Skip to content

fix: transfer effects when merging batches#18254

Merged
dummdidumm merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
effect-merge-fix
May 20, 2026
Merged

fix: transfer effects when merging batches#18254
dummdidumm merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
effect-merge-fix

Conversation

@dummdidumm

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

An effect could be gated behind a branch. If we don't defer + transfer them upon merge, the branch would still be marked clean but the effect behind it is dirty but no longer reachable. It's not reachable via mark either because that one only concerns itself with block/async effects, and the branch gating the effect is not guaranteed to be touched by that.

Fixes #18249

Little sad side-effect: Since we cannot reliably know before traversal if we have no blocking pending work left (the traversal could mark an if block falsy which contains the last blocker), we gotta undo a performance optimization.

An effect could be gated behind a branch. If we don't defer + transfer them upon merge, the branch would still be marked clean but the effect behind it is dirty but no longer reachable. It's not reachable via mark either because that one only concerns itself with block/async effects, and the branch gating the effect is not guaranteed to be touched by that.

Fixes #18249

Little sad side-effect: Since we cannot reliably know _before_ traversal if we have no blocking pending work left (the traversal could mark an if block falsy which contains the last blocker), we gotta undo a performance optimization.
@changeset-bot

changeset-bot Bot commented May 20, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: 38775a1

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 1 package
Name Type
svelte Patch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Playground

pnpm add https://pkg.pr.new/svelte@18254

@dummdidumm dummdidumm merged commit 65283bc into main May 20, 2026
20 of 21 checks passed
@dummdidumm dummdidumm deleted the effect-merge-fix branch May 20, 2026 21:49
@github-actions github-actions Bot mentioned this pull request May 20, 2026
Rich-Harris pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 27, 2026
This PR was opened by the [Changesets
release](https://github.com/changesets/action) GitHub action. When
you're ready to do a release, you can merge this and the packages will
be published to npm automatically. If you're not ready to do a release
yet, that's fine, whenever you add more changesets to main, this PR will
be updated.


# Releases
## svelte@5.55.10

### Patch Changes

- fix: unlink errored and otherwise finished batch
([#18264](#18264))

- perf: walk composedPath() directly in delegated event propagation
([#18268](#18268))

- fix: transfer effects when merging batches
([#18254](#18254))

- fix: allow `$derived(await ...)` in disconnected effect roots
([#18273](#18273))

- fix: remove temporary raw-text hydration markers
([#18269](#18269))

- fix: propagate async `@const` blockers through closure references so
template expressions like `{(() => host)()}` correctly wait for the
awaited value ([#18309](#18309))

- fix: properly unlink batches
([#18298](#18298))

- fix: settle discarded batch
([#18290](#18290))

- fix: declare `let:` directives before `{@const}` declarations on
slotted elements
([#18271](#18271))

- fix: resume outro-ed branches if they were kept around
([#18291](#18291))

- fix: avoid waterfall-warning when async resolves to same value
([#18297](#18297))

- fix: correctly coordinate component-level effects inside async blocks
([#18260](#18260))

- fix: make unnecessary commit work less likely
([#18263](#18263))

- chore: add tag name to `a11y_click_events_have_key_events` warning
([#18272](#18272))

- fix: catch rejected promises while merging/committing
([#18266](#18266))

Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Nested bind does not propagate under specific circumstances

2 participants