Cherry-pick "Fix darwin-ld-lto test for some special path" to stable by nathawes · Pull Request #6 · swiftlang/llvm-project

nathawes · 2019-10-19T00:58:35Z

Cherry-picking @cachemeifyoucan's test fix over to stable to unblock CI bots with hyphens in their temp directory.

Original message:
Fix the test by not assuming the prefix path of the temp directory can
be matched by a regex.

rdar://problem/56259195

llvm-svn: 375027

Fix the test by not assuming the prefix path of the temp directory can be matched by a regex. rdar://problem/56259195 llvm-svn: 375027

nathawes · 2019-10-19T01:04:23Z

@swift-ci test

nathawes · 2019-10-21T16:31:06Z

@swift-ci please test

nathawes · 2019-10-22T22:15:55Z

@swift-ci please test

nathawes · 2019-10-24T20:06:54Z

@swift-ci please test

This fixes a failing testcase on Fedora 30 x86_64 (regression Fedora 29->30): PASS: ./bin/lldb ./lldb-test-build.noindex/functionalities/unwind/noreturn/TestNoreturnUnwind.test_dwarf/a.out -o 'settings set symbols.enable-external-lookup false' -o r -o bt -o quit * frame #0: 0x00007ffff7aa6e75 libc.so.6`__GI_raise + 325 frame swiftlang#1: 0x00007ffff7a91895 libc.so.6`__GI_abort + 295 frame swiftlang#2: 0x0000000000401140 a.out`func_c at main.c:12:2 frame swiftlang#3: 0x000000000040113a a.out`func_b at main.c:18:2 frame swiftlang#4: 0x0000000000401134 a.out`func_a at main.c:26:2 frame swiftlang#5: 0x000000000040112e a.out`main(argc=<unavailable>, argv=<unavailable>) at main.c:32:2 frame swiftlang#6: 0x00007ffff7a92f33 libc.so.6`__libc_start_main + 243 frame swiftlang#7: 0x000000000040106e a.out`_start + 46 vs. FAIL - unrecognized abort() function: ./bin/lldb ./lldb-test-build.noindex/functionalities/unwind/noreturn/TestNoreturnUnwind.test_dwarf/a.out -o 'settings set symbols.enable-external-lookup false' -o r -o bt -o quit * frame #0: 0x00007ffff7aa6e75 libc.so.6`.annobin_raise.c + 325 frame swiftlang#1: 0x00007ffff7a91895 libc.so.6`.annobin_loadmsgcat.c_end.unlikely + 295 frame swiftlang#2: 0x0000000000401140 a.out`func_c at main.c:12:2 frame swiftlang#3: 0x000000000040113a a.out`func_b at main.c:18:2 frame swiftlang#4: 0x0000000000401134 a.out`func_a at main.c:26:2 frame swiftlang#5: 0x000000000040112e a.out`main(argc=<unavailable>, argv=<unavailable>) at main.c:32:2 frame swiftlang#6: 0x00007ffff7a92f33 libc.so.6`.annobin_libc_start.c + 243 frame swiftlang#7: 0x000000000040106e a.out`.annobin_init.c.hot + 46 The extra ELF symbols are there due to Annobin (I did not investigate why this problem happened specifically since F-30 and not since F-28). It is due to: Symbol table '.dynsym' contains 2361 entries: Valu e Size Type Bind Vis Name 0000000000022769 5 FUNC LOCAL DEFAULT _nl_load_domain.cold 000000000002276e 0 NOTYPE LOCAL HIDDEN .annobin_abort.c.unlikely ... 000000000002276e 0 NOTYPE LOCAL HIDDEN .annobin_loadmsgcat.c_end.unlikely ... 000000000002276e 0 NOTYPE LOCAL HIDDEN .annobin_textdomain.c_end.unlikely 000000000002276e 548 FUNC GLOBAL DEFAULT abort 000000000002276e 548 FUNC GLOBAL DEFAULT abort@@GLIBC_2.2.5 000000000002276e 548 FUNC LOCAL DEFAULT __GI_abort 0000000000022992 0 NOTYPE LOCAL HIDDEN .annobin_abort.c_end.unlikely Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63540 llvm-svn: 364773 (cherry picked from commit 3f594ed)

If a core file has an EFI version string which includes a UUID (similar to what it returns for the kdp KDP_KERNELVERSION packet) in the LC_IDENT or LC_NOTE 'kern ver str' load command. In that case, we should try to find the binary and dSYM for the UUID listed. The dSYM may have python code which knows how to relocate the binary to the correct address in lldb's target section load list and loads other ancillary binaries. The test case is a little involved, 1. it compiles an inferior hello world apple (a.out), 2. it compiles a program which can create a corefile manually with a specific binary's UUID encoded in it, 3. it gets the UUID of the a.out binary, 4. it creates a shell script, dsym-for-uuid.sh, which will return the full path to the a.out + a.out.dSYM when called with teh correct UUID, 5. it sets the LLDB_APPLE_DSYMFORUUID_EXECUTABLE env var before creating the lldb target, to point to this dsym-for-uuid.sh, 6. runs the create-corefile binary we compiled in step swiftlang#2, 7. loads the corefile from step swiftlang#6 into lldb, 8. verifies that lldb loaded a.out by reading the LC_NOTE load command from the corefile, calling dsym-for-uuid.sh with that UUID, got back the path to a.out and loaded it. whew! <rdar://problem/47562911> llvm-svn: 366378 (cherry picked from commit be4be61)

nathawes · 2019-10-29T01:16:56Z

@swift-ci please test

…t binding This fixes a failing testcase on Fedora 30 x86_64 (regression Fedora 29->30): PASS: ./bin/lldb ./lldb-test-build.noindex/functionalities/unwind/noreturn/TestNoreturnUnwind.test_dwarf/a.out -o 'settings set symbols.enable-external-lookup false' -o r -o bt -o quit * frame #0: 0x00007ffff7aa6e75 libc.so.6`__GI_raise + 325 frame #1: 0x00007ffff7a91895 libc.so.6`__GI_abort + 295 frame #2: 0x0000000000401140 a.out`func_c at main.c:12:2 frame #3: 0x000000000040113a a.out`func_b at main.c:18:2 frame #4: 0x0000000000401134 a.out`func_a at main.c:26:2 frame #5: 0x000000000040112e a.out`main(argc=<unavailable>, argv=<unavailable>) at main.c:32:2 frame #6: 0x00007ffff7a92f33 libc.so.6`__libc_start_main + 243 frame #7: 0x000000000040106e a.out`_start + 46 vs. FAIL - unrecognized abort() function: ./bin/lldb ./lldb-test-build.noindex/functionalities/unwind/noreturn/TestNoreturnUnwind.test_dwarf/a.out -o 'settings set symbols.enable-external-lookup false' -o r -o bt -o quit * frame #0: 0x00007ffff7aa6e75 libc.so.6`.annobin_raise.c + 325 frame #1: 0x00007ffff7a91895 libc.so.6`.annobin_loadmsgcat.c_end.unlikely + 295 frame #2: 0x0000000000401140 a.out`func_c at main.c:12:2 frame #3: 0x000000000040113a a.out`func_b at main.c:18:2 frame #4: 0x0000000000401134 a.out`func_a at main.c:26:2 frame #5: 0x000000000040112e a.out`main(argc=<unavailable>, argv=<unavailable>) at main.c:32:2 frame #6: 0x00007ffff7a92f33 libc.so.6`.annobin_libc_start.c + 243 frame #7: 0x000000000040106e a.out`.annobin_init.c.hot + 46 The extra ELF symbols are there due to Annobin (I did not investigate why this problem happened specifically since F-30 and not since F-28). It is due to: Symbol table '.dynsym' contains 2361 entries: Valu e Size Type Bind Vis Name 0000000000022769 5 FUNC LOCAL DEFAULT _nl_load_domain.cold 000000000002276e 0 NOTYPE LOCAL HIDDEN .annobin_abort.c.unlikely ... 000000000002276e 0 NOTYPE LOCAL HIDDEN .annobin_loadmsgcat.c_end.unlikely ... 000000000002276e 0 NOTYPE LOCAL HIDDEN .annobin_textdomain.c_end.unlikely 000000000002276e 548 FUNC GLOBAL DEFAULT abort 000000000002276e 548 FUNC GLOBAL DEFAULT abort@@GLIBC_2.2.5 000000000002276e 548 FUNC LOCAL DEFAULT __GI_abort 0000000000022992 0 NOTYPE LOCAL HIDDEN .annobin_abort.c_end.unlikely GDB has some more complicated preferences between overlapping and/or sharing address symbols, I have made here so far the most simple fix for this case. Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63540

The test is currently failing on some systems with ASAN enabled due to: ``` ==22898==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: heap-buffer-overflow on address 0x603000003da4 at pc 0x00010951c33d bp 0x7ffee6709e00 sp 0x7ffee67095c0 READ of size 5 at 0x603000003da4 thread T0 #0 0x10951c33c in wrap_memmove+0x16c (libclang_rt.asan_osx_dynamic.dylib:x86_64+0x1833c) #1 0x7fff4a327f57 in CFDataReplaceBytes+0x1ba (CoreFoundation:x86_64+0x13f57) #2 0x7fff4a415a44 in __CFDataInit+0x2db (CoreFoundation:x86_64+0x101a44) #3 0x1094f8490 in main main.m:424 #4 0x7fff77482084 in start+0x0 (libdyld.dylib:x86_64+0x17084) 0x603000003da4 is located 0 bytes to the right of 20-byte region [0x603000003d90,0x603000003da4) allocated by thread T0 here: #0 0x109547c02 in wrap_calloc+0xa2 (libclang_rt.asan_osx_dynamic.dylib:x86_64+0x43c02) #1 0x7fff763ad3ef in class_createInstance+0x52 (libobjc.A.dylib:x86_64+0x73ef) #2 0x7fff4c6b2d73 in NSAllocateObject+0x12 (Foundation:x86_64+0x1d73) #3 0x7fff4c6b5e5f in -[_NSPlaceholderData initWithBytes:length:copy:deallocator:]+0x40 (Foundation:x86_64+0x4e5f) #4 0x7fff4c6d4cf1 in -[NSData(NSData) initWithBytes:length:]+0x24 (Foundation:x86_64+0x23cf1) #5 0x1094f8245 in main main.m:404 #6 0x7fff77482084 in start+0x0 (libdyld.dylib:x86_64+0x17084) ``` The reason is that we create a string "HELLO" but get the size wrong (it's 5 bytes instead of 4). Later on we read the buffer and pretend it is 5 bytes long, causing an OOB read which ASAN detects. In general this test probably needs some cleanup as it produces on macOS 10.15 around 100 compiler warnings which isn't great, but let's first get the bot green.

This reverts commit e57a9ab. Parser/cxx2a-placeholder-type-constraint.cpp has MSan failures. Present at 7b81c3f: http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-msan/builds/17133/steps/check-clang%20msan/logs/stdio not present at eaa594f: http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-msan/builds/17132/steps/check-clang%20msan/logs/stdio Stack trace: ``` ==57032==WARNING: MemorySanitizer: use-of-uninitialized-value #0 0xccfe016 in clang::AutoTypeLoc::getLocalSourceRange() const /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-msan/build/llvm-project/clang/include/clang/AST/TypeLoc.h:2036:19 #1 0xcc56758 in CheckDeducedPlaceholderConstraints(clang::Sema&, clang::AutoType const&, clang::AutoTypeLoc, clang::QualType) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-msan/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Sema/SemaTemplateDeduction.cpp:4505:56 #2 0xcc550ce in clang::Sema::DeduceAutoType(clang::TypeLoc, clang::Expr*&, clang::QualType&, llvm::Optional<unsigned int>, bool) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-msan/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Sema/SemaTemplateDeduction.cpp:4707:11 #3 0xcc52407 in clang::Sema::DeduceAutoType(clang::TypeSourceInfo*, clang::Expr*&, clang::QualType&, llvm::Optional<unsigned int>, bool) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-msan/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Sema/SemaTemplateDeduction.cpp:4457:10 #4 0xba38332 in clang::Sema::deduceVarTypeFromInitializer(clang::VarDecl*, clang::DeclarationName, clang::QualType, clang::TypeSourceInfo*, clang::SourceRange, bool, clang::Expr*) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-msan/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp:11351:7 #5 0xba3a8a9 in clang::Sema::DeduceVariableDeclarationType(clang::VarDecl*, bool, clang::Expr*) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-msan/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp:11385:26 #6 0xba3c520 in clang::Sema::AddInitializerToDecl(clang::Decl*, clang::Expr*, bool) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-msan/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp:11725:9 #7 0xb39c498 in clang::Parser::ParseDeclarationAfterDeclaratorAndAttributes(clang::Declarator&, clang::Parser::ParsedTemplateInfo const&, clang::Parser::ForRangeInit*) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-msan/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Parse/ParseDecl.cpp:2399:17 #8 0xb394d80 in clang::Parser::ParseDeclGroup(clang::ParsingDeclSpec&, clang::DeclaratorContext, clang::SourceLocation*, clang::Parser::ForRangeInit*) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-msan/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Parse/ParseDecl.cpp:2128:21 #9 0xb383bbf in clang::Parser::ParseSimpleDeclaration(clang::DeclaratorContext, clang::SourceLocation&, clang::Parser::ParsedAttributesWithRange&, bool, clang::Parser::ForRangeInit*, clang::SourceLocation*) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-msan/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Parse/ParseDecl.cpp:1848:10 #10 0xb383129 in clang::Parser::ParseDeclaration(clang::DeclaratorContext, clang::SourceLocation&, clang::Parser::ParsedAttributesWithRange&, clang::SourceLocation*) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-msan/build/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/PointerUnion.h #11 0xb53a388 in clang::Parser::ParseStatementOrDeclarationAfterAttributes(llvm::SmallVector<clang::Stmt*, 32u>&, clang::Parser::ParsedStmtContext, clang::SourceLocation*, clang::Parser::ParsedAttributesWithRange&) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-msan/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Parse/ParseStmt.cpp:221:13 #12 0xb539309 in clang::Parser::ParseStatementOrDeclaration(llvm::SmallVector<clang::Stmt*, 32u>&, clang::Parser::ParsedStmtContext, clang::SourceLocation*) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-msan/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Parse/ParseStmt.cpp:106:20 #13 0xb55610e in clang::Parser::ParseCompoundStatementBody(bool) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-msan/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Parse/ParseStmt.cpp:1079:11 #14 0xb559529 in clang::Parser::ParseFunctionStatementBody(clang::Decl*, clang::Parser::ParseScope&) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-msan/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Parse/ParseStmt.cpp:2204:21 #15 0xb33c13e in clang::Parser::ParseFunctionDefinition(clang::ParsingDeclarator&, clang::Parser::ParsedTemplateInfo const&, clang::Parser::LateParsedAttrList*) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-msan/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Parse/Parser.cpp:1339:10 #16 0xb394703 in clang::Parser::ParseDeclGroup(clang::ParsingDeclSpec&, clang::DeclaratorContext, clang::SourceLocation*, clang::Parser::ForRangeInit*) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-msan/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Parse/ParseDecl.cpp:2068:11 #17 0xb338e52 in clang::Parser::ParseDeclOrFunctionDefInternal(clang::Parser::ParsedAttributesWithRange&, clang::ParsingDeclSpec&, clang::AccessSpecifier) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-msan/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Parse/Parser.cpp:1099:10 #18 0xb337674 in clang::Parser::ParseDeclarationOrFunctionDefinition(clang::Parser::ParsedAttributesWithRange&, clang::ParsingDeclSpec*, clang::AccessSpecifier) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-msan/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Parse/Parser.cpp:1115:12 #19 0xb334a96 in clang::Parser::ParseExternalDeclaration(clang::Parser::ParsedAttributesWithRange&, clang::ParsingDeclSpec*) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-msan/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Parse/Parser.cpp:935:12 #20 0xb32f12a in clang::Parser::ParseTopLevelDecl(clang::OpaquePtr<clang::DeclGroupRef>&, bool) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-msan/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Parse/Parser.cpp:686:12 #21 0xb31e193 in clang::ParseAST(clang::Sema&, bool, bool) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-msan/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Parse/ParseAST.cpp:158:20 #22 0x80263f0 in clang::FrontendAction::Execute() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-msan/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Frontend/FrontendAction.cpp:936:8 #23 0x7f2a257 in clang::CompilerInstance::ExecuteAction(clang::FrontendAction&) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-msan/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Frontend/CompilerInstance.cpp:965:33 #24 0x8288bef in clang::ExecuteCompilerInvocation(clang::CompilerInstance*) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-msan/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/FrontendTool/ExecuteCompilerInvocation.cpp:290:25 #25 0xad44c2 in cc1_main(llvm::ArrayRef<char const*>, char const*, void*) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-msan/build/llvm-project/clang/tools/driver/cc1_main.cpp:239:15 #26 0xacd76a in ExecuteCC1Tool(llvm::ArrayRef<char const*>) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-msan/build/llvm-project/clang/tools/driver/driver.cpp:325:12 #27 0xacc9fd in main /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-msan/build/llvm-project/clang/tools/driver/driver.cpp:398:12 #28 0x7f7d82cdb2e0 in __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x202e0) #29 0xa4dde9 in _start (/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-msan/build/llvm_build_msan/bin/clang-11+0xa4dde9) ```

Summary: Applying this cleanup: - MIRBuilder.buildInstr(TargetOpcode::G_ASHR) - .addDef(Shifted) - .addUse(Res) - .addUse(ShiftAmt); + MIRBuilder.buildAShr(Shifted, Res, ShiftAmt); caused an assertion failure here: llc: /home/jayfoad2/git/llvm-project/llvm/lib/CodeGen/MachineRegisterInfo.cpp:404: llvm::MachineInstr *llvm::MachineRegisterInfo::getVRegDef(unsigned int) const: Assertion `(I.atEnd() || std::next(I) == def_instr_end()) && "getVRegDef assumes a single definition or no definition"' failed. #4 0x00000000050a6d96 in llvm::MachineRegisterInfo::getVRegDef (this=0x74606a0, Reg=2147483650) at /home/jayfoad2/git/llvm-project/llvm/lib/CodeGen/MachineRegisterInfo.cpp:403 #5 0x00000000066148f6 in llvm::getConstantVRegValWithLookThrough (VReg=2147483650, MRI=..., LookThroughInstrs=false, HandleFConstant=true) at /home/jayfoad2/git/llvm-project/llvm/lib/CodeGen/GlobalISel/Utils.cpp:244 #6 0x00000000066147da in llvm::getConstantVRegVal (VReg=2147483650, MRI=...) at /home/jayfoad2/git/llvm-project/llvm/lib/CodeGen/GlobalISel/Utils.cpp:210 #7 0x0000000006615367 in llvm::ConstantFoldBinOp (Opcode=101, Op1=2147483650, Op2=2147483656, MRI=...) at /home/jayfoad2/git/llvm-project/llvm/lib/CodeGen/GlobalISel/Utils.cpp:341 #8 0x000000000657eee0 in llvm::CSEMIRBuilder::buildInstr (this=0x7465010, Opc=101, DstOps=..., SrcOps=..., Flag=...) at /home/jayfoad2/git/llvm-project/llvm/lib/CodeGen/GlobalISel/CSEMIRBuilder.cpp:160 #9 0x0000000003645958 in llvm::MachineIRBuilder::buildAShr (this=0x7465010, Dst=..., Src0=..., Src1=..., Flags=...) at /home/jayfoad2/git/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/CodeGen/GlobalISel/MachineIRBuilder.h:1298 #10 0x00000000065c35b1 in llvm::LegalizerHelper::lower (this=0x7fffffffb5f8, MI=..., TypeIdx=0, Ty=...) at /home/jayfoad2/git/llvm-project/llvm/lib/CodeGen/GlobalISel/LegalizerHelper.cpp:2020 because at this point there are two instructions defining Res: the original G_SMULO/G_UMULO and the new G_MUL that we built. The fix is to modify the original mul in place, so that there is only ever one definition of Res. Reviewers: arsenm, aditya_nandakumar Subscribers: wdng, rovka, hiraditya, volkan, Petar.Avramovic, llvm-commits Tags: #llvm Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72842

This reverts commit dfecec6. Merging the change revealed that there is a failure on the memory sanitizer bots. Command Output (stderr): -- ==3569==WARNING: MemorySanitizer: use-of-uninitialized-value #0 0x1d71bff in llvm::AVRSubtarget::ParseSubtargetFeatures(llvm::StringRef, llvm::StringRef) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm_build_msan/lib/Target/AVR/AVRGenSubtargetInfo.inc:471:7 #1 0x1d721f8 in initializeSubtargetDependencies /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Target/AVR/AVRSubtarget.cpp:50:3 #2 0x1d721f8 in llvm::AVRSubtarget::AVRSubtarget(llvm::Triple const&, std::__1::basic_string<char, std::__1::char_traits<char>, std::__1::allocator<char> > const&, std::__1::basic_string<char, std::__1::char_traits<char>, std::__1::allocator<char> > const&, llvm::AVRTargetMachine const&) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Target/AVR/AVRSubtarget.cpp:33:18 #3 0x1d3077f in llvm::AVRTargetMachine::AVRTargetMachine(llvm::Target const&, llvm::Triple const&, llvm::StringRef, llvm::StringRef, llvm::TargetOptions const&, llvm::Optional<llvm::Reloc::Model>, llvm::Optional<llvm::CodeModel::Model>, llvm::CodeGenOpt::Level, bool) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Target/AVR/AVRTargetMachine.cpp:52:7 #4 0x1d3169d in llvm::RegisterTargetMachine<llvm::AVRTargetMachine>::Allocator(llvm::Target const&, llvm::Triple const&, llvm::StringRef, llvm::StringRef, llvm::TargetOptions const&, llvm::Optional<llvm::Reloc::Model>, llvm::Optional<llvm::CodeModel::Model>, llvm::CodeGenOpt::Level, bool) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/Support/TargetRegistry.h:1121:16 #5 0x86662f in createTargetMachine /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/Support/TargetRegistry.h:402:12 #6 0x86662f in compileModule(char**, llvm::LLVMContext&) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/tools/llc/llc.cpp:473:52 #7 0x861f42 in main /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/tools/llc/llc.cpp:356:22 #8 0x7f76f7b072e0 in __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x202e0) #9 0x7ebbc9 in _start (/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm_build_msan/bin/llc+0x7ebbc9) SUMMARY: MemorySanitizer: use-of-uninitialized-value /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm_build_msan/lib/Target/AVR/AVRGenSubtargetInfo.inc:471:7 in llvm::AVRSubtarget::ParseSubtargetFeatures(llvm::StringRef, llvm::StringRef) Exiting FileCheck error: '<stdin>' is empty. -- The patch wiill be re-committed once fixed.

Summary: crash stack: ``` lang: tools/clang/include/clang/AST/AttrImpl.inc:1490: unsigned int clang::AlignedAttr::getAlignment(clang::ASTContext &) const: Assertion `!isAlignmentDependent()' failed. PLEASE submit a bug report to https://bugs.llvm.org/ and include the crash backtrace, preprocessed source, and associated run script. Stack dump: 0. Program arguments: ./bin/clang -cc1 -std=c++1y -ast-dump -frecovery-ast -fcxx-exceptions /tmp/t4.cpp 1. /tmp/t4.cpp:3:31: current parser token ';' #0 0x0000000002530cff llvm::sys::PrintStackTrace(llvm::raw_ostream&) llvm-project/llvm/lib/Support/Unix/Signals.inc:564:13 #1 0x000000000252ee30 llvm::sys::RunSignalHandlers() llvm-project/llvm/lib/Support/Signals.cpp:69:18 #2 0x000000000253126c SignalHandler(int) llvm-project/llvm/lib/Support/Unix/Signals.inc:396:3 #3 0x00007f86964d0520 __restore_rt (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0+0x13520) #4 0x00007f8695f9ff61 raise /build/glibc-oCLvUT/glibc-2.29/signal/../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/raise.c:51:1 #5 0x00007f8695f8b535 abort /build/glibc-oCLvUT/glibc-2.29/stdlib/abort.c:81:7 #6 0x00007f8695f8b40f _nl_load_domain /build/glibc-oCLvUT/glibc-2.29/intl/loadmsgcat.c:1177:9 #7 0x00007f8695f98b92 (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x32b92) #8 0x0000000004503d9f llvm::APInt::getZExtValue() const llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/APInt.h:1623:5 #9 0x0000000004503d9f clang::AlignedAttr::getAlignment(clang::ASTContext&) const llvm-project/build/tools/clang/include/clang/AST/AttrImpl.inc:1492:0 ``` Reviewers: sammccall Subscribers: cfe-commits Tags: #clang Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78085

Bitcode file alignment is only 32-bit so 64-bit offsets need special handling. /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Serialization/ASTReader.cpp:6327:28: runtime error: load of misaligned address 0x7fca2bcfe54c for type 'const uint64_t' (aka 'const unsigned long'), which requires 8 byte alignment 0x7fca2bcfe54c: note: pointer points here 00 00 00 00 5a a6 01 00 00 00 00 00 19 a7 01 00 00 00 00 00 48 a7 01 00 00 00 00 00 7d a7 01 00 ^ #0 0x3be2fe4 in clang::ASTReader::TypeCursorForIndex(unsigned int) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Serialization/ASTReader.cpp:6327:28 #1 0x3be30a0 in clang::ASTReader::readTypeRecord(unsigned int) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Serialization/ASTReader.cpp:6348:24 #2 0x3bd3d4a in clang::ASTReader::GetType(unsigned int) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Serialization/ASTReader.cpp:6985:26 #3 0x3c5d9ae in clang::ASTDeclReader::Visit(clang::Decl*) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Serialization/ASTReaderDecl.cpp:533:31 #4 0x3c91cac in clang::ASTReader::ReadDeclRecord(unsigned int) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Serialization/ASTReaderDecl.cpp:4045:10 #5 0x3bd4fb1 in clang::ASTReader::GetDecl(unsigned int) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Serialization/ASTReader.cpp:7352:5 #6 0x3bce2f9 in clang::ASTReader::ReadASTBlock(clang::serialization::ModuleFile&, unsigned int) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Serialization/ASTReader.cpp:3625:22 #7 0x3bd6d75 in clang::ASTReader::ReadAST(llvm::StringRef, clang::serialization::ModuleKind, clang::SourceLocation, unsigned int, llvm::SmallVectorImpl<clang::ASTReader::ImportedSubmodule>*) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Serialization/ASTReader.cpp:4230:32 #8 0x3a6b415 in clang::CompilerInstance::createPCHExternalASTSource(llvm::StringRef, llvm::StringRef, bool, bool, clang::Preprocessor&, clang::InMemoryModuleCache&, clang::ASTContext&, clang::PCHContainerReader const&, llvm::ArrayRef<std::shared_ptr<clang::ModuleFileExtension> >, llvm::ArrayRef<std::shared_ptr<clang::DependencyCollector> >, void*, bool, bool, bool) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Frontend/CompilerInstance.cpp:539:19 #9 0x3a6b00e in clang::CompilerInstance::createPCHExternalASTSource(llvm::StringRef, bool, bool, void*, bool) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Frontend/CompilerInstance.cpp:501:18 #10 0x3abac80 in clang::FrontendAction::BeginSourceFile(clang::CompilerInstance&, clang::FrontendInputFile const&) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Frontend/FrontendAction.cpp:865:12 #11 0x3a6e61c in clang::CompilerInstance::ExecuteAction(clang::FrontendAction&) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Frontend/CompilerInstance.cpp:972:13 #12 0x3ba74bf in clang::ExecuteCompilerInvocation(clang::CompilerInstance*) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/FrontendTool/ExecuteCompilerInvocation.cpp:282:25 #13 0xa3f753 in cc1_main(llvm::ArrayRef<char const*>, char const*, void*) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/clang/tools/driver/cc1_main.cpp:240:15 #14 0xa3a68a in ExecuteCC1Tool(llvm::SmallVectorImpl<char const*>&) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/clang/tools/driver/driver.cpp:330:12 #15 0xa37f31 in main /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/clang/tools/driver/driver.cpp:407:12 #16 0x7fca2a7032e0 in __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x202e0) #17 0xa21029 in _start (/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm_build_ubsan/bin/clang-11+0xa21029) This reverts commit 30d5946.

Summary: The previous code tries to strip out parentheses and anything in between them. I'm guessing the idea here was to try to drop any listed arguments for the function being symbolized. Unfortunately this approach is broken in several ways. * Templated functions may contain parentheses. The existing approach messes up these names. * In C++ argument types are part of a function's signature for the purposes of overloading so removing them could be confusing. Fix this simply by not trying to adjust the function name that comes from `atos`. A test case is included. Without the change the test case produced output like: ``` WRITE of size 4 at 0x6060000001a0 thread T0 #0 0x10b96614d in IntWrapper<void >::operator=> const&) asan-symbolize-templated-cxx.cpp:10 #1 0x10b960b0e in void writeToA<IntWrapper<void > >>) asan-symbolize-templated-cxx.cpp:30 #2 0x10b96bf27 in decltype>)>> >)) std::__1::__invoke<void >), IntWrapper<void > >>), IntWrapper<void >&&) type_traits:4425 #3 0x10b96bdc1 in void std::__1::__invoke_void_return_wrapper<void>::__call<void >), IntWrapper<void > >>), IntWrapper<void >&&) __functional_base:348 #4 0x10b96bd71 in std::__1::__function::__alloc_func<void >), std::__1::allocator<void >)>, void >)>::operator>&&) functional:1533 #5 0x10b9684e2 in std::__1::__function::__func<void >), std::__1::allocator<void >)>, void >)>::operator>&&) functional:1707 #6 0x10b96cd7b in std::__1::__function::__value_func<void >)>::operator>&&) const functional:1860 #7 0x10b96cc17 in std::__1::function<void >)>::operator>) const functional:2419 #8 0x10b960ca6 in Foo<void >), IntWrapper<void > >::doCall>) asan-symbolize-templated-cxx.cpp:44 #9 0x10b96088b in main asan-symbolize-templated-cxx.cpp:54 #10 0x7fff6ffdfcc8 in start (in libdyld.dylib) + 0 ``` Note how the symbol names for the frames are messed up (e.g. #8, #1). With the patch the output looks like: ``` WRITE of size 4 at 0x6060000001a0 thread T0 #0 0x10005214d in IntWrapper<void (int)>::operator=(IntWrapper<void (int)> const&) asan-symbolize-templated-cxx.cpp:10 #1 0x10004cb0e in void writeToA<IntWrapper<void (int)> >(IntWrapper<void (int)>) asan-symbolize-templated-cxx.cpp:30 #2 0x100057f27 in decltype(std::__1::forward<void (*&)(IntWrapper<void (int)>)>(fp)(std::__1::forward<IntWrapper<void (int)> >(fp0))) std::__1::__invoke<void (*&)(IntWrapper<void (int)>), IntWrapper<void (int)> >(void (*&)(IntWrapper<void (int)>), IntWrapper<void (int)>&&) type_traits:4425 #3 0x100057dc1 in void std::__1::__invoke_void_return_wrapper<void>::__call<void (*&)(IntWrapper<void (int)>), IntWrapper<void (int)> >(void (*&)(IntWrapper<void (int)>), IntWrapper<void (int)>&&) __functional_base:348 #4 0x100057d71 in std::__1::__function::__alloc_func<void (*)(IntWrapper<void (int)>), std::__1::allocator<void (*)(IntWrapper<void (int)>)>, void (IntWrapper<void (int)>)>::operator()(IntWrapper<void (int)>&&) functional:1533 #5 0x1000544e2 in std::__1::__function::__func<void (*)(IntWrapper<void (int)>), std::__1::allocator<void (*)(IntWrapper<void (int)>)>, void (IntWrapper<void (int)>)>::operator()(IntWrapper<void (int)>&&) functional:1707 #6 0x100058d7b in std::__1::__function::__value_func<void (IntWrapper<void (int)>)>::operator()(IntWrapper<void (int)>&&) const functional:1860 #7 0x100058c17 in std::__1::function<void (IntWrapper<void (int)>)>::operator()(IntWrapper<void (int)>) const functional:2419 #8 0x10004cca6 in Foo<void (IntWrapper<void (int)>), IntWrapper<void (int)> >::doCall(IntWrapper<void (int)>) asan-symbolize-templated-cxx.cpp:44 #9 0x10004c88b in main asan-symbolize-templated-cxx.cpp:54 #10 0x7fff6ffdfcc8 in start (in libdyld.dylib) + 0 ``` rdar://problem/58887175 Reviewers: kubamracek, yln Subscribers: #sanitizers, llvm-commits Tags: #sanitizers Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79597

Summary: crash stack: ``` llvm-project/clang/lib/AST/ASTContext.cpp:2248: clang::TypeInfo clang::ASTContext::getTypeInfoImpl(const clang::Type *) const: Assertion `!A->getDeducedType().isNull() && "cannot request the size of an undeduced or dependent auto type"' failed. PLEASE submit a bug report to https://bugs.llvm.org/ and include the crash backtrace, preprocessed source, and associated run script. Stack dump: #0 0x00000000025bb0bf llvm::sys::PrintStackTrace(llvm::raw_ostream&) llvm-project/llvm/lib/Support/Unix/Signals.inc:564:13 #1 0x00000000025b92b0 llvm::sys::RunSignalHandlers() llvm-project/llvm/lib/Support/Signals.cpp:69:18 #2 0x00000000025bb535 SignalHandler(int) llvm-project/llvm/lib/Support/Unix/Signals.inc:396:3 #3 0x00007f9ef9298110 __restore_rt (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0+0x14110) #4 0x00007f9ef8d72761 raise /build/glibc-M65Gwz/glibc-2.30/signal/../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/raise.c:51:1 #5 0x00007f9ef8d5c55b abort /build/glibc-M65Gwz/glibc-2.30/stdlib/abort.c:81:7 #6 0x00007f9ef8d5c42f get_sysdep_segment_value /build/glibc-M65Gwz/glibc-2.30/intl/loadmsgcat.c:509:8 #7 0x00007f9ef8d5c42f _nl_load_domain /build/glibc-M65Gwz/glibc-2.30/intl/loadmsgcat.c:970:34 #8 0x00007f9ef8d6b092 (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x34092) #9 0x000000000458abe0 clang::ASTContext::getTypeInfoImpl(clang::Type const*) const llvm-project/clang/lib/AST/ASTContext.cpp:0:5 ``` Reviewers: sammccall Subscribers: cfe-commits Tags: #clang Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81384

When `Target::GetEntryPointAddress()` calls `exe_module->GetObjectFile()->GetEntryPointAddress()`, and the returned `entry_addr` is valid, it can immediately be returned. However, just before that, an `llvm::Error` value has been setup, but in this case it is not consumed before returning, like is done further below in the function. In https://bugs.freebsd.org/248745 we got a bug report for this, where a very simple test case aborts and dumps core: ``` * thread #1, name = 'testcase', stop reason = breakpoint 1.1 frame #0: 0x00000000002018d4 testcase`main(argc=1, argv=0x00007fffffffea18) at testcase.c:3:5 1 int main(int argc, char *argv[]) 2 { -> 3 return 0; 4 } (lldb) p argc Program aborted due to an unhandled Error: Error value was Success. (Note: Success values must still be checked prior to being destroyed). Thread 1 received signal SIGABRT, Aborted. thr_kill () at thr_kill.S:3 3 thr_kill.S: No such file or directory. (gdb) bt #0 thr_kill () at thr_kill.S:3 #1 0x00000008049a0004 in __raise (s=6) at /usr/src/lib/libc/gen/raise.c:52 #2 0x0000000804916229 in abort () at /usr/src/lib/libc/stdlib/abort.c:67 #3 0x000000000451b5f5 in fatalUncheckedError () at /usr/src/contrib/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Support/Error.cpp:112 #4 0x00000000019cf008 in GetEntryPointAddress () at /usr/src/contrib/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/Support/Error.h:267 #5 0x0000000001bccbd8 in ConstructorSetup () at /usr/src/contrib/llvm-project/lldb/source/Target/ThreadPlanCallFunction.cpp:67 #6 0x0000000001bcd2c0 in ThreadPlanCallFunction () at /usr/src/contrib/llvm-project/lldb/source/Target/ThreadPlanCallFunction.cpp:114 #7 0x00000000020076d4 in InferiorCallMmap () at /usr/src/contrib/llvm-project/lldb/source/Plugins/Process/Utility/InferiorCallPOSIX.cpp:97 #8 0x0000000001f4be33 in DoAllocateMemory () at /usr/src/contrib/llvm-project/lldb/source/Plugins/Process/FreeBSD/ProcessFreeBSD.cpp:604 #9 0x0000000001fe51b9 in AllocatePage () at /usr/src/contrib/llvm-project/lldb/source/Target/Memory.cpp:347 #10 0x0000000001fe5385 in AllocateMemory () at /usr/src/contrib/llvm-project/lldb/source/Target/Memory.cpp:383 #11 0x0000000001974da2 in AllocateMemory () at /usr/src/contrib/llvm-project/lldb/source/Target/Process.cpp:2301 #12 CanJIT () at /usr/src/contrib/llvm-project/lldb/source/Target/Process.cpp:2331 #13 0x0000000001a1bf3d in Evaluate () at /usr/src/contrib/llvm-project/lldb/source/Expression/UserExpression.cpp:190 #14 0x00000000019ce7a2 in EvaluateExpression () at /usr/src/contrib/llvm-project/lldb/source/Target/Target.cpp:2372 #15 0x0000000001ad784c in EvaluateExpression () at /usr/src/contrib/llvm-project/lldb/source/Commands/CommandObjectExpression.cpp:414 #16 0x0000000001ad86ae in DoExecute () at /usr/src/contrib/llvm-project/lldb/source/Commands/CommandObjectExpression.cpp:646 #17 0x0000000001a5e3ed in Execute () at /usr/src/contrib/llvm-project/lldb/source/Interpreter/CommandObject.cpp:1003 #18 0x0000000001a6c4a3 in HandleCommand () at /usr/src/contrib/llvm-project/lldb/source/Interpreter/CommandInterpreter.cpp:1762 #19 0x0000000001a6f98c in IOHandlerInputComplete () at /usr/src/contrib/llvm-project/lldb/source/Interpreter/CommandInterpreter.cpp:2760 #20 0x0000000001a90b08 in Run () at /usr/src/contrib/llvm-project/lldb/source/Core/IOHandler.cpp:548 #21 0x00000000019a6c6a in ExecuteIOHandlers () at /usr/src/contrib/llvm-project/lldb/source/Core/Debugger.cpp:903 #22 0x0000000001a70337 in RunCommandInterpreter () at /usr/src/contrib/llvm-project/lldb/source/Interpreter/CommandInterpreter.cpp:2946 #23 0x0000000001d9d812 in RunCommandInterpreter () at /usr/src/contrib/llvm-project/lldb/source/API/SBDebugger.cpp:1169 #24 0x0000000001918be8 in MainLoop () at /usr/src/contrib/llvm-project/lldb/tools/driver/Driver.cpp:675 #25 0x000000000191a114 in main () at /usr/src/contrib/llvm-project/lldb/tools/driver/Driver.cpp:890``` Fix the incorrect error catch by only instantiating an `Error` object if it is necessary. Reviewed By: JDevlieghere Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86355

When `Target::GetEntryPointAddress()` calls `exe_module->GetObjectFile()->GetEntryPointAddress()`, and the returned `entry_addr` is valid, it can immediately be returned. However, just before that, an `llvm::Error` value has been setup, but in this case it is not consumed before returning, like is done further below in the function. In https://bugs.freebsd.org/248745 we got a bug report for this, where a very simple test case aborts and dumps core: ``` * thread #1, name = 'testcase', stop reason = breakpoint 1.1 frame #0: 0x00000000002018d4 testcase`main(argc=1, argv=0x00007fffffffea18) at testcase.c:3:5 1 int main(int argc, char *argv[]) 2 { -> 3 return 0; 4 } (lldb) p argc Program aborted due to an unhandled Error: Error value was Success. (Note: Success values must still be checked prior to being destroyed). Thread 1 received signal SIGABRT, Aborted. thr_kill () at thr_kill.S:3 3 thr_kill.S: No such file or directory. (gdb) bt #0 thr_kill () at thr_kill.S:3 #1 0x00000008049a0004 in __raise (s=6) at /usr/src/lib/libc/gen/raise.c:52 #2 0x0000000804916229 in abort () at /usr/src/lib/libc/stdlib/abort.c:67 #3 0x000000000451b5f5 in fatalUncheckedError () at /usr/src/contrib/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Support/Error.cpp:112 #4 0x00000000019cf008 in GetEntryPointAddress () at /usr/src/contrib/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/Support/Error.h:267 #5 0x0000000001bccbd8 in ConstructorSetup () at /usr/src/contrib/llvm-project/lldb/source/Target/ThreadPlanCallFunction.cpp:67 #6 0x0000000001bcd2c0 in ThreadPlanCallFunction () at /usr/src/contrib/llvm-project/lldb/source/Target/ThreadPlanCallFunction.cpp:114 #7 0x00000000020076d4 in InferiorCallMmap () at /usr/src/contrib/llvm-project/lldb/source/Plugins/Process/Utility/InferiorCallPOSIX.cpp:97 #8 0x0000000001f4be33 in DoAllocateMemory () at /usr/src/contrib/llvm-project/lldb/source/Plugins/Process/FreeBSD/ProcessFreeBSD.cpp:604 #9 0x0000000001fe51b9 in AllocatePage () at /usr/src/contrib/llvm-project/lldb/source/Target/Memory.cpp:347 #10 0x0000000001fe5385 in AllocateMemory () at /usr/src/contrib/llvm-project/lldb/source/Target/Memory.cpp:383 #11 0x0000000001974da2 in AllocateMemory () at /usr/src/contrib/llvm-project/lldb/source/Target/Process.cpp:2301 #12 CanJIT () at /usr/src/contrib/llvm-project/lldb/source/Target/Process.cpp:2331 #13 0x0000000001a1bf3d in Evaluate () at /usr/src/contrib/llvm-project/lldb/source/Expression/UserExpression.cpp:190 #14 0x00000000019ce7a2 in EvaluateExpression () at /usr/src/contrib/llvm-project/lldb/source/Target/Target.cpp:2372 #15 0x0000000001ad784c in EvaluateExpression () at /usr/src/contrib/llvm-project/lldb/source/Commands/CommandObjectExpression.cpp:414 #16 0x0000000001ad86ae in DoExecute () at /usr/src/contrib/llvm-project/lldb/source/Commands/CommandObjectExpression.cpp:646 #17 0x0000000001a5e3ed in Execute () at /usr/src/contrib/llvm-project/lldb/source/Interpreter/CommandObject.cpp:1003 #18 0x0000000001a6c4a3 in HandleCommand () at /usr/src/contrib/llvm-project/lldb/source/Interpreter/CommandInterpreter.cpp:1762 #19 0x0000000001a6f98c in IOHandlerInputComplete () at /usr/src/contrib/llvm-project/lldb/source/Interpreter/CommandInterpreter.cpp:2760 #20 0x0000000001a90b08 in Run () at /usr/src/contrib/llvm-project/lldb/source/Core/IOHandler.cpp:548 #21 0x00000000019a6c6a in ExecuteIOHandlers () at /usr/src/contrib/llvm-project/lldb/source/Core/Debugger.cpp:903 #22 0x0000000001a70337 in RunCommandInterpreter () at /usr/src/contrib/llvm-project/lldb/source/Interpreter/CommandInterpreter.cpp:2946 #23 0x0000000001d9d812 in RunCommandInterpreter () at /usr/src/contrib/llvm-project/lldb/source/API/SBDebugger.cpp:1169 #24 0x0000000001918be8 in MainLoop () at /usr/src/contrib/llvm-project/lldb/tools/driver/Driver.cpp:675 #25 0x000000000191a114 in main () at /usr/src/contrib/llvm-project/lldb/tools/driver/Driver.cpp:890``` Fix the incorrect error catch by only instantiating an `Error` object if it is necessary. Reviewed By: JDevlieghere Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86355 (cherry picked from commit 1ce07cd)

ADDI often has a frameindex in operand 1, but consumers of this interface, such as MachineSink, tend to call getReg() on the Destination and Source operands, leading to the following crash when building FreeBSD after this implementation was added in 8cf6778: ``` clang: llvm/include/llvm/CodeGen/MachineOperand.h:359: llvm::Register llvm::MachineOperand::getReg() const: Assertion `isReg() && "This is not a register operand!"' failed. PLEASE submit a bug report to https://bugs.llvm.org/ and include the crash backtrace, preprocessed source, and associated run script. Stack dump: #0 0x00007f4286f9b4d0 llvm::sys::PrintStackTrace(llvm::raw_ostream&, int) llvm/lib/Support/Unix/Signals.inc:563:0 #1 0x00007f4286f9b587 PrintStackTraceSignalHandler(void*) llvm/lib/Support/Unix/Signals.inc:630:0 #2 0x00007f4286f9926b llvm::sys::RunSignalHandlers() llvm/lib/Support/Signals.cpp:71:0 #3 0x00007f4286f9ae52 SignalHandler(int) llvm/lib/Support/Unix/Signals.inc:405:0 #4 0x00007f428646ffd0 (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x3efd0) #5 0x00007f428646ff47 raise /build/glibc-2ORdQG/glibc-2.27/signal/../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/raise.c:51:0 #6 0x00007f42864718b1 abort /build/glibc-2ORdQG/glibc-2.27/stdlib/abort.c:81:0 #7 0x00007f428646142a __assert_fail_base /build/glibc-2ORdQG/glibc-2.27/assert/assert.c:89:0 #8 0x00007f42864614a2 (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x304a2) #9 0x00007f428d4078e2 llvm::MachineOperand::getReg() const llvm/include/llvm/CodeGen/MachineOperand.h:359:0 #10 0x00007f428d8260e7 attemptDebugCopyProp(llvm::MachineInstr&, llvm::MachineInstr&) llvm/lib/CodeGen/MachineSink.cpp:862:0 #11 0x00007f428d826442 performSink(llvm::MachineInstr&, llvm::MachineBasicBlock&, llvm::MachineInstrBundleIterator<llvm::MachineInstr, false>, llvm::SmallVectorImpl<llvm::MachineInstr*>&) llvm/lib/CodeGen/MachineSink.cpp:918:0 #12 0x00007f428d826e27 (anonymous namespace)::MachineSinking::SinkInstruction(llvm::MachineInstr&, bool&, std::map<llvm::MachineBasicBlock*, llvm::SmallVector<llvm::MachineBasicBlock*, 4u>, std::less<llvm::MachineBasicBlock*>, std::allocator<std::pair<llvm::MachineBasicBlock* const, llvm::SmallVector<llvm::MachineBasicBlock*, 4u> > > >&) llvm/lib/CodeGen/MachineSink.cpp:1073:0 #13 0x00007f428d824a2c (anonymous namespace)::MachineSinking::ProcessBlock(llvm::MachineBasicBlock&) llvm/lib/CodeGen/MachineSink.cpp:410:0 #14 0x00007f428d824513 (anonymous namespace)::MachineSinking::runOnMachineFunction(llvm::MachineFunction&) llvm/lib/CodeGen/MachineSink.cpp:340:0 ``` Thus, check that operand 1 is also a register in the condition. Reviewed By: arichardson, luismarques Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89090

This reverts commit bfd2c21. This appears to be causing stage2 msan failures on buildbots: FAIL: LLVM :: Transforms/SimplifyCFG/X86/bug-25299.ll (65872 of 71835) ******************** TEST 'LLVM :: Transforms/SimplifyCFG/X86/bug-25299.ll' FAILED ******************** Script: -- : 'RUN: at line 1'; /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm_build_msan/bin/opt < /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/test/Transforms/SimplifyCFG/X86/bug-25299.ll -simplifycfg -S | /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm_build_msan/bin/FileCheck /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/test/Transforms/SimplifyCFG/X86/bug-25299.ll -- Exit Code: 2 Command Output (stderr): -- ==87374==WARNING: MemorySanitizer: use-of-uninitialized-value #0 0x9de47b6 in getBasicBlockIndex /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/IR/Instructions.h:2749:5 #1 0x9de47b6 in simplifyCommonResume /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/SimplifyCFG.cpp:4112:23 #2 0x9de47b6 in simplifyResume /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/SimplifyCFG.cpp:4039:12 #3 0x9de47b6 in (anonymous namespace)::SimplifyCFGOpt::simplifyOnce(llvm::BasicBlock*) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/SimplifyCFG.cpp:6330:16 #4 0x9dcca13 in run /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/SimplifyCFG.cpp:6358:16 #5 0x9dcca13 in llvm::simplifyCFG(llvm::BasicBlock*, llvm::TargetTransformInfo const&, llvm::SimplifyCFGOptions const&, llvm::SmallPtrSetImpl<llvm::BasicBlock*>*) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/SimplifyCFG.cpp:6369:8 #6 0x974643d in iterativelySimplifyCFG(

CXXDeductionGuideDecl with a local typedef has its own copy of the TypedefDecl with the CXXDeductionGuideDecl as the DeclContext of that TypedefDecl. ``` template <typename T> struct A { typedef T U; A(U, T); }; A a{(int)0, (int)0}; ``` Related discussion on cfe-dev: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2020-November/067252.html Without this fix, when we import the CXXDeductionGuideDecl (via VisitFunctionDecl) then before creating the Decl we must import the FunctionType. However, the first parameter's type is the afore mentioned local typedef. So, we then start importing the TypedefDecl whose DeclContext is the CXXDeductionGuideDecl itself. The infinite loop is formed. ``` #0 clang::ASTNodeImporter::VisitCXXDeductionGuideDecl(clang::CXXDeductionGuideDecl*) clang/lib/AST/ASTImporter.cpp:3543:0 #1 clang::declvisitor::Base<std::add_pointer, clang::ASTNodeImporter, llvm::Expected<clang::Decl*> >::Visit(clang::Decl*) /home/egbomrt/WORK/llvm5/build/debug/tools/clang/include/clang/AST/DeclNodes.inc:405:0 #2 clang::ASTImporter::ImportImpl(clang::Decl*) clang/lib/AST/ASTImporter.cpp:8038:0 #3 clang::ASTImporter::Import(clang::Decl*) clang/lib/AST/ASTImporter.cpp:8200:0 #4 clang::ASTImporter::ImportContext(clang::DeclContext*) clang/lib/AST/ASTImporter.cpp:8297:0 #5 clang::ASTNodeImporter::ImportDeclContext(clang::Decl*, clang::DeclContext*&, clang::DeclContext*&) clang/lib/AST/ASTImporter.cpp:1852:0 #6 clang::ASTNodeImporter::ImportDeclParts(clang::NamedDecl*, clang::DeclContext*&, clang::DeclContext*&, clang::DeclarationName&, clang::NamedDecl*&, clang::SourceLocation&) clang/lib/AST/ASTImporter.cpp:1628:0 #7 clang::ASTNodeImporter::VisitTypedefNameDecl(clang::TypedefNameDecl*, bool) clang/lib/AST/ASTImporter.cpp:2419:0 #8 clang::ASTNodeImporter::VisitTypedefDecl(clang::TypedefDecl*) clang/lib/AST/ASTImporter.cpp:2500:0 #9 clang::declvisitor::Base<std::add_pointer, clang::ASTNodeImporter, llvm::Expected<clang::Decl*> >::Visit(clang::Decl*) /home/egbomrt/WORK/llvm5/build/debug/tools/clang/include/clang/AST/DeclNodes.inc:315:0 #10 clang::ASTImporter::ImportImpl(clang::Decl*) clang/lib/AST/ASTImporter.cpp:8038:0 #11 clang::ASTImporter::Import(clang::Decl*) clang/lib/AST/ASTImporter.cpp:8200:0 #12 llvm::Expected<clang::TypedefNameDecl*> clang::ASTNodeImporter::import<clang::TypedefNameDecl>(clang::TypedefNameDecl*) clang/lib/AST/ASTImporter.cpp:165:0 #13 clang::ASTNodeImporter::VisitTypedefType(clang::TypedefType const*) clang/lib/AST/ASTImporter.cpp:1304:0 #14 clang::TypeVisitor<clang::ASTNodeImporter, llvm::Expected<clang::QualType> >::Visit(clang::Type const*) /home/egbomrt/WORK/llvm5/build/debug/tools/clang/include/clang/AST/TypeNodes.inc:74:0 #15 clang::ASTImporter::Import(clang::QualType) clang/lib/AST/ASTImporter.cpp:8071:0 #16 llvm::Expected<clang::QualType> clang::ASTNodeImporter::import<clang::QualType>(clang::QualType const&) clang/lib/AST/ASTImporter.cpp:179:0 #17 clang::ASTNodeImporter::VisitFunctionProtoType(clang::FunctionProtoType const*) clang/lib/AST/ASTImporter.cpp:1244:0 #18 clang::TypeVisitor<clang::ASTNodeImporter, llvm::Expected<clang::QualType> >::Visit(clang::Type const*) /home/egbomrt/WORK/llvm5/build/debug/tools/clang/include/clang/AST/TypeNodes.inc:47:0 #19 clang::ASTImporter::Import(clang::QualType) clang/lib/AST/ASTImporter.cpp:8071:0 #20 llvm::Expected<clang::QualType> clang::ASTNodeImporter::import<clang::QualType>(clang::QualType const&) clang/lib/AST/ASTImporter.cpp:179:0 #21 clang::QualType clang::ASTNodeImporter::importChecked<clang::QualType>(llvm::Error&, clang::QualType const&) clang/lib/AST/ASTImporter.cpp:198:0 #22 clang::ASTNodeImporter::VisitFunctionDecl(clang::FunctionDecl*) clang/lib/AST/ASTImporter.cpp:3313:0 #23 clang::ASTNodeImporter::VisitCXXDeductionGuideDecl(clang::CXXDeductionGuideDecl*) clang/lib/AST/ASTImporter.cpp:3543:0 ``` The fix is to first create the TypedefDecl and only then start to import the DeclContext. Basically, we could do this during the import of all other Decls (not just for typedefs). But it seems, there is only one another AST construct that has a similar cycle: a struct defined as a function parameter: ``` int struct_in_proto(struct data_t{int a;int b;} *d); ``` In that case, however, we had decided to return simply with an error back then because that seemed to be a very rare construct. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92209

/home/marxin/Programming/gcc2/libsanitizer/ubsan/ubsan_value.cpp:77:25: runtime error: left shift of 0x0000000000000000fffffffffffffffb by 96 places cannot be represented in type '__int128' #0 0x7ffff754edfe in __ubsan::Value::getSIntValue() const /home/marxin/Programming/gcc2/libsanitizer/ubsan/ubsan_value.cpp:77 #1 0x7ffff7548719 in __ubsan::Value::isNegative() const /home/marxin/Programming/gcc2/libsanitizer/ubsan/ubsan_value.h:190 #2 0x7ffff7542a34 in handleShiftOutOfBoundsImpl /home/marxin/Programming/gcc2/libsanitizer/ubsan/ubsan_handlers.cpp:338 #3 0x7ffff75431b7 in __ubsan_handle_shift_out_of_bounds /home/marxin/Programming/gcc2/libsanitizer/ubsan/ubsan_handlers.cpp:370 #4 0x40067f in main (/home/marxin/Programming/testcases/a.out+0x40067f) #5 0x7ffff72c8b24 in __libc_start_main (/lib64/libc.so.6+0x27b24) #6 0x4005bd in _start (/home/marxin/Programming/testcases/a.out+0x4005bd) Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97263

Andrei Matei reported a llvm11 core dump for his bpf program https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48578 The core dump happens in LiveVariables analysis phase. #4 0x00007fce54356bb0 __restore_rt #5 0x00007fce4d51785e llvm::LiveVariables::HandleVirtRegUse(unsigned int, llvm::MachineBasicBlock*, llvm::MachineInstr&) #6 0x00007fce4d519abe llvm::LiveVariables::runOnInstr(llvm::MachineInstr&, llvm::SmallVectorImpl<unsigned int>&) #7 0x00007fce4d519ec6 llvm::LiveVariables::runOnBlock(llvm::MachineBasicBlock*, unsigned int) #8 0x00007fce4d51a4bf llvm::LiveVariables::runOnMachineFunction(llvm::MachineFunction&) The bug can be reproduced with llvm12 and latest trunk as well. Futher analysis shows that there is a bug in BPF peephole TRUNC elimination optimization, which tries to remove unnecessary TRUNC operations (a <<= 32; a >>= 32). Specifically, the compiler did wrong transformation for the following patterns: %1 = LDW ... %2 = SLL_ri %1, 32 %3 = SRL_ri %2, 32 ... %3 ... %4 = SRA_ri %2, 32 ... %4 ... The current transformation did not check how many uses of %2 and did transformation like %1 = LDW ... ... %1 ... %4 = SRL_ri %2, 32 ... %4 ... and pseudo register %2 is used by not defined and caused LiveVariables analysis core dump. To fix the issue, when traversing back from SRL_ri to SLL_ri, check to ensure SLL_ri has only one use. Otherwise, don't do transformation. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97792

This reverts commit c274b6e. The x86_64 debian bot got a failure with this patch, https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot#builders/68/builds/33078 where SymbolFile/DWARF/x86/DW_TAG_variable-DW_AT_decl_file-DW_AT_abstract_origin-crosscu1.s is crashing here - #2 0x0000000000425a9f SignalHandler(int) Signals.cpp:0:0 #3 0x00007f57160e9140 __restore_rt (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0+0x14140) #4 0x00007f570d911e43 lldb_private::SourceManager::GetFile(lldb_private::FileSpec const&) crtstuff.c:0:0 #5 0x00007f570d914270 lldb_private::SourceManager::DisplaySourceLinesWithLineNumbers(lldb_private::FileSpec const&, unsigned int, unsigned int, unsigned int, unsigned int, char const*, lldb_private::Stream*, lldb_private::SymbolContextList const*) crtstuff.c:0:0 #6 0x00007f570da662c8 lldb_private::StackFrame::GetStatus(lldb_private::Stream&, bool, bool, bool, char const*) crtstuff.c:0:0 I don't get a failure here my mac, I'll review this method more closely tomorrow.

…mic types We observed a failed assert in overloaded compound-assignment operator resolution: ``` Assertion failed: (Result.isInvalid() && "C++ binary operator overloading is missing candidates!"), function CreateOverloadedBinOp, file SemaOverload.cpp, line 13944. ... frame #4: clang` clang::Sema::CreateOverloadedBinOp(..., Opc=BO_OrAssign, ..., PerformADL=true, AllowRewrittenCandidates=false, ...) at SemaOverload.cpp:13943 frame #5: clang` BuildOverloadedBinOp(..., Opc=BO_OrAssign, ...) at SemaExpr.cpp:15228 frame #6: clang` clang::Sema::BuildBinOp(..., Opc=BO_OrAssign, ...) at SemaExpr.cpp:15330 frame #7: clang` clang::Sema::ActOnBinOp(..., Kind=pipeequal, ...) at SemaExpr.cpp:15187 frame #8: clang` clang::Parser::ParseRHSOfBinaryExpression(..., MinPrec=Assignment) at ParseExpr.cpp:629 frame #9: clang` clang::Parser::ParseAssignmentExpression(..., isTypeCast=NotTypeCast) at ParseExpr.cpp:176 frame #10: clang` clang::Parser::ParseExpression(... isTypeCast=NotTypeCast) at ParseExpr.cpp:124 frame #11: clang` clang::Parser::ParseExprStatement(...) at ParseStmt.cpp:464 ``` A simple reproducer is: ``` _Atomic unsigned an_atomic_uint; enum { an_enum_value = 1 }; void enum1() { an_atomic_uint += an_enum_value; } ``` This patch fixes the issue by generating builtin operator overloads for (volatile) _Atomic types. Reviewed By: aaron.ballman Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125349

…ned form The DWARF spec says: Any debugging information entry representing the declaration of an object, module, subprogram or type may have DW_AT_decl_file, DW_AT_decl_line and DW_AT_decl_column attributes, each of whose value is an unsigned integer ^^^^^^^^ constant. If however, a producer happens to emit DW_AT_decl_file / DW_AT_decl_line using a signed integer form, llvm-dwarfdump crashes, like so: (... snip ...) 0x000000b4: DW_TAG_structure_type DW_AT_name ("test_struct") DW_AT_byte_size (136) DW_AT_decl_file (llvm-dwarfdump: (... snip ...)/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/Optional.h:197: T& llvm::optional_detail::OptionalStorage<T, true>::getValue() & [with T = long unsigned int]: Assertion `hasVal' failed. PLEASE submit a bug report to https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/ and include the crash backtrace. Stack dump: 0. Program arguments: /opt/rocm/llvm/bin/llvm-dwarfdump ./testsuite/outputs/gdb.rocm/lane-pc-vega20/lane-pc-vega20-kernel.so #0 0x000055cc8e78315f PrintStackTraceSignalHandler(void*) Signals.cpp:0:0 #1 0x000055cc8e780d3d SignalHandler(int) Signals.cpp:0:0 #2 0x00007f8f2cae8420 __restore_rt (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0+0x14420) #3 0x00007f8f2c58d00b raise /build/glibc-SzIz7B/glibc-2.31/signal/../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/raise.c:51:1 #4 0x00007f8f2c56c859 abort /build/glibc-SzIz7B/glibc-2.31/stdlib/abort.c:81:7 #5 0x00007f8f2c56c729 get_sysdep_segment_value /build/glibc-SzIz7B/glibc-2.31/intl/loadmsgcat.c:509:8 #6 0x00007f8f2c56c729 _nl_load_domain /build/glibc-SzIz7B/glibc-2.31/intl/loadmsgcat.c:970:34 #7 0x00007f8f2c57dfd6 (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x33fd6) #8 0x000055cc8e58ceb9 llvm::DWARFDie::dump(llvm::raw_ostream&, unsigned int, llvm::DIDumpOptions) const (/opt/rocm/llvm/bin/llvm-dwarfdump+0x2e0eb9) #9 0x000055cc8e58bec3 llvm::DWARFDie::dump(llvm::raw_ostream&, unsigned int, llvm::DIDumpOptions) const (/opt/rocm/llvm/bin/llvm-dwarfdump+0x2dfec3) #10 0x000055cc8e5b28a3 llvm::DWARFCompileUnit::dump(llvm::raw_ostream&, llvm::DIDumpOptions) (.part.21) DWARFCompileUnit.cpp:0:0 Likewise with DW_AT_call_file / DW_AT_call_line. The problem is that the code in llvm/lib/DebugInfo/DWARF/DWARFDie.cpp dumping these attributes assumes that FormValue.getAsUnsignedConstant() returns an armed optional. If in debug mode, we get an assertion line the above. If in release mode, and asserts are compiled out, then we proceed as if the optional had a value, running into undefined behavior, printing whatever random value. Fix this by checking whether the optional returned by FormValue.getAsUnsignedConstant() has a value, like done in other places. In addition, DWARFVerifier.cpp is validating DW_AT_call_file / DW_AT_decl_file, but not AT_call_line / DW_AT_decl_line. This commit fixes that too. The llvm-dwarfdump/X86/verify_file_encoding.yaml testcase is extended to cover these cases. Current llvm-dwarfdump crashes running the newly-extended test. "make check-llvm-tools-llvm-dwarfdump" shows no regressions, on x86-64 GNU/Linux. Reviewed By: dblaikie Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129392

…Impl The `File` might point to an invalid `FileID` when the AST is broken. That leads to clang/clangd crashes while processing comments. The relevant part of the crash is below ``` #4 0x00007f1d7fbf95bc std::_Rb_tree<unsigned int, std::pair<unsigned int const, clang::RawComment*>, std::_Select1st<std::pair<unsigned int const, clang::RawComment*>>, std::less<unsigned int>, std::allocator<std::pair<unsigned int const , clang::RawComment*>>>::_M_lower_bound(std::_Rb_tree_node<std::pair<unsigned int const, clang::RawComment*>> const*, std::_Rb_tree_node_base const*, unsigned int const&) const /usr/include/c++/8/bits/stl_tree.h:1911:2 #5 0x00007f1d7fbf95bc std::_Rb_tree<unsigned int, std::pair<unsigned int const, clang::RawComment*>, std::_Select1st<std::pair<unsigned int const, clang::RawComment*>>, std::less<unsigned int>, std::allocator<std::pair<unsigned int const, clang::RawComment*>>>::lower_bound(unsigned int const&) const /usr/include/c++/8/bits/stl_tree.h:1214:56 #6 0x00007f1d7fbf95bc std::map<unsigned int, clang::RawComment*, std::less<unsigned int>, std::allocator<std::pair<unsigned int const, clang::RawComment*>>>::lower_bound(unsigned int const&) const /usr/include/c++/8/bits/stl_map.h:1264:36 #7 0x00007f1d7fbf95bc clang::ASTContext::getRawCommentForDeclNoCacheImpl(clang::Decl const*, clang::SourceLocation, std::map<unsigned int, clang::RawComment*, std::less<unsigned int>, std::allocator<std::pair<unsigned int const, clang::RawComment*>>> const&) const /home/ivanmurashko/local/llvm-project/clang/lib/AST/ASTContext.cpp:226:57 ``` The corresponding LIT test that reproduces the crash was also added Same issue is described at https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49707 Reviewed By: gribozavr2 Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131675

…mic types We observed a failed assert in overloaded compound-assignment operator resolution: ``` Assertion failed: (Result.isInvalid() && "C++ binary operator overloading is missing candidates!"), function CreateOverloadedBinOp, file SemaOverload.cpp, line 13944. ... frame #4: clang` clang::Sema::CreateOverloadedBinOp(..., Opc=BO_OrAssign, ..., PerformADL=true, AllowRewrittenCandidates=false, ...) at SemaOverload.cpp:13943 frame #5: clang` BuildOverloadedBinOp(..., Opc=BO_OrAssign, ...) at SemaExpr.cpp:15228 frame #6: clang` clang::Sema::BuildBinOp(..., Opc=BO_OrAssign, ...) at SemaExpr.cpp:15330 frame #7: clang` clang::Sema::ActOnBinOp(..., Kind=pipeequal, ...) at SemaExpr.cpp:15187 frame #8: clang` clang::Parser::ParseRHSOfBinaryExpression(..., MinPrec=Assignment) at ParseExpr.cpp:629 frame #9: clang` clang::Parser::ParseAssignmentExpression(..., isTypeCast=NotTypeCast) at ParseExpr.cpp:176 frame #10: clang` clang::Parser::ParseExpression(... isTypeCast=NotTypeCast) at ParseExpr.cpp:124 frame #11: clang` clang::Parser::ParseExprStatement(...) at ParseStmt.cpp:464 ``` A simple reproducer is: ``` _Atomic unsigned an_atomic_uint; enum { an_enum_value = 1 }; void enum1() { an_atomic_uint += an_enum_value; } ``` This patch fixes the issue by generating builtin operator overloads for (volatile) _Atomic types. Reviewed By: aaron.ballman Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125349 (cherry picked from commit b02d970)

Found by msan -fsanitize-memory-use-after-dtor. ==8259==WARNING: MemorySanitizer: use-of-uninitialized-value #0 0x55dbec54d2b8 in dtorRecord(clang::interp::Block*, char*, clang::interp::Descriptor*) clang/lib/AST/Interp/Descriptor.cpp:150:22 #1 0x55dbec54bfcf in dtorArrayDesc(clang::interp::Block*, char*, clang::interp::Descriptor*) clang/lib/AST/Interp/Descriptor.cpp:97:7 #2 0x55dbec508578 in invokeDtor clang/lib/AST/Interp/InterpBlock.h:79:7 #3 0x55dbec508578 in clang::interp::Program::~Program() clang/lib/AST/Interp/Program.h:55:19 #4 0x55dbec50657a in operator() third_party/crosstool/v18/stable/toolchain/bin/../include/c++/v1/__memory/unique_ptr.h:55:5 #5 0x55dbec50657a in std::__msan::unique_ptr<clang::interp::Program, std::__msan::default_delete<clang::interp::Program>>::~unique_ptr() third_party/crosstool/v18/stable/toolchain/bin/../include/c++/v1/__memory/unique_ptr.h:261:7 #6 0x55dbec5035a1 in clang::interp::Context::~Context() clang/lib/AST/Interp/Context.cpp:27:22 #7 0x55dbebec1daa in operator() third_party/crosstool/v18/stable/toolchain/bin/../include/c++/v1/__memory/unique_ptr.h:55:5 #8 0x55dbebec1daa in std::__msan::unique_ptr<clang::interp::Context, std::__msan::default_delete<clang::interp::Context>>::~unique_ptr() third_party/crosstool/v18/stable/toolchain/bin/../include/c++/v1/__memory/unique_ptr.h:261:7 #9 0x55dbebe285f9 in clang::ASTContext::~ASTContext() clang/lib/AST/ASTContext.cpp:1038:40 #10 0x55dbe941ff13 in llvm::RefCountedBase<clang::ASTContext>::Release() const llvm/include/llvm/ADT/IntrusiveRefCntPtr.h:101:7 #11 0x55dbe94353ef in release llvm/include/llvm/ADT/IntrusiveRefCntPtr.h:159:38 #12 0x55dbe94353ef in release llvm/include/llvm/ADT/IntrusiveRefCntPtr.h:224:7 #13 0x55dbe94353ef in ~IntrusiveRefCntPtr llvm/include/llvm/ADT/IntrusiveRefCntPtr.h:191:27 #14 0x55dbe94353ef in clang::CompilerInstance::setASTContext(clang::ASTContext*) clang/lib/Frontend/CompilerInstance.cpp:178:3 #15 0x55dbe95ad0ad in clang::FrontendAction::EndSourceFile() clang/lib/Frontend/FrontendAction.cpp:1100:8 #16 0x55dbe9445fcf in clang::CompilerInstance::ExecuteAction(clang::FrontendAction&) clang/lib/Frontend/CompilerInstance.cpp:1047:11 #17 0x55dbe6b3afef in clang::ExecuteCompilerInvocation(clang::CompilerInstance*) clang/lib/FrontendTool/ExecuteCompilerInvocation.cpp:266:25 #18 0x55dbe6b13288 in cc1_main(llvm::ArrayRef<char const*>, char const*, void*) clang/tools/driver/cc1_main.cpp:250:15 #19 0x55dbe6b0095f in ExecuteCC1Tool(llvm::SmallVectorImpl<char const*>&) clang/tools/driver/driver.cpp:319:12 #20 0x55dbe6aff41c in clang_main(int, char**) clang/tools/driver/driver.cpp:395:12 #21 0x7f9be07fa632 in __libc_start_main #22 0x55dbe6a702e9 in _start Member fields were destroyed #0 0x55dbe6a7da5d in __sanitizer_dtor_callback_fields compiler-rt/lib/msan/msan_interceptors.cpp:949:5 #1 0x55dbec5094ac in ~SmallVectorImpl llvm/include/llvm/ADT/SmallVector.h:479:7 #2 0x55dbec5094ac in ~SmallVectorImpl llvm/include/llvm/ADT/SmallVector.h:612:3 #3 0x55dbec5094ac in llvm::SmallVector<clang::interp::Record::Base, 8u>::~SmallVector() llvm/include/llvm/ADT/SmallVector.h:1207:3 #4 0x55dbec508e79 in clang::interp::Record::~Record() clang/lib/AST/Interp/Record.h:24:7 #5 0x55dbec508612 in clang::interp::Program::~Program() clang/lib/AST/Interp/Program.h:49:26 #6 0x55dbec50657a in operator() third_party/crosstool/v18/stable/toolchain/bin/../include/c++/v1/__memory/unique_ptr.h:55:5 #7 0x55dbec50657a in std::__msan::unique_ptr<clang::interp::Program, std::__msan::default_delete<clang::interp::Program>>::~unique_ptr() third_party/crosstool/v18/stable/toolchain/bin/../include/c++/v1/__memory/unique_ptr.h:261:7 #8 0x55dbec5035a1 in clang::interp::Context::~Context() clang/lib/AST/Interp/Context.cpp:27:22 #9 0x55dbebec1daa in operator() third_party/crosstool/v18/stable/toolchain/bin/../include/c++/v1/__memory/unique_ptr.h:55:5 #10 0x55dbebec1daa in std::__msan::unique_ptr<clang::interp::Context, std::__msan::default_delete<clang::interp::Context>>::~unique_ptr() third_party/crosstool/v18/stable/toolchain/bin/../include/c++/v1/__memory/unique_ptr.h:261:7 #11 0x55dbebe285f9 in clang::ASTContext::~ASTContext() clang/lib/AST/ASTContext.cpp:1038:40 #12 0x55dbe941ff13 in llvm::RefCountedBase<clang::ASTContext>::Release() const llvm/include/llvm/ADT/IntrusiveRefCntPtr.h:101:7 #13 0x55dbe94353ef in release llvm/include/llvm/ADT/IntrusiveRefCntPtr.h:159:38 #14 0x55dbe94353ef in release llvm/include/llvm/ADT/IntrusiveRefCntPtr.h:224:7 #15 0x55dbe94353ef in ~IntrusiveRefCntPtr llvm/include/llvm/ADT/IntrusiveRefCntPtr.h:191:27 #16 0x55dbe94353ef in clang::CompilerInstance::setASTContext(clang::ASTContext*) clang/lib/Frontend/CompilerInstance.cpp:178:3 #17 0x55dbe95ad0ad in clang::FrontendAction::EndSourceFile() clang/lib/Frontend/FrontendAction.cpp:1100:8 #18 0x55dbe9445fcf in clang::CompilerInstance::ExecuteAction(clang::FrontendAction&) clang/lib/Frontend/CompilerInstance.cpp:1047:11 #19 0x55dbe6b3afef in clang::ExecuteCompilerInvocation(clang::CompilerInstance*) clang/lib/FrontendTool/ExecuteCompilerInvocation.cpp:266:25 #20 0x55dbe6b13288 in cc1_main(llvm::ArrayRef<char const*>, char const*, void*) clang/tools/driver/cc1_main.cpp:250:15 #21 0x55dbe6b0095f in ExecuteCC1Tool(llvm::SmallVectorImpl<char const*>&) clang/tools/driver/driver.cpp:319:12 #22 0x55dbe6aff41c in clang_main(int, char**) clang/tools/driver/driver.cpp:395:12 #23 0x7f9be07fa632 in __libc_start_main #24 0x55dbe6a702e9 in _start

For the following program, $ cat t.c struct t { int (__attribute__((btf_type_tag("rcu"))) *f)(); int a; }; int foo(struct t *arg) { return arg->a; } Compiling with 'clang -g -O2 -S t.c' will cause a failure like below: clang: /home/yhs/work/llvm-project/clang/lib/Sema/SemaType.cpp:6391: void {anonymous}::DeclaratorLocFiller::VisitParenTypeLoc(clang::ParenTypeLoc): Assertion `Chunk.Kind == DeclaratorChunk::Paren' failed. PLEASE submit a bug report to https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/ and include the crash backtrace, preprocessed source, and associated run script. Stack dump: ...... #5 0x00007f89e4280ea5 abort (/lib64/libc.so.6+0x21ea5) #6 0x00007f89e4280d79 _nl_load_domain.cold.0 (/lib64/libc.so.6+0x21d79) #7 0x00007f89e42a6456 (/lib64/libc.so.6+0x47456) #8 0x00000000045c2596 GetTypeSourceInfoForDeclarator((anonymous namespace)::TypeProcessingState&, clang::QualType, clang::TypeSourceInfo*) SemaType.cpp:0:0 #9 0x00000000045ccfa5 GetFullTypeForDeclarator((anonymous namespace)::TypeProcessingState&, clang::QualType, clang::TypeSourceInfo*) SemaType.cpp:0:0 ...... The reason of the failure is due to the mismatch of TypeLoc and D.getTypeObject().Kind. For example, the TypeLoc is BTFTagAttributedType 0x88614e0 'int btf_type_tag(rcu)()' sugar |-ParenType 0x8861480 'int ()' sugar | `-FunctionNoProtoType 0x8861450 'int ()' cdecl | `-BuiltinType 0x87fd500 'int' while corresponding D.getTypeObject().Kind points to DeclaratorChunk::Paren, and this will cause later assertion. To fix the issue, similar to AttributedTypeLoc, let us skip BTFTagAttributedTypeLoc in GetTypeSourceInfoForDeclarator(). Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D136807

…D112621 It seems like `LHS` and `RHS` could be empty range sets. This caused an assertion failure inside RangeConstraintManager. I'm hoisting out the check from the function into the call-site. This way we could assert that we only want to deal with non-empty range sets. The relevant part of the trace: ``` #6 0x00007fe6ff5f81a6 __assert_fail_base (/lib64/libc.so.6+0x2f1a6) #7 0x00007fe6ff5f8252 (/lib64/libc.so.6+0x2f252) #8 0x00000000049caed2 (anonymous namespace)::SymbolicRangeInferrer::VisitBinaryOperator(clang::ento::RangeSet, clang::BinaryOperatorKind, clang::ento::RangeSet, clang::QualType) RangeConstraintManager.cpp:0:0 #9 0x00000000049c9867 (anonymous namespace)::SymbolicRangeInferrer::infer(clang::ento::SymExpr const*) RangeConstraintManager.cpp:0:0 #10 0x00000000049bebf5 (anonymous namespace)::RangeConstraintManager::assumeSymNE(llvm::IntrusiveRefCntPtr<clang::ento::ProgramState const>, clang::ento::SymExpr const*, llvm::APSInt const&, llvm::APSInt const&) RangeConstraintManager.cpp:0:0 #11 0x00000000049d368c clang::ento::RangedConstraintManager::assumeSymUnsupported(llvm::IntrusiveRefCntPtr<clang::ento::ProgramState const>, clang::ento::SymExpr const*, bool) (../../main-github/llvm/build-all/bin/clang+0x49d368c) #12 0x00000000049f0b09 clang::ento::SimpleConstraintManager::assumeAux(llvm::IntrusiveRefCntPtr<clang::ento::ProgramState const>, clang::ento::NonLoc, bool) (../../main-github/llvm/build-all/bin/clang+0x49f0b09) #13 0x00000000049f096a clang::ento::SimpleConstraintManager::assume(llvm::IntrusiveRefCntPtr<clang::ento::ProgramState const>, clang::ento::NonLoc, bool) (../../main-github/llvm/build-all/bin/clang+0x49f096a) #14 0x00000000049f086d clang::ento::SimpleConstraintManager::assumeInternal(llvm::IntrusiveRefCntPtr<clang::ento::ProgramState const>, clang::ento::DefinedSVal, bool) (../../main-github/llvm/build-all/bin/clang+0x49f086d) #15 0x000000000492d3e3 clang::ento::ConstraintManager::assumeDual(llvm::IntrusiveRefCntPtr<clang::ento::ProgramState const>, clang::ento::DefinedSVal) (../../main-github/llvm/build-all/bin/clang+0x492d3e3) #16 0x0000000004955b6d clang::ento::ExprEngine::evalEagerlyAssumeBinOpBifurcation(clang::ento::ExplodedNodeSet&, clang::ento::ExplodedNodeSet&, clang::Expr const*) (../../main-github/llvm/build-all/bin/clang+0x4955b6d) #17 0x00000000049514b6 clang::ento::ExprEngine::Visit(clang::Stmt const*, clang::ento::ExplodedNode*, clang::ento::ExplodedNodeSet&) (../../main-github/llvm/build-all/bin/clang+0x49514b6) #18 0x000000000494c73e clang::ento::ExprEngine::ProcessStmt(clang::Stmt const*, clang::ento::ExplodedNode*) (../../main-github/llvm/build-all/bin/clang+0x494c73e) #19 0x000000000494c459 clang::ento::ExprEngine::processCFGElement(clang::CFGElement, clang::ento::ExplodedNode*, unsigned int, clang::ento::NodeBuilderContext*) (../../main-github/llvm/build-all/bin/clang+0x494c459) #20 0x000000000492f3d0 clang::ento::CoreEngine::HandlePostStmt(clang::CFGBlock const*, unsigned int, clang::ento::ExplodedNode*) (../../main-github/llvm/build-all/bin/clang+0x492f3d0) #21 0x000000000492e1f6 clang::ento::CoreEngine::ExecuteWorkList(clang::LocationContext const*, unsigned int, llvm::IntrusiveRefCntPtr<clang::ento::ProgramState const>) (../../main-github/llvm/build-all/bin/clang+0x492e1f6) ``` Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112621

…D112621 It seems like `LHS` and `RHS` could be empty range sets. This caused an assertion failure inside RangeConstraintManager. I'm hoisting out the check from the function into the call-site. This way we could assert that we only want to deal with non-empty range sets. The relevant part of the trace: ``` swiftlang#6 0x00007fe6ff5f81a6 __assert_fail_base (/lib64/libc.so.6+0x2f1a6) swiftlang#7 0x00007fe6ff5f8252 (/lib64/libc.so.6+0x2f252) swiftlang#8 0x00000000049caed2 (anonymous namespace)::SymbolicRangeInferrer::VisitBinaryOperator(clang::ento::RangeSet, clang::BinaryOperatorKind, clang::ento::RangeSet, clang::QualType) RangeConstraintManager.cpp:0:0 swiftlang#9 0x00000000049c9867 (anonymous namespace)::SymbolicRangeInferrer::infer(clang::ento::SymExpr const*) RangeConstraintManager.cpp:0:0 swiftlang#10 0x00000000049bebf5 (anonymous namespace)::RangeConstraintManager::assumeSymNE(llvm::IntrusiveRefCntPtr<clang::ento::ProgramState const>, clang::ento::SymExpr const*, llvm::APSInt const&, llvm::APSInt const&) RangeConstraintManager.cpp:0:0 swiftlang#11 0x00000000049d368c clang::ento::RangedConstraintManager::assumeSymUnsupported(llvm::IntrusiveRefCntPtr<clang::ento::ProgramState const>, clang::ento::SymExpr const*, bool) (../../main-github/llvm/build-all/bin/clang+0x49d368c) swiftlang#12 0x00000000049f0b09 clang::ento::SimpleConstraintManager::assumeAux(llvm::IntrusiveRefCntPtr<clang::ento::ProgramState const>, clang::ento::NonLoc, bool) (../../main-github/llvm/build-all/bin/clang+0x49f0b09) swiftlang#13 0x00000000049f096a clang::ento::SimpleConstraintManager::assume(llvm::IntrusiveRefCntPtr<clang::ento::ProgramState const>, clang::ento::NonLoc, bool) (../../main-github/llvm/build-all/bin/clang+0x49f096a) swiftlang#14 0x00000000049f086d clang::ento::SimpleConstraintManager::assumeInternal(llvm::IntrusiveRefCntPtr<clang::ento::ProgramState const>, clang::ento::DefinedSVal, bool) (../../main-github/llvm/build-all/bin/clang+0x49f086d) swiftlang#15 0x000000000492d3e3 clang::ento::ConstraintManager::assumeDual(llvm::IntrusiveRefCntPtr<clang::ento::ProgramState const>, clang::ento::DefinedSVal) (../../main-github/llvm/build-all/bin/clang+0x492d3e3) swiftlang#16 0x0000000004955b6d clang::ento::ExprEngine::evalEagerlyAssumeBinOpBifurcation(clang::ento::ExplodedNodeSet&, clang::ento::ExplodedNodeSet&, clang::Expr const*) (../../main-github/llvm/build-all/bin/clang+0x4955b6d) swiftlang#17 0x00000000049514b6 clang::ento::ExprEngine::Visit(clang::Stmt const*, clang::ento::ExplodedNode*, clang::ento::ExplodedNodeSet&) (../../main-github/llvm/build-all/bin/clang+0x49514b6) swiftlang#18 0x000000000494c73e clang::ento::ExprEngine::ProcessStmt(clang::Stmt const*, clang::ento::ExplodedNode*) (../../main-github/llvm/build-all/bin/clang+0x494c73e) swiftlang#19 0x000000000494c459 clang::ento::ExprEngine::processCFGElement(clang::CFGElement, clang::ento::ExplodedNode*, unsigned int, clang::ento::NodeBuilderContext*) (../../main-github/llvm/build-all/bin/clang+0x494c459) swiftlang#20 0x000000000492f3d0 clang::ento::CoreEngine::HandlePostStmt(clang::CFGBlock const*, unsigned int, clang::ento::ExplodedNode*) (../../main-github/llvm/build-all/bin/clang+0x492f3d0) swiftlang#21 0x000000000492e1f6 clang::ento::CoreEngine::ExecuteWorkList(clang::LocationContext const*, unsigned int, llvm::IntrusiveRefCntPtr<clang::ento::ProgramState const>) (../../main-github/llvm/build-all/bin/clang+0x492e1f6) ``` Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112621 (cherry picked from commit f61a08b)

static analysis related cherry picks to Stable/20221013 #6

When building/testing ASan inside the GCC tree on Solaris while using GNU `ld` instead of Solaris `ld`, a large number of tests SEGVs on both sparc and x86 like this: Thread 2 received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. [Switching to Thread 1 (LWP 1)] 0xfe014cfc in __sanitizer::atomic_load<__sanitizer::atomic_uintptr_t> (a=0xfc602a58, mo=__sanitizer::memory_order_acquire) at sanitizer_common/sanitizer_atomic_clang_x86.h:46 46 v = a->val_dont_use; 1: x/i $pc => 0xfe014cfc <_ZN11__sanitizer11atomic_loadINS_16atomic_uintptr_tEEENT_4TypeEPVKS2_NS_12memory_orderE+62>: mov (%eax),%eax (gdb) bt #0 0xfe014cfc in __sanitizer::atomic_load<__sanitizer::atomic_uintptr_t> (a=0xfc602a58, mo=__sanitizer::memory_order_acquire) at sanitizer_common/sanitizer_atomic_clang_x86.h:46 #1 0xfe0bd1d7 in __sanitizer::DTLS_NextBlock (cur=0xfc602a58) at sanitizer_common/sanitizer_tls_get_addr.cpp:53 #2 0xfe0bd319 in __sanitizer::DTLS_Find (id=1) at sanitizer_common/sanitizer_tls_get_addr.cpp:77 #3 0xfe0bd466 in __sanitizer::DTLS_on_tls_get_addr (arg_void=0xfeffd068, res=0xfe602a18, static_tls_begin=0, static_tls_end=0) at sanitizer_common/sanitizer_tls_get_addr.cpp:116 #4 0xfe063f81 in __interceptor___tls_get_addr (arg=0xfeffd068) at sanitizer_common/sanitizer_common_interceptors.inc:5501 #5 0xfe0a3054 in __sanitizer::CollectStaticTlsBlocks (info=0xfeffd108, size=40, data=0xfeffd16c) at sanitizer_common/sanitizer_linux_libcdep.cpp:366 #6 0xfe6ba9fa in dl_iterate_phdr () from /usr/lib/ld.so.1 #7 0xfe0a3132 in __sanitizer::GetStaticTlsBoundary (addr=0xfe608020, size=0xfeffd244, align=0xfeffd1b0) at sanitizer_common/sanitizer_linux_libcdep.cpp:382 #8 0xfe0a33f7 in __sanitizer::GetTls (addr=0xfe608020, size=0xfeffd244) at sanitizer_common/sanitizer_linux_libcdep.cpp:482 #9 0xfe0a34b1 in __sanitizer::GetThreadStackAndTls (main=true, stk_addr=0xfe608010, stk_size=0xfeffd240, tls_addr=0xfe608020, tls_size=0xfeffd244) at sanitizer_common/sanitizer_linux_libcdep.cpp:565 The address being accessed is unmapped. However, even when the tests `PASS` with Solaris `ld`, `ASAN_OPTIONS=verbosity=2` shows ==6582==__tls_get_addr: Can't guess glibc version Given that that the code is stricly `glibc`-specific according to `sanitizer_tls_get_addr.h`, there seems little point in using the interceptor on non-`glibc` targets. That's what this patch does. Tested on `i386-pc-solaris2.11` and `sparc-sun-solaris2.11` inside the GCC tree. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D141385

the swift branch. The function IRExecutionUnit::PopulateSymtab() is only implemented in swift-lldb. One thing it does is resolve any unresolved global symbols in the JIT module. This global search can cause the JIT module to recursively be asked for its symtab. This patch works around the problem by removing the JIT module from the list of modules being searched while in PopulateSymtab. That isn't done in the most elegant fashion, as it does so by changing the state of the IRExecutionUnit object. (lldb) bt * thread swiftlang#2, queue = 'com.apple.main-thread', stop reason = signal SIGSTOP frame #0: 0x00007ff80dc2a0ce libsystem_kernel.dylib`__psynch_cvwait + 10 frame swiftlang#1: 0x00007ff80dc66758 libsystem_pthread.dylib`_pthread_cond_wait + 1242 frame swiftlang#2: 0x00007ff80dba51fd libc++.1.dylib`std::__1::__call_once(unsigned long volatile&, void*, void (*)(void*)) + 70 frame swiftlang#3: 0x000000014ff9235d LLDB`lldb_private::ObjectFile::GetSymtab() at mutex:676:9 [opt] * frame swiftlang#4: 0x000000014ff92334 LLDB`lldb_private::ObjectFile::GetSymtab() [inlined] void llvm::call_once<lldb_private::ObjectFile::GetSymtab()::$_0>(flag=<unavailable>, F=<unavailable>)::$_0&&) at Threading.h:89:5 [opt] frame swiftlang#5: 0x000000014ff92334 LLDB`lldb_private::ObjectFile::GetSymtab(this=0x0000600003d04f18) at ObjectFile.cpp:758:5 [opt] frame swiftlang#6: 0x0000000150531d67 LLDB`SymbolFileSymtab::CalculateAbilities(this=0x0000600003e20600) at SymbolFileSymtab.cpp:60:42 [opt] frame swiftlang#7: 0x000000015053001d LLDB`lldb_private::SymbolFileCommon::GetAbilities(this=0x0000600003e20600) at SymbolFile.h:478:21 [opt] frame swiftlang#8: 0x000000014ff9a8cd LLDB`lldb_private::SymbolFile::FindPlugin(objfile_sp=std::__1::shared_ptr<lldb_private::ObjectFile>::element_type @ 0x0000600003d04f18 strong=7 weak=2) at SymbolFile.cpp:71:62 [opt] frame swiftlang#9: 0x000000014ff9f4bd LLDB`lldb_private::SymbolVendor::AddSymbolFileRepresentation(this=0x00006000002b05a0, objfile_sp=std::__1::shared_ptr<lldb_private::ObjectFile>::element_type @ 0x0000600003d04f18 strong=7 weak=2) at SymbolVendor.cpp:71:27 [opt] frame swiftlang#10: 0x000000014ff9f419 LLDB`lldb_private::SymbolVendor::FindPlugin(module_sp=std::__1::shared_ptr<lldb_private::Module>::element_type @ 0x0000000106589ca0 strong=12 weak=26, feedback_strm=0x0000000000000000) at SymbolVendor.cpp:57:16 [opt] frame swiftlang#11: 0x000000014fe8d2a0 LLDB`lldb_private::Module::GetSymbolFile(this=0x0000000106589ca0, can_create=<unavailable>, feedback_strm=0x0000000000000000) at Module.cpp:1083:13 [opt] frame swiftlang#12: 0x000000014fe8c4c0 LLDB`lldb_private::Module::FindFunctions(lldb_private::ConstString, lldb_private::CompilerDeclContext const&, lldb::FunctionNameType, lldb_private::ModuleFunctionSearchOptions const&, lldb_private::SymbolContextList&) at Module.cpp:857:29 [opt] frame swiftlang#13: 0x000000014fe8c4b0 LLDB`lldb_private::Module::FindFunctions(this=0x0000000106589ca0, name=<unavailable>, parent_decl_ctx=0x00007ff7bfef98d0, name_type_mask=eFunctionNameTypeFull, options=0x00007ff7bfef9990, sc_list=0x00007ff7bfef9960) at Module.cpp:878:3 [opt] frame swiftlang#14: 0x000000014fe92ba1 LLDB`lldb_private::ModuleList::FindFunctions(this=<unavailable>, name=<unavailable>, name_type_mask=<unavailable>, options=0x00007ff7bfef9990, sc_list=0x00007ff7bfef9960) const at ModuleList.cpp:554:18 [opt] frame swiftlang#15: 0x000000014fef36cb LLDB`lldb_private::IRExecutionUnit::FindInSymbols(this=<unavailable>, names=<unavailable>, sc=0x00000001004db950, symbol_was_missing_weak=<unavailable>) at IRExecutionUnit.cpp:843:33 [opt] frame swiftlang#16: 0x000000014fef3c36 LLDB`lldb_private::IRExecutionUnit::FindSymbol(this=0x00000001004db860, name=<unavailable>, missing_weak=0x00007ff7bfef9a97) at IRExecutionUnit.cpp:915:22 [opt] frame swiftlang#17: 0x000000014fef43f3 LLDB`lldb_private::IRExecutionUnit::MemoryManager::GetSymbolAddressAndPresence(this=0x0000000107c71000, Name="_$sBoWV", missing_weak=0x00007ff7bfef9a97) at IRExecutionUnit.cpp:1010:31 [opt] frame swiftlang#18: 0x000000014fef4490 LLDB`non-virtual thunk to lldb_private::IRExecutionUnit::MemoryManager::findSymbol(std::__1::basic_string<char, std::__1::char_traits<char>, std::__1::allocator<char> > const&) [inlined] lldb_private::IRExecutionUnit::MemoryManager::findSymbol(this=<unavailable>, Name=<unavailable>) at IRExecutionUnit.cpp:988:21 [opt] frame swiftlang#19: 0x000000014fef447d LLDB`non-virtual thunk to lldb_private::IRExecutionUnit::MemoryManager::findSymbol(std::__1::basic_string<char, std::__1::char_traits<char>, std::__1::allocator<char> > const&) at IRExecutionUnit.cpp:0 [opt] frame swiftlang#20: 0x0000000154ab3a5c LLDB`llvm::LinkingSymbolResolver::findSymbol(this=0x0000000107e0ecc0, Name="_$sBoWV") at MCJIT.cpp:681:26 [opt] frame swiftlang#21: 0x0000000154abd458 LLDB`llvm::LegacyJITSymbolResolver::lookup(this=<unavailable>, Symbols=<unavailable>, OnResolved=<unavailable>)>) at JITSymbol.cpp:125:22 [opt] frame swiftlang#22: 0x0000000154abf6f3 LLDB`llvm::RuntimeDyldImpl::resolveExternalSymbols(this=0x000000013cfeea20) at RuntimeDyld.cpp:1195:16 [opt] frame swiftlang#23: 0x0000000154abecde LLDB`llvm::RuntimeDyldImpl::resolveRelocations(this=0x000000013cfeea20) at RuntimeDyld.cpp:131:18 [opt] frame swiftlang#24: 0x0000000154ab1482 LLDB`llvm::MCJIT::finalizeLoadedModules(this=0x0000000107e0ea00) at MCJIT.cpp:242:8 [opt] frame swiftlang#25: 0x0000000154ab24ec LLDB`llvm::MCJIT::getGlobalValueAddress(this=0x0000000107e0ea00, Name=<unavailable>) at MCJIT.cpp:400:5 [opt] frame swiftlang#26: 0x000000014fef499d LLDB`lldb_private::IRExecutionUnit::PopulateSymtab(this=0x00000001004db860, obj_file=<unavailable>, symtab=0x0000600003342f80) at IRExecutionUnit.cpp:1246:34 [opt] frame swiftlang#27: 0x00000001503e4bf1 LLDB`ObjectFileJIT::ParseSymtab(this=0x0000600003d04f18, symtab=0x0000600003342f80) at ObjectFileJIT.cpp:112:18 [opt] frame swiftlang#28: 0x000000014ff93a14 LLDB`void std::__1::__call_once_proxy<std::__1::tuple<lldb_private::ObjectFile::GetSymtab()::$_0&&> >(void*) at ObjectFile.cpp:764:9 [opt] frame swiftlang#29: 0x000000014ff93998 LLDB`void std::__1::__call_once_proxy<std::__1::tuple<lldb_private::ObjectFile::GetSymtab()::$_0&&> >(void*) [inlined] decltype(__f=0x00007ff7bfefa180)::$_0>(fp)()) std::__1::__invoke<lldb_private::ObjectFile::GetSymtab()::$_0>(lldb_private::ObjectFile::GetSymtab()::$_0&&) at type_traits:3918:1 [opt] frame swiftlang#30: 0x000000014ff93998 LLDB`void std::__1::__call_once_proxy<std::__1::tuple<lldb_private::ObjectFile::GetSymtab()::$_0&&> >(void*) [inlined] void std::__1::__call_once_param<std::__1::tuple<lldb_private::ObjectFile::GetSymtab()::$_0&&> >::__execute<>(this=<unavailable>, (null)=<unavailable>) at mutex:630:9 [opt] frame swiftlang#31: 0x000000014ff93984 LLDB`void std::__1::__call_once_proxy<std::__1::tuple<lldb_private::ObjectFile::GetSymtab()::$_0&&> >(void*) [inlined] std::__1::__call_once_param<std::__1::tuple<lldb_private::ObjectFile::GetSymtab()::$_0&&> >::operator(this=<unavailable>)() at mutex:622:9 [opt] frame swiftlang#32: 0x000000014ff93984 LLDB`void std::__1::__call_once_proxy<std::__1::tuple<lldb_private::ObjectFile::GetSymtab()::$_0&&> >(__vp=<unavailable>) at mutex:658:5 [opt] frame swiftlang#33: 0x00007ff80dba5242 libc++.1.dylib`std::__1::__call_once(unsigned long volatile&, void*, void (*)(void*)) + 139 frame swiftlang#34: 0x000000014ff9235d LLDB`lldb_private::ObjectFile::GetSymtab() at mutex:676:9 [opt] frame swiftlang#35: 0x000000014ff92334 LLDB`lldb_private::ObjectFile::GetSymtab() [inlined] void llvm::call_once<lldb_private::ObjectFile::GetSymtab()::$_0>(flag=<unavailable>, F=<unavailable>)::$_0&&) at Threading.h:89:5 [opt] frame swiftlang#36: 0x000000014ff92334 LLDB`lldb_private::ObjectFile::GetSymtab(this=0x0000600003d04f18) at ObjectFile.cpp:758:5 [opt] frame swiftlang#37: 0x0000000150531d67 LLDB`SymbolFileSymtab::CalculateAbilities(this=0x0000600003e20100) at SymbolFileSymtab.cpp:60:42 [opt] frame swiftlang#38: 0x000000015053001d LLDB`lldb_private::SymbolFileCommon::GetAbilities(this=0x0000600003e20100) at SymbolFile.h:478:21 [opt] frame swiftlang#39: 0x000000014ff9a8cd LLDB`lldb_private::SymbolFile::FindPlugin(objfile_sp=std::__1::shared_ptr<lldb_private::ObjectFile>::element_type @ 0x0000600003d04f18 strong=7 weak=2) at SymbolFile.cpp:71:62 [opt] frame swiftlang#40: 0x000000014ff9f4bd LLDB`lldb_private::SymbolVendor::AddSymbolFileRepresentation(this=0x00006000002b0560, objfile_sp=std::__1::shared_ptr<lldb_private::ObjectFile>::element_type @ 0x0000600003d04f18 strong=7 weak=2) at SymbolVendor.cpp:71:27 [opt] frame swiftlang#41: 0x000000014ff9f419 LLDB`lldb_private::SymbolVendor::FindPlugin(module_sp=std::__1::shared_ptr<lldb_private::Module>::element_type @ 0x0000000106589ca0 strong=12 weak=26, feedback_strm=0x0000000000000000) at SymbolVendor.cpp:57:16 [opt] frame swiftlang#42: 0x000000014fe8d2a0 LLDB`lldb_private::Module::GetSymbolFile(this=0x0000000106589ca0, can_create=<unavailable>, feedback_strm=0x0000000000000000) at Module.cpp:1083:13 [opt] frame swiftlang#43: 0x000000015041f366 LLDB`lldb_private::PlatformDarwin::LocateExecutableScriptingResources(this=<unavailable>, target=0x000000010309e800, module=0x0000000106589ca0, feedback_stream=0x00007ff7bfefa770) at PlatformDarwin.cpp:212:40 [opt] frame swiftlang#44: 0x000000014fe8f97c LLDB`lldb_private::Module::LoadScriptingResourceInTarget(this=<unavailable>, target=0x000000010309e800, error=0x00007ff7bfefa750, feedback_stream=<unavailable>) at Module.cpp:1588:44 [opt] frame swiftlang#45: 0x0000000150027520 LLDB`lldb_private::Target::ModulesDidLoad(lldb_private::ModuleList&) [inlined] LoadScriptingResourceForModule(module_sp=<unavailable>, target=0x000000010309e800) at Target.cpp:1415:32 [opt] frame swiftlang#46: 0x00000001500274f4 LLDB`lldb_private::Target::ModulesDidLoad(this=0x000000010309e800, module_list=<unavailable>) at Target.cpp:1672:7 [opt] frame swiftlang#47: 0x00000001500284ca LLDB`non-virtual thunk to lldb_private::Target::NotifyModuleAdded(lldb_private::ModuleList const&, std::__1::shared_ptr<lldb_private::Module> const&) at Target.cpp:1637:5 [opt] frame swiftlang#48: 0x00000001500284a7 LLDB`non-virtual thunk to lldb_private::Target::NotifyModuleAdded(lldb_private::ModuleList const&, std::__1::shared_ptr<lldb_private::Module> const&) at Target.cpp:0 [opt] frame swiftlang#49: 0x000000014fe91f8b LLDB`lldb_private::ModuleList::Append(std::__1::shared_ptr<lldb_private::Module> const&, bool) at ModuleList.cpp:334:19 [opt] frame swiftlang#50: 0x000000014fe91f44 LLDB`lldb_private::ModuleList::Append(this=0x000000010309eb48, module_sp=std::__1::shared_ptr<lldb_private::Module>::element_type @ 0x0000000106589ca0 strong=12 weak=26, notify=<unavailable>) at ModuleList.cpp:339:3 [opt] frame swiftlang#51: 0x000000014fef5200 LLDB`lldb_private::IRExecutionUnit::CreateJITModule(this=<unavailable>, name="$__lldb_expr2") at IRExecutionUnit.cpp:1339:27 [opt] frame swiftlang#52: 0x000000015011063b LLDB`lldb_private::SwiftUserExpression::Parse(this=<unavailable>, diagnostic_manager=<unavailable>, exe_ctx=<unavailable>, execution_policy=eExecutionPolicyOnlyWhenNeeded, keep_result_in_memory=<unavailable>, generate_debug_info=<unavailable>) at SwiftUserExpression.cpp:802:28 [opt] frame swiftlang#53: 0x000000014ff0cd05 LLDB`lldb_private::UserExpression::Evaluate(exe_ctx=<unavailable>, options=0x00006000033441e0, expr="", prefix="", result_valobj_sp=nullptr, error=0x00007ff7bfefaf40, fixed_expression=Summary Unavailable, ctx_obj=0x0000000000000000) at UserExpression.cpp:281:27 [opt] frame swiftlang#54: 0x000000015002e124 LLDB`lldb_private::Target::EvaluateExpression(this=0x000000010309e800, expr="", exe_scope=<unavailable>, result_valobj_sp=nullptr, options=<unavailable>, fixed_expression=Summary Unavailable, ctx_obj=0x0000000000000000) at Target.cpp:2960:25 [opt] frame swiftlang#55: 0x000000014fcc3e62 LLDB`lldb::SBFrame::EvaluateExpression(this=<unavailable>, expr=<unavailable>, options=0x0000600000011880) at SBFrame.cpp:1084:17 [opt] frame swiftlang#56: 0x000000014fdaaf70 LLDB`_wrap_SBFrame_EvaluateExpression(_object*, _object*) at LLDBWrapPython.cpp:32887:22 [opt] frame swiftlang#57: 0x000000014fdaaebf LLDB`_wrap_SBFrame_EvaluateExpression(self=<unavailable>, args=<unavailable>) at LLDBWrapPython.cpp:32933:18 [opt]

the swift branch. The function IRExecutionUnit::PopulateSymtab() is only implemented in swift-lldb. One thing it does is resolve any unresolved global symbols in the JIT module. This global search can cause the JIT module to recursively be asked for its symtab. This patch works around the problem by removing the JIT module from the list of modules being searched while in PopulateSymtab. That isn't done in the most elegant fashion, as it does so by changing the state of the IRExecutionUnit object. (lldb) bt * thread swiftlang#2, queue = 'com.apple.main-thread', stop reason = signal SIGSTOP frame #0: 0x00007ff80dc2a0ce libsystem_kernel.dylib`__psynch_cvwait + 10 frame swiftlang#1: 0x00007ff80dc66758 libsystem_pthread.dylib`_pthread_cond_wait + 1242 frame swiftlang#2: 0x00007ff80dba51fd libc++.1.dylib`std::__1::__call_once(unsigned long volatile&, void*, void (*)(void*)) + 70 frame swiftlang#3: 0x000000014ff9235d LLDB`lldb_private::ObjectFile::GetSymtab() at mutex:676:9 [opt] * frame swiftlang#4: 0x000000014ff92334 LLDB`lldb_private::ObjectFile::GetSymtab() [inlined] void llvm::call_once<lldb_private::ObjectFile::GetSymtab()::$_0>(flag=<unavailable>, F=<unavailable>)::$_0&&) at Threading.h:89:5 [opt] frame swiftlang#5: 0x000000014ff92334 LLDB`lldb_private::ObjectFile::GetSymtab(this=0x0000600003d04f18) at ObjectFile.cpp:758:5 [opt] frame swiftlang#6: 0x0000000150531d67 LLDB`SymbolFileSymtab::CalculateAbilities(this=0x0000600003e20600) at SymbolFileSymtab.cpp:60:42 [opt] frame swiftlang#7: 0x000000015053001d LLDB`lldb_private::SymbolFileCommon::GetAbilities(this=0x0000600003e20600) at SymbolFile.h:478:21 [opt] frame swiftlang#8: 0x000000014ff9a8cd LLDB`lldb_private::SymbolFile::FindPlugin(objfile_sp=std::__1::shared_ptr<lldb_private::ObjectFile>::element_type @ 0x0000600003d04f18 strong=7 weak=2) at SymbolFile.cpp:71:62 [opt] frame swiftlang#9: 0x000000014ff9f4bd LLDB`lldb_private::SymbolVendor::AddSymbolFileRepresentation(this=0x00006000002b05a0, objfile_sp=std::__1::shared_ptr<lldb_private::ObjectFile>::element_type @ 0x0000600003d04f18 strong=7 weak=2) at SymbolVendor.cpp:71:27 [opt] frame swiftlang#10: 0x000000014ff9f419 LLDB`lldb_private::SymbolVendor::FindPlugin(module_sp=std::__1::shared_ptr<lldb_private::Module>::element_type @ 0x0000000106589ca0 strong=12 weak=26, feedback_strm=0x0000000000000000) at SymbolVendor.cpp:57:16 [opt] frame swiftlang#11: 0x000000014fe8d2a0 LLDB`lldb_private::Module::GetSymbolFile(this=0x0000000106589ca0, can_create=<unavailable>, feedback_strm=0x0000000000000000) at Module.cpp:1083:13 [opt] frame swiftlang#12: 0x000000014fe8c4c0 LLDB`lldb_private::Module::FindFunctions(lldb_private::ConstString, lldb_private::CompilerDeclContext const&, lldb::FunctionNameType, lldb_private::ModuleFunctionSearchOptions const&, lldb_private::SymbolContextList&) at Module.cpp:857:29 [opt] frame swiftlang#13: 0x000000014fe8c4b0 LLDB`lldb_private::Module::FindFunctions(this=0x0000000106589ca0, name=<unavailable>, parent_decl_ctx=0x00007ff7bfef98d0, name_type_mask=eFunctionNameTypeFull, options=0x00007ff7bfef9990, sc_list=0x00007ff7bfef9960) at Module.cpp:878:3 [opt] frame swiftlang#14: 0x000000014fe92ba1 LLDB`lldb_private::ModuleList::FindFunctions(this=<unavailable>, name=<unavailable>, name_type_mask=<unavailable>, options=0x00007ff7bfef9990, sc_list=0x00007ff7bfef9960) const at ModuleList.cpp:554:18 [opt] frame swiftlang#15: 0x000000014fef36cb LLDB`lldb_private::IRExecutionUnit::FindInSymbols(this=<unavailable>, names=<unavailable>, sc=0x00000001004db950, symbol_was_missing_weak=<unavailable>) at IRExecutionUnit.cpp:843:33 [opt] frame swiftlang#16: 0x000000014fef3c36 LLDB`lldb_private::IRExecutionUnit::FindSymbol(this=0x00000001004db860, name=<unavailable>, missing_weak=0x00007ff7bfef9a97) at IRExecutionUnit.cpp:915:22 [opt] frame swiftlang#17: 0x000000014fef43f3 LLDB`lldb_private::IRExecutionUnit::MemoryManager::GetSymbolAddressAndPresence(this=0x0000000107c71000, Name="_$sBoWV", missing_weak=0x00007ff7bfef9a97) at IRExecutionUnit.cpp:1010:31 [opt] frame swiftlang#18: 0x000000014fef4490 LLDB`non-virtual thunk to lldb_private::IRExecutionUnit::MemoryManager::findSymbol(std::__1::basic_string<char, std::__1::char_traits<char>, std::__1::allocator<char> > const&) [inlined] lldb_private::IRExecutionUnit::MemoryManager::findSymbol(this=<unavailable>, Name=<unavailable>) at IRExecutionUnit.cpp:988:21 [opt] frame swiftlang#19: 0x000000014fef447d LLDB`non-virtual thunk to lldb_private::IRExecutionUnit::MemoryManager::findSymbol(std::__1::basic_string<char, std::__1::char_traits<char>, std::__1::allocator<char> > const&) at IRExecutionUnit.cpp:0 [opt] frame swiftlang#20: 0x0000000154ab3a5c LLDB`llvm::LinkingSymbolResolver::findSymbol(this=0x0000000107e0ecc0, Name="_$sBoWV") at MCJIT.cpp:681:26 [opt] frame swiftlang#21: 0x0000000154abd458 LLDB`llvm::LegacyJITSymbolResolver::lookup(this=<unavailable>, Symbols=<unavailable>, OnResolved=<unavailable>)>) at JITSymbol.cpp:125:22 [opt] frame swiftlang#22: 0x0000000154abf6f3 LLDB`llvm::RuntimeDyldImpl::resolveExternalSymbols(this=0x000000013cfeea20) at RuntimeDyld.cpp:1195:16 [opt] frame swiftlang#23: 0x0000000154abecde LLDB`llvm::RuntimeDyldImpl::resolveRelocations(this=0x000000013cfeea20) at RuntimeDyld.cpp:131:18 [opt] frame swiftlang#24: 0x0000000154ab1482 LLDB`llvm::MCJIT::finalizeLoadedModules(this=0x0000000107e0ea00) at MCJIT.cpp:242:8 [opt] frame swiftlang#25: 0x0000000154ab24ec LLDB`llvm::MCJIT::getGlobalValueAddress(this=0x0000000107e0ea00, Name=<unavailable>) at MCJIT.cpp:400:5 [opt] frame swiftlang#26: 0x000000014fef499d LLDB`lldb_private::IRExecutionUnit::PopulateSymtab(this=0x00000001004db860, obj_file=<unavailable>, symtab=0x0000600003342f80) at IRExecutionUnit.cpp:1246:34 [opt] frame swiftlang#27: 0x00000001503e4bf1 LLDB`ObjectFileJIT::ParseSymtab(this=0x0000600003d04f18, symtab=0x0000600003342f80) at ObjectFileJIT.cpp:112:18 [opt] frame swiftlang#28: 0x000000014ff93a14 LLDB`void std::__1::__call_once_proxy<std::__1::tuple<lldb_private::ObjectFile::GetSymtab()::$_0&&> >(void*) at ObjectFile.cpp:764:9 [opt] frame swiftlang#29: 0x000000014ff93998 LLDB`void std::__1::__call_once_proxy<std::__1::tuple<lldb_private::ObjectFile::GetSymtab()::$_0&&> >(void*) [inlined] decltype(__f=0x00007ff7bfefa180)::$_0>(fp)()) std::__1::__invoke<lldb_private::ObjectFile::GetSymtab()::$_0>(lldb_private::ObjectFile::GetSymtab()::$_0&&) at type_traits:3918:1 [opt] frame swiftlang#30: 0x000000014ff93998 LLDB`void std::__1::__call_once_proxy<std::__1::tuple<lldb_private::ObjectFile::GetSymtab()::$_0&&> >(void*) [inlined] void std::__1::__call_once_param<std::__1::tuple<lldb_private::ObjectFile::GetSymtab()::$_0&&> >::__execute<>(this=<unavailable>, (null)=<unavailable>) at mutex:630:9 [opt] frame swiftlang#31: 0x000000014ff93984 LLDB`void std::__1::__call_once_proxy<std::__1::tuple<lldb_private::ObjectFile::GetSymtab()::$_0&&> >(void*) [inlined] std::__1::__call_once_param<std::__1::tuple<lldb_private::ObjectFile::GetSymtab()::$_0&&> >::operator(this=<unavailable>)() at mutex:622:9 [opt] frame swiftlang#32: 0x000000014ff93984 LLDB`void std::__1::__call_once_proxy<std::__1::tuple<lldb_private::ObjectFile::GetSymtab()::$_0&&> >(__vp=<unavailable>) at mutex:658:5 [opt] frame swiftlang#33: 0x00007ff80dba5242 libc++.1.dylib`std::__1::__call_once(unsigned long volatile&, void*, void (*)(void*)) + 139 frame swiftlang#34: 0x000000014ff9235d LLDB`lldb_private::ObjectFile::GetSymtab() at mutex:676:9 [opt] frame swiftlang#35: 0x000000014ff92334 LLDB`lldb_private::ObjectFile::GetSymtab() [inlined] void llvm::call_once<lldb_private::ObjectFile::GetSymtab()::$_0>(flag=<unavailable>, F=<unavailable>)::$_0&&) at Threading.h:89:5 [opt] frame swiftlang#36: 0x000000014ff92334 LLDB`lldb_private::ObjectFile::GetSymtab(this=0x0000600003d04f18) at ObjectFile.cpp:758:5 [opt] frame swiftlang#37: 0x0000000150531d67 LLDB`SymbolFileSymtab::CalculateAbilities(this=0x0000600003e20100) at SymbolFileSymtab.cpp:60:42 [opt] frame swiftlang#38: 0x000000015053001d LLDB`lldb_private::SymbolFileCommon::GetAbilities(this=0x0000600003e20100) at SymbolFile.h:478:21 [opt] frame swiftlang#39: 0x000000014ff9a8cd LLDB`lldb_private::SymbolFile::FindPlugin(objfile_sp=std::__1::shared_ptr<lldb_private::ObjectFile>::element_type @ 0x0000600003d04f18 strong=7 weak=2) at SymbolFile.cpp:71:62 [opt] frame swiftlang#40: 0x000000014ff9f4bd LLDB`lldb_private::SymbolVendor::AddSymbolFileRepresentation(this=0x00006000002b0560, objfile_sp=std::__1::shared_ptr<lldb_private::ObjectFile>::element_type @ 0x0000600003d04f18 strong=7 weak=2) at SymbolVendor.cpp:71:27 [opt] frame swiftlang#41: 0x000000014ff9f419 LLDB`lldb_private::SymbolVendor::FindPlugin(module_sp=std::__1::shared_ptr<lldb_private::Module>::element_type @ 0x0000000106589ca0 strong=12 weak=26, feedback_strm=0x0000000000000000) at SymbolVendor.cpp:57:16 [opt] frame swiftlang#42: 0x000000014fe8d2a0 LLDB`lldb_private::Module::GetSymbolFile(this=0x0000000106589ca0, can_create=<unavailable>, feedback_strm=0x0000000000000000) at Module.cpp:1083:13 [opt] frame swiftlang#43: 0x000000015041f366 LLDB`lldb_private::PlatformDarwin::LocateExecutableScriptingResources(this=<unavailable>, target=0x000000010309e800, module=0x0000000106589ca0, feedback_stream=0x00007ff7bfefa770) at PlatformDarwin.cpp:212:40 [opt] frame swiftlang#44: 0x000000014fe8f97c LLDB`lldb_private::Module::LoadScriptingResourceInTarget(this=<unavailable>, target=0x000000010309e800, error=0x00007ff7bfefa750, feedback_stream=<unavailable>) at Module.cpp:1588:44 [opt] frame swiftlang#45: 0x0000000150027520 LLDB`lldb_private::Target::ModulesDidLoad(lldb_private::ModuleList&) [inlined] LoadScriptingResourceForModule(module_sp=<unavailable>, target=0x000000010309e800) at Target.cpp:1415:32 [opt] frame swiftlang#46: 0x00000001500274f4 LLDB`lldb_private::Target::ModulesDidLoad(this=0x000000010309e800, module_list=<unavailable>) at Target.cpp:1672:7 [opt] frame swiftlang#47: 0x00000001500284ca LLDB`non-virtual thunk to lldb_private::Target::NotifyModuleAdded(lldb_private::ModuleList const&, std::__1::shared_ptr<lldb_private::Module> const&) at Target.cpp:1637:5 [opt] frame swiftlang#48: 0x00000001500284a7 LLDB`non-virtual thunk to lldb_private::Target::NotifyModuleAdded(lldb_private::ModuleList const&, std::__1::shared_ptr<lldb_private::Module> const&) at Target.cpp:0 [opt] frame swiftlang#49: 0x000000014fe91f8b LLDB`lldb_private::ModuleList::Append(std::__1::shared_ptr<lldb_private::Module> const&, bool) at ModuleList.cpp:334:19 [opt] frame swiftlang#50: 0x000000014fe91f44 LLDB`lldb_private::ModuleList::Append(this=0x000000010309eb48, module_sp=std::__1::shared_ptr<lldb_private::Module>::element_type @ 0x0000000106589ca0 strong=12 weak=26, notify=<unavailable>) at ModuleList.cpp:339:3 [opt] frame swiftlang#51: 0x000000014fef5200 LLDB`lldb_private::IRExecutionUnit::CreateJITModule(this=<unavailable>, name="$__lldb_expr2") at IRExecutionUnit.cpp:1339:27 [opt] frame swiftlang#52: 0x000000015011063b LLDB`lldb_private::SwiftUserExpression::Parse(this=<unavailable>, diagnostic_manager=<unavailable>, exe_ctx=<unavailable>, execution_policy=eExecutionPolicyOnlyWhenNeeded, keep_result_in_memory=<unavailable>, generate_debug_info=<unavailable>) at SwiftUserExpression.cpp:802:28 [opt] frame swiftlang#53: 0x000000014ff0cd05 LLDB`lldb_private::UserExpression::Evaluate(exe_ctx=<unavailable>, options=0x00006000033441e0, expr="", prefix="", result_valobj_sp=nullptr, error=0x00007ff7bfefaf40, fixed_expression=Summary Unavailable, ctx_obj=0x0000000000000000) at UserExpression.cpp:281:27 [opt] frame swiftlang#54: 0x000000015002e124 LLDB`lldb_private::Target::EvaluateExpression(this=0x000000010309e800, expr="", exe_scope=<unavailable>, result_valobj_sp=nullptr, options=<unavailable>, fixed_expression=Summary Unavailable, ctx_obj=0x0000000000000000) at Target.cpp:2960:25 [opt] frame swiftlang#55: 0x000000014fcc3e62 LLDB`lldb::SBFrame::EvaluateExpression(this=<unavailable>, expr=<unavailable>, options=0x0000600000011880) at SBFrame.cpp:1084:17 [opt] frame swiftlang#56: 0x000000014fdaaf70 LLDB`_wrap_SBFrame_EvaluateExpression(_object*, _object*) at LLDBWrapPython.cpp:32887:22 [opt] frame swiftlang#57: 0x000000014fdaaebf LLDB`_wrap_SBFrame_EvaluateExpression(self=<unavailable>, args=<unavailable>) at LLDBWrapPython.cpp:32933:18 [opt] (cherry picked from commit ba81700)

…ak ordering `std::sort` requires a comparison operator that obides by strict weak ordering. `operator<=` on pointer does not and leads to undefined behaviour. Specifically, when we grow the `scratch_type_systems` vector slightly larger (and thus take `std::sort` down a slightly different codepath), we segfault. This happened while working on a patch that would in fact grow this vector. In such a case ASAN reports: ``` $ ./bin/lldb ./lldb-test-build.noindex/lang/cpp/complete-type-check/TestCppIsTypeComplete.test_builtin_types/a.out -o "script -- lldb.target.FindFirstType(\"void\")" (lldb) script -- lldb.target.FindFirstType("void") ================================================================= ==59975==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: container-overflow on address 0x000108f6b510 at pc 0x000280177b4c bp 0x00016b7d7430 sp 0x00016b7d7428 READ of size 8 at 0x000108f6b510 thread T0 #0 0x280177b48 in std::__1::shared_ptr<lldb_private::TypeSystem>::shared_ptr[abi:v15006](std::__1::shared_ptr<lldb_private::TypeSystem> const&)+0xb4 (/Users/michaelbuch/Git/lldb-build-main-no-modules/lib/liblldb.17.0.0git.dylib:arm64+0x177b48) (BuildId: ea963d2c0d47354fb647f5c5f32b76d932000000200000000100000000000d00) #1 0x280dcc008 in void std::__1::__introsort<std::__1::_ClassicAlgPolicy, lldb_private::Target::GetScratchTypeSystems(bool)::$_3&, std::__1::shared_ptr<lldb_private::TypeSystem>*>(std::__1::shared_ptr<lldb_private::TypeSystem>*, std::__1::shared_ ptr<lldb_private::TypeSystem>*, lldb_private::Target::GetScratchTypeSystems(bool)::$_3&, std::__1::iterator_traits<std::__1::shared_ptr<lldb_private::TypeSystem>*>::difference_type)+0x1050 (/Users/michaelbuch/Git/lldb-build-main-no-modules/lib/liblld b.17.0.0git.dylib:arm64+0xdcc008) (BuildId: ea963d2c0d47354fb647f5c5f32b76d932000000200000000100000000000d00) #2 0x280d88788 in lldb_private::Target::GetScratchTypeSystems(bool)+0x5a4 (/Users/michaelbuch/Git/lldb-build-main-no-modules/lib/liblldb.17.0.0git.dylib:arm64+0xd88788) (BuildId: ea963d2c0d47354fb647f5c5f32b76d932000000200000000100000000000d00) #3 0x28021f0b4 in lldb::SBTarget::FindFirstType(char const*)+0x624 (/Users/michaelbuch/Git/lldb-build-main-no-modules/lib/liblldb.17.0.0git.dylib:arm64+0x21f0b4) (BuildId: ea963d2c0d47354fb647f5c5f32b76d932000000200000000100000000000d00) #4 0x2804e9590 in _wrap_SBTarget_FindFirstType(_object*, _object*)+0x26c (/Users/michaelbuch/Git/lldb-build-main-no-modules/lib/liblldb.17.0.0git.dylib:arm64+0x4e9590) (BuildId: ea963d2c0d47354fb647f5c5f32b76d932000000200000000100000000000d00) #5 0x1062d3ad4 in cfunction_call+0x5c (/opt/homebrew/Cellar/python@3.11/3.11.1/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.11/Python:arm64+0xcfad4) (BuildId: c9efc4bbb1943f9a9b7cc4e91fce477732000000200000000100000000000d00) <--- snipped ---> 0x000108f6b510 is located 400 bytes inside of 512-byte region [0x000108f6b380,0x000108f6b580) allocated by thread T0 here: #0 0x105209414 in wrap__Znwm+0x74 (/Applications/Xcode2.app/Contents/Developer/Toolchains/XcodeDefault.xctoolchain/usr/lib/clang/14.0.3/lib/darwin/libclang_rt.asan_osx_dynamic.dylib:arm64e+0x51414) (BuildId: 0a44828ceb64337bbfff60b22cd838f0320000 00200000000100000000000b00) #1 0x280dca3b4 in std::__1::__split_buffer<std::__1::shared_ptr<lldb_private::TypeSystem>, std::__1::allocator<std::__1::shared_ptr<lldb_private::TypeSystem>>&>::__split_buffer(unsigned long, unsigned long, std::__1::allocator<std::__1::shared_pt r<lldb_private::TypeSystem>>&)+0x11c (/Users/michaelbuch/Git/lldb-build-main-no-modules/lib/liblldb.17.0.0git.dylib:arm64+0xdca3b4) (BuildId: ea963d2c0d47354fb647f5c5f32b76d932000000200000000100000000000d00) #2 0x280dc978c in void std::__1::vector<std::__1::shared_ptr<lldb_private::TypeSystem>, std::__1::allocator<std::__1::shared_ptr<lldb_private::TypeSystem>>>::__push_back_slow_path<std::__1::shared_ptr<lldb_private::TypeSystem> const&>(std::__1::s hared_ptr<lldb_private::TypeSystem> const&)+0x13c (/Users/michaelbuch/Git/lldb-build-main-no-modules/lib/liblldb.17.0.0git.dylib:arm64+0xdc978c) (BuildId: ea963d2c0d47354fb647f5c5f32b76d932000000200000000100000000000d00) #3 0x280d88dec in std::__1::vector<std::__1::shared_ptr<lldb_private::TypeSystem>, std::__1::allocator<std::__1::shared_ptr<lldb_private::TypeSystem>>>::push_back[abi:v15006](std::__1::shared_ptr<lldb_private::TypeSystem> const&)+0x80 (/Users/mic haelbuch/Git/lldb-build-main-no-modules/lib/liblldb.17.0.0git.dylib:arm64+0xd88dec) (BuildId: ea963d2c0d47354fb647f5c5f32b76d932000000200000000100000000000d00) #4 0x280d8857c in lldb_private::Target::GetScratchTypeSystems(bool)+0x398 (/Users/michaelbuch/Git/lldb-build-main-no-modules/lib/liblldb.17.0.0git.dylib:arm64+0xd8857c) (BuildId: ea963d2c0d47354fb647f5c5f32b76d932000000200000000100000000000d00) #5 0x28021f0b4 in lldb::SBTarget::FindFirstType(char const*)+0x624 (/Users/michaelbuch/Git/lldb-build-main-no-modules/lib/liblldb.17.0.0git.dylib:arm64+0x21f0b4) (BuildId: ea963d2c0d47354fb647f5c5f32b76d932000000200000000100000000000d00) #6 0x2804e9590 in _wrap_SBTarget_FindFirstType(_object*, _object*)+0x26c (/Users/michaelbuch/Git/lldb-build-main-no-modules/lib/liblldb.17.0.0git.dylib:arm64+0x4e9590) (BuildId: ea963d2c0d47354fb647f5c5f32b76d932000000200000000100000000000d00) #7 0x1062d3ad4 in cfunction_call+0x5c (/opt/homebrew/Cellar/python@3.11/3.11.1/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.11/Python:arm64+0xcfad4) (BuildId: c9efc4bbb1943f9a9b7cc4e91fce477732000000200000000100000000000d00) #8 0x10627fff0 in _PyObject_MakeTpCall+0x7c (/opt/homebrew/Cellar/python@3.11/3.11.1/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.11/Python:arm64+0x7bff0) (BuildId: c9efc4bbb1943f9a9b7cc4e91fce477732000000200000000100000000000d00) #9 0x106378a98 in _PyEval_EvalFrameDefault+0xbcf8 (/opt/homebrew/Cellar/python@3.11/3.11.1/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.11/Python:arm64+0x174a98) (BuildId: c9efc4bbb1943f9a9b7cc4e91fce477732000000200000000100000000000d00) ``` Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D142709

This change prevents rare deadlocks observed for specific macOS/iOS GUI applications which issue many `dlopen()` calls from multiple different threads at startup and where TSan finds and reports a race during startup. Providing a reliable test for this has been deemed infeasible. Although I've only observed this deadlock on Apple platforms, conceptually the cause is not confined to Apple code so the fix lives in platform-independent code. Deadlock scenario: ``` Thread 2 | Thread 4 ReportRace() | Lock internal TSan mutexes | &ctx->slot_mtx | | dlopen() interceptor | OnLibraryLoaded() | MemoryMappingLayout::DumpListOfModules() | calls dyld API, which takes internal lock | lock() interceptor | TSan tries to take internal mutexes again | &ctx->slot_mtx call into symbolizer | MemoryMappingLayout::DumpListOfModules() calls dyld API, which hangs on trying to take lock ``` Resulting in: * Thread 2 has internal TSan mutex, blocked on dyld lock * Thread 4 has dyld lock, blocked on internal TSan mutex The fix prevents this situation by not intercepting any of the calls originating from `MemoryMappingLayout::DumpListOfModules()`. Stack traces for deadlock between ReportRace() and dlopen() interceptor: ``` thread #2, queue = 'com.apple.root.default-qos' frame #0: libsystem_kernel.dylib frame #1: libclang_rt.tsan_osx_dynamic.dylib`::wrap_os_unfair_lock_lock_with_options(lock=<unavailable>, options=<unavailable>) at tsan_interceptors_mac.cpp:306:3 frame #2: dyld`dyld4::RuntimeLocks::withLoadersReadLock(this=0x000000016f21b1e0, work=0x00000001814523c0) block_pointer) at DyldRuntimeState.cpp:227:28 frame #3: dyld`dyld4::APIs::_dyld_get_image_header(this=0x0000000101012a20, imageIndex=614) at DyldAPIs.cpp:240:11 frame #4: libclang_rt.tsan_osx_dynamic.dylib`__sanitizer::MemoryMappingLayout::CurrentImageHeader(this=<unavailable>) at sanitizer_procmaps_mac.cpp:391:35 frame #5: libclang_rt.tsan_osx_dynamic.dylib`__sanitizer::MemoryMappingLayout::Next(this=0x000000016f2a2800, segment=0x000000016f2a2738) at sanitizer_procmaps_mac.cpp:397:51 frame #6: libclang_rt.tsan_osx_dynamic.dylib`__sanitizer::MemoryMappingLayout::DumpListOfModules(this=0x000000016f2a2800, modules=0x00000001011000a0) at sanitizer_procmaps_mac.cpp:460:10 frame #7: libclang_rt.tsan_osx_dynamic.dylib`__sanitizer::ListOfModules::init(this=0x00000001011000a0) at sanitizer_mac.cpp:610:18 frame #8: libclang_rt.tsan_osx_dynamic.dylib`__sanitizer::Symbolizer::FindModuleForAddress(unsigned long) [inlined] __sanitizer::Symbolizer::RefreshModules(this=0x0000000101100078) at sanitizer_symbolizer_libcdep.cpp:185:12 frame #9: libclang_rt.tsan_osx_dynamic.dylib`__sanitizer::Symbolizer::FindModuleForAddress(this=0x0000000101100078, address=6465454512) at sanitizer_symbolizer_libcdep.cpp:204:5 frame #10: libclang_rt.tsan_osx_dynamic.dylib`__sanitizer::Symbolizer::SymbolizePC(this=0x0000000101100078, addr=6465454512) at sanitizer_symbolizer_libcdep.cpp:88:15 frame #11: libclang_rt.tsan_osx_dynamic.dylib`__tsan::SymbolizeCode(addr=6465454512) at tsan_symbolize.cpp:106:35 frame #12: libclang_rt.tsan_osx_dynamic.dylib`__tsan::SymbolizeStack(trace=StackTrace @ 0x0000600002d66d00) at tsan_rtl_report.cpp:112:28 frame #13: libclang_rt.tsan_osx_dynamic.dylib`__tsan::ScopedReportBase::AddMemoryAccess(this=0x000000016f2a2a90, addr=4381057136, external_tag=<unavailable>, s=<unavailable>, tid=<unavailable>, stack=<unavailable>, mset=0x00000001012fc310) at tsan_rtl_report.cpp:190:16 frame #14: libclang_rt.tsan_osx_dynamic.dylib`__tsan::ReportRace(thr=0x00000001012fc000, shadow_mem=0x000008020a4340e0, cur=<unavailable>, old=<unavailable>, typ0=1) at tsan_rtl_report.cpp:795:9 frame #15: libclang_rt.tsan_osx_dynamic.dylib`__tsan::DoReportRace(thr=0x00000001012fc000, shadow_mem=0x000008020a4340e0, cur=Shadow @ x22, old=Shadow @ 0x0000600002d6b4f0, typ=1) at tsan_rtl_access.cpp:166:3 frame #16: libclang_rt.tsan_osx_dynamic.dylib`::__tsan_read8(void *) at tsan_rtl_access.cpp:220:5 frame #17: libclang_rt.tsan_osx_dynamic.dylib`::__tsan_read8(void *) [inlined] __tsan::MemoryAccess(thr=0x00000001012fc000, pc=<unavailable>, addr=<unavailable>, size=8, typ=1) at tsan_rtl_access.cpp:442:3 frame #18: libclang_rt.tsan_osx_dynamic.dylib`::__tsan_read8(addr=<unavailable>) at tsan_interface.inc:34:3 <call into TSan from from instrumented code> thread #4, queue = 'com.apple.dock.fullscreen' frame #0: libsystem_kernel.dylib frame #1: libclang_rt.tsan_osx_dynamic.dylib`__sanitizer::FutexWait(p=<unavailable>, cmp=<unavailable>) at sanitizer_mac.cpp:540:3 frame #2: libclang_rt.tsan_osx_dynamic.dylib`__sanitizer::Semaphore::Wait(this=<unavailable>) at sanitizer_mutex.cpp:35:7 frame #3: libclang_rt.tsan_osx_dynamic.dylib`__sanitizer::Mutex::Lock(this=0x0000000102992a80) at sanitizer_mutex.h:196:18 frame #4: libclang_rt.tsan_osx_dynamic.dylib`__tsan::ScopedInterceptor::~ScopedInterceptor() [inlined] __sanitizer::GenericScopedLock<__sanitizer::Mutex>::GenericScopedLock(this=<unavailable>, mu=0x0000000102992a80) at sanitizer_mutex.h:383:10 frame #5: libclang_rt.tsan_osx_dynamic.dylib`__tsan::ScopedInterceptor::~ScopedInterceptor() [inlined] __sanitizer::GenericScopedLock<__sanitizer::Mutex>::GenericScopedLock(this=<unavailable>, mu=0x0000000102992a80) at sanitizer_mutex.h:382:77 frame #6: libclang_rt.tsan_osx_dynamic.dylib`__tsan::ScopedInterceptor::~ScopedInterceptor() at tsan_rtl.h:708:10 frame #7: libclang_rt.tsan_osx_dynamic.dylib`__tsan::ScopedInterceptor::~ScopedInterceptor() [inlined] __tsan::TryTraceFunc(thr=0x000000010f084000, pc=0) at tsan_rtl.h:751:7 frame #8: libclang_rt.tsan_osx_dynamic.dylib`__tsan::ScopedInterceptor::~ScopedInterceptor() [inlined] __tsan::FuncExit(thr=0x000000010f084000) at tsan_rtl.h:798:7 frame #9: libclang_rt.tsan_osx_dynamic.dylib`__tsan::ScopedInterceptor::~ScopedInterceptor(this=0x000000016f3ba280) at tsan_interceptors_posix.cpp:300:5 frame #10: libclang_rt.tsan_osx_dynamic.dylib`__tsan::ScopedInterceptor::~ScopedInterceptor(this=<unavailable>) at tsan_interceptors_posix.cpp:293:41 frame #11: libclang_rt.tsan_osx_dynamic.dylib`::wrap_os_unfair_lock_lock_with_options(lock=0x000000016f21b1e8, options=OS_UNFAIR_LOCK_NONE) at tsan_interceptors_mac.cpp:310:1 frame #12: dyld`dyld4::RuntimeLocks::withLoadersReadLock(this=0x000000016f21b1e0, work=0x00000001814525d4) block_pointer) at DyldRuntimeState.cpp:227:28 frame #13: dyld`dyld4::APIs::_dyld_get_image_vmaddr_slide(this=0x0000000101012a20, imageIndex=412) at DyldAPIs.cpp:273:11 frame #14: libclang_rt.tsan_osx_dynamic.dylib`__sanitizer::MemoryMappingLayout::Next(__sanitizer::MemoryMappedSegment*) at sanitizer_procmaps_mac.cpp:286:17 frame #15: libclang_rt.tsan_osx_dynamic.dylib`__sanitizer::MemoryMappingLayout::Next(this=0x000000016f3ba560, segment=0x000000016f3ba498) at sanitizer_procmaps_mac.cpp:432:15 frame #16: libclang_rt.tsan_osx_dynamic.dylib`__sanitizer::MemoryMappingLayout::DumpListOfModules(this=0x000000016f3ba560, modules=0x000000016f3ba618) at sanitizer_procmaps_mac.cpp:460:10 frame #17: libclang_rt.tsan_osx_dynamic.dylib`__sanitizer::ListOfModules::init(this=0x000000016f3ba618) at sanitizer_mac.cpp:610:18 frame #18: libclang_rt.tsan_osx_dynamic.dylib`__sanitizer::LibIgnore::OnLibraryLoaded(this=0x0000000101f3aa40, name="<some library>") at sanitizer_libignore.cpp:54:11 frame #19: libclang_rt.tsan_osx_dynamic.dylib`::wrap_dlopen(filename="<some library>", flag=<unavailable>) at sanitizer_common_interceptors.inc:6466:3 <library code> ``` rdar://106766395 Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D146593

…ak ordering `std::sort` requires a comparison operator that obides by strict weak ordering. `operator<=` on pointer does not and leads to undefined behaviour. Specifically, when we grow the `scratch_type_systems` vector slightly larger (and thus take `std::sort` down a slightly different codepath), we segfault. This happened while working on a patch that would in fact grow this vector. In such a case ASAN reports: ``` $ ./bin/lldb ./lldb-test-build.noindex/lang/cpp/complete-type-check/TestCppIsTypeComplete.test_builtin_types/a.out -o "script -- lldb.target.FindFirstType(\"void\")" (lldb) script -- lldb.target.FindFirstType("void") ================================================================= ==59975==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: container-overflow on address 0x000108f6b510 at pc 0x000280177b4c bp 0x00016b7d7430 sp 0x00016b7d7428 READ of size 8 at 0x000108f6b510 thread T0 #0 0x280177b48 in std::__1::shared_ptr<lldb_private::TypeSystem>::shared_ptr[abi:v15006](std::__1::shared_ptr<lldb_private::TypeSystem> const&)+0xb4 (/Users/michaelbuch/Git/lldb-build-main-no-modules/lib/liblldb.17.0.0git.dylib:arm64+0x177b48) (BuildId: ea963d2c0d47354fb647f5c5f32b76d932000000200000000100000000000d00) swiftlang#1 0x280dcc008 in void std::__1::__introsort<std::__1::_ClassicAlgPolicy, lldb_private::Target::GetScratchTypeSystems(bool)::$_3&, std::__1::shared_ptr<lldb_private::TypeSystem>*>(std::__1::shared_ptr<lldb_private::TypeSystem>*, std::__1::shared_ ptr<lldb_private::TypeSystem>*, lldb_private::Target::GetScratchTypeSystems(bool)::$_3&, std::__1::iterator_traits<std::__1::shared_ptr<lldb_private::TypeSystem>*>::difference_type)+0x1050 (/Users/michaelbuch/Git/lldb-build-main-no-modules/lib/liblld b.17.0.0git.dylib:arm64+0xdcc008) (BuildId: ea963d2c0d47354fb647f5c5f32b76d932000000200000000100000000000d00) swiftlang#2 0x280d88788 in lldb_private::Target::GetScratchTypeSystems(bool)+0x5a4 (/Users/michaelbuch/Git/lldb-build-main-no-modules/lib/liblldb.17.0.0git.dylib:arm64+0xd88788) (BuildId: ea963d2c0d47354fb647f5c5f32b76d932000000200000000100000000000d00) swiftlang#3 0x28021f0b4 in lldb::SBTarget::FindFirstType(char const*)+0x624 (/Users/michaelbuch/Git/lldb-build-main-no-modules/lib/liblldb.17.0.0git.dylib:arm64+0x21f0b4) (BuildId: ea963d2c0d47354fb647f5c5f32b76d932000000200000000100000000000d00) swiftlang#4 0x2804e9590 in _wrap_SBTarget_FindFirstType(_object*, _object*)+0x26c (/Users/michaelbuch/Git/lldb-build-main-no-modules/lib/liblldb.17.0.0git.dylib:arm64+0x4e9590) (BuildId: ea963d2c0d47354fb647f5c5f32b76d932000000200000000100000000000d00) swiftlang#5 0x1062d3ad4 in cfunction_call+0x5c (/opt/homebrew/Cellar/python@3.11/3.11.1/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.11/Python:arm64+0xcfad4) (BuildId: c9efc4bbb1943f9a9b7cc4e91fce477732000000200000000100000000000d00) <--- snipped ---> 0x000108f6b510 is located 400 bytes inside of 512-byte region [0x000108f6b380,0x000108f6b580) allocated by thread T0 here: #0 0x105209414 in wrap__Znwm+0x74 (/Applications/Xcode2.app/Contents/Developer/Toolchains/XcodeDefault.xctoolchain/usr/lib/clang/14.0.3/lib/darwin/libclang_rt.asan_osx_dynamic.dylib:arm64e+0x51414) (BuildId: 0a44828ceb64337bbfff60b22cd838f0320000 00200000000100000000000b00) swiftlang#1 0x280dca3b4 in std::__1::__split_buffer<std::__1::shared_ptr<lldb_private::TypeSystem>, std::__1::allocator<std::__1::shared_ptr<lldb_private::TypeSystem>>&>::__split_buffer(unsigned long, unsigned long, std::__1::allocator<std::__1::shared_pt r<lldb_private::TypeSystem>>&)+0x11c (/Users/michaelbuch/Git/lldb-build-main-no-modules/lib/liblldb.17.0.0git.dylib:arm64+0xdca3b4) (BuildId: ea963d2c0d47354fb647f5c5f32b76d932000000200000000100000000000d00) swiftlang#2 0x280dc978c in void std::__1::vector<std::__1::shared_ptr<lldb_private::TypeSystem>, std::__1::allocator<std::__1::shared_ptr<lldb_private::TypeSystem>>>::__push_back_slow_path<std::__1::shared_ptr<lldb_private::TypeSystem> const&>(std::__1::s hared_ptr<lldb_private::TypeSystem> const&)+0x13c (/Users/michaelbuch/Git/lldb-build-main-no-modules/lib/liblldb.17.0.0git.dylib:arm64+0xdc978c) (BuildId: ea963d2c0d47354fb647f5c5f32b76d932000000200000000100000000000d00) swiftlang#3 0x280d88dec in std::__1::vector<std::__1::shared_ptr<lldb_private::TypeSystem>, std::__1::allocator<std::__1::shared_ptr<lldb_private::TypeSystem>>>::push_back[abi:v15006](std::__1::shared_ptr<lldb_private::TypeSystem> const&)+0x80 (/Users/mic haelbuch/Git/lldb-build-main-no-modules/lib/liblldb.17.0.0git.dylib:arm64+0xd88dec) (BuildId: ea963d2c0d47354fb647f5c5f32b76d932000000200000000100000000000d00) swiftlang#4 0x280d8857c in lldb_private::Target::GetScratchTypeSystems(bool)+0x398 (/Users/michaelbuch/Git/lldb-build-main-no-modules/lib/liblldb.17.0.0git.dylib:arm64+0xd8857c) (BuildId: ea963d2c0d47354fb647f5c5f32b76d932000000200000000100000000000d00) swiftlang#5 0x28021f0b4 in lldb::SBTarget::FindFirstType(char const*)+0x624 (/Users/michaelbuch/Git/lldb-build-main-no-modules/lib/liblldb.17.0.0git.dylib:arm64+0x21f0b4) (BuildId: ea963d2c0d47354fb647f5c5f32b76d932000000200000000100000000000d00) swiftlang#6 0x2804e9590 in _wrap_SBTarget_FindFirstType(_object*, _object*)+0x26c (/Users/michaelbuch/Git/lldb-build-main-no-modules/lib/liblldb.17.0.0git.dylib:arm64+0x4e9590) (BuildId: ea963d2c0d47354fb647f5c5f32b76d932000000200000000100000000000d00) swiftlang#7 0x1062d3ad4 in cfunction_call+0x5c (/opt/homebrew/Cellar/python@3.11/3.11.1/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.11/Python:arm64+0xcfad4) (BuildId: c9efc4bbb1943f9a9b7cc4e91fce477732000000200000000100000000000d00) swiftlang#8 0x10627fff0 in _PyObject_MakeTpCall+0x7c (/opt/homebrew/Cellar/python@3.11/3.11.1/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.11/Python:arm64+0x7bff0) (BuildId: c9efc4bbb1943f9a9b7cc4e91fce477732000000200000000100000000000d00) swiftlang#9 0x106378a98 in _PyEval_EvalFrameDefault+0xbcf8 (/opt/homebrew/Cellar/python@3.11/3.11.1/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.11/Python:arm64+0x174a98) (BuildId: c9efc4bbb1943f9a9b7cc4e91fce477732000000200000000100000000000d00) ``` Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D142709 (cherry picked from commit 78fee46)

…callback The `TypeSystemMap::m_mutex` guards against concurrent modifications of members of `TypeSystemMap`. In particular, `m_map`. `TypeSystemMap::ForEach` iterates through the entire `m_map` calling a user-specified callback for each entry. This is all done while `m_mutex` is locked. However, there's nothing that guarantees that the callback itself won't call back into `TypeSystemMap` APIs on the same thread. This lead to double-locking `m_mutex`, which is undefined behaviour. We've seen this cause a deadlock in the swift plugin with following backtrace: ``` int main() { std::unique_ptr<int> up = std::make_unique<int>(5); volatile int val = *up; return val; } clang++ -std=c++2a -g -O1 main.cpp ./bin/lldb -o “br se -p return” -o run -o “v *up” -o “expr *up” -b ``` ``` frame #4: std::lock_guard<std::mutex>::lock_guard frame #5: lldb_private::TypeSystemMap::GetTypeSystemForLanguage <<<< Lock #2 frame #6: lldb_private::TypeSystemMap::GetTypeSystemForLanguage frame #7: lldb_private::Target::GetScratchTypeSystemForLanguage ... frame #26: lldb_private::SwiftASTContext::LoadLibraryUsingPaths frame #27: lldb_private::SwiftASTContext::LoadModule frame #30: swift::ModuleDecl::collectLinkLibraries frame #31: lldb_private::SwiftASTContext::LoadModule frame #34: lldb_private::SwiftASTContext::GetCompileUnitImportsImpl frame #35: lldb_private::SwiftASTContext::PerformCompileUnitImports frame #36: lldb_private::TypeSystemSwiftTypeRefForExpressions::GetSwiftASTContext frame #37: lldb_private::TypeSystemSwiftTypeRefForExpressions::GetPersistentExpressionState frame #38: lldb_private::Target::GetPersistentSymbol frame #41: lldb_private::TypeSystemMap::ForEach <<<< Lock #1 frame #42: lldb_private::Target::GetPersistentSymbol frame #43: lldb_private::IRExecutionUnit::FindInUserDefinedSymbols frame #44: lldb_private::IRExecutionUnit::FindSymbol frame #45: lldb_private::IRExecutionUnit::MemoryManager::GetSymbolAddressAndPresence frame #46: lldb_private::IRExecutionUnit::MemoryManager::findSymbol frame #47: non-virtual thunk to lldb_private::IRExecutionUnit::MemoryManager::findSymbol frame #48: llvm::LinkingSymbolResolver::findSymbol frame #49: llvm::LegacyJITSymbolResolver::lookup frame #50: llvm::RuntimeDyldImpl::resolveExternalSymbols frame #51: llvm::RuntimeDyldImpl::resolveRelocations frame #52: llvm::MCJIT::finalizeLoadedModules frame #53: llvm::MCJIT::finalizeObject frame #54: lldb_private::IRExecutionUnit::ReportAllocations frame #55: lldb_private::IRExecutionUnit::GetRunnableInfo frame #56: lldb_private::ClangExpressionParser::PrepareForExecution frame #57: lldb_private::ClangUserExpression::TryParse frame #58: lldb_private::ClangUserExpression::Parse ``` Our solution is to simply iterate over a local copy of `m_map`. **Testing** * Confirmed on manual reproducer (would reproduce 100% of the time before the patch) Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D149949 (cherry picked from commit dda3a6a)

…callback The `TypeSystemMap::m_mutex` guards against concurrent modifications of members of `TypeSystemMap`. In particular, `m_map`. `TypeSystemMap::ForEach` iterates through the entire `m_map` calling a user-specified callback for each entry. This is all done while `m_mutex` is locked. However, there's nothing that guarantees that the callback itself won't call back into `TypeSystemMap` APIs on the same thread. This lead to double-locking `m_mutex`, which is undefined behaviour. We've seen this cause a deadlock in the swift plugin with following backtrace: ``` int main() { std::unique_ptr<int> up = std::make_unique<int>(5); volatile int val = *up; return val; } clang++ -std=c++2a -g -O1 main.cpp ./bin/lldb -o “br se -p return” -o run -o “v *up” -o “expr *up” -b ``` ``` frame #4: std::lock_guard<std::mutex>::lock_guard frame #5: lldb_private::TypeSystemMap::GetTypeSystemForLanguage <<<< Lock #2 frame #6: lldb_private::TypeSystemMap::GetTypeSystemForLanguage frame #7: lldb_private::Target::GetScratchTypeSystemForLanguage ... frame #26: lldb_private::SwiftASTContext::LoadLibraryUsingPaths frame #27: lldb_private::SwiftASTContext::LoadModule frame #30: swift::ModuleDecl::collectLinkLibraries frame #31: lldb_private::SwiftASTContext::LoadModule frame #34: lldb_private::SwiftASTContext::GetCompileUnitImportsImpl frame #35: lldb_private::SwiftASTContext::PerformCompileUnitImports frame #36: lldb_private::TypeSystemSwiftTypeRefForExpressions::GetSwiftASTContext frame #37: lldb_private::TypeSystemSwiftTypeRefForExpressions::GetPersistentExpressionState frame #38: lldb_private::Target::GetPersistentSymbol frame #41: lldb_private::TypeSystemMap::ForEach <<<< Lock #1 frame #42: lldb_private::Target::GetPersistentSymbol frame #43: lldb_private::IRExecutionUnit::FindInUserDefinedSymbols frame #44: lldb_private::IRExecutionUnit::FindSymbol frame #45: lldb_private::IRExecutionUnit::MemoryManager::GetSymbolAddressAndPresence frame #46: lldb_private::IRExecutionUnit::MemoryManager::findSymbol frame #47: non-virtual thunk to lldb_private::IRExecutionUnit::MemoryManager::findSymbol frame #48: llvm::LinkingSymbolResolver::findSymbol frame #49: llvm::LegacyJITSymbolResolver::lookup frame #50: llvm::RuntimeDyldImpl::resolveExternalSymbols frame #51: llvm::RuntimeDyldImpl::resolveRelocations frame #52: llvm::MCJIT::finalizeLoadedModules frame #53: llvm::MCJIT::finalizeObject frame #54: lldb_private::IRExecutionUnit::ReportAllocations frame #55: lldb_private::IRExecutionUnit::GetRunnableInfo frame #56: lldb_private::ClangExpressionParser::PrepareForExecution frame #57: lldb_private::ClangUserExpression::TryParse frame #58: lldb_private::ClangUserExpression::Parse ``` Our solution is to simply iterate over a local copy of `m_map`. **Testing** * Confirmed on manual reproducer (would reproduce 100% of the time before the patch) Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D149949

Running this on Amazon Ubuntu the final backtrace is: ``` (lldb) thread backtrace * thread #1, name = 'a.out', stop reason = breakpoint 1.1 * frame #0: 0x0000aaaaaaaa07d0 a.out`func_c at main.c:10:3 frame #1: 0x0000aaaaaaaa07c4 a.out`func_b at main.c:14:3 frame #2: 0x0000aaaaaaaa07b4 a.out`func_a at main.c:18:3 frame #3: 0x0000aaaaaaaa07a4 a.out`main(argc=<unavailable>, argv=<unavailable>) at main.c:22:3 frame #4: 0x0000fffff7b373fc libc.so.6`___lldb_unnamed_symbol2962 + 108 frame #5: 0x0000fffff7b374cc libc.so.6`__libc_start_main + 152 frame #6: 0x0000aaaaaaaa06b0 a.out`_start + 48 ``` This causes the test to fail because of the extra ___lldb_unnamed_symbol2962 frame (an inlined function?). To fix this, strictly check all the frames in main.c then for the rest just check we find __libc_start_main and _start in that order regardless of other frames in between. Reviewed By: omjavaid Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D154204

…tput The crash happens in clang::driver::tools::SplitDebugName when Output is InputInfo::Nothing. It doesn't happen with standalone clang driver because output is created in Driver::BuildJobsForActionNoCache. Example backtrace: ``` * thread #1, name = 'clangd', stop reason = hit program assert * frame #0: 0x00007ffff5c4eacf libc.so.6`raise + 271 frame #1: 0x00007ffff5c21ea5 libc.so.6`abort + 295 frame #2: 0x00007ffff5c21d79 libc.so.6`__assert_fail_base.cold.0 + 15 frame #3: 0x00007ffff5c47426 libc.so.6`__assert_fail + 70 frame #4: 0x000055555dc0923c clangd`clang::driver::InputInfo::getFilename(this=0x00007fffffff9398) const at InputInfo.h:84:5 frame #5: 0x000055555dcd0d8d clangd`clang::driver::tools::SplitDebugName(JA=0x000055555f6c6a50, Args=0x000055555f6d0b80, Input=0x00007fffffff9678, Output=0x00007fffffff9398) at CommonArgs.cpp:1275:40 frame #6: 0x000055555dc955a5 clangd`clang::driver::tools::Clang::ConstructJob(this=0x000055555f6c69d0, C=0x000055555f6c64a0, JA=0x000055555f6c6a50, Output=0x00007fffffff9398, Inputs=0x00007fffffff9668, Args=0x000055555f6d0b80, LinkingOutput=0x0000000000000000) const at Clang.cpp:5690:33 frame #7: 0x000055555dbf6b54 clangd`clang::driver::Driver::BuildJobsForActionNoCache(this=0x00007fffffffb5e0, C=0x000055555f6c64a0, A=0x000055555f6c6a50, TC=0x000055555f6c4be0, BoundArch=(Data = 0x0000000000000000, Length = 0), AtTopLevel=true, MultipleArchs=false, LinkingOutput=0x0000000000000000, CachedResults=size=1, TargetDeviceOffloadKind=OFK_None) const at Driver.cpp:5618:10 frame #8: 0x000055555dbf4ef0 clangd`clang::driver::Driver::BuildJobsForAction(this=0x00007fffffffb5e0, C=0x000055555f6c64a0, A=0x000055555f6c6a50, TC=0x000055555f6c4be0, BoundArch=(Data = 0x0000000000000000, Length = 0), AtTopLevel=true, MultipleArchs=false, LinkingOutput=0x0000000000000000, CachedResults=size=1, TargetDeviceOffloadKind=OFK_None) const at Driver.cpp:5306:26 frame #9: 0x000055555dbeb590 clangd`clang::driver::Driver::BuildJobs(this=0x00007fffffffb5e0, C=0x000055555f6c64a0) const at Driver.cpp:4844:5 frame #10: 0x000055555dbe6b0f clangd`clang::driver::Driver::BuildCompilation(this=0x00007fffffffb5e0, ArgList=ArrayRef<const char *> @ 0x00007fffffffb268) at Driver.cpp:1496:3 frame #11: 0x000055555b0cc0d9 clangd`clang::createInvocation(ArgList=ArrayRef<const char *> @ 0x00007fffffffbb38, Opts=CreateInvocationOptions @ 0x00007fffffffbb90) at CreateInvocationFromCommandLine.cpp:53:52 frame #12: 0x000055555b378e7b clangd`clang::clangd::buildCompilerInvocation(Inputs=0x00007fffffffca58, D=0x00007fffffffc158, CC1Args=size=0) at Compiler.cpp:116:44 frame #13: 0x000055555895a6c8 clangd`clang::clangd::(anonymous namespace)::Checker::buildInvocation(this=0x00007fffffffc760, TFS=0x00007fffffffe570, Contents= Has Value=false ) at Check.cpp:212:9 frame #14: 0x0000555558959cec clangd`clang::clangd::check(File=(Data = "build/test.cpp", Length = 64), TFS=0x00007fffffffe570, Opts=0x00007fffffffe600) at Check.cpp:486:34 frame #15: 0x000055555892164a clangd`main(argc=4, argv=0x00007fffffffecd8) at ClangdMain.cpp:993:12 frame #16: 0x00007ffff5c3ad85 libc.so.6`__libc_start_main + 229 frame #17: 0x00005555585bbe9e clangd`_start + 46 ``` Test Plan: ninja ClangDriverTests && tools/clang/unittests/Driver/ClangDriverTests Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D154602

The example sequence add z0.h, z0.h, #32 lsr z0.h, #6 st1b z0.h, x1 can be replaced with rshrnb z0.b, #6 st1b z0.h, x1 As the top half of the destination elements are truncated. In similar fashion, add z0.s, z0.s, #32 lsr z1.s, z1.s, #6 add z1.s, z1.s, #32 lsr z0.s, z0.s, #6 uzp1 z0.h, z0.h, z1.h Can be replaced with rshrnb z1.h, z1.s, #6 rshrnb z0.h, z0.s, #6 uzp1 z0.h, z0.h, z1.h Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D155299

TSan reports the following race: Write of size 8 at 0x000107707ee8 by main thread: #0 lldb_private::ThreadedCommunication::StartReadThread(...) ThreadedCommunication.cpp:175 #1 lldb_private::Process::SetSTDIOFileDescriptor(...) Process.cpp:4533 #2 lldb_private::Platform::DebugProcess(...) Platform.cpp:1121 #3 lldb_private::PlatformDarwin::DebugProcess(...) PlatformDarwin.cpp:711 #4 lldb_private::Target::Launch(...) Target.cpp:3235 #5 CommandObjectProcessLaunch::DoExecute(...) CommandObjectProcess.cpp:256 #6 lldb_private::CommandObjectParsed::Execute(...) CommandObject.cpp:751 #7 lldb_private::CommandInterpreter::HandleCommand(...) CommandInterpreter.cpp:2054 Previous read of size 8 at 0x000107707ee8 by thread T5: #0 lldb_private::HostThread::IsJoinable(...) const HostThread.cpp:30 #1 lldb_private::ThreadedCommunication::StopReadThread(...) ThreadedCommunication.cpp:192 #2 lldb_private::Process::ShouldBroadcastEvent(...) Process.cpp:3420 #3 lldb_private::Process::HandlePrivateEvent(...) Process.cpp:3728 #4 lldb_private::Process::RunPrivateStateThread(...) Process.cpp:3914 #5 std::__1::__function::__func<lldb_private::Process::StartPrivateStateThread(...) function.h:356 #6 lldb_private::HostNativeThreadBase::ThreadCreateTrampoline(...) HostNativeThreadBase.cpp:62 #7 lldb_private::HostThreadMacOSX::ThreadCreateTrampoline(...) HostThreadMacOSX.mm:18 The problem is the lack of synchronization between starting and stopping the read thread. This patch fixes that by protecting those operations with a mutex. Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D157361

Fix darwin-ld-lto test for some speical path

08a8c80

Fix the test by not assuming the prefix path of the temp directory can be matched by a regex. rdar://problem/56259195 llvm-svn: 375027

nathawes merged commit 5cbb824 into swiftlang:apple/stable/20190619 Oct 29, 2019

nathawes deleted the cherry-pick-fix-for-r56259195-to-stable branch October 29, 2019 16:42

marcrasi mentioned this pull request Feb 13, 2020

[lldb] Rewrite Swift completion logic in REPL to not crash [WIP] #662

Closed

medismailben mentioned this pull request Jun 13, 2020

[lldb/formatter] Add Swift.UnsafeRawBufferPointer data formatter #1314

Merged

adrian-prantl mentioned this pull request Jul 20, 2020

NFC: Refactor clang extra args addition #1444

Merged

JDevlieghere mentioned this pull request Aug 1, 2020

[lldb/Host] Remove TaskPool and replace its uses with llvm::ThreadPool #1576

Merged

This was referenced May 7, 2022

[SR-10527] swift-lldb crashes setting breakpoint on app with deployment target <12.0 #4571

Open

[SR-3274] Failed to launch REPL process on LFS #4651

Closed

ziqingluo-90 added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 13, 2023

Merge pull request #5987 from ziqingluo-90/stable/20221013-cherrypick-6

5a31c54

static analysis related cherry picks to Stable/20221013 #6

kendalharland mentioned this pull request Aug 8, 2024

LLDB test TestCppBitFields.py fails on Windows x86_64 with fatal access violation #9072

Open

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Cherry-pick "Fix darwin-ld-lto test for some special path" to stable#6

Cherry-pick "Fix darwin-ld-lto test for some special path" to stable#6
nathawes merged 1 commit intoswiftlang:apple/stable/20190619from
nathawes:cherry-pick-fix-for-r56259195-to-stable

nathawes commented Oct 19, 2019

Uh oh!

nathawes commented Oct 19, 2019

Uh oh!

nathawes commented Oct 21, 2019

Uh oh!

nathawes commented Oct 22, 2019

Uh oh!

nathawes commented Oct 24, 2019

Uh oh!

nathawes commented Oct 29, 2019

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

2 participants

Conversation

nathawes commented Oct 19, 2019

Uh oh!

nathawes commented Oct 19, 2019

Uh oh!

nathawes commented Oct 21, 2019

Uh oh!

nathawes commented Oct 22, 2019

Uh oh!

nathawes commented Oct 24, 2019

Uh oh!

nathawes commented Oct 29, 2019

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

2 participants