:
- Clang rejects `llvm#4` because the trailing _requires-clause_ has `U`
substituted with the wrong template parameter depth when
`Sema::AreConstraintExpressionsEqual` is called to determine whether it
matches the trailing _requires-clause_ of the implicitly instantiated
function template.
- Clang rejects `llvm#5` because the function template specialization
instantiated from `A<int>::f` has a trailing _requires-clause_, but `llvm#5`
does not (nor can it have one as it isn't a templated function).
- Clang rejects `llvm#6` for the same reasons it rejects `llvm#5`.

This patch resolves these issues by making the following changes:
- To fix `llvm#4`, `Sema::AreConstraintExpressionsEqual` is passed
`FunctionTemplateDecl`s when comparing the trailing _requires-clauses_
of `llvm#4` and the function template instantiated from `#1`.
- To fix `llvm#5` and `llvm#6`, the trailing _requires-clauses_ are not compared
for explicit specializations that declare functions.

In addition to these changes, `CheckMemberSpecialization` now considers
constraint satisfaction/constraint partial ordering when determining
which member function is specialized by an explicit specialization of a
member function for an implicit instantiation of a class template (we
previously would select the first function that has the same type as the
explicit specialization). With constraints taken under consideration, we
match EDG's behavior for these declarations.

...which caused issues like

> ==42==ERROR: AddressSanitizer failed to deallocate 0x32 (50) bytes at
address 0x117e0000 (error code: 28)
> ==42==Cannot dump memory map on emscriptenAddressSanitizer: CHECK
failed: sanitizer_common.cpp:81 "((0 && "unable to unmmap")) != (0)"
(0x0, 0x0) (tid=288045824)
> #0 0x14f73b0c in __asan::CheckUnwind()+0x14f73b0c
(this.program+0x14f73b0c)
> #1 0x14f8a3c2 in __sanitizer::CheckFailed(char const*, int, char
const*, unsigned long long, unsigned long long)+0x14f8a3c2
(this.program+0x14f8a3c2)
> llvm#2 0x14f7d6e1 in __sanitizer::ReportMunmapFailureAndDie(void*,
unsigned long, int, bool)+0x14f7d6e1 (this.program+0x14f7d6e1)
> llvm#3 0x14f81fbd in __sanitizer::UnmapOrDie(void*, unsigned
long)+0x14f81fbd (this.program+0x14f81fbd)
> llvm#4 0x14f875df in __sanitizer::SuppressionContext::ParseFromFile(char
const*)+0x14f875df (this.program+0x14f875df)
> llvm#5 0x14f74eab in __asan::InitializeSuppressions()+0x14f74eab
(this.program+0x14f74eab)
> llvm#6 0x14f73a1a in __asan::AsanInitInternal()+0x14f73a1a
(this.program+0x14f73a1a)

when trying to use an ASan suppressions file under Emscripten: Even
though it would be considered OK by SUSv4, the Emscripten runtime states
"We don't support partial munmapping" (see

<emscripten-core/emscripten@f4115eb>
"Implement MAP_ANONYMOUS on top of malloc in STANDALONE_WASM mode
(llvm#16289)").

Co-authored-by: Stephan Bergmann <stephan.bergmann@allotropia.de>

…ication as used during partial ordering (llvm#91534)

We do not deduce template arguments from the exception specification
when determining the primary template of a function template
specialization or when taking the address of a function template.
Therefore, this patch changes `isAtLeastAsSpecializedAs` such that we do
not mark template parameters in the exception specification as 'used'
during partial ordering (per [temp.deduct.partial]
p12) to prevent the following from being ambiguous:

```
template<typename T, typename U>
void f(U) noexcept(noexcept(T())); // #1

template<typename T>
void f(T*) noexcept; // llvm#2

template<>
void f<int>(int*) noexcept; // currently ambiguous, selects llvm#2 with this patch applied 
```

Although there is no corresponding wording in the standard (see core issue filed here
cplusplus/CWG#537), this seems
to be the intended behavior given the definition of _deduction
substitution loci_ in [temp.deduct.general] p7 (and EDG does the same thing).

…erSize (llvm#67657)"

This reverts commit f0b3654.

This commit triggers UB by reading an uninitialized variable.

`UP.PartialThreshold` is used uninitialized in `getUnrollingPreferences()` when
it is called from `LoopVectorizationPlanner::executePlan()`. In this case the
`UP` variable is created on the stack and its fields are not initialized.

```
==8802==WARNING: MemorySanitizer: use-of-uninitialized-value
    #0 0x557c0b081b99 in llvm::BasicTTIImplBase<llvm::X86TTIImpl>::getUnrollingPreferences(llvm::Loop*, llvm::ScalarEvolution&, llvm::TargetTransformInfo::UnrollingPreferences&, llvm::OptimizationRemarkEmitter*) llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/CodeGen/BasicTTIImpl.h
    #1 0x557c0b07a40c in llvm::TargetTransformInfo::Model<llvm::X86TTIImpl>::getUnrollingPreferences(llvm::Loop*, llvm::ScalarEvolution&, llvm::TargetTransformInfo::UnrollingPreferences&, llvm::OptimizationRemarkEmitter*) llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/Analysis/TargetTransformInfo.h:2277:17
    llvm#2 0x557c0f5d69ee in llvm::TargetTransformInfo::getUnrollingPreferences(llvm::Loop*, llvm::ScalarEvolution&, llvm::TargetTransformInfo::UnrollingPreferences&, llvm::OptimizationRemarkEmitter*) const llvm-project/llvm/lib/Analysis/TargetTransformInfo.cpp:387:19
    llvm#3 0x557c0e6b96a0 in llvm::LoopVectorizationPlanner::executePlan(llvm::ElementCount, unsigned int, llvm::VPlan&, llvm::InnerLoopVectorizer&, llvm::DominatorTree*, bool, llvm::DenseMap<llvm::SCEV const*, llvm::Value*, llvm::DenseMapInfo<llvm::SCEV const*, void>, llvm::detail::DenseMapPair<llvm::SCEV const*, llvm::Value*>> const*) llvm-project/llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/LoopVectorize.cpp:7624:7
    llvm#4 0x557c0e6e4b63 in llvm::LoopVectorizePass::processLoop(llvm::Loop*) llvm-project/llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/LoopVectorize.cpp:10253:13
    llvm#5 0x557c0e6f2429 in llvm::LoopVectorizePass::runImpl(llvm::Function&, llvm::ScalarEvolution&, llvm::LoopInfo&, llvm::TargetTransformInfo&, llvm::DominatorTree&, llvm::BlockFrequencyInfo*, llvm::TargetLibraryInfo*, llvm::DemandedBits&, llvm::AssumptionCache&, llvm::LoopAccessInfoManager&, llvm::OptimizationRemarkEmitter&, llvm::ProfileSummaryInfo*) llvm-project/llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/LoopVectorize.cpp:10344:30
    llvm#6 0x557c0e6f2f97 in llvm::LoopVectorizePass::run(llvm::Function&, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::Function>&) llvm-project/llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/LoopVectorize.cpp:10383:9

[...]

  Uninitialized value was created by an allocation of 'UP' in the stack frame
    #0 0x557c0e6b961e in llvm::LoopVectorizationPlanner::executePlan(llvm::ElementCount, unsigned int, llvm::VPlan&, llvm::InnerLoopVectorizer&, llvm::DominatorTree*, bool, llvm::DenseMap<llvm::SCEV const*, llvm::Value*, llvm::DenseMapInfo<llvm::SCEV const*, void>, llvm::detail::DenseMapPair<llvm::SCEV const*, llvm::Value*>> const*) llvm-project/llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/LoopVectorize.cpp:7623:3
```

…vm#90820)

This solves some ambuguity introduced in P0522 regarding how
template template parameters are partially ordered, and should reduce
the negative impact of enabling `-frelaxed-template-template-args`
by default.

When performing template argument deduction, a template template
parameter
containing no packs should be more specialized than one that does.

Given the following example:
```C++
template<class T2> struct A;
template<template<class ...T3s> class TT1, class T4> struct A<TT1<T4>>; // #1
template<template<class    T5 > class TT2, class T6> struct A<TT2<T6>>; // llvm#2

template<class T1> struct B;
template struct A<B<char>>;
```

Prior to P0522, candidate `llvm#2` would be more specialized.
After P0522, neither is more specialized, so this becomes ambiguous.
With this change, `llvm#2` becomes more specialized again,
maintaining compatibility with pre-P0522 implementations.

The problem is that in P0522, candidates are at least as specialized
when matching packs to fixed-size lists both ways, whereas before,
a fixed-size list is more specialized.

This patch keeps the original behavior when checking template arguments
outside deduction, but restores this aspect of pre-P0522 matching
during deduction.

---

Since this changes provisional implementation of CWG2398 which has
not been released yet, and already contains a changelog entry,
we don't provide a changelog entry here.

…llvm#92855)

This solves some ambuguity introduced in P0522 regarding how template
template parameters are partially ordered, and should reduce the
negative impact of enabling `-frelaxed-template-template-args` by
default.

When performing template argument deduction, we extend the provisional
wording introduced in llvm#89807 so
it also covers deduction of class templates.

Given the following example:
```C++
template <class T1, class T2 = float> struct A;
template <class T3> struct B;

template <template <class T4> class TT1, class T5> struct B<TT1<T5>>;   // #1
template <class T6, class T7>                      struct B<A<T6, T7>>; // llvm#2

template struct B<A<int>>;
```
Prior to P0522, `llvm#2` was picked. Afterwards, this became ambiguous. This
patch restores the pre-P0522 behavior, `llvm#2` is picked again.

This has the beneficial side effect of making the following code valid:
```C++
template<class T, class U> struct A {};
A<int, float> v;
template<template<class> class TT> void f(TT<int>);

// OK: TT picks 'float' as the default argument for the second parameter.
void g() { f(v); }
```

---

Since this changes provisional implementation of CWG2398 which has not
been released yet, and already contains a changelog entry, we don't
provide a changelog entry here.

The problematic program is as follows:

```shell
#define pre_a 0
#define PRE(x) pre_##x

void f(void) {
    PRE(a) && 0;
}

int main(void) { return 0; }
```

in which after token concatenation (`##`), there's another nested macro
`pre_a`.

Currently only the outer expansion region will be produced. ([compiler
explorer
link](https://godbolt.org/#g:!((g:!((g:!((h:codeEditor,i:(filename:'1',fontScale:14,fontUsePx:'0',j:1,lang:___c,selection:(endColumn:29,endLineNumber:8,positionColumn:29,positionLineNumber:8,selectionStartColumn:29,selectionStartLineNumber:8,startColumn:29,startLineNumber:8),source:'%23define+pre_a+0%0A%23define+PRE(x)+pre_%23%23x%0A%0Avoid+f(void)+%7B%0A++++PRE(a)+%26%26+0%3B%0A%7D%0A%0Aint+main(void)+%7B+return+0%3B+%7D'),l:'5',n:'0',o:'C+source+%231',t:'0')),k:51.69491525423727,l:'4',n:'0',o:'',s:0,t:'0'),(g:!((g:!((h:compiler,i:(compiler:cclang_assertions_trunk,filters:(b:'0',binary:'1',binaryObject:'1',commentOnly:'0',debugCalls:'1',demangle:'0',directives:'0',execute:'0',intel:'0',libraryCode:'1',trim:'1',verboseDemangling:'0'),flagsViewOpen:'1',fontScale:14,fontUsePx:'0',j:2,lang:___c,libs:!(),options:'-fprofile-instr-generate+-fcoverage-mapping+-fcoverage-mcdc+-Xclang+-dump-coverage-mapping+',overrides:!(),selection:(endColumn:1,endLineNumber:1,positionColumn:1,positionLineNumber:1,selectionStartColumn:1,selectionStartLineNumber:1,startColumn:1,startLineNumber:1),source:1),l:'5',n:'0',o:'+x86-64+clang+(assertions+trunk)+(Editor+%231)',t:'0')),k:34.5741843594503,l:'4',m:28.903654485049834,n:'0',o:'',s:0,t:'0'),(g:!((h:output,i:(compilerName:'x86-64+clang+(trunk)',editorid:1,fontScale:14,fontUsePx:'0',j:2,wrap:'1'),l:'5',n:'0',o:'Output+of+x86-64+clang+(assertions+trunk)+(Compiler+%232)',t:'0')),header:(),l:'4',m:71.09634551495017,n:'0',o:'',s:0,t:'0')),k:48.30508474576271,l:'3',n:'0',o:'',t:'0')),l:'2',m:100,n:'0',o:'',t:'0')),version:4))

```text
f:
  File 0, 4:14 -> 6:2 = #0
  Decision,File 0, 5:5 -> 5:16 = M:0, C:2
  Expansion,File 0, 5:5 -> 5:8 = #0 (Expanded file = 1)
  File 0, 5:15 -> 5:16 = #1
  Branch,File 0, 5:15 -> 5:16 = 0, 0 [2,0,0] 
  File 1, 2:16 -> 2:23 = #0
  File 2, 1:15 -> 1:16 = #0
  File 2, 1:15 -> 1:16 = #0
  Branch,File 2, 1:15 -> 1:16 = 0, 0 [1,2,0] 
```

The inner expansion region isn't produced because:

1. In the range-based for loop quoted below, each sloc is processed and
possibly emit a corresponding expansion region.
2. For our sloc in question, its direct parent returned by
`getIncludeOrExpansionLoc()` is a `<scratch space>`, because that's how
`##` is processed.


https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/88b6186af3908c55b357858eb348b5143f21c289/clang/lib/CodeGen/CoverageMappingGen.cpp#L518-L520

3. This `<scratch space>` cannot be found in the FileID mapping so
`ParentFileID` will be assigned an `std::nullopt`


https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/88b6186af3908c55b357858eb348b5143f21c289/clang/lib/CodeGen/CoverageMappingGen.cpp#L521-L526

4. As a result this iteration of for loop finishes early and no
expansion region is added for the sloc.

This problem gets worse with MC/DC: as the example shows, there's a
branch from File 2 but File 2 itself is missing. This will trigger
assertion failures.

The fix is more or less a workaround and takes a similar approach as
llvm#89573.

~~Depends on llvm#89573.~~ This includes llvm#89573. Kudos to @chapuni!
This and llvm#89573 together fix llvm#87000: I tested locally, both the reduced
program and my original use case (fwiw, Linux kernel) can run
successfully.

---------

Co-authored-by: NAKAMURA Takumi <geek4civic@gmail.com>

…des (llvm#94453)

LSR will generate chains of related instructions with a known increment
between them. With SVE, in the case of the test case, this can include
increments like 'vscale * 16 + 8'. The idea of this patch is if we have
a '+8' increment already calculated in the chain, we can generate a
(legal) '+ vscale*16' addressing mode from it, allowing us to use the
'[x16, #1, mul vl]' addressing mode instructions.

In order to do this we keep track of the known 'bases' when generating
chains in GenerateIVChain, checking for each if the accumulated
increment expression from the base neatly folds into a legal addressing
mode. If they do not we fall back to the existing LeftOverExpr, whether
it is legal or not.

This is mostly orthogonal to llvm#88124, dealing with the generation of
chains as opposed to rest of LSR. The existing vscale addressing mode
work has greatly helped compared to the last time I looked at this,
allowing us to check that the addressing modes are indeed legal.

…on (llvm#94752)

Fixes llvm#62925.

The following code:
```cpp
#include <map>

int main() {
   std::map m1 = {std::pair{"foo", 2}, {"bar", 3}}; // guide llvm#2
   std::map m2(m1.begin(), m1.end()); // guide #1
}
```
Is rejected by clang, but accepted by both gcc and msvc:
https://godbolt.org/z/6v4fvabb5 .

So basically CTAD with copy-list-initialization is rejected.

Note that this exact code is also used in a cppreference article:
https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/container/map/deduction_guides

I checked the C++11 and C++20 standard drafts to see whether suppressing
user conversion is the correct thing to do for user conversions. Based
on the standard I don't think that it is correct.

```
13.3.1.4 Copy-initialization of class by user-defined conversion [over.match.copy]
Under the conditions specified in 8.5, as part of a copy-initialization of an object of class type, a user-defined
conversion can be invoked to convert an initializer expression to the type of the object being initialized.
Overload resolution is used to select the user-defined conversion to be invoked
```
So we could use user defined conversions according to the standard.

```
If a narrowing conversion is required to initialize any of the elements, the
program is ill-formed.
```
We should not do narrowing.

```
In copy-list-initialization, if an explicit constructor is chosen, the initialization is ill-formed.
```
We should not use explicit constructors.

`rethrow` instruction is a terminator, but when when its DAG is built in
`SelectionDAGBuilder` in a custom routine, it was NOT treated as such.

```ll
rethrow:                                          ; preds = %catch.start
  invoke void @llvm.wasm.rethrow() #1 [ "funclet"(token %1) ]
          to label %unreachable unwind label %ehcleanup

ehcleanup:                                        ; preds = %rethrow, %catch.dispatch
  %tmp = phi i32 [ 10, %catch.dispatch ], [ 20, %rethrow ]
  ...
```

In this bitcode, because of the `phi`, a `CONST_I32` will be created in
the `rethrow` BB. Without this patch, the DAG for the `rethrow` BB looks
like this:
```
  t0: ch,glue = EntryToken
      t3: ch = CopyToReg t0, Register:i32 %9, Constant:i32<20>
      t5: ch = llvm.wasm.rethrow t0, TargetConstant:i32<12161>
    t6: ch = TokenFactor t3, t5
  t8: ch = br t6, BasicBlock:ch<unreachable 0x562532e43c50>
```
Note that `CopyToReg` and `llvm.wasm.rethrow` don't have dependence so
either can come first in the selected code, which can result in the code
like
```mir
bb.3.rethrow:
  RETHROW 0, implicit-def dead $arguments
  %9:i32 = CONST_I32 20, implicit-def dead $arguments
  BR %bb.6, implicit-def dead $arguments
```

After this patch, `llvm.wasm.rethrow` is treated as a terminator, and
the DAG will look like
```
        t0: ch,glue = EntryToken
      t3: ch = CopyToReg t0, Register:i32 %9, Constant:i32<20>
    t5: ch = llvm.wasm.rethrow t3, TargetConstant:i32<12161>
  t7: ch = br t5, BasicBlock:ch<unreachable 0x5555e3d32c70>
```
Note that now `rethrow` takes a token from `CopyToReg`, so `rethrow` has
to come after `CopyToReg`. And the resulting code will be
```mir
bb.3.rethrow:
  %9:i32 = CONST_I32 20, implicit-def dead $arguments
  RETHROW 0, implicit-def dead $arguments
  BR %bb.6, implicit-def dead $arguments
```

I'm not very familiar with the internals of `getRoot` vs.
`getControlRoot`, but other terminator instructions seem to use the
latter, and using it for `rethrow` too worked.

…arallel fusion llvm#94391 (llvm#97607)"

This reverts commit edbc0e3.

Reason for rollback. ASAN complains about this PR:

==4320==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: heap-use-after-free on address 0x502000006cd8 at pc 0x55e2978d63cf bp 0x7ffe6431c2b0 sp 0x7ffe6431c2a8
READ of size 8 at 0x502000006cd8 thread T0
    #0 0x55e2978d63ce in map<llvm::MutableArrayRef<mlir::BlockArgument> &, llvm::MutableArrayRef<mlir::BlockArgument>, nullptr> mlir/include/mlir/IR/IRMapping.h:40:11
    #1 0x55e2978d63ce in mlir::createFused(mlir::LoopLikeOpInterface, mlir::LoopLikeOpInterface, mlir::RewriterBase&, std::__u::function<llvm::SmallVector<mlir::Value, 6u> (mlir::OpBuilder&, mlir::Location, llvm::ArrayRef<mlir::BlockArgument>)>, llvm::function_ref<void (mlir::RewriterBase&, mlir::LoopLikeOpInterface, mlir::LoopLikeOpInterface&, mlir::IRMapping)>) mlir/lib/Interfaces/LoopLikeInterface.cpp:156:11
    llvm#2 0x55e2952a614b in mlir::fuseIndependentSiblingForLoops(mlir::scf::ForOp, mlir::scf::ForOp, mlir::RewriterBase&) mlir/lib/Dialect/SCF/Utils/Utils.cpp:1398:43
    llvm#3 0x55e291480c6f in mlir::transform::LoopFuseSiblingOp::apply(mlir::transform::TransformRewriter&, mlir::transform::TransformResults&, mlir::transform::TransformState&) mlir/lib/Dialect/SCF/TransformOps/SCFTransformOps.cpp:482:17
    llvm#4 0x55e29149ed5e in mlir::transform::detail::TransformOpInterfaceInterfaceTraits::Model<mlir::transform::LoopFuseSiblingOp>::apply(mlir::transform::detail::TransformOpInterfaceInterfaceTraits::Concept const*, mlir::Operation*, mlir::transform::TransformRewriter&, mlir::transform::TransformResults&, mlir::transform::TransformState&) blaze-out/k8-opt-asan/bin/mlir/include/mlir/Dialect/Transform/Interfaces/TransformInterfaces.h.inc:477:56
    llvm#5 0x55e297494a60 in apply blaze-out/k8-opt-asan/bin/mlir/include/mlir/Dialect/Transform/Interfaces/TransformInterfaces.cpp.inc:61:14
    llvm#6 0x55e297494a60 in mlir::transform::TransformState::applyTransform(mlir::transform::TransformOpInterface) mlir/lib/Dialect/Transform/Interfaces/TransformInterfaces.cpp:953:48
    llvm#7 0x55e294646a8d in applySequenceBlock(mlir::Block&, mlir::transform::FailurePropagationMode, mlir::transform::TransformState&, mlir::transform::TransformResults&) mlir/lib/Dialect/Transform/IR/TransformOps.cpp:1788:15
    llvm#8 0x55e29464f927 in mlir::transform::NamedSequenceOp::apply(mlir::transform::TransformRewriter&, mlir::transform::TransformResults&, mlir::transform::TransformState&) mlir/lib/Dialect/Transform/IR/TransformOps.cpp:2155:10
    llvm#9 0x55e2945d28ee in mlir::transform::detail::TransformOpInterfaceInterfaceTraits::Model<mlir::transform::NamedSequenceOp>::apply(mlir::transform::detail::TransformOpInterfaceInterfaceTraits::Concept const*, mlir::Operation*, mlir::transform::TransformRewriter&, mlir::transform::TransformResults&, mlir::transform::TransformState&) blaze-out/k8-opt-asan/bin/mlir/include/mlir/Dialect/Transform/Interfaces/TransformInterfaces.h.inc:477:56
    llvm#10 0x55e297494a60 in apply blaze-out/k8-opt-asan/bin/mlir/include/mlir/Dialect/Transform/Interfaces/TransformInterfaces.cpp.inc:61:14
    llvm#11 0x55e297494a60 in mlir::transform::TransformState::applyTransform(mlir::transform::TransformOpInterface) mlir/lib/Dialect/Transform/Interfaces/TransformInterfaces.cpp:953:48
    llvm#12 0x55e2974a5fe2 in mlir::transform::applyTransforms(mlir::Operation*, mlir::transform::TransformOpInterface, mlir::RaggedArray<llvm::PointerUnion<mlir::Operation*, mlir::Attribute, mlir::Value>> const&, mlir::transform::TransformOptions const&, bool) mlir/lib/Dialect/Transform/Interfaces/TransformInterfaces.cpp:2016:16
    llvm#13 0x55e2945888d7 in mlir::transform::applyTransformNamedSequence(mlir::RaggedArray<llvm::PointerUnion<mlir::Operation*, mlir::Attribute, mlir::Value>>, mlir::transform::TransformOpInterface, mlir::ModuleOp, mlir::transform::TransformOptions const&) mlir/lib/Dialect/Transform/Transforms/TransformInterpreterUtils.cpp:234:10
    llvm#14 0x55e294582446 in (anonymous namespace)::InterpreterPass::runOnOperation() mlir/lib/Dialect/Transform/Transforms/InterpreterPass.cpp:147:16
    llvm#15 0x55e2978e93c6 in operator() mlir/lib/Pass/Pass.cpp:527:17
    llvm#16 0x55e2978e93c6 in void llvm::function_ref<void ()>::callback_fn<mlir::detail::OpToOpPassAdaptor::run(mlir::Pass*, mlir::Operation*, mlir::AnalysisManager, bool, unsigned int)::$_1>(long) llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLFunctionalExtras.h:45:12
    llvm#17 0x55e2978e207a in operator() llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLFunctionalExtras.h:68:12
    llvm#18 0x55e2978e207a in executeAction<mlir::PassExecutionAction, mlir::Pass &> mlir/include/mlir/IR/MLIRContext.h:275:7
    llvm#19 0x55e2978e207a in mlir::detail::OpToOpPassAdaptor::run(mlir::Pass*, mlir::Operation*, mlir::AnalysisManager, bool, unsigned int) mlir/lib/Pass/Pass.cpp:521:21
    llvm#20 0x55e2978e5fbf in runPipeline mlir/lib/Pass/Pass.cpp:593:16
    llvm#21 0x55e2978e5fbf in mlir::PassManager::runPasses(mlir::Operation*, mlir::AnalysisManager) mlir/lib/Pass/Pass.cpp:904:10
    llvm#22 0x55e2978e5b65 in mlir::PassManager::run(mlir::Operation*) mlir/lib/Pass/Pass.cpp:884:60
    llvm#23 0x55e291ebb460 in performActions(llvm::raw_ostream&, std::__u::shared_ptr<llvm::SourceMgr> const&, mlir::MLIRContext*, mlir::MlirOptMainConfig const&) mlir/lib/Tools/mlir-opt/MlirOptMain.cpp:408:17
    llvm#24 0x55e291ebabd9 in processBuffer mlir/lib/Tools/mlir-opt/MlirOptMain.cpp:481:9
    llvm#25 0x55e291ebabd9 in operator() mlir/lib/Tools/mlir-opt/MlirOptMain.cpp:548:12
    llvm#26 0x55e291ebabd9 in llvm::LogicalResult llvm::function_ref<llvm::LogicalResult (std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, llvm::raw_ostream&)>::callback_fn<mlir::MlirOptMain(llvm::raw_ostream&, std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, mlir::DialectRegistry&, mlir::MlirOptMainConfig const&)::$_0>(long, std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, llvm::raw_ostream&) llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLFunctionalExtras.h:45:12
    llvm#27 0x55e297b1cffe in operator() llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLFunctionalExtras.h:68:12
    llvm#28 0x55e297b1cffe in mlir::splitAndProcessBuffer(std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, llvm::function_ref<llvm::LogicalResult (std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, llvm::raw_ostream&)>, llvm::raw_ostream&, llvm::StringRef, llvm::StringRef)::$_0::operator()(llvm::StringRef) const mlir/lib/Support/ToolUtilities.cpp:86:16
    llvm#29 0x55e297b1c9c5 in interleave<const llvm::StringRef *, (lambda at mlir/lib/Support/ToolUtilities.cpp:79:23), (lambda at llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLExtras.h:2147:49), void> llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLExtras.h:2125:3
    llvm#30 0x55e297b1c9c5 in interleave<llvm::SmallVector<llvm::StringRef, 8U>, (lambda at mlir/lib/Support/ToolUtilities.cpp:79:23), llvm::raw_ostream, llvm::StringRef> llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLExtras.h:2147:3
    llvm#31 0x55e297b1c9c5 in mlir::splitAndProcessBuffer(std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, llvm::function_ref<llvm::LogicalResult (std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, llvm::raw_ostream&)>, llvm::raw_ostream&, llvm::StringRef, llvm::StringRef) mlir/lib/Support/ToolUtilities.cpp:89:3
    llvm#32 0x55e291eb0cf0 in mlir::MlirOptMain(llvm::raw_ostream&, std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, mlir::DialectRegistry&, mlir::MlirOptMainConfig const&) mlir/lib/Tools/mlir-opt/MlirOptMain.cpp:551:10
    llvm#33 0x55e291eb115c in mlir::MlirOptMain(int, char**, llvm::StringRef, llvm::StringRef, mlir::DialectRegistry&) mlir/lib/Tools/mlir-opt/MlirOptMain.cpp:589:14
    llvm#34 0x55e291eb15f8 in mlir::MlirOptMain(int, char**, llvm::StringRef, mlir::DialectRegistry&) mlir/lib/Tools/mlir-opt/MlirOptMain.cpp:605:10
    llvm#35 0x55e29130d1be in main mlir/tools/mlir-opt/mlir-opt.cpp:311:33
    llvm#36 0x7fbcf3fff3d3 in __libc_start_main (/usr/grte/v5/lib64/libc.so.6+0x613d3) (BuildId: 9a996398ce14a94560b0c642eb4f6e94)
    llvm#37 0x55e2912365a9 in _start /usr/grte/v5/debug-src/src/csu/../sysdeps/x86_64/start.S:120

0x502000006cd8 is located 8 bytes inside of 16-byte region [0x502000006cd0,0x502000006ce0)
freed by thread T0 here:
    #0 0x55e29130b7e2 in operator delete(void*, unsigned long) compiler-rt/lib/asan/asan_new_delete.cpp:155:3
    #1 0x55e2979eb657 in __libcpp_operator_delete<void *, unsigned long>
    llvm#2 0x55e2979eb657 in __do_deallocate_handle_size<>
    llvm#3 0x55e2979eb657 in __libcpp_deallocate
    llvm#4 0x55e2979eb657 in deallocate
    llvm#5 0x55e2979eb657 in deallocate
    llvm#6 0x55e2979eb657 in operator()
    llvm#7 0x55e2979eb657 in ~vector
    llvm#8 0x55e2979eb657 in mlir::Block::~Block() mlir/lib/IR/Block.cpp:24:1
    llvm#9 0x55e2979ebc17 in deleteNode llvm/include/llvm/ADT/ilist.h:42:39
    llvm#10 0x55e2979ebc17 in erase llvm/include/llvm/ADT/ilist.h:205:5
    llvm#11 0x55e2979ebc17 in erase llvm/include/llvm/ADT/ilist.h:209:39
    llvm#12 0x55e2979ebc17 in mlir::Block::erase() mlir/lib/IR/Block.cpp:67:28
    llvm#13 0x55e297aef978 in mlir::RewriterBase::eraseBlock(mlir::Block*) mlir/lib/IR/PatternMatch.cpp:245:10
    llvm#14 0x55e297af0563 in mlir::RewriterBase::inlineBlockBefore(mlir::Block*, mlir::Block*, llvm::ilist_iterator<llvm::ilist_detail::node_options<mlir::Operation, false, false, void, false, void>, false, false>, mlir::ValueRange) mlir/lib/IR/PatternMatch.cpp:331:3
    llvm#15 0x55e297af06d8 in mlir::RewriterBase::mergeBlocks(mlir::Block*, mlir::Block*, mlir::ValueRange) mlir/lib/IR/PatternMatch.cpp:341:3
    llvm#16 0x55e297036608 in mlir::scf::ForOp::replaceWithAdditionalYields(mlir::RewriterBase&, mlir::ValueRange, bool, std::__u::function<llvm::SmallVector<mlir::Value, 6u> (mlir::OpBuilder&, mlir::Location, llvm::ArrayRef<mlir::BlockArgument>)> const&) mlir/lib/Dialect/SCF/IR/SCF.cpp:575:12
    llvm#17 0x55e2970673ca in mlir::detail::LoopLikeOpInterfaceInterfaceTraits::Model<mlir::scf::ForOp>::replaceWithAdditionalYields(mlir::detail::LoopLikeOpInterfaceInterfaceTraits::Concept const*, mlir::Operation*, mlir::RewriterBase&, mlir::ValueRange, bool, std::__u::function<llvm::SmallVector<mlir::Value, 6u> (mlir::OpBuilder&, mlir::Location, llvm::ArrayRef<mlir::BlockArgument>)> const&) blaze-out/k8-opt-asan/bin/mlir/include/mlir/Interfaces/LoopLikeInterface.h.inc:658:56
    llvm#18 0x55e2978d5feb in replaceWithAdditionalYields blaze-out/k8-opt-asan/bin/mlir/include/mlir/Interfaces/LoopLikeInterface.cpp.inc:105:14
    llvm#19 0x55e2978d5feb in mlir::createFused(mlir::LoopLikeOpInterface, mlir::LoopLikeOpInterface, mlir::RewriterBase&, std::__u::function<llvm::SmallVector<mlir::Value, 6u> (mlir::OpBuilder&, mlir::Location, llvm::ArrayRef<mlir::BlockArgument>)>, llvm::function_ref<void (mlir::RewriterBase&, mlir::LoopLikeOpInterface, mlir::LoopLikeOpInterface&, mlir::IRMapping)>) mlir/lib/Interfaces/LoopLikeInterface.cpp:135:14
    llvm#20 0x55e2952a614b in mlir::fuseIndependentSiblingForLoops(mlir::scf::ForOp, mlir::scf::ForOp, mlir::RewriterBase&) mlir/lib/Dialect/SCF/Utils/Utils.cpp:1398:43
    llvm#21 0x55e291480c6f in mlir::transform::LoopFuseSiblingOp::apply(mlir::transform::TransformRewriter&, mlir::transform::TransformResults&, mlir::transform::TransformState&) mlir/lib/Dialect/SCF/TransformOps/SCFTransformOps.cpp:482:17
    llvm#22 0x55e29149ed5e in mlir::transform::detail::TransformOpInterfaceInterfaceTraits::Model<mlir::transform::LoopFuseSiblingOp>::apply(mlir::transform::detail::TransformOpInterfaceInterfaceTraits::Concept const*, mlir::Operation*, mlir::transform::TransformRewriter&, mlir::transform::TransformResults&, mlir::transform::TransformState&) blaze-out/k8-opt-asan/bin/mlir/include/mlir/Dialect/Transform/Interfaces/TransformInterfaces.h.inc:477:56
    llvm#23 0x55e297494a60 in apply blaze-out/k8-opt-asan/bin/mlir/include/mlir/Dialect/Transform/Interfaces/TransformInterfaces.cpp.inc:61:14
    llvm#24 0x55e297494a60 in mlir::transform::TransformState::applyTransform(mlir::transform::TransformOpInterface) mlir/lib/Dialect/Transform/Interfaces/TransformInterfaces.cpp:953:48
    llvm#25 0x55e294646a8d in applySequenceBlock(mlir::Block&, mlir::transform::FailurePropagationMode, mlir::transform::TransformState&, mlir::transform::TransformResults&) mlir/lib/Dialect/Transform/IR/TransformOps.cpp:1788:15
    llvm#26 0x55e29464f927 in mlir::transform::NamedSequenceOp::apply(mlir::transform::TransformRewriter&, mlir::transform::TransformResults&, mlir::transform::TransformState&) mlir/lib/Dialect/Transform/IR/TransformOps.cpp:2155:10
    llvm#27 0x55e2945d28ee in mlir::transform::detail::TransformOpInterfaceInterfaceTraits::Model<mlir::transform::NamedSequenceOp>::apply(mlir::transform::detail::TransformOpInterfaceInterfaceTraits::Concept const*, mlir::Operation*, mlir::transform::TransformRewriter&, mlir::transform::TransformResults&, mlir::transform::TransformState&) blaze-out/k8-opt-asan/bin/mlir/include/mlir/Dialect/Transform/Interfaces/TransformInterfaces.h.inc:477:56
    llvm#28 0x55e297494a60 in apply blaze-out/k8-opt-asan/bin/mlir/include/mlir/Dialect/Transform/Interfaces/TransformInterfaces.cpp.inc:61:14
    llvm#29 0x55e297494a60 in mlir::transform::TransformState::applyTransform(mlir::transform::TransformOpInterface) mlir/lib/Dialect/Transform/Interfaces/TransformInterfaces.cpp:953:48
    llvm#30 0x55e2974a5fe2 in mlir::transform::applyTransforms(mlir::Operation*, mlir::transform::TransformOpInterface, mlir::RaggedArray<llvm::PointerUnion<mlir::Operation*, mlir::Attribute, mlir::Value>> const&, mlir::transform::TransformOptions const&, bool) mlir/lib/Dialect/Transform/Interfaces/TransformInterfaces.cpp:2016:16
    llvm#31 0x55e2945888d7 in mlir::transform::applyTransformNamedSequence(mlir::RaggedArray<llvm::PointerUnion<mlir::Operation*, mlir::Attribute, mlir::Value>>, mlir::transform::TransformOpInterface, mlir::ModuleOp, mlir::transform::TransformOptions const&) mlir/lib/Dialect/Transform/Transforms/TransformInterpreterUtils.cpp:234:10
    llvm#32 0x55e294582446 in (anonymous namespace)::InterpreterPass::runOnOperation() mlir/lib/Dialect/Transform/Transforms/InterpreterPass.cpp:147:16
    llvm#33 0x55e2978e93c6 in operator() mlir/lib/Pass/Pass.cpp:527:17
    llvm#34 0x55e2978e93c6 in void llvm::function_ref<void ()>::callback_fn<mlir::detail::OpToOpPassAdaptor::run(mlir::Pass*, mlir::Operation*, mlir::AnalysisManager, bool, unsigned int)::$_1>(long) llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLFunctionalExtras.h:45:12
    llvm#35 0x55e2978e207a in operator() llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLFunctionalExtras.h:68:12
    llvm#36 0x55e2978e207a in executeAction<mlir::PassExecutionAction, mlir::Pass &> mlir/include/mlir/IR/MLIRContext.h:275:7
    llvm#37 0x55e2978e207a in mlir::detail::OpToOpPassAdaptor::run(mlir::Pass*, mlir::Operation*, mlir::AnalysisManager, bool, unsigned int) mlir/lib/Pass/Pass.cpp:521:21
    llvm#38 0x55e2978e5fbf in runPipeline mlir/lib/Pass/Pass.cpp:593:16
    llvm#39 0x55e2978e5fbf in mlir::PassManager::runPasses(mlir::Operation*, mlir::AnalysisManager) mlir/lib/Pass/Pass.cpp:904:10
    llvm#40 0x55e2978e5b65 in mlir::PassManager::run(mlir::Operation*) mlir/lib/Pass/Pass.cpp:884:60
    llvm#41 0x55e291ebb460 in performActions(llvm::raw_ostream&, std::__u::shared_ptr<llvm::SourceMgr> const&, mlir::MLIRContext*, mlir::MlirOptMainConfig const&) mlir/lib/Tools/mlir-opt/MlirOptMain.cpp:408:17
    llvm#42 0x55e291ebabd9 in processBuffer mlir/lib/Tools/mlir-opt/MlirOptMain.cpp:481:9
    llvm#43 0x55e291ebabd9 in operator() mlir/lib/Tools/mlir-opt/MlirOptMain.cpp:548:12
    llvm#44 0x55e291ebabd9 in llvm::LogicalResult llvm::function_ref<llvm::LogicalResult (std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, llvm::raw_ostream&)>::callback_fn<mlir::MlirOptMain(llvm::raw_ostream&, std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, mlir::DialectRegistry&, mlir::MlirOptMainConfig const&)::$_0>(long, std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, llvm::raw_ostream&) llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLFunctionalExtras.h:45:12
    llvm#45 0x55e297b1cffe in operator() llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLFunctionalExtras.h:68:12
    llvm#46 0x55e297b1cffe in mlir::splitAndProcessBuffer(std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, llvm::function_ref<llvm::LogicalResult (std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, llvm::raw_ostream&)>, llvm::raw_ostream&, llvm::StringRef, llvm::StringRef)::$_0::operator()(llvm::StringRef) const mlir/lib/Support/ToolUtilities.cpp:86:16
    llvm#47 0x55e297b1c9c5 in interleave<const llvm::StringRef *, (lambda at mlir/lib/Support/ToolUtilities.cpp:79:23), (lambda at llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLExtras.h:2147:49), void> llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLExtras.h:2125:3
    llvm#48 0x55e297b1c9c5 in interleave<llvm::SmallVector<llvm::StringRef, 8U>, (lambda at mlir/lib/Support/ToolUtilities.cpp:79:23), llvm::raw_ostream, llvm::StringRef> llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLExtras.h:2147:3
    llvm#49 0x55e297b1c9c5 in mlir::splitAndProcessBuffer(std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, llvm::function_ref<llvm::LogicalResult (std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, llvm::raw_ostream&)>, llvm::raw_ostream&, llvm::StringRef, llvm::StringRef) mlir/lib/Support/ToolUtilities.cpp:89:3
    llvm#50 0x55e291eb0cf0 in mlir::MlirOptMain(llvm::raw_ostream&, std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, mlir::DialectRegistry&, mlir::MlirOptMainConfig const&) mlir/lib/Tools/mlir-opt/MlirOptMain.cpp:551:10
    llvm#51 0x55e291eb115c in mlir::MlirOptMain(int, char**, llvm::StringRef, llvm::StringRef, mlir::DialectRegistry&) mlir/lib/Tools/mlir-opt/MlirOptMain.cpp:589:14

previously allocated by thread T0 here:
    #0 0x55e29130ab5d in operator new(unsigned long) compiler-rt/lib/asan/asan_new_delete.cpp:86:3
    #1 0x55e2979ed5d4 in __libcpp_operator_new<unsigned long>
    llvm#2 0x55e2979ed5d4 in __libcpp_allocate
    llvm#3 0x55e2979ed5d4 in allocate
    llvm#4 0x55e2979ed5d4 in __allocate_at_least<std::__u::allocator<mlir::BlockArgument> >
    llvm#5 0x55e2979ed5d4 in __split_buffer
    llvm#6 0x55e2979ed5d4 in mlir::BlockArgument* std::__u::vector<mlir::BlockArgument, std::__u::allocator<mlir::BlockArgument>>::__push_back_slow_path<mlir::BlockArgument const&>(mlir::BlockArgument const&)
    llvm#7 0x55e2979ec0f2 in push_back
    llvm#8 0x55e2979ec0f2 in mlir::Block::addArgument(mlir::Type, mlir::Location) mlir/lib/IR/Block.cpp:154:13
    llvm#9 0x55e29796e457 in parseRegionBody mlir/lib/AsmParser/Parser.cpp:2172:34
    llvm#10 0x55e29796e457 in (anonymous namespace)::OperationParser::parseRegion(mlir::Region&, llvm::ArrayRef<mlir::OpAsmParser::Argument>, bool) mlir/lib/AsmParser/Parser.cpp:2121:7
    llvm#11 0x55e29796b25e in (anonymous namespace)::CustomOpAsmParser::parseRegion(mlir::Region&, llvm::ArrayRef<mlir::OpAsmParser::Argument>, bool) mlir/lib/AsmParser/Parser.cpp:1785:16
    llvm#12 0x55e297035742 in mlir::scf::ForOp::parse(mlir::OpAsmParser&, mlir::OperationState&) mlir/lib/Dialect/SCF/IR/SCF.cpp:521:14
    llvm#13 0x55e291322c18 in llvm::ParseResult llvm::detail::UniqueFunctionBase<llvm::ParseResult, mlir::OpAsmParser&, mlir::OperationState&>::CallImpl<llvm::ParseResult (*)(mlir::OpAsmParser&, mlir::OperationState&)>(void*, mlir::OpAsmParser&, mlir::OperationState&) llvm/include/llvm/ADT/FunctionExtras.h:220:12
    llvm#14 0x55e29795bea3 in operator() llvm/include/llvm/ADT/FunctionExtras.h:384:12
    llvm#15 0x55e29795bea3 in callback_fn<llvm::unique_function<llvm::ParseResult (mlir::OpAsmParser &, mlir::OperationState &)> > llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLFunctionalExtras.h:45:12
    llvm#16 0x55e29795bea3 in operator() llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLFunctionalExtras.h:68:12
    llvm#17 0x55e29795bea3 in parseOperation mlir/lib/AsmParser/Parser.cpp:1521:9
    llvm#18 0x55e29795bea3 in parseCustomOperation mlir/lib/AsmParser/Parser.cpp:2017:19
    llvm#19 0x55e29795bea3 in (anonymous namespace)::OperationParser::parseOperation() mlir/lib/AsmParser/Parser.cpp:1174:10
    llvm#20 0x55e297971d20 in parseBlockBody mlir/lib/AsmParser/Parser.cpp:2296:9
    llvm#21 0x55e297971d20 in (anonymous namespace)::OperationParser::parseBlock(mlir::Block*&) mlir/lib/AsmParser/Parser.cpp:2226:12
    llvm#22 0x55e29796e4f5 in parseRegionBody mlir/lib/AsmParser/Parser.cpp:2184:7
    llvm#23 0x55e29796e4f5 in (anonymous namespace)::OperationParser::parseRegion(mlir::Region&, llvm::ArrayRef<mlir::OpAsmParser::Argument>, bool) mlir/lib/AsmParser/Parser.cpp:2121:7
    llvm#24 0x55e29796b25e in (anonymous namespace)::CustomOpAsmParser::parseRegion(mlir::Region&, llvm::ArrayRef<mlir::OpAsmParser::Argument>, bool) mlir/lib/AsmParser/Parser.cpp:1785:16
    llvm#25 0x55e29796b2cf in (anonymous namespace)::CustomOpAsmParser::parseOptionalRegion(mlir::Region&, llvm::ArrayRef<mlir::OpAsmParser::Argument>, bool) mlir/lib/AsmParser/Parser.cpp:1796:12
    llvm#26 0x55e2978d89ff in mlir::function_interface_impl::parseFunctionOp(mlir::OpAsmParser&, mlir::OperationState&, bool, mlir::StringAttr, llvm::function_ref<mlir::Type (mlir::Builder&, llvm::ArrayRef<mlir::Type>, llvm::ArrayRef<mlir::Type>, mlir::function_interface_impl::VariadicFlag, std::__u::basic_string<char, std::__u::char_traits<char>, std::__u::allocator<char>>&)>, mlir::StringAttr, mlir::StringAttr) mlir/lib/Interfaces/FunctionImplementation.cpp:232:14
    llvm#27 0x55e2969ba41d in mlir::func::FuncOp::parse(mlir::OpAsmParser&, mlir::OperationState&) mlir/lib/Dialect/Func/IR/FuncOps.cpp:203:10
    llvm#28 0x55e291322c18 in llvm::ParseResult llvm::detail::UniqueFunctionBase<llvm::ParseResult, mlir::OpAsmParser&, mlir::OperationState&>::CallImpl<llvm::ParseResult (*)(mlir::OpAsmParser&, mlir::OperationState&)>(void*, mlir::OpAsmParser&, mlir::OperationState&) llvm/include/llvm/ADT/FunctionExtras.h:220:12
    llvm#29 0x55e29795bea3 in operator() llvm/include/llvm/ADT/FunctionExtras.h:384:12
    llvm#30 0x55e29795bea3 in callback_fn<llvm::unique_function<llvm::ParseResult (mlir::OpAsmParser &, mlir::OperationState &)> > llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLFunctionalExtras.h:45:12
    llvm#31 0x55e29795bea3 in operator() llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLFunctionalExtras.h:68:12
    llvm#32 0x55e29795bea3 in parseOperation mlir/lib/AsmParser/Parser.cpp:1521:9
    llvm#33 0x55e29795bea3 in parseCustomOperation mlir/lib/AsmParser/Parser.cpp:2017:19
    llvm#34 0x55e29795bea3 in (anonymous namespace)::OperationParser::parseOperation() mlir/lib/AsmParser/Parser.cpp:1174:10
    llvm#35 0x55e297959b78 in parse mlir/lib/AsmParser/Parser.cpp:2725:20
    llvm#36 0x55e297959b78 in mlir::parseAsmSourceFile(llvm::SourceMgr const&, mlir::Block*, mlir::ParserConfig const&, mlir::AsmParserState*, mlir::AsmParserCodeCompleteContext*) mlir/lib/AsmParser/Parser.cpp:2785:41
    llvm#37 0x55e29790d5c2 in mlir::parseSourceFile(std::__u::shared_ptr<llvm::SourceMgr> const&, mlir::Block*, mlir::ParserConfig const&, mlir::LocationAttr*) mlir/lib/Parser/Parser.cpp:46:10
    llvm#38 0x55e291ebbfe2 in parseSourceFile<mlir::ModuleOp, const std::__u::shared_ptr<llvm::SourceMgr> &> mlir/include/mlir/Parser/Parser.h:159:14
    llvm#39 0x55e291ebbfe2 in parseSourceFile<mlir::ModuleOp> mlir/include/mlir/Parser/Parser.h:189:10
    llvm#40 0x55e291ebbfe2 in mlir::parseSourceFileForTool(std::__u::shared_ptr<llvm::SourceMgr> const&, mlir::ParserConfig const&, bool) mlir/include/mlir/Tools/ParseUtilities.h:31:12
    llvm#41 0x55e291ebb263 in performActions(llvm::raw_ostream&, std::__u::shared_ptr<llvm::SourceMgr> const&, mlir::MLIRContext*, mlir::MlirOptMainConfig const&) mlir/lib/Tools/mlir-opt/MlirOptMain.cpp:383:33
    llvm#42 0x55e291ebabd9 in processBuffer mlir/lib/Tools/mlir-opt/MlirOptMain.cpp:481:9
    llvm#43 0x55e291ebabd9 in operator() mlir/lib/Tools/mlir-opt/MlirOptMain.cpp:548:12
    llvm#44 0x55e291ebabd9 in llvm::LogicalResult llvm::function_ref<llvm::LogicalResult (std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, llvm::raw_ostream&)>::callback_fn<mlir::MlirOptMain(llvm::raw_ostream&, std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, mlir::DialectRegistry&, mlir::MlirOptMainConfig const&)::$_0>(long, std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, llvm::raw_ostream&) llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLFunctionalExtras.h:45:12
    llvm#45 0x55e297b1cffe in operator() llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLFunctionalExtras.h:68:12
    llvm#46 0x55e297b1cffe in mlir::splitAndProcessBuffer(std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, llvm::function_ref<llvm::LogicalResult (std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, llvm::raw_ostream&)>, llvm::raw_ostream&, llvm::StringRef, llvm::StringRef)::$_0::operator()(llvm::StringRef) const mlir/lib/Support/ToolUtilities.cpp:86:16
    llvm#47 0x55e297b1c9c5 in interleave<const llvm::StringRef *, (lambda at mlir/lib/Support/ToolUtilities.cpp:79:23), (lambda at llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLExtras.h:2147:49), void> llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLExtras.h:2125:3
    llvm#48 0x55e297b1c9c5 in interleave<llvm::SmallVector<llvm::StringRef, 8U>, (lambda at mlir/lib/Support/ToolUtilities.cpp:79:23), llvm::raw_ostream, llvm::StringRef> llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLExtras.h:2147:3
    llvm#49 0x55e297b1c9c5 in mlir::splitAndProcessBuffer(std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, llvm::function_ref<llvm::LogicalResult (std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, llvm::raw_ostream&)>, llvm::raw_ostream&, llvm::StringRef, llvm::StringRef) mlir/lib/Support/ToolUtilities.cpp:89:3
    llvm#50 0x55e291eb0cf0 in mlir::MlirOptMain(llvm::raw_ostream&, std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, mlir::DialectRegistry&, mlir::MlirOptMainConfig const&) mlir/lib/Tools/mlir-opt/MlirOptMain.cpp:551:10
    llvm#51 0x55e291eb115c in mlir::MlirOptMain(int, char**, llvm::StringRef, llvm::StringRef, mlir::DialectRegistry&) mlir/lib/Tools/mlir-opt/MlirOptMain.cpp:589:14
    llvm#52 0x55e291eb15f8 in mlir::MlirOptMain(int, char**, llvm::StringRef, mlir::DialectRegistry&) mlir/lib/Tools/mlir-opt/MlirOptMain.cpp:605:10
    llvm#53 0x55e29130d1be in main mlir/tools/mlir-opt/mlir-opt.cpp:311:33
    llvm#54 0x7fbcf3fff3d3 in __libc_start_main (/usr/grte/v5/lib64/libc.so.6+0x613d3) (BuildId: 9a996398ce14a94560b0c642eb4f6e94)
    llvm#55 0x55e2912365a9 in _start /usr/grte/v5/debug-src/src/csu/../sysdeps/x86_64/start.S:120

SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: heap-use-after-free mlir/include/mlir/IR/IRMapping.h:40:11 in map<llvm::MutableArrayRef<mlir::BlockArgument> &, llvm::MutableArrayRef<mlir::BlockArgument>, nullptr>
Shadow bytes around the buggy address:
  0x502000006a00: fa fa 00 fa fa fa 00 00 fa fa 00 fa fa fa 00 fa
  0x502000006a80: fa fa 00 fa fa fa 00 00 fa fa 00 00 fa fa 00 00
  0x502000006b00: fa fa 00 00 fa fa 00 00 fa fa 00 fa fa fa 00 fa
  0x502000006b80: fa fa 00 fa fa fa 00 fa fa fa 00 00 fa fa 00 00
  0x502000006c00: fa fa 00 00 fa fa 00 00 fa fa 00 00 fa fa fd fa
=>0x502000006c80: fa fa fd fa fa fa fd fd fa fa fd[fd]fa fa fd fd
  0x502000006d00: fa fa 00 fa fa fa 00 fa fa fa 00 fa fa fa 00 fa
  0x502000006d80: fa fa 00 fa fa fa 00 fa fa fa 00 fa fa fa 00 fa
  0x502000006e00: fa fa 00 fa fa fa 00 fa fa fa 00 00 fa fa 00 fa
  0x502000006e80: fa fa 00 fa fa fa 00 00 fa fa 00 fa fa fa 00 fa
  0x502000006f00: fa fa 00 fa fa fa 00 fa fa fa 00 fa fa fa 00 fa
Shadow byte legend (one shadow byte represents 8 application bytes):
  Addressable:           00
  Partially addressable: 01 02 03 04 05 06 07
  Heap left redzone:       fa
  Freed heap region:       fd
  Stack left redzone:      f1
  Stack mid redzone:       f2
  Stack right redzone:     f3
  Stack after return:      f5
  Stack use after scope:   f8
  Global redzone:          f9
  Global init order:       f6
  Poisoned by user:        f7
  Container overflow:      fc
  Array cookie:            ac
  Intra object redzone:    bb
  ASan internal:           fe
  Left alloca redzone:     ca
  Right alloca redzone:    cb
==4320==ABORTING

This test is currently flaky on a local Windows amd64 build. The reason
is that it relies on the order of `process.threads` but this order is
nondeterministic:

If we print lldb's inputs and outputs while running, we can see that the
breakpoints are always being set correctly, and always being hit:

```sh
runCmd: breakpoint set -f "main.c" -l 2
output: Breakpoint 1: where = a.out`func_inner + 1 at main.c:2:9, address = 0x0000000140001001

runCmd: breakpoint set -f "main.c" -l 7
output: Breakpoint 2: where = a.out`main + 17 at main.c:7:5, address = 0x0000000140001021

runCmd: run
output: Process 52328 launched: 'C:\workspace\llvm-project\llvm\build\lldb-test-build.noindex\functionalities\unwind\zeroth_frame\TestZerothFrame.test_dwarf\a.out' (x86_64)
Process 52328 stopped
* thread #1, stop reason = breakpoint 1.1
    frame #0: 0x00007ff68f6b1001 a.out`func_inner at main.c:2:9
   1    void func_inner() {
-> 2        int a = 1;  // Set breakpoint 1 here
                ^
   3    }
   4
   5    int main() {
   6        func_inner();
   7        return 0; // Set breakpoint 2 here
```

However, sometimes the backtrace printed in this test shows that the
process is stopped inside NtWaitForWorkViaWorkerFactory from
`ntdll.dll`:

```sh
Backtrace at the first breakpoint:
frame #0: 0x00007ffecc7b3bf4 ntdll.dll`NtWaitForWorkViaWorkerFactory + 20
frame #1: 0x00007ffecc74585e ntdll.dll`RtlClearThreadWorkOnBehalfTicket + 862
frame llvm#2: 0x00007ffecc3e257d kernel32.dll`BaseThreadInitThunk + 29
frame llvm#3: 0x00007ffecc76af28 ntdll.dll`RtlUserThreadStart + 40
```

When this happens, the test fails with an assertion error that the
stopped thread's zeroth frame's current line number does not match the
expected line number. This is because the test is looking at the wrong
thread: `process.threads[0]`.

If we print the list of threads each time the test is run, we notice
that threads are sometimes in a different order, within
`process.threads`:

```sh
Thread 0: thread llvm#4: tid = 0x9c38, 0x00007ffecc7b3bf4 ntdll.dll`NtWaitForWorkViaWorkerFactory + 20
Thread 1: thread llvm#2: tid = 0xa950, 0x00007ffecc7b3bf4 ntdll.dll`NtWaitForWorkViaWorkerFactory + 20
Thread 2: thread #1: tid = 0xab18, 0x00007ff64bc81001 a.out`func_inner at main.c:2:9, stop reason = breakpoint 1.1
Thread 3: thread llvm#3: tid = 0xc514, 0x00007ffecc7b3bf4 ntdll.dll`NtWaitForWorkViaWorkerFactory + 20

Thread 0: thread llvm#3: tid = 0x018c, 0x00007ffecc7b3bf4 ntdll.dll`NtWaitForWorkViaWorkerFactory + 20
Thread 1: thread #1: tid = 0x85c8, 0x00007ff7130c1001 a.out`func_inner at main.c:2:9, stop reason = breakpoint 1.1
Thread 2: thread llvm#2: tid = 0xf344, 0x00007ffecc7b3bf4 ntdll.dll`NtWaitForWorkViaWorkerFactory + 20
Thread 3: thread llvm#4: tid = 0x6a50, 0x00007ffecc7b3bf4 ntdll.dll`NtWaitForWorkViaWorkerFactory + 20
```

Use `self.thread()` to consistently select the correct thread, instead.

Co-authored-by: kendal <kendal@thebrowser.company>

…izations of function templates to USRGenerator (llvm#98027)

Given the following:
```
template<typename T>
struct A
{
    void f(int); // #1
    
    template<typename U>
    void f(U); // llvm#2
    
    template<>
    void f<int>(int); // llvm#3
};
```
Clang will generate the same USR for `#1` and `llvm#2`. This patch fixes the
issue by including the template arguments of dependent class scope
explicit specializations in their USRs.

This patch adds a frame recognizer for Clang's
`__builtin_verbose_trap`, which behaves like a
`__builtin_trap`, but emits a failure-reason string into debug-info in
order for debuggers to display
it to a user.

The frame recognizer triggers when we encounter
a frame with a function name that begins with
`__clang_trap_msg`, which is the magic prefix
Clang emits into debug-info for verbose traps.
Once such frame is encountered we display the
frame function name as the `Stop Reason` and display that frame to the
user.

Example output:
```
(lldb) run
warning: a.out was compiled with optimization - stepping may behave oddly; variables may not be available.
Process 35942 launched: 'a.out' (arm64)
Process 35942 stopped
* thread #1, queue = 'com.apple.main-thread', stop reason = Misc.: Function is not implemented
    frame #1: 0x0000000100003fa4 a.out`main [inlined] Dummy::func(this=<unavailable>) at verbose_trap.cpp:3:5 [opt]
   1    struct Dummy {
   2      void func() {
-> 3        __builtin_verbose_trap("Misc.", "Function is not implemented");
   4      }
   5    };
   6
   7    int main() {
(lldb) bt
* thread #1, queue = 'com.apple.main-thread', stop reason = Misc.: Function is not implemented
    frame #0: 0x0000000100003fa4 a.out`main [inlined] __clang_trap_msg$Misc.$Function is not implemented$ at verbose_trap.cpp:0 [opt]
  * frame #1: 0x0000000100003fa4 a.out`main [inlined] Dummy::func(this=<unavailable>) at verbose_trap.cpp:3:5 [opt]
    frame llvm#2: 0x0000000100003fa4 a.out`main at verbose_trap.cpp:8:13 [opt]
    frame llvm#3: 0x0000000189d518b4 dyld`start + 1988
```

…linux (llvm#99613)

Examples of the output:

ARM:
```
# ./a.out 
AddressSanitizer:DEADLYSIGNAL
=================================================================
==122==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: SEGV on unknown address 0x0000007a (pc 0x76e13ac0 bp 0x7eb7fd00 sp 0x7eb7fcc8 T0)
==122==The signal is caused by a READ memory access.
==122==Hint: address points to the zero page.
    #0 0x76e13ac0  (/lib/libc.so.6+0x7cac0)
    #1 0x76dce680 in gsignal (/lib/libc.so.6+0x37680)
    llvm#2 0x005c2250  (/root/a.out+0x145250)
    llvm#3 0x76db982c  (/lib/libc.so.6+0x2282c)
    llvm#4 0x76db9918 in __libc_start_main (/lib/libc.so.6+0x22918)

==122==Register values:
 r0 = 0x00000000   r1 = 0x0000007a   r2 = 0x0000000b   r3 = 0x76d95020  
 r4 = 0x0000007a   r5 = 0x00000001   r6 = 0x005dcc5c   r7 = 0x0000010c  
 r8 = 0x0000000b   r9 = 0x76f9ece0  r10 = 0x00000000  r11 = 0x7eb7fd00  
r12 = 0x76dce670   sp = 0x7eb7fcc8   lr = 0x76e13ab4   pc = 0x76e13ac0  
AddressSanitizer can not provide additional info.
SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: SEGV (/lib/libc.so.6+0x7cac0) 
==122==ABORTING
```

AArch64:
```
# ./a.out 
UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer:DEADLYSIGNAL
==99==ERROR: UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer: SEGV on unknown address 0x000000000063 (pc 0x007fbbbc5860 bp 0x007fcfdcb700 sp 0x007fcfdcb700 T99)
==99==The signal is caused by a UNKNOWN memory access.
==99==Hint: address points to the zero page.
    #0 0x007fbbbc5860  (/lib64/libc.so.6+0x82860)
    #1 0x007fbbb81578  (/lib64/libc.so.6+0x3e578)
    llvm#2 0x00556051152c  (/root/a.out+0x3152c)
    llvm#3 0x007fbbb6e268  (/lib64/libc.so.6+0x2b268)
    llvm#4 0x007fbbb6e344  (/lib64/libc.so.6+0x2b344)
    llvm#5 0x0055604e45ec  (/root/a.out+0x45ec)

==99==Register values:
 x0 = 0x0000000000000000   x1 = 0x0000000000000063   x2 = 0x000000000000000b   x3 = 0x0000007fbbb41440  
 x4 = 0x0000007fbbb41580   x5 = 0x3669288942d44cce   x6 = 0x0000000000000000   x7 = 0x00000055605110b0  
 x8 = 0x0000000000000083   x9 = 0x0000000000000000  x10 = 0x0000000000000000  x11 = 0x0000000000000000  
x12 = 0x0000007fbbdb3360  x13 = 0x0000000000010000  x14 = 0x0000000000000039  x15 = 0x00000000004113a0  
x16 = 0x0000007fbbb81560  x17 = 0x0000005560540138  x18 = 0x000000006474e552  x19 = 0x0000000000000063  
x20 = 0x0000000000000001  x21 = 0x000000000000000b  x22 = 0x0000005560511510  x23 = 0x0000007fcfdcb918  
x24 = 0x0000007fbbdb1b50  x25 = 0x0000000000000000  x26 = 0x0000007fbbdb2000  x27 = 0x000000556053f858  
x28 = 0x0000000000000000   fp = 0x0000007fcfdcb700   lr = 0x0000007fbbbc584c   sp = 0x0000007fcfdcb700  
UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer can not provide additional info.
SUMMARY: UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer: SEGV (/lib64/libc.so.6+0x82860) 
==99==ABORTING
```

```
  UBSan-Standalone-sparc :: TestCases/Misc/Linux/diag-stacktrace.cpp
```
`FAIL`s on 32 and 64-bit Linux/sparc64 (and on Solaris/sparcv9, too: the
test isn't Linux-specific at all). With
`UBSAN_OPTIONS=fast_unwind_on_fatal=1`, the stack trace shows a
duplicate innermost frame:
```
compiler-rt/test/ubsan/TestCases/Misc/Linux/diag-stacktrace.cpp:14:31: runtime error: execution reached the end of a value-returning function without returning a value
    #0 0x7003a708 in f() compiler-rt/test/ubsan/TestCases/Misc/Linux/diag-stacktrace.cpp:14:35
    #1 0x7003a708 in f() compiler-rt/test/ubsan/TestCases/Misc/Linux/diag-stacktrace.cpp:14:35
    llvm#2 0x7003a714 in g() compiler-rt/test/ubsan/TestCases/Misc/Linux/diag-stacktrace.cpp:17:38
```
which isn't seen with `fast_unwind_on_fatal=0`.

This turns out to be another fallout from fixing
`__builtin_return_address`/`__builtin_extract_return_addr` on SPARC. In
`sanitizer_stacktrace_sparc.cpp` (`BufferedStackTrace::UnwindFast`) the
`pc` arg is the return address, while `pc1` from the stack frame
(`fr_savpc`) is the address of the `call` insn, leading to a double
entry for the innermost frame in `trace_buffer[]`.

This patch fixes this by moving the adjustment before all uses.

Tested on `sparc64-unknown-linux-gnu` and `sparcv9-sun-solaris2.11`
(with the `ubsan/TestCases/Misc/Linux` tests enabled).

When compiling for an SVE target we can use INDEX to generate constant
fixed-length step vectors, e.g.:
```
uint32x4_t foo() {
  return (uint32x4_t){0, 1, 2, 3};
}
```
Currently:
```
foo():
        adrp    x8, .LCPI1_0
        ldr     q0, [x8, :lo12:.LCPI1_0]
        ret
```
With INDEX:
```
foo():
        index   z0.s, #0, #1
        ret
```

The logic for this was already in `LowerBUILD_VECTOR`, though it was
hidden under a check for `!Subtarget->isNeonAvailable()`. This patch
refactors this to enable the corresponding code path unconditionally for
constant step vectors (as long as we can use SVE for them).

…ates explicitly specialized for an implicitly instantiated class template specialization (llvm#113464)

Consider the following:
```
template<typename T>
struct A {
  template<typename U>
  struct B {
    static constexpr int x = 0; // #1
  };

  template<typename U>
  struct B<U*> {
    static constexpr int x = 1; // llvm#2
  };
};

template<>
template<typename U>
struct A<long>::B {
  static constexpr int x = 2; // llvm#3
};

static_assert(A<short>::B<int>::y == 0); // uses #1
static_assert(A<short>::B<int*>::y == 1); // uses llvm#2

static_assert(A<long>::B<int>::y == 2); // uses llvm#3
static_assert(A<long>::B<int*>::y == 2); // uses llvm#3
```

According to [temp.spec.partial.member] p2:
> If the primary member template is explicitly specialized for a given
(implicit) specialization of the enclosing class template, the partial
specializations of the member template are ignored for this
specialization of the enclosing class template.
If a partial specialization of the member template is explicitly
specialized for a given (implicit) specialization of the enclosing class
template, the primary member template and its other partial
specializations are still considered for this specialization of the
enclosing class template.

The example above fails to compile because we currently don't implement
[temp.spec.partial.member] p2. This patch implements the wording, fixing llvm#51051.

We've found that basic profiling could help improving/optimizing when
developing clang-tidy checks.

This PR adds an extra command
```
set enable-profile (true|false)   Set whether to enable matcher profiling.
```
which enables profiling queries on each file.

Sample output:

```
$ cat test.cql
set enable-profile true
m binaryOperator(isExpansionInMainFile())

$ cat test.c
int test(int i, int j) {
  return i + j;
}

$ clang-query --track-memory -f test.cql test.c --

Match #1:

{{.*}}/test.c:2:10: note: "root" binds here
    2 |   return i + j;
      |          ^~~~~
1 match.
===-------------------------------------------------------------------------===
                         clang-query matcher profiling
===-------------------------------------------------------------------------===
  Total Execution Time: 0.0000 seconds (0.0000 wall clock)

   ---User Time---   --System Time--   --User+System--   ---Wall Time---  ---Mem---  --- Name ---
   0.0000 (100.0%)   0.0000 (100.0%)   0.0000 (100.0%)   0.0000 (100.0%)        224  {{.*}}/test.c
   0.0000 (100.0%)   0.0000 (100.0%)   0.0000 (100.0%)   0.0000 (100.0%)        224  Total
```

This will be sent by Arm's Guarded Control Stack extension when an
invalid return is executed.

The signal does have an address we could show, but it's the PC at which
the fault occured. The debugger has plenty of ways to show you that
already, so I've left it out.

```
(lldb) c
Process 460 resuming
Process 460 stopped
* thread #1, name = 'test', stop reason = signal SIGSEGV: control protection fault
    frame #0: 0x0000000000400784 test`main at main.c:57:1
   54  	  afunc();
   55  	  printf("return from main\n");
   56  	  return 0;
-> 57  	}
(lldb) dis
<...>
->  0x400784 <+100>: ret
```

The new test case generates the signal by corrupting the link register
then attempting to return. This will work whether we manually enable GCS
or the C library does it for us.

(in the former case you could just return from main and it would fault)

llvm#123877)

Reverts llvm#122811 due to buildbot breakage e.g.,
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/52/builds/5421/steps/11/logs/stdio

ASan output from local re-run:
```
==2780289==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: use-after-poison on address 0x7e0b87e28d28 at pc 0x55a979a99e7e bp 0x7ffe4b18f0b0 sp 0x7ffe4b18f0a8
READ of size 1 at 0x7e0b87e28d28 thread T0
    #0 0x55a979a99e7d in getStorageClass /usr/local/google/home/thurston/buildbot_repro/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/Object/COFF.h:344
    #1 0x55a979a99e7d in isSectionDefinition /usr/local/google/home/thurston/buildbot_repro/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/Object/COFF.h:429:9
    llvm#2 0x55a979a99e7d in getSymbols /usr/local/google/home/thurston/buildbot_repro/llvm-project/lld/COFF/LLDMapFile.cpp:54:42
    llvm#3 0x55a979a99e7d in lld::coff::writeLLDMapFile(lld::coff::COFFLinkerContext const&) /usr/local/google/home/thurston/buildbot_repro/llvm-project/lld/COFF/LLDMapFile.cpp:103:40
    llvm#4 0x55a979a16879 in (anonymous namespace)::Writer::run() /usr/local/google/home/thurston/buildbot_repro/llvm-project/lld/COFF/Writer.cpp:810:3
    llvm#5 0x55a979a00aac in lld::coff::writeResult(lld::coff::COFFLinkerContext&) /usr/local/google/home/thurston/buildbot_repro/llvm-project/lld/COFF/Writer.cpp:354:15
    llvm#6 0x55a97985f7ed in lld::coff::LinkerDriver::linkerMain(llvm::ArrayRef<char const*>) /usr/local/google/home/thurston/buildbot_repro/llvm-project/lld/COFF/Driver.cpp:2826:3
    llvm#7 0x55a97984cdd3 in lld::coff::link(llvm::ArrayRef<char const*>, llvm::raw_ostream&, llvm::raw_ostream&, bool, bool) /usr/local/google/home/thurston/buildbot_repro/llvm-project/lld/COFF/Driver.cpp:97:15
    llvm#8 0x55a9797f9793 in lld::unsafeLldMain(llvm::ArrayRef<char const*>, llvm::raw_ostream&, llvm::raw_ostream&, llvm::ArrayRef<lld::DriverDef>, bool) /usr/local/google/home/thurston/buildbot_repro/llvm-project/lld/Common/DriverDispatcher.cpp:163:12
    llvm#9 0x55a9797fa3b6 in operator() /usr/local/google/home/thurston/buildbot_repro/llvm-project/lld/Common/DriverDispatcher.cpp:188:15
    llvm#10 0x55a9797fa3b6 in void llvm::function_ref<void ()>::callback_fn<lld::lldMain(llvm::ArrayRef<char const*>, llvm::raw_ostream&, llvm::raw_ostream&, llvm::ArrayRef<lld::DriverDef>)::$_0>(long) /usr/local/google/home/thurston/buildbot_repro/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLFunctionalExtras.h:46:12
    llvm#11 0x55a97966cb93 in operator() /usr/local/google/home/thurston/buildbot_repro/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLFunctionalExtras.h:69:12
    llvm#12 0x55a97966cb93 in llvm::CrashRecoveryContext::RunSafely(llvm::function_ref<void ()>) /usr/local/google/home/thurston/buildbot_repro/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Support/CrashRecoveryContext.cpp:426:3
    llvm#13 0x55a9797f9dc3 in lld::lldMain(llvm::ArrayRef<char const*>, llvm::raw_ostream&, llvm::raw_ostream&, llvm::ArrayRef<lld::DriverDef>) /usr/local/google/home/thurston/buildbot_repro/llvm-project/lld/Common/DriverDispatcher.cpp:187:14
    llvm#14 0x55a979627512 in lld_main(int, char**, llvm::ToolContext const&) /usr/local/google/home/thurston/buildbot_repro/llvm-project/lld/tools/lld/lld.cpp:103:14
    llvm#15 0x55a979628731 in main /usr/local/google/home/thurston/buildbot_repro/llvm_build_asan/tools/lld/tools/lld/lld-driver.cpp:17:10
    llvm#16 0x7ffb8b202c89 in __libc_start_call_main csu/../sysdeps/nptl/libc_start_call_main.h:58:16
    llvm#17 0x7ffb8b202d44 in __libc_start_main csu/../csu/libc-start.c:360:3
    llvm#18 0x55a97953ef60 in _start (/usr/local/google/home/thurston/buildbot_repro/llvm_build_asan/bin/lld+0x8fd1f60)
```

Prevents avoidable memory leaks.

Looks like exchange added in aa1333a
didn't take "continue" into account.

```
==llc==2150782==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
Direct leak of 10 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
    #0 0x5f1b0f9ac14a in strdup llvm-project/compiler-rt/lib/asan/asan_interceptors.cpp:593:3
    #1 0x5f1b1768428d in FileToRemoveList llvm-project/llvm/lib/Support/Unix/Signals.inc:105:55
```

…ible (llvm#123752)

This patch adds a new option `-aarch64-enable-zpr-predicate-spills`
(which is disabled by default), this option replaces predicate spills
with vector spills in streaming[-compatible] functions.

For example:

```
str	p8, [sp, llvm#7, mul vl]            // 2-byte Folded Spill
// ...
ldr	p8, [sp, llvm#7, mul vl]            // 2-byte Folded Reload
```

Becomes:

```
mov	z0.b, p8/z, #1
str	z0, [sp]                        // 16-byte Folded Spill
// ...
ldr	z0, [sp]                        // 16-byte Folded Reload
ptrue	p4.b
cmpne	p8.b, p4/z, z0.b, #0
```

This is done to avoid streaming memory hazards between FPR/vector and
predicate spills, which currently occupy the same stack area even when
the `-aarch64-stack-hazard-size` flag is set.

This is implemented with two new pseudos SPILL_PPR_TO_ZPR_SLOT_PSEUDO
and FILL_PPR_FROM_ZPR_SLOT_PSEUDO. The expansion of these pseudos
handles scavenging the required registers (z0 in the above example) and,
in the worst case spilling a register to an emergency stack slot in the
expansion. The condition flags are also preserved around the `cmpne` in
case they are live at the expansion point.

…StrictPackMatch field (llvm#126215)

This addresses the MSAN failure reported
in
llvm#125791 (comment):
```
==5633==WARNING: MemorySanitizer: use-of-uninitialized-value
    #0 in clang::ASTNodeImporter::CallOverloadedCreateFun<clang::ClassTemplateSpecializationDecl>::operator()
    #1 in bool clang::ASTNodeImporter::GetImportedOrCreateSpecialDecl<...>
...
```

The ASTImporter reads `D->hasStrictPackMatch()` and forwards it to the
constructor of the destination `ClassTemplateSpecializationDecl`. But if
`D` is a decl that LLDB created from debug-info, it would've been
created using `ClassTemplateSpecializationDecl::CreateDeserialized`,
which doesn't initialize the `StrictPackMatch` field.

This patch just initializes the field to a fixed value of `false`, to
preserve previous behaviour and avoid the use-of-uninitialized-value.

An alternative would be to always initialize it in the
`ClassTemplateSpecializationDecl` constructor, but there were
reservations about providing a default value for it because it might
lead to hard-to-diagnose problems down the line.

We can't guaranty that underlying string is
0-terminated and [String.size()] is even in the
same allocation.


https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/94/builds/4152/steps/17/logs/stdio
```
==c-index-test==1846256==WARNING: MemorySanitizer: use-of-uninitialized-value
    #0  in clang::cxstring::createRef(llvm::StringRef) llvm-project/clang/tools/libclang/CXString.cpp:96:36
    #1  in DumpCXCommentInternal llvm-project/clang/tools/c-index-test/c-index-test.c:521:39
    llvm#2  in DumpCXCommentInternal llvm-project/clang/tools/c-index-test/c-index-test.c:674:7
    llvm#3  in DumpCXCommentInternal llvm-project/clang/tools/c-index-test/c-index-test.c:674:7
    llvm#4  in DumpCXComment llvm-project/clang/tools/c-index-test/c-index-test.c:685:3
    llvm#5  in PrintCursorComments llvm-project/clang/tools/c-index-test/c-index-test.c:768:7

  Memory was marked as uninitialized
    #0  in __msan_allocated_memory llvm-project/compiler-rt/lib/msan/msan_interceptors.cpp:1023:5
    #1  in Allocate llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/Support/Allocator.h:172:7
    llvm#2  in Allocate llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/Support/Allocator.h:216:12
    llvm#3  in Allocate llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/Support/AllocatorBase.h:53:43
    llvm#4  in Allocate<char> llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/Support/AllocatorBase.h:76:29
    llvm#5  in convertCodePointToUTF8 llvm-project/clang/lib/AST/CommentLexer.cpp:42:30
    llvm#6  in clang::comments::Lexer::resolveHTMLDecimalCharacterReference(llvm::StringRef) const llvm-project/clang/lib/AST/CommentLexer.cpp:76:10
    llvm#7  in clang::comments::Lexer::lexHTMLCharacterReference(clang::comments::Token&) llvm-project/clang/lib/AST/CommentLexer.cpp:615:16
    llvm#8  in consumeToken llvm-project/clang/include/clang/AST/CommentParser.h:62:9
    llvm#9  in clang::comments::Parser::parseParagraphOrBlockCommand() llvm-project/clang/lib/AST/CommentParser.cpp
    llvm#10 in clang::comments::Parser::parseFullComment() llvm-project/clang/lib/AST/CommentParser.cpp:925:22
    llvm#11 in clang::RawComment::parse(clang::ASTContext const&, clang::Preprocessor const*, clang::Decl const*) const llvm-project/clang/lib/AST/RawCommentList.cpp:221:12
    llvm#12 in clang::ASTContext::getCommentForDecl(clang::Decl const*, clang::Preprocessor const*) const llvm-project/clang/lib/AST/ASTContext.cpp:714:35
    llvm#13 in clang_Cursor_getParsedComment llvm-project/clang/tools/libclang/CXComment.cpp:36:35
    llvm#14 in PrintCursorComments llvm-project/clang/tools/c-index-test/c-index-test.c:756:25
 ```

Reverts llvm#125020


https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/24/builds/5252/steps/12/logs/stdio

```
==c-index-test==2512295==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: heap-use-after-free on address 0xe19338c27992 at pc 0xc66be4784830 bp 0xe0e33660df00 sp 0xe0e33660d6e8
READ of size 23 at 0xe19338c27992 thread T1
    #0 0xc66be478482c in printf_common(void*, char const*, std::__va_list) /home/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-asan/build/llvm-project/compiler-rt/lib/asan/../sanitizer_common/sanitizer_common_interceptors_format.inc:563:9
    #1 0xc66be478643c in vprintf /home/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-asan/build/llvm-project/compiler-rt/lib/asan/../sanitizer_common/sanitizer_common_interceptors.inc:1699:1
    llvm#2 0xc66be478643c in printf /home/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-asan/build/llvm-project/compiler-rt/lib/asan/../sanitizer_common/sanitizer_common_interceptors.inc:1757:1
    llvm#3 0xc66be4839384 in FilteredPrintingVisitor /home/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-asan/build/llvm-project/clang/tools/c-index-test/c-index-test.c:1359:5
    llvm#4 0xe4e3454f12e8 in clang::cxcursor::CursorVisitor::Visit(CXCursor, bool) /home/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-asan/build/llvm-project/clang/tools/libclang/CIndex.cpp:227:11
    llvm#5 0xe4e3454f48a8 in bool clang::cxcursor::CursorVisitor::visitPreprocessedEntities<clang::PreprocessingRecord::iterator>(clang::PreprocessingRecord::iterator, clang::PreprocessingRecord::iterator, clang::PreprocessingRecord&, clang::FileID) CIndex.cpp
    
0xe19338c27992 is located 82 bytes inside of 105-byte region [0xe19338c27940,0xe19338c279a9)
freed by thread T1 here:
    #0 0xc66be480040c in free /home/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-asan/build/llvm-project/compiler-rt/lib/asan/asan_malloc_linux.cpp:51:3
    #1 0xc66be4839728 in GetCursorSource c-index-test.c
    llvm#2 0xc66be4839368 in FilteredPrintingVisitor /home/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-asan/build/llvm-project/clang/tools/c-index-test/c-index-test.c:1360:12
    llvm#3 0xe4e3454f12e8 in clang::cxcursor::CursorVisitor::Visit(CXCursor, bool) /home/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-asan/build/llvm-project/clang/tools/libclang/CIndex.cpp:227:11
    llvm#4 0xe4e3454f48a8 in bool clang::cxcursor::CursorVisitor::visitPreprocessedEntities<clang::PreprocessingRecord::iterator>(clang::PreprocessingRecord::iterator, clang::PreprocessingRecord::iterator, clang::PreprocessingRecord&, clang::FileID) CIndex.cpp


previously allocated by thread T1 here:
    #0 0xc66be4800680 in malloc /home/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-asan/build/llvm-project/compiler-rt/lib/asan/asan_malloc_linux.cpp:67:3
    #1 0xe4e3456379b0 in safe_malloc /home/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-asan/build/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/Support/MemAlloc.h:26:18
    llvm#2 0xe4e3456379b0 in createDup /home/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-asan/build/llvm-project/clang/tools/libclang/CXString.cpp:95:40
    llvm#3 0xe4e3456379b0 in clang::cxstring::createRef(llvm::StringRef) /home/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-asan/build/llvm-project/clang/tools/libclang/CXString.cpp:90:10
```

…127087)

Fixes the following crash in clang-repl

```c++
clang-repl> try { throw 1; } catch { 0; }
In file included from <<< inputs >>>:1:
input_line_1:1:23: error: expected '('
    1 | try { throw 1; } catch { 0; }
      |                       ^
      |                       (
clang-repl: /home/vipul-cariappa/Documents/Workspace/cpp-py/llvms/llvm-project-a/clang/lib/AST/DeclBase.cpp:1757: void clang::DeclContext::addHiddenDecl(clang::Decl*): Assertion `D->getLexicalDeclContext() == this && "Decl inserted into wrong lexical context"' failed.
 #0 0x000059b28459e6da llvm::sys::PrintStackTrace(llvm::raw_ostream&, int) /home/vipul-cariappa/Documents/Workspace/cpp-py/llvms/llvm-project-a/llvm/lib/Support/Unix/Signals.inc:804:22
 #1 0x000059b28459eaed PrintStackTraceSignalHandler(void*) /home/vipul-cariappa/Documents/Workspace/cpp-py/llvms/llvm-project-a/llvm/lib/Support/Unix/Signals.inc:880:1
 llvm#2 0x000059b28459bf7f llvm::sys::RunSignalHandlers() /home/vipul-cariappa/Documents/Workspace/cpp-py/llvms/llvm-project-a/llvm/lib/Support/Signals.cpp:105:20
 llvm#3 0x000059b28459df8e SignalHandler(int, siginfo_t*, void*) /home/vipul-cariappa/Documents/Workspace/cpp-py/llvms/llvm-project-a/llvm/lib/Support/Unix/Signals.inc:418:13
 llvm#4 0x000077cdf444ea50 (/usr/lib/libc.so.6+0x42a50)
 llvm#5 0x000077cdf44aee3b pthread_kill (/usr/lib/libc.so.6+0xa2e3b)
 llvm#6 0x000077cdf444e928 raise (/usr/lib/libc.so.6+0x42928)
 llvm#7 0x000077cdf443156c abort (/usr/lib/libc.so.6+0x2556c)
 llvm#8 0x000077cdf44314d2 __assert_perror_fail (/usr/lib/libc.so.6+0x254d2)
 llvm#9 0x000077cdf4444c56 (/usr/lib/libc.so.6+0x38c56)
llvm#10 0x000059b28495bfc4 clang::DeclContext::addHiddenDecl(clang::Decl*) /home/vipul-cariappa/Documents/Workspace/cpp-py/llvms/llvm-project-a/clang/lib/AST/DeclBase.cpp:1759:3
llvm#11 0x000059b28495c0f5 clang::DeclContext::addDecl(clang::Decl*) /home/vipul-cariappa/Documents/Workspace/cpp-py/llvms/llvm-project-a/clang/lib/AST/DeclBase.cpp:1785:37
llvm#12 0x000059b28773cc2a clang::Sema::ActOnStartTopLevelStmtDecl(clang::Scope*) /home/vipul-cariappa/Documents/Workspace/cpp-py/llvms/llvm-project-a/clang/lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp:20302:18
llvm#13 0x000059b286f1efdf clang::Parser::ParseTopLevelStmtDecl() /home/vipul-cariappa/Documents/Workspace/cpp-py/llvms/llvm-project-a/clang/lib/Parse/ParseDecl.cpp:6024:62
llvm#14 0x000059b286ef18ee clang::Parser::ParseExternalDeclaration(clang::ParsedAttributes&, clang::ParsedAttributes&, clang::ParsingDeclSpec*) /home/vipul-cariappa/Documents/Workspace/cpp-py/llvms/llvm-project-a/clang/lib/Parse/Parser.cpp:1065:35
llvm#15 0x000059b286ef0702 clang::Parser::ParseTopLevelDecl(clang::OpaquePtr<clang::DeclGroupRef>&, clang::Sema::ModuleImportState&) /home/vipul-cariappa/Documents/Workspace/cpp-py/llvms/llvm-project-a/clang/lib/Parse/Parser.cpp:758:36
llvm#16 0x000059b28562dff2 clang::IncrementalParser::ParseOrWrapTopLevelDecl() /home/vipul-cariappa/Documents/Workspace/cpp-py/llvms/llvm-project-a/clang/lib/Interpreter/IncrementalParser.cpp:66:36
llvm#17 0x000059b28562e5b7 clang::IncrementalParser::Parse(llvm::StringRef) /home/vipul-cariappa/Documents/Workspace/cpp-py/llvms/llvm-project-a/clang/lib/Interpreter/IncrementalParser.cpp:132:8
llvm#18 0x000059b28561832b clang::Interpreter::Parse(llvm::StringRef) /home/vipul-cariappa/Documents/Workspace/cpp-py/llvms/llvm-project-a/clang/lib/Interpreter/Interpreter.cpp:570:8
llvm#19 0x000059b285618cbd clang::Interpreter::ParseAndExecute(llvm::StringRef, clang::Value*) /home/vipul-cariappa/Documents/Workspace/cpp-py/llvms/llvm-project-a/clang/lib/Interpreter/Interpreter.cpp:649:8
llvm#20 0x000059b2836f9343 main /home/vipul-cariappa/Documents/Workspace/cpp-py/llvms/llvm-project-a/clang/tools/clang-repl/ClangRepl.cpp:255:59
llvm#21 0x000077cdf443388e (/usr/lib/libc.so.6+0x2788e)
llvm#22 0x000077cdf443394a __libc_start_main (/usr/lib/libc.so.6+0x2794a)
llvm#23 0x000059b2836f7965 _start (./bin/clang-repl+0x73b8965)
fish: Job 1, './bin/clang-repl' terminated by signal SIGABRT (Abort)
```

With this change:
```c++
clang-repl> try { throw 1; } catch { 0; }
In file included from <<< inputs >>>:1:
input_line_1:1:23: error: expected '('
    1 | try { throw 1; } catch { 0; }
      |                       ^
      |                       (
error: Parsing failed.
clang-repl> 1;
clang-repl> %quit
```

For function declarations (i.e. func op has no entry block), the
FunctionOpInterface method `insertArgument` and `eraseArgument` will
cause segfault. This PR guards against manipulation of empty entry block
by checking whether func op is external.

An example can be seen in google/heir#1324

The segfault trace

```
 #1 0x0000560f1289d9db PrintStackTraceSignalHandler(void*) /proc/self/cwd/external/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Support/Unix/Signals.inc:874:1
 llvm#2 0x0000560f1289b116 llvm::sys::RunSignalHandlers() /proc/self/cwd/external/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Support/Signals.cpp:105:5
 llvm#3 0x0000560f1289e145 SignalHandler(int) /proc/self/cwd/external/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Support/Unix/Signals.inc:415:1
 llvm#4 0x00007f829a3d9520 (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x42520)
 llvm#5 0x0000560f1257f8bc void __gnu_cxx::new_allocator<mlir::BlockArgument>::construct<mlir::BlockArgument, mlir::BlockArgument>(mlir::BlockArgument*, mlir::BlockArgument&&) /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/11/../../../../include/c++/11/ext/new_allocator.h:162:23
 llvm#6 0x0000560f1257f84d void std::allocator_traits<std::allocator<mlir::BlockArgument> >::construct<mlir::BlockArgument, mlir::BlockArgument>(std::allocator<mlir::BlockArgument>&, mlir::BlockArgument*, mlir::BlockArgument&&) /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/11/../../../../include/c++/11/bits/alloc_traits.h:520:2
 llvm#7 0x0000560f12580498 void std::vector<mlir::BlockArgument, std::allocator<mlir::BlockArgument> >::_M_insert_aux<mlir::BlockArgument>(__gnu_cxx::__normal_iterator<mlir::BlockArgument*, std::vector<mlir::BlockArgument, std::allocator<mlir::BlockArgument> > >, mlir::BlockArgument&&) /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/11/../../../../include/c++/11/bits/vector.tcc:405:7
 llvm#8 0x0000560f1257cf7e std::vector<mlir::BlockArgument, std::allocator<mlir::BlockArgument> >::insert(__gnu_cxx::__normal_iterator<mlir::BlockArgument const*, std::vector<mlir::BlockArgument, std::allocator<mlir::BlockArgument> > >, mlir::BlockArgument const&) /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/11/../../../../include/c++/11/bits/vector.tcc:154:6
 llvm#9 0x0000560f1257b349 mlir::Block::insertArgument(unsigned int, mlir::Type, mlir::Location) /proc/self/cwd/external/llvm-project/mlir/lib/IR/Block.cpp:178:13
llvm#10 0x0000560f123d2a1c mlir::function_interface_impl::insertFunctionArguments(mlir::FunctionOpInterface, llvm::ArrayRef<unsigned int>, mlir::TypeRange, llvm::ArrayRef<mlir::DictionaryAttr>, llvm::ArrayRef<mlir::Location>, unsigned int, mlir::Type) /proc/self/cwd/external/llvm-project/mlir/lib/Interfaces/FunctionInterfaces.cpp:232:11
llvm#11 0x0000560f0be6b727 mlir::detail::FunctionOpInterfaceTrait<mlir::func::FuncOp>::insertArguments(llvm::ArrayRef<unsigned int>, mlir::TypeRange, llvm::ArrayRef<mlir::DictionaryAttr>, llvm::ArrayRef<mlir::Location>) /proc/self/cwd/bazel-out/k8-dbg/bin/external/llvm-project/mlir/include/mlir/Interfaces/FunctionInterfaces.h.inc:809:7
llvm#12 0x0000560f0be6b536 mlir::detail::FunctionOpInterfaceTrait<mlir::func::FuncOp>::insertArgument(unsigned int, mlir::Type, mlir::DictionaryAttr, mlir::Location) /proc/self/cwd/bazel-out/k8-dbg/bin/external/llvm-project/mlir/include/mlir/Interfaces/FunctionInterfaces.h.inc:796:7
```

When compiling VLS SVE, the compiler often replaces VL-based offsets
with immediate-based ones. This leads to a mismatch in the allowed
addressing modes due to SVE loads/stores generally expecting immediate
offsets relative to VL. For example, given:
```c

svfloat64_t foo(const double *x) {
  svbool_t pg = svptrue_b64();
  return svld1_f64(pg, x+svcntd());
}
```

When compiled with `-msve-vector-bits=128`, we currently generate:
```gas
foo:
        ptrue   p0.d
        mov     x8, llvm#2
        ld1d    { z0.d }, p0/z, [x0, x8, lsl llvm#3]
        ret
```

Instead, we could be generating:
```gas
foo:
        ldr     z0, [x0, #1, mul vl]
        ret
```

Likewise for other types, stores, and other VLS lengths.

This patch achieves the above by extending `SelectAddrModeIndexedSVE`
to let constants through when `vscale` is known.

`TestReportData.py` is failing on the macOS CI with:
```
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/Users/ec2-user/jenkins/workspace/llvm.org/lldb-cmake/llvm-project/lldb/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/lldbtest.py", line 1784, in test_method
    return attrvalue(self)
  File "/Users/ec2-user/jenkins/workspace/llvm.org/lldb-cmake/llvm-project/lldb/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/decorators.py", line 148, in wrapper
    return func(*args, **kwargs)
  File "/Users/ec2-user/jenkins/workspace/llvm.org/lldb-cmake/llvm-project/lldb/test/API/functionalities/asan/TestReportData.py", line 28, in test_libsanitizers_asan
    self.asan_tests(libsanitizers=True)
  File "/Users/ec2-user/jenkins/workspace/llvm.org/lldb-cmake/llvm-project/lldb/test/API/functionalities/asan/TestReportData.py", line 60, in asan_tests
    self.expect(
  File "/Users/ec2-user/jenkins/workspace/llvm.org/lldb-cmake/llvm-project/lldb/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/lldbtest.py", line 2490, in expect
    self.fail(log_msg)
AssertionError: Ran command:
"thread list"

Got output:
Process 3474 stopped
* thread #1: tid = 0x38b5e9, 0x00007ff80f563b52 libsystem_kernel.dylib`__pthread_kill + 10, queue = 'com.apple.main-thread', stop reason = signal SIGABRT

Expecting sub string: "stopped" (was found)
Expecting sub string: "stop reason = Use of deallocated memory" (was not found)
Process should be stopped due to ASan report
```

There isn't much to go off of in the log, so adding more to help us debug this.

These are macOS tests only and are currently failing on the x86_64 CI
and on arm64 on recent versions of macOS/Xcode.

The tests are failing because we're stopping in:
```
Process 17458 stopped
* thread #1: tid = 0xbda69a, 0x00000002735bd000
  libsystem_malloc.dylib`purgeable_print_self.cold.1, stop reason = EXC_BREAKPOINT (code=1, subcode=0x2735bd000)
```
instead of the libsanitizers library. This seems to be related to
`-fsanitize-trivial-abi` support

Skip these for now until we figure out the root cause.

… pointers (llvm#132261)

Currently, the helpers to get fir::ExtendedValue out of hlfir::Entity
use hlfir.declare second result (`#1`) in most cases. This is because
this result is the same as the input and matches what FIR was getting
before lowering to HLFIR.

But this creates odd situations when both hlfir.declare are raw pointers
and either result ends-up being used in the IR depending on whether the
code was generated by a helper using fir::ExtendedValue, or via "pure
HLFIR" helpers using the first result.

This will typically prevent simple CSE and easy identification that two
operation (e.g load/store) are touching the exact same memory location
without using alias analysis or "manual detection" (looking for common
hlfir.declare defining op).

Hence, when hlfir.declare results are both raw pointers, use `#0` when
producing `fir::ExtendedValue`.
When `#0` is a fir.box, keep using `#1` because these are not the same. 
The only code change is in HLFIRTools.cpp and is pretty small, but there
is a big test fallout of `#1` to `#0`.

…too. (llvm#132267)

Observed in Wine when trying to intercept `ExitThread`, which forwards
to `ntdll.RtlExitUserThread`.

`gdb` interprets it as `xchg %ax,%ax`.
`llvm-mc` outputs simply `nop`.

```
==Asan-i386-calls-Dynamic-Test.exe==964==interception_win: unhandled instruction at 0x7be27cf0: 66 90 55 89 e5 56 50 8b
```

```
Wine-gdb> bt
#0  0x789a1766 in __interception::GetInstructionSize (address=<optimized out>, rel_offset=<optimized out>) at C:/llvm-mingw/llvm-mingw/llvm-project/compiler-rt/lib/interception/interception_win.cpp:983
#1  0x789ab480 in __sanitizer::SharedPrintfCode(bool, char const*, char*) () at C:/llvm-mingw/llvm-mingw/llvm-project/compiler-rt/lib/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_printf.cpp:311
llvm#2  0x789a18e7 in __interception::OverrideFunctionWithHotPatch (old_func=2078440688, new_func=2023702608, orig_old_func=warning: (Internal error: pc 0x792f1a2c in read in CU, but not in symtab.)warning: (Error: pc 0x792f1a2c in address map, but not in symtab.)0x792f1a2c) at C:/llvm-mingw/llvm-mingw/llvm-project/compiler-rt/lib/interception/interception_win.cpp:1118
llvm#3  0x789a1f34 in __interception::OverrideFunction (old_func=2078440688, new_func=2023702608, orig_old_func=warning: (Internal error: pc 0x792f1a2c in read in CU, but not in symtab.)warning: (Error: pc 0x792f1a2c in address map, but not in symtab.)0x792f1a2c) at C:/llvm-mingw/llvm-mingw/llvm-project/compiler-rt/lib/interception/interception_win.cpp:1224
llvm#4  0x789a24ce in __interception::OverrideFunction (func_name=0x78a0bc43 <vtable for __asan::AsanThreadContext+1163> "ExitThread", new_func=2023702608, orig_old_func=warning: (Internal error: pc 0x792f1a2c in read in CU, but not in symtab.)warning: (Error: pc 0x792f1a2c in address map, but not in symtab.)0x792f1a2c)    at C:/llvm-mingw/llvm-mingw/llvm-project/compiler-rt/lib/interception/interception_win.cpp:1369
llvm#5  0x789f40ef in __asan::InitializePlatformInterceptors () at C:/llvm-mingw/llvm-mingw/llvm-project/compiler-rt/lib/asan/asan_win.cpp:190
llvm#6  0x789e0c3c in __asan::InitializeAsanInterceptors () at C:/llvm-mingw/llvm-mingw/llvm-project/compiler-rt/lib/asan/asan_interceptors.cpp:802
llvm#7  0x789ee6b5 in __asan::AsanInitInternal () at C:/llvm-mingw/llvm-mingw/llvm-project/compiler-rt/lib/asan/asan_rtl.cpp:442
llvm#8  0x789eefb0 in __asan::AsanInitFromRtl () at C:/llvm-mingw/llvm-mingw/llvm-project/compiler-rt/lib/asan/asan_rtl.cpp:522
llvm#9  __asan::AsanInitializer::AsanInitializer (this=<optimized out>) at C:/llvm-mingw/llvm-mingw/llvm-project/compiler-rt/lib/asan/asan_rtl.cpp:542
llvm#10 __cxx_global_var_init () at C:/llvm-mingw/llvm-mingw/llvm-project/compiler-rt/lib/asan/asan_rtl.cpp:546
...
Wine-gdb> disassemble /r 2078440688,2078440688+20
Dump of assembler code from 0x7be27cf0 to 0x7be27d04:
   0x7be27cf0 <_RtlExitUserThread@4+0>: 66 90                   xchg   %ax,%ax
...
```

…d A520 (llvm#132246)

Inefficient SVE codegen occurs on at least two in-order cores,
those being Cortex-A510 and Cortex-A520. For example a simple vector
add

```
void foo(float a, float b, float dst, unsigned n) {
    for (unsigned i = 0; i < n; ++i)
        dst[i] = a[i] + b[i];
}
```

Vectorizes the inner loop into the following interleaved sequence
of instructions.

```
        add     x12, x1, x10
        ld1b    { z0.b }, p0/z, [x1, x10]
        add     x13, x2, x10
        ld1b    { z1.b }, p0/z, [x2, x10]
        ldr     z2, [x12, #1, mul vl]
        ldr     z3, [x13, #1, mul vl]
        dech    x11
        add     x12, x0, x10
        fadd    z0.s, z1.s, z0.s
        fadd    z1.s, z3.s, z2.s
        st1b    { z0.b }, p0, [x0, x10]
        addvl   x10, x10, llvm#2
        str     z1, [x12, #1, mul vl]
```

By adjusting the target features to prefer fixed over scalable if the
cost is equal we get the following vectorized loop.

```
         ldp q0, q3, [x11, #-16]
         subs    x13, x13, llvm#8
         ldp q1, q2, [x10, #-16]
         add x10, x10, llvm#32
         add x11, x11, llvm#32
         fadd    v0.4s, v1.4s, v0.4s
         fadd    v1.4s, v2.4s, v3.4s
         stp q0, q1, [x12, #-16]
         add x12, x12, llvm#32
```

Which is more efficient.

… A510/A520 (llvm#134606)

Recommit. This work was done by llvm#132246 but failed buildbots due to the
test introduced needing updates

Inefficient SVE codegen occurs on at least two in-order cores, those
being Cortex-A510 and Cortex-A520. For example a simple vector add

```
void foo(float a, float b, float dst, unsigned n) {
    for (unsigned i = 0; i < n; ++i)
        dst[i] = a[i] + b[i];
}
```

Vectorizes the inner loop into the following interleaved sequence of
instructions.

```
        add     x12, x1, x10
        ld1b    { z0.b }, p0/z, [x1, x10]
        add     x13, x2, x10
        ld1b    { z1.b }, p0/z, [x2, x10]
        ldr     z2, [x12, #1, mul vl]
        ldr     z3, [x13, #1, mul vl]
        dech    x11
        add     x12, x0, x10
        fadd    z0.s, z1.s, z0.s
        fadd    z1.s, z3.s, z2.s
        st1b    { z0.b }, p0, [x0, x10]
        addvl   x10, x10, llvm#2
        str     z1, [x12, #1, mul vl]
```

By adjusting the target features to prefer fixed over scalable if the
cost is equal we get the following vectorized loop.

```
         ldp q0, q3, [x11, #-16]
         subs    x13, x13, llvm#8
         ldp q1, q2, [x10, #-16]
         add x10, x10, llvm#32
         add x11, x11, llvm#32
         fadd    v0.4s, v1.4s, v0.4s
         fadd    v1.4s, v2.4s, v3.4s
         stp q0, q1, [x12, #-16]
         add x12, x12, llvm#32
```

Which is more efficient.

…s=128. (llvm#134068)

When compiling with -msve-vector-bits=128 or vscale_range(1, 1) and when
the offsets allow it, we can pair SVE LDR/STR instructions into Neon
LDP/STP.

For example, given:
```cpp
#include <arm_sve.h>

void foo(double const *ldp, double *stp) {
  svbool_t pg = svptrue_b64();
  svfloat64_t ld1 = svld1_f64(pg, ldp);
  svfloat64_t ld2 = svld1_f64(pg, ldp+svcntd());
  svst1_f64(pg, stp, ld1);
  svst1_f64(pg, stp+svcntd(), ld2);
}
```

When compiled with `-msve-vector-bits=128`, we currently generate:
```gas
foo:
        ldr     z0, [x0]
        ldr     z1, [x0, #1, mul vl]
        str     z0, [x1]
        str     z1, [x1, #1, mul vl]
        ret
```

With this patch, we instead generate:
```gas
foo:
        ldp     q0, q1, [x0]
        stp     q0, q1, [x1]
        ret
```

This is an alternative, more targetted approach to llvm#127500.

…ctor-bits=128." (llvm#134997)

Reverts llvm#134068

Caused a stage 2 build failure:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/41/builds/6016

```
FAILED: lib/Support/CMakeFiles/LLVMSupport.dir/Caching.cpp.o 
/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-aarch64-sve-vla-2stage/stage1.install/bin/clang++ -DGTEST_HAS_RTTI=0 -D_DEBUG -D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS -D_GNU_SOURCE -D__STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS -D__STDC_FORMAT_MACROS -D__STDC_LIMIT_MACROS -I/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-aarch64-sve-vla-2stage/stage2/lib/Support -I/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-aarch64-sve-vla-2stage/llvm/llvm/lib/Support -I/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-aarch64-sve-vla-2stage/stage2/include -I/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-aarch64-sve-vla-2stage/llvm/llvm/include -mcpu=neoverse-512tvb -mllvm -scalable-vectorization=preferred -mllvm -treat-scalable-fixed-error-as-warning=false -fPIC -fno-semantic-interposition -fvisibility-inlines-hidden -Werror=date-time -Werror=unguarded-availability-new -Wall -Wextra -Wno-unused-parameter -Wwrite-strings -Wcast-qual -Wmissing-field-initializers -pedantic -Wno-long-long -Wc++98-compat-extra-semi -Wimplicit-fallthrough -Wcovered-switch-default -Wno-noexcept-type -Wnon-virtual-dtor -Wdelete-non-virtual-dtor -Wsuggest-override -Wno-comment -Wstring-conversion -Wmisleading-indentation -Wctad-maybe-unsupported -fdiagnostics-color -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -Werror=global-constructors -O3 -DNDEBUG -std=c++17 -UNDEBUG  -fno-exceptions -funwind-tables -fno-rtti -MD -MT lib/Support/CMakeFiles/LLVMSupport.dir/Caching.cpp.o -MF lib/Support/CMakeFiles/LLVMSupport.dir/Caching.cpp.o.d -o lib/Support/CMakeFiles/LLVMSupport.dir/Caching.cpp.o -c /home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-aarch64-sve-vla-2stage/llvm/llvm/lib/Support/Caching.cpp
Opcode has unknown scale!
UNREACHABLE executed at ../llvm/llvm/lib/Target/AArch64/AArch64InstrInfo.cpp:4530!
PLEASE submit a bug report to https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/ and include the crash backtrace, preprocessed source, and associated run script.
Stack dump:
0.	Program arguments: /home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-aarch64-sve-vla-2stage/stage1.install/bin/clang++ -DGTEST_HAS_RTTI=0 -D_DEBUG -D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS -D_GNU_SOURCE -D__STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS -D__STDC_FORMAT_MACROS -D__STDC_LIMIT_MACROS -I/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-aarch64-sve-vla-2stage/stage2/lib/Support -I/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-aarch64-sve-vla-2stage/llvm/llvm/lib/Support -I/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-aarch64-sve-vla-2stage/stage2/include -I/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-aarch64-sve-vla-2stage/llvm/llvm/include -mcpu=neoverse-512tvb -mllvm -scalable-vectorization=preferred -mllvm -treat-scalable-fixed-error-as-warning=false -fPIC -fno-semantic-interposition -fvisibility-inlines-hidden -Werror=date-time -Werror=unguarded-availability-new -Wall -Wextra -Wno-unused-parameter -Wwrite-strings -Wcast-qual -Wmissing-field-initializers -pedantic -Wno-long-long -Wc++98-compat-extra-semi -Wimplicit-fallthrough -Wcovered-switch-default -Wno-noexcept-type -Wnon-virtual-dtor -Wdelete-non-virtual-dtor -Wsuggest-override -Wno-comment -Wstring-conversion -Wmisleading-indentation -Wctad-maybe-unsupported -fdiagnostics-color -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -Werror=global-constructors -O3 -DNDEBUG -std=c++17 -UNDEBUG -fno-exceptions -funwind-tables -fno-rtti -MD -MT lib/Support/CMakeFiles/LLVMSupport.dir/Caching.cpp.o -MF lib/Support/CMakeFiles/LLVMSupport.dir/Caching.cpp.o.d -o lib/Support/CMakeFiles/LLVMSupport.dir/Caching.cpp.o -c /home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-aarch64-sve-vla-2stage/llvm/llvm/lib/Support/Caching.cpp
1.	<eof> parser at end of file
2.	Code generation
3.	Running pass 'Function Pass Manager' on module '/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-aarch64-sve-vla-2stage/llvm/llvm/lib/Support/Caching.cpp'.
4.	Running pass 'AArch64 load / store optimization pass' on function '@"_ZNSt17_Function_handlerIFN4llvm8ExpectedISt8functionIFNS1_ISt10unique_ptrINS0_16CachedFileStreamESt14default_deleteIS4_EEEEjRKNS0_5TwineEEEEEjNS0_9StringRefESB_EZNS0_10localCacheESB_SB_SB_S2_IFvjSB_S3_INS0_12MemoryBufferES5_ISH_EEEEE3$_0E9_M_invokeERKSt9_Any_dataOjOSF_SB_"'
 #0 0x0000b6eae9b67bf0 llvm::sys::PrintStackTrace(llvm::raw_ostream&, int) (/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-aarch64-sve-vla-2stage/stage1.install/bin/clang+++0x81c7bf0)
 #1 0x0000b6eae9b65aec llvm::sys::RunSignalHandlers() (/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-aarch64-sve-vla-2stage/stage1.install/bin/clang+++0x81c5aec)
 llvm#2 0x0000b6eae9acd5f4 CrashRecoverySignalHandler(int) CrashRecoveryContext.cpp:0:0
 llvm#3 0x0000f16c1aff28f8 (linux-vdso.so.1+0x8f8)
 llvm#4 0x0000f16c1aacf1f0 __pthread_kill_implementation ./nptl/pthread_kill.c:44:76
 llvm#5 0x0000f16c1aa8a67c gsignal ./signal/../sysdeps/posix/raise.c:27:6
 llvm#6 0x0000f16c1aa77130 abort ./stdlib/abort.c:81:7
 llvm#7 0x0000b6eae9ad6628 (/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-aarch64-sve-vla-2stage/stage1.install/bin/clang+++0x8136628)
 llvm#8 0x0000b6eae72e95a8 (/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-aarch64-sve-vla-2stage/stage1.install/bin/clang+++0x59495a8)
 llvm#9 0x0000b6eae74ca9a8 (anonymous namespace)::AArch64LoadStoreOpt::findMatchingInsn(llvm::MachineInstrBundleIterator<llvm::MachineInstr, false>, (anonymous namespace)::LdStPairFlags&, unsigned int, bool) AArch64LoadStoreOptimizer.cpp:0:0
llvm#10 0x0000b6eae74c85a8 (anonymous namespace)::AArch64LoadStoreOpt::tryToPairLdStInst(llvm::MachineInstrBundleIterator<llvm::MachineInstr, false>&) AArch64LoadStoreOptimizer.cpp:0:0
llvm#11 0x0000b6eae74c624c (anonymous namespace)::AArch64LoadStoreOpt::optimizeBlock(llvm::MachineBasicBlock&, bool) AArch64LoadStoreOptimizer.cpp:0:0
llvm#12 0x0000b6eae74c429c (anonymous namespace)::AArch64LoadStoreOpt::runOnMachineFunction(llvm::MachineFunction&) AArch64LoadStoreOptimizer.cpp:0:0
```

…vailable (llvm#135343)

When a frame is inlined, LLDB will display its name in backtraces as
follows:
```
* thread #1, queue = 'com.apple.main-thread', stop reason = breakpoint 1.3
  * frame #0: 0x0000000100000398 a.out`func() [inlined] baz(x=10) at inline.cpp:1:42
    frame #1: 0x0000000100000398 a.out`func() [inlined] bar() at inline.cpp:2:37
    frame llvm#2: 0x0000000100000398 a.out`func() at inline.cpp:4:15
    frame llvm#3: 0x00000001000003c0 a.out`main at inline.cpp:7:5
    frame llvm#4: 0x000000026eb29ab8 dyld`start + 6812
```
The longer the names get the more confusing this gets because the first
function name that appears is the parent frame. My assumption (which may
need some more surveying) is that for the majority of cases we only care
about the actual frame name (not the parent). So this patch removes all
the special logic that prints the parent frame.

Another quirk of the current format is that the inlined frame name does
not abide by the `${function.name-XXX}` format variables. We always just
print the raw demangled name. With this patch, we would format the
inlined frame name according to the `frame-format` setting (see the
test-cases).

If we really want to have the `parentFrame [inlined] inlinedFrame`
format, we could expose it through a new `frame-format` variable (e..g.,
`${function.inlined-at-name}` and let the user decide where to place
things.

Currently, given:
```cpp
uint64_t incb(uint64_t x) {
  return x+svcntb();
}
```
LLVM generates:
```gas
incb:
        addvl   x0, x0, #1
        ret
```
Which is equivalent to:
```gas
incb:
        incb    x0
        ret
```

However, on microarchitectures like the Neoverse V2 and Neoverse V3,
the second form (with INCB) can have significantly better latency and
throughput (according to their SWOG). On the Neoverse V2, for example,
ADDVL has a latency and throughput of 2, whereas some forms of INCB
have a latency of 1 and a throughput of 4. The same applies to DECB.
This patch adds patterns to prefer the cheaper INCB/DECB forms over
ADDVL where applicable.

- Avoid dereferencing the end() iterator to get the end pointer, instead
calculate it explicitly
- Fixes a regression introduced in
llvm#136220.
- The windows build failure shows the following call stack:

```
 | Exception Code: 0x80000003
 |  #0 0x00007ff74bc05897 std::_Vector_const_iterator<class std::_Vector_val<struct std::_Simple_types<unsigned char>>>::operator*(void) const C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio\2022\Professional\VC\Tools\MSVC\14.37.32822\include\vector:52:0
 |  #1 0x00007ff74bbd3d64 `anonymous namespace'::DecoderEmitter::emitTable D:\buildbot\llvm-worker\clang-cmake-x86_64-avx512-win\llvm\llvm\utils\TableGen\DecoderEmitter.cpp:852:0
```

… collection (llvm#136795)

Fix a [test
failure](llvm#136236 (comment))
in llvm#136236, apply a minor renaming of statistics, and remerge. See
details below.

# Changes in llvm#136236

Currently, `DebuggerStats::ReportStatistics()` calls
`Module::GetSymtab(/*can_create=*/false)`, but then the latter calls
`SymbolFile::GetSymtab()`. This will load symbols if haven't yet. See
stacktrace below.

The problem is that `DebuggerStats::ReportStatistics` should be
read-only. This is especially important because it reports stats for
symtab parsing/indexing time, which could be affected by the reporting
itself if it's not read-only.

This patch fixes this problem by adding an optional parameter
`SymbolFile::GetSymtab(bool can_create = true)` and receiving the
`false` value passed down from `Module::GetSymtab(/*can_create=*/false)`
when the call is initiated from `DebuggerStats::ReportStatistics()`.

---

Notes about the following stacktrace:
1. This can be reproduced. Create a helloworld program on **macOS** with
dSYM, add `settings set target.preload-symbols false` to `~/.lldbinit`,
do `lldb a.out`, then `statistics dump`.
2. `ObjectFile::GetSymtab` has `llvm::call_once`. So the fact that it
called into `ObjectFileMachO::ParseSymtab` means that the symbol table
is actually being parsed.

```
(lldb) bt
* thread #1, queue = 'com.apple.main-thread', stop reason = step over
    frame #0: 0x0000000124c4d5a0 LLDB`ObjectFileMachO::ParseSymtab(this=0x0000000111504e40, symtab=0x0000600000a05e00) at ObjectFileMachO.cpp:2259:44
  * frame #1: 0x0000000124fc50a0 LLDB`lldb_private::ObjectFile::GetSymtab()::$_0::operator()(this=0x000000016d35c858) const at ObjectFile.cpp:761:9
    frame llvm#5: 0x0000000124fc4e68 LLDB`void std::__1::__call_once_proxy[abi:v160006]<std::__1::tuple<lldb_private::ObjectFile::GetSymtab()::$_0&&>>(__vp=0x000000016d35c7f0) at mutex:652:5
    frame llvm#6: 0x0000000198afb99c libc++.1.dylib`std::__1::__call_once(unsigned long volatile&, void*, void (*)(void*)) + 196
    frame llvm#7: 0x0000000124fc4dd0 LLDB`void std::__1::call_once[abi:v160006]<lldb_private::ObjectFile::GetSymtab()::$_0>(__flag=0x0000600003920080, __func=0x000000016d35c858) at mutex:670:9
    frame llvm#8: 0x0000000124fc3cb0 LLDB`void llvm::call_once<lldb_private::ObjectFile::GetSymtab()::$_0>(flag=0x0000600003920080, F=0x000000016d35c858) at Threading.h:88:5
    frame llvm#9: 0x0000000124fc2bc4 LLDB`lldb_private::ObjectFile::GetSymtab(this=0x0000000111504e40) at ObjectFile.cpp:755:5
    frame llvm#10: 0x0000000124fe0a28 LLDB`lldb_private::SymbolFileCommon::GetSymtab(this=0x0000000104865200) at SymbolFile.cpp:158:39
    frame llvm#11: 0x0000000124d8fedc LLDB`lldb_private::Module::GetSymtab(this=0x00000001113041a8, can_create=false) at Module.cpp:1027:21
    frame llvm#12: 0x0000000125125bdc LLDB`lldb_private::DebuggerStats::ReportStatistics(debugger=0x000000014284d400, target=0x0000000115808200, options=0x000000014195d6d1) at Statistics.cpp:329:30
    frame llvm#13: 0x0000000125672978 LLDB`CommandObjectStatsDump::DoExecute(this=0x000000014195d540, command=0x000000016d35d820, result=0x000000016d35e150) at CommandObjectStats.cpp:144:18
    frame llvm#14: 0x0000000124f29b40 LLDB`lldb_private::CommandObjectParsed::Execute(this=0x000000014195d540, args_string="", result=0x000000016d35e150) at CommandObject.cpp:832:9
    frame llvm#15: 0x0000000124efbd70 LLDB`lldb_private::CommandInterpreter::HandleCommand(this=0x0000000141b22f30, command_line="statistics dump", lazy_add_to_history=eLazyBoolCalculate, result=0x000000016d35e150, force_repeat_command=false) at CommandInterpreter.cpp:2134:14
    frame llvm#16: 0x0000000124f007f4 LLDB`lldb_private::CommandInterpreter::IOHandlerInputComplete(this=0x0000000141b22f30, io_handler=0x00000001419b2aa8, line="statistics dump") at CommandInterpreter.cpp:3251:3
    frame llvm#17: 0x0000000124d7b5ec LLDB`lldb_private::IOHandlerEditline::Run(this=0x00000001419b2aa8) at IOHandler.cpp:588:22
    frame llvm#18: 0x0000000124d1e8fc LLDB`lldb_private::Debugger::RunIOHandlers(this=0x000000014284d400) at Debugger.cpp:1225:16
    frame llvm#19: 0x0000000124f01f74 LLDB`lldb_private::CommandInterpreter::RunCommandInterpreter(this=0x0000000141b22f30, options=0x000000016d35e63c) at CommandInterpreter.cpp:3543:16
    frame llvm#20: 0x0000000122840294 LLDB`lldb::SBDebugger::RunCommandInterpreter(this=0x000000016d35ebd8, auto_handle_events=true, spawn_thread=false) at SBDebugger.cpp:1212:42
    frame llvm#21: 0x0000000102aa6d28 lldb`Driver::MainLoop(this=0x000000016d35ebb8) at Driver.cpp:621:18
    frame llvm#22: 0x0000000102aa75b0 lldb`main(argc=1, argv=0x000000016d35f548) at Driver.cpp:829:26
    frame llvm#23: 0x0000000198858274 dyld`start + 2840
```

# Changes in this PR top of the above

Fix a [test
failure](llvm#136236 (comment))
in `TestStats.py`. The original version of the added test checks that
all modules have symbol count zero when `target.preload-symbols ==
false`. The test failed on macOS. Due to various reasons, on macOS,
symbols can be loaded for dylibs even with that setting, but not for the
main module. For now, the fix of the test is to limit the assertion to
only the main module. The test now passes on macOS. In the future, when
we have a way to control a specific list of plug-ins to be loaded, there
may be a configuration that this test can use to assert that all modules
have symbol count zero.

Apply a minor renaming of statistics, per the
[suggestion](llvm#136226 (comment))
in llvm#136226 after merge.

…mbolConjured" (llvm#137304)

Reverts llvm#128251

ASAN bots reported some errors:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/55/builds/10398
Reverting for investigation.

```
Failed Tests (6):
  Clang :: Analysis/loop-widening-ignore-static-methods.cpp
  Clang :: Analysis/loop-widening-notes.cpp
  Clang :: Analysis/loop-widening-preserve-reference-type.cpp
  Clang :: Analysis/loop-widening.c
  Clang :: Analysis/loop-widening.cpp
  Clang :: Analysis/this-pointer.cpp
Testing Time: 411.55s
Total Discovered Tests: 118563
  Skipped          :     33 (0.03%)
  Unsupported      :   2015 (1.70%)
  Passed           : 116291 (98.08%)
  Expectedly Failed:    218 (0.18%)
  Failed           :      6 (0.01%)
FAILED: CMakeFiles/check-all /home/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-hwasan/build/llvm_build_hwasan/CMakeFiles/check-all 
cd /home/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-hwasan/build/llvm_build_hwasan && /usr/bin/python3 /home/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-hwasan/build/llvm_build_hwasan/./bin/llvm-lit -sv --param USE_Z3_SOLVER=0 /home/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-hwasan/build/llvm_build_hwasan/utils/mlgo-utils /home/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-hwasan/build/llvm_build_hwasan/tools/lld/test /home/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-hwasan/build/llvm_build_hwasan/tools/mlir/test /home/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-hwasan/build/llvm_build_hwasan/tools/clang/test /home/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-hwasan/build/llvm_build_hwasan/utils/lit /home/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-hwasan/build/llvm_build_hwasan/test
ninja: build stopped: subcommand failed.
```

```
/home/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-hwasan/build/llvm_build_hwasan/bin/clang -cc1 -internal-isystem /home/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-hwasan/build/llvm_build_hwasan/lib/clang/21/include -nostdsysteminc -analyze -analyzer-constraints=range -setup-static-analyzer -analyzer-checker=core,unix.Malloc,debug.ExprInspection -analyzer-max-loop 4 -analyzer-config widen-loops=true -verify -analyzer-config eagerly-assume=false /home/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-hwasan/build/llvm-project/clang/test/Analysis/loop-widening.c # RUN: at line 1
+ /home/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-hwasan/build/llvm_build_hwasan/bin/clang -cc1 -internal-isystem /home/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-hwasan/build/llvm_build_hwasan/lib/clang/21/include -nostdsysteminc -analyze -analyzer-constraints=range -setup-static-analyzer -analyzer-checker=core,unix.Malloc,debug.ExprInspection -analyzer-max-loop 4 -analyzer-config widen-loops=true -verify -analyzer-config eagerly-assume=false /home/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-hwasan/build/llvm-project/clang/test/Analysis/loop-widening.c
PLEASE submit a bug report to https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/ and include the crash backtrace, preprocessed source, and associated run script.
Stack dump:
0.	Program arguments: /home/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-hwasan/build/llvm_build_hwasan/bin/clang -cc1 -internal-isystem /home/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-hwasan/build/llvm_build_hwasan/lib/clang/21/include -nostdsysteminc -analyze -analyzer-constraints=range -setup-static-analyzer -analyzer-checker=core,unix.Malloc,debug.ExprInspection -analyzer-max-loop 4 -analyzer-config widen-loops=true -verify -analyzer-config eagerly-assume=false /home/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-hwasan/build/llvm-project/clang/test/Analysis/loop-widening.c
1.	<eof> parser at end of file
2.	While analyzing stack: 
	#0 Calling nested_loop_inner_widen
 #0 0x0000c894cca289cc llvm::sys::PrintStackTrace(llvm::raw_ostream&, int) /home/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-hwasan/build/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Support/Unix/Signals.inc:804:13
 #1 0x0000c894cca23324 llvm::sys::RunSignalHandlers() /home/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-hwasan/build/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Support/Signals.cpp:106:18
 llvm#2 0x0000c894cca29bbc SignalHandler(int, siginfo_t*, void*) /home/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-hwasan/build/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Support/Unix/Signals.inc:0:3
 llvm#3 0x0000f6898da4a8f8 (linux-vdso.so.1+0x8f8)
 llvm#4 0x0000f6898d377608 (/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x87608)
 llvm#5 0x0000f6898d32cb3c raise (/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x3cb3c)
 llvm#6 0x0000f6898d317e00 abort (/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x27e00)
 llvm#7 0x0000c894c5e77fec __sanitizer::Atexit(void (*)()) /home/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-hwasan/build/llvm-project/compiler-rt/lib/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_posix_libcdep.cpp:168:10
 llvm#8 0x0000c894c5e76680 __sanitizer::Die() /home/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-hwasan/build/llvm-project/compiler-rt/lib/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_termination.cpp:52:5
 llvm#9 0x0000c894c5e69650 Unlock /home/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-hwasan/build/llvm-project/compiler-rt/lib/hwasan/../sanitizer_common/sanitizer_mutex.h:250:16
llvm#10 0x0000c894c5e69650 ~GenericScopedLock /home/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-hwasan/build/llvm-project/compiler-rt/lib/hwasan/../sanitizer_common/sanitizer_mutex.h:386:51
llvm#11 0x0000c894c5e69650 __hwasan::ScopedReport::~ScopedReport() /home/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-hwasan/build/llvm-project/compiler-rt/lib/hwasan/hwasan_report.cpp:54:5
llvm#12 0x0000c894c5e68de0 __hwasan::(anonymous namespace)::BaseReport::~BaseReport() /home/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-hwasan/build/llvm-project/compiler-rt/lib/hwasan/hwasan_report.cpp:476:7
llvm#13 0x0000c894c5e66b74 __hwasan::ReportTagMismatch(__sanitizer::StackTrace*, unsigned long, unsigned long, bool, bool, unsigned long*) /home/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-hwasan/build/llvm-project/compiler-rt/lib/hwasan/hwasan_report.cpp:1091:1
llvm#14 0x0000c894c5e52cf8 Destroy /home/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-hwasan/build/llvm-project/compiler-rt/lib/hwasan/../sanitizer_common/sanitizer_common.h:532:31
llvm#15 0x0000c894c5e52cf8 ~InternalMmapVector /home/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-hwasan/build/llvm-project/compiler-rt/lib/hwasan/../sanitizer_common/sanitizer_common.h:642:56
llvm#16 0x0000c894c5e52cf8 __hwasan::HandleTagMismatch(__hwasan::AccessInfo, unsigned long, unsigned long, void*, unsigned long*) /home/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-hwasan/build/llvm-project/compiler-rt/lib/hwasan/hwasan.cpp:245:1
llvm#17 0x0000c894c5e551c8 __hwasan_tag_mismatch4 /home/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-hwasan/build/llvm-project/compiler-rt/lib/hwasan/hwasan.cpp:764:1
llvm#18 0x0000c894c5e6a2f8 __interception::InterceptFunction(char const*, unsigned long*, unsigned long, unsigned long) /home/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-hwasan/build/llvm-project/compiler-rt/lib/interception/interception_linux.cpp:60:0
llvm#19 0x0000c894d166f664 getBlock /home/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-hwasan/build/llvm-project/clang/include/clang/StaticAnalyzer/Core/PathSensitive/CoreEngine.h:217:45
llvm#20 0x0000c894d166f664 getCFGElementRef /home/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-hwasan/build/llvm-project/clang/include/clang/StaticAnalyzer/Core/PathSensitive/ExprEngine.h:230:59
llvm#21 0x0000c894d166f664 clang::ento::ExprEngine::processCFGBlockEntrance(clang::BlockEdge const&, clang::ento::NodeBuilderWithSinks&, clang::ento::ExplodedNode*) /home/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-hwasan/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/ExprEngine.cpp:2570:45
llvm#22 0x0000c894d15f3a1c hasGeneratedNodes /home/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-hwasan/build/llvm-project/clang/include/clang/StaticAnalyzer/Core/PathSensitive/CoreEngine.h:333:37
llvm#23 0x0000c894d15f3a1c clang::ento::CoreEngine::HandleBlockEdge(clang::BlockEdge const&, clang::ento::ExplodedNode*) /home/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-hwasan/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/CoreEngine.cpp:319:20
llvm#24 0x0000c894d15f2c34 clang::ento::CoreEngine::dispatchWorkItem(clang::ento::ExplodedNode*, clang::ProgramPoint, clang::ento::WorkListUnit const&) /home/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-hwasan/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/CoreEngine.cpp:220:7
llvm#25 0x0000c894d15f2398 operator-> /home/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-hwasan/build/libcxx_install_hwasan/include/c++/v1/__memory/unique_ptr.h:267:101
llvm#26 0x0000c894d15f2398 clang::ento::CoreEngine::ExecuteWorkList(clang::LocationContext const*, unsigned int, llvm::IntrusiveRefCntPtr<clang::ento::ProgramState const>)::$_0::operator()(unsigned int) const /home/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-hwasan/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/CoreEngine.cpp:140:12
llvm#27 0x0000c894d15f14b4 clang::ento::CoreEngine::ExecuteWorkList(clang::LocationContext const*, unsigned int, llvm::IntrusiveRefCntPtr<clang::ento::ProgramState const>) /home/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-hwasan/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/CoreEngine.cpp:165:7
llvm#28 0x0000c894d0ebb9dc release /home/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-hwasan/build/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/IntrusiveRefCntPtr.h:232:9
llvm#29 0x0000c894d0ebb9dc ~IntrusiveRefCntPtr /home/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-hwasan/build/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/IntrusiveRefCntPtr.h:196:27
llvm#30 0x0000c894d0ebb9dc ExecuteWorkList /home/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-hwasan/build/llvm-project/clang/include/clang/StaticAnalyzer/Core/PathSensitive/ExprEngine.h:192:5
llvm#31 0x0000c894d0ebb9dc RunPathSensitiveChecks /home/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-hwasan/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Frontend/AnalysisConsumer.cpp:772:7
llvm#32 0x0000c894d0ebb9dc (anonymous namespace)::AnalysisConsumer::HandleCode(clang::Decl*, unsigned int, clang::ento::ExprEngine::InliningModes, llvm::DenseSet<clang::Decl const*, llvm::DenseMapInfo<clang::Decl const*, void>>*) /home/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-hwasan/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Frontend/AnalysisConsumer.cpp:741:5
llvm#33 0x0000c894d0eb6ee4 begin /home/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-hwasan/build/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/DenseMap.h:0:0
llvm#34 0x0000c894d0eb6ee4 begin /home/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-hwasan/build/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/DenseSet.h:187:45
llvm#35 0x0000c894d0eb6ee4 HandleDeclsCallGraph /home/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-hwasan/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Frontend/AnalysisConsumer.cpp:516:29
llvm#36 0x0000c894d0eb6ee4 runAnalysisOnTranslationUnit /home/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-hwasan/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Frontend/AnalysisConsumer.cpp:584:5
llvm#37 0x0000c894d0eb6ee4 (anonymous namespace)::AnalysisConsumer::HandleTranslationUnit(clang::ASTContext&) /home/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-hwasan/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Frontend/AnalysisConsumer.cpp:647:3
llvm#38 0x0000c894d18a7a38 clang::ParseAST(clang::Sema&, bool, bool) /home/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-hwasan/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Parse/ParseAST.cpp:0:13
llvm#39 0x0000c894ce81ed70 clang::FrontendAction::Execute() /home/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-hwasan/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Frontend/FrontendAction.cpp:1231:10
llvm#40 0x0000c894ce6f2144 getPtr /home/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-hwasan/build/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/Support/Error.h:278:42
llvm#41 0x0000c894ce6f2144 operator bool /home/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-hwasan/build/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/Support/Error.h:241:16
llvm#42 0x0000c894ce6f2144 clang::CompilerInstance::ExecuteAction(clang::FrontendAction&) /home/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-hwasan/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Frontend/CompilerInstance.cpp:1058:23
llvm#43 0x0000c894cea718cc operator-> /home/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-hwasan/build/libcxx_install_hwasan/include/c++/v1/__memory/shared_ptr.h:635:12
llvm#44 0x0000c894cea718cc getFrontendOpts /home/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-hwasan/build/llvm-project/clang/include/clang/Frontend/CompilerInstance.h:307:12
llvm#45 0x0000c894cea718cc clang::ExecuteCompilerInvocation(clang::CompilerInstance*) /home/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-hwasan/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/FrontendTool/ExecuteCompilerInvocation.cpp:301:14
llvm#46 0x0000c894c5e9cf28 cc1_main(llvm::ArrayRef<char const*>, char const*, void*) /home/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-hwasan/build/llvm-project/clang/tools/driver/cc1_main.cpp:294:15
llvm#47 0x0000c894c5e92a9c ExecuteCC1Tool(llvm::SmallVectorImpl<char const*>&, llvm::ToolContext const&) /home/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-hwasan/build/llvm-project/clang/tools/driver/driver.cpp:223:12
llvm#48 0x0000c894c5e902ac clang_main(int, char**, llvm::ToolContext const&) /home/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-hwasan/build/llvm-project/clang/tools/driver/driver.cpp:0:12
llvm#49 0x0000c894c5eb2e34 main /home/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-hwasan/build/llvm_build_hwasan/tools/clang/tools/driver/clang-driver.cpp:17:3
llvm#50 0x0000f6898d3184c4 (/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x284c4)
llvm#51 0x0000f6898d318598 __libc_start_main (/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x28598)
llvm#52 0x0000c894c5e52a30 _start (/home/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-hwasan/build/llvm_build_hwasan/bin/clang+0x6512a30)
/home/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-hwasan/build/llvm_build_hwasan/tools/clang/test/Analysis/Output/loop-widening.c.script: line 2: 2870204 Aborted                 /home/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-hwasan/build/llvm_build_hwasan/bin/clang -cc1 -internal-isystem /home/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-hwasan/build/llvm_build_hwasan/lib/clang/21/include -nostdsysteminc -analyze -analyzer-constraints=range -setup-static-analyzer -analyzer-checker=core,unix.Malloc,debug.ExprInspection -analyzer-max-loop 4 -analyzer-config widen-loops=true -verify -analyzer-config eagerly-assume=false /home/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-hwasan/build/llvm-project/clang/test/Analysis/loop-widening.c
```

`clang-repl --cuda` was previously crashing with a segmentation fault,
instead of reporting a clean error
```
(base) anutosh491@Anutoshs-MacBook-Air bin % ./clang-repl --cuda
#0 0x0000000111da4fbc llvm::sys::PrintStackTrace(llvm::raw_ostream&, int) (/opt/local/libexec/llvm-20/lib/libLLVM.dylib+0x150fbc)
#1 0x0000000111da31dc llvm::sys::RunSignalHandlers() (/opt/local/libexec/llvm-20/lib/libLLVM.dylib+0x14f1dc)
llvm#2 0x0000000111da5628 SignalHandler(int) (/opt/local/libexec/llvm-20/lib/libLLVM.dylib+0x151628)
llvm#3 0x000000019b242de4 (/usr/lib/system/libsystem_platform.dylib+0x180482de4)
llvm#4 0x0000000107f638d0 clang::IncrementalCUDADeviceParser::IncrementalCUDADeviceParser(std::__1::unique_ptr<clang::CompilerInstance, std::__1::default_delete<clang::CompilerInstance>>, clang::CompilerInstance&, llvm::IntrusiveRefCntPtr<llvm::vfs::InMemoryFileSystem>, llvm::Error&, std::__1::list<clang::PartialTranslationUnit, std::__1::allocator<clang::PartialTranslationUnit>> const&) (/opt/local/libexec/llvm-20/lib/libclang-cpp.dylib+0x216b8d0)
llvm#5 0x0000000107f638d0 clang::IncrementalCUDADeviceParser::IncrementalCUDADeviceParser(std::__1::unique_ptr<clang::CompilerInstance, std::__1::default_delete<clang::CompilerInstance>>, clang::CompilerInstance&, llvm::IntrusiveRefCntPtr<llvm::vfs::InMemoryFileSystem>, llvm::Error&, std::__1::list<clang::PartialTranslationUnit, std::__1::allocator<clang::PartialTranslationUnit>> const&) (/opt/local/libexec/llvm-20/lib/libclang-cpp.dylib+0x216b8d0)
llvm#6 0x0000000107f6bac8 clang::Interpreter::createWithCUDA(std::__1::unique_ptr<clang::CompilerInstance, std::__1::default_delete<clang::CompilerInstance>>, std::__1::unique_ptr<clang::CompilerInstance, std::__1::default_delete<clang::CompilerInstance>>) (/opt/local/libexec/llvm-20/lib/libclang-cpp.dylib+0x2173ac8)
llvm#7 0x000000010206f8a8 main (/opt/local/libexec/llvm-20/bin/clang-repl+0x1000038a8)
llvm#8 0x000000019ae8c274 
Segmentation fault: 11
```


The underlying issue was that the `DeviceCompilerInstance` (used for
device-side CUDA compilation) was never initialized with a `Sema`, which
is required before constructing the `IncrementalCUDADeviceParser`.


https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/89687e6f383b742a3c6542dc673a84d9f82d02de/clang/lib/Interpreter/DeviceOffload.cpp#L32


https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/89687e6f383b742a3c6542dc673a84d9f82d02de/clang/lib/Interpreter/IncrementalParser.cpp#L31

Unlike the host-side `CompilerInstance` which runs `ExecuteAction`
inside the Interpreter constructor (thereby setting up Sema), the
device-side CI was passed into the parser uninitialized, leading to an
assertion or crash when accessing its internals.

To fix this, I refactored the `Interpreter::create` method to include an
optional `DeviceCI` parameter. If provided, we know we need to take care
of this instance too. Only then do we construct the
`IncrementalCUDADeviceParser`.

This were failing on Windows CI with errors like:
```
22: (lldb) bt
23: * thread #1, stop reason = breakpoint 1.1
24:  frame #0: 0x00007ff7c5e41000 TestFrameFormatFunctionFormattedArgumentsObjC.test.tmp.objc.out`func at main.m:2
25:  frame #1: 0x00007ff7c5e4101c TestFrameFormatFunctionFormattedArgumentsObjC.test.tmp.objc.out`bar + 12 at main.m:3
26:  frame llvm#2: 0x00007ff7c5e4103c TestFrameFormatFunctionFormattedArgumentsObjC.test.tmp.objc.out`main + 16 at main.m:5
27:  custom-frame '()'
     !~~~~~~~~~~~       error: no match expected
28:  custom-frame '(__formal=<unavailable>)'
```

… without debug-info" (llvm#137757)

Reverts llvm#137408

This change broke `lldb/test/Shell/Unwind/split-machine-functions.test`.

The test binary has a symbol named `_Z3foov.cold` and the test expects
the backtrace to print the name of the cold part of the function like
this:

```
# SPLIT: frame #1: {{.*}}`foo() (.cold) +
```
but now it gets

```
frame #1: 0x000055555555514f split-machine-functions.test.tmp`foo() + 12
```

…gger memory is updated (llvm#129092)"

This reverts commit daa4061.

Original PR llvm#129092.

I have restricted the test to X86 Windows because it turns out the only
reason that `expr x.get()` would change m_memory_id is that on x86 we
have to write the return address to the stack in ABIWindows_X86_64::PrepareTrivialCall:
```
  // Save return address onto the stack
  if (!process_sp->WritePointerToMemory(sp, return_addr, error))
    return false;
```

This is not required on AArch64 so m_memory_id was not changed:
```
(lldb) expr x.get()
(int) $0 = 0
(lldb) process status -d
Process 15316 stopped
* thread #1, stop reason = Exception 0x80000003 encountered at address 0x7ff764a31034
    frame #0: 0x00007ff764a31038 TestProcessModificationIdOnExpr.cpp.tmp`main at TestProcessModificationIdOnExpr.cpp:35
   32     __builtin_debugtrap();
   33     __builtin_debugtrap();
   34     return 0;
-> 35   }
   36
   37   // CHECK-LABEL: process status -d
   38   // CHECK: m_stop_id: 2
ProcessModID:
  m_stop_id: 3
  m_last_natural_stop_id: 0
  m_resume_id: 0
  m_memory_id: 0
```

Really we should find a better way to force a memory write here, but
I can't think of one right now.

we already check for `platform_sp` not null in one line below. 

existing code
```
if (platform_sp) {
      Status error;
      if (platform_sp) {
...
...
     }
}
```

`platform_sp` null check is redundant and error variable is unused. 

### TEST PLAN 
manual test 

```
satyajanga@devvm21837:toolchain $ ./bin/lldb
LLDB logging initialized. Logs stored in: /tmp
(lldb) platform select host
  Platform: host
    Triple: x86_64-*-linux-gnu
OS Version: 6.9.0 (6.9.0-0_fbk5_hardened_1_gf368ae920c1a)
  Hostname: 127.0.0.1
WorkingDir: /home/satyajanga/llvm-sand/build/Debug/fbcode-x86_64/toolchain
    Kernel: #1 SMP Tue Feb 11 07:24:41 PST 2025
    Kernel: Linux
   Release: 6.9.0-0_fbk5_hardened_1_gf368ae920c1a
   Version: #1 SMP Tue Feb 11 07:24:41 PST 2025
(lldb) platform process list
144 matching processes were found on "host"

PID    PARENT USER       TRIPLE                         NAME
====== ====== ========== ============================== ============================
130461 874915 satyajanga x86_64-*-linux-gnu             sushd
135505 874915 satyajanga x86_64-*-linux-gnu             hg.real
817146 874915 satyajanga x86_64-*-linux-gnu             vscode-thrift
874915 1      satyajanga                                
874947 874915 satyajanga                                
```

and running the existing tests
```
satyajanga@devvm21837:toolchain $ ./bin/llvm-lit -v  ~/llvm-sand/external/llvm-project/lldb/test/API/commands/platform/
-- Testing: 9 tests, 9 workers --
PASS: lldb-api :: commands/platform/file/read/TestPlatformFileRead.py (1 of 9)
PASS: lldb-api :: commands/platform/file/close/TestPlatformFileClose.py (2 of 9)
UNSUPPORTED: lldb-api :: commands/platform/sdk/TestPlatformSDK.py (3 of 9)
PASS: lldb-api :: commands/platform/basic/TestPlatformPython.py (4 of 9)
PASS: lldb-api :: commands/platform/basic/TestPlatformCommand.py (5 of 9)
PASS: lldb-api :: commands/platform/connect/TestPlatformConnect.py (6 of 9)
PASS: lldb-api :: commands/platform/process/launch/TestPlatformProcessLaunch.py (7 of 9)
PASS: lldb-api :: commands/platform/launchgdbserver/TestPlatformLaunchGDBServer.py (8 of 9)
PASS: lldb-api :: commands/platform/process/list/TestProcessList.py (9 of 9)

Testing Time: 13.48s

Total Discovered Tests: 9
  Unsupported: 1 (11.11%)
  Passed     : 8 (88.89%)
satyajanga@devvm21837:toolchain $ 
```

llvm#138091)

Check this error for more context
(https://github.com/compiler-research/CppInterOp/actions/runs/14749797085/job/41407625681?pr=491#step:10:531)

This fails with 
```
* thread #1, name = 'CppInterOpTests', stop reason = signal SIGSEGV: address not mapped to object (fault address: 0x55500356d6d3)
  * frame #0: 0x00007fffee41cfe3 libclangCppInterOp.so.21.0gitclang::PragmaNamespace::~PragmaNamespace() + 99
    frame #1: 0x00007fffee435666 libclangCppInterOp.so.21.0gitclang::Preprocessor::~Preprocessor() + 3830
    frame llvm#2: 0x00007fffee20917a libclangCppInterOp.so.21.0gitstd::_Sp_counted_base<(__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::_M_release() + 58
    frame llvm#3: 0x00007fffee224796 libclangCppInterOp.so.21.0gitclang::CompilerInstance::~CompilerInstance() + 838
    frame llvm#4: 0x00007fffee22494d libclangCppInterOp.so.21.0gitclang::CompilerInstance::~CompilerInstance() + 13
    frame llvm#5: 0x00007fffed95ec62 libclangCppInterOp.so.21.0gitclang::IncrementalCUDADeviceParser::~IncrementalCUDADeviceParser() + 98
    frame llvm#6: 0x00007fffed9551b6 libclangCppInterOp.so.21.0gitclang::Interpreter::~Interpreter() + 102
    frame llvm#7: 0x00007fffed95598d libclangCppInterOp.so.21.0gitclang::Interpreter::~Interpreter() + 13
    frame llvm#8: 0x00007fffed9181e7 libclangCppInterOp.so.21.0gitcompat::createClangInterpreter(std::vector<char const*, std::allocator<char const*>>&) + 2919
```

Problem : 

1) The destructor currently handles no clearance for the DeviceParser
and the DeviceAct. We currently only have this

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/976493822443c52a71ed3c67aaca9a555b20c55d/clang/lib/Interpreter/Interpreter.cpp#L416-L419

2) The ownership for DeviceCI currently is present in
IncrementalCudaDeviceParser. But this should be similar to how the
combination for hostCI, hostAction and hostParser are managed by the
Interpreter. As on master the DeviceAct and DeviceParser are managed by
the Interpreter but not DeviceCI. This is problematic because :
IncrementalParser holds a Sema& which points into the DeviceCI. On
master, DeviceCI is destroyed before the base class ~IncrementalParser()
runs, causing Parser::reset() to access a dangling Sema (and as Sema
holds a reference to Preprocessor which owns PragmaNamespace) we see
this
```
  * frame #0: 0x00007fffee41cfe3 libclangCppInterOp.so.21.0gitclang::PragmaNamespace::~PragmaNamespace() + 99
    frame #1: 0x00007fffee435666 libclangCppInterOp.so.21.0gitclang::Preprocessor::~Preprocessor() + 3830
    
```

When running the `openmp` testsuite on Solaris/amd64, many tests `FAIL`
like

```
# | OMP: Error llvm#11: Stack overflow detected for OpenMP thread #1
```

In a `Debug` build, I also get
```
# | Assertion failure at kmp_runtime.cpp(203): __kmp_gtid_get_specific() < 0 || __kmp_gtid_get_specific() == i.
```

Further investigation shows that just setting `__kmp_gtid_mode` to 3
massively reduces the number of failures.

Tested on `amd64-pc-solaris2.11` and `x86_64-pc-linux-gnu`.