Skip to content

fix: avoid false positives for reactivity loss warning#18088

Merged
Rich-Harris merged 5 commits into
mainfrom
reactivity-loss-warning-fix
Apr 10, 2026
Merged

fix: avoid false positives for reactivity loss warning#18088
Rich-Harris merged 5 commits into
mainfrom
reactivity-loss-warning-fix

Conversation

@dummdidumm

@dummdidumm dummdidumm commented Apr 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Avoids two categories of false positives for reactivity loss warning:

  1. if you have synchronously read signals already as part of invoking the async_derived function, then it shouldn't warn when these signals are read after an await if we know they haven't changed (we check the write version for that)
  2. track_reactivity_loss kept the reactivity_loss_tracker around indefinitely, both when invoking the async operation as well as when it's finished. The former is buggy because while the async operation happens unrelated reads as part of other reactivity work can happen, the latter is buggy because if it's the last in a chain of awaits it's kept around until the next async work starts.

Fixes sveltejs/kit#15654

Avoids two categories of false positives for reactivity loss warning:
1. if you have synchronously read signals already as part of invoking the async_derived function, then it shouldn't warn when these signals are read after an await if we know they haven't changed (we check the write version for that)
2. `track_reactivity_loss` kept the `reactivity_loss_tracker` around indefinitely, both when invoking the async operation as well as when it's finished. The former is buggy because while the async operation happens unrelated reads as part of other reactivity work can happen, the latter is buggy because if it's the last in a chain of awaits it's kept around until the next async work starts.
@changeset-bot

changeset-bot Bot commented Apr 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: 3cf1c49

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 1 package
Name Type
svelte Patch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

@svelte-docs-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Apr 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Playground

pnpm add https://pkg.pr.new/svelte@18088

Comment thread packages/svelte/src/internal/client/reactivity/deriveds.js Outdated
Comment thread packages/svelte/src/internal/client/reactivity/async.js
Comment thread packages/svelte/src/internal/client/reactivity/deriveds.js Outdated
#18090 (comment)

---------

Co-authored-by: vercel[bot] <35613825+vercel[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
@Rich-Harris Rich-Harris merged commit 15588f5 into main Apr 10, 2026
21 checks passed
@Rich-Harris Rich-Harris deleted the reactivity-loss-warning-fix branch April 10, 2026 01:05
@github-actions github-actions Bot mentioned this pull request Apr 9, 2026
Rich-Harris pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 10, 2026
This PR was opened by the [Changesets
release](https://github.com/changesets/action) GitHub action. When
you're ready to do a release, you can merge this and the packages will
be published to npm automatically. If you're not ready to do a release
yet, that's fine, whenever you add more changesets to main, this PR will
be updated.


# Releases
## svelte@5.55.3

### Patch Changes

- fix: ensure proper HMR updates for dynamic components
([#18079](#18079))

- fix: correctly calculate `@const` blockers
([#18039](#18039))

- fix: freeze deriveds once their containing effects are destroyed
([#17921](#17921))

- fix: defer error boundary rendering in forks
([#18076](#18076))

- fix: avoid false positives for reactivity loss warning
([#18088](#18088))

Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

await_reactivity_loss with $derived(await query(derivedParams)) — single query, single reactive param

2 participants