Skip to content

fix: remove event listeners on form attachment cleanup#15286

Merged
teemingc merged 5 commits intomainfrom
form-for-evt-listener-fix
Feb 19, 2026
Merged

fix: remove event listeners on form attachment cleanup#15286
teemingc merged 5 commits intomainfrom
form-for-evt-listener-fix

Conversation

@dummdidumm
Copy link
Member

@dummdidumm dummdidumm commented Feb 8, 2026

Fixes #14546

The call to enhance() returns a new object each time with a new attachment. And because we didn't remove the event listeners on attachment cleanup this created more and more listeners over time.

I do wonder if this is indicative of .enhance(...) being a bit of a suboptimal API


Please don't delete this checklist! Before submitting the PR, please make sure you do the following:

  • It's really useful if your PR references an issue where it is discussed ahead of time. In many cases, features are absent for a reason. For large changes, please create an RFC: https://github.com/sveltejs/rfcs
  • This message body should clearly illustrate what problems it solves.
  • Ideally, include a test that fails without this PR but passes with it.

Tests

  • Run the tests with pnpm test and lint the project with pnpm lint and pnpm check

Changesets

  • If your PR makes a change that should be noted in one or more packages' changelogs, generate a changeset by running pnpm changeset and following the prompts. Changesets that add features should be minor and those that fix bugs should be patch. Please prefix changeset messages with feat:, fix:, or chore:.

Edits

  • Please ensure that 'Allow edits from maintainers' is checked. PRs without this option may be closed.

Fixes #14546

The call to `enhance()` returns a new object each time with a new attachment. And because we didn't remove the event listeners on attachment cleanup this created more and more listeners over time
@changeset-bot
Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Feb 8, 2026

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: f89120e

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 1 package
Name Type
@sveltejs/kit Patch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

Copy link
Member

@teemingc teemingc left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks! I left one comment to optimise the test. Feel free to merge if it's not needed

teemingc and others added 2 commits February 18, 2026 10:01
Co-authored-by: Tee Ming <chewteeming01@gmail.com>
@teemingc teemingc merged commit 6df9d33 into main Feb 19, 2026
28 checks passed
@teemingc teemingc deleted the form-for-evt-listener-fix branch February 19, 2026 04:04
This was referenced Feb 19, 2026
Copilot AI pushed a commit to Stadly/kit that referenced this pull request Mar 6, 2026
Fixes sveltejs#14546

The call to `enhance()` returns a new object each time with a new
attachment. And because we didn't remove the event listeners on
attachment cleanup this created more and more listeners over time.

I do wonder if this is indicative of `.enhance(...)` being a bit of a
suboptimal API

---

### Please don't delete this checklist! Before submitting the PR, please
make sure you do the following:
- [x] It's really useful if your PR references an issue where it is
discussed ahead of time. In many cases, features are absent for a
reason. For large changes, please create an RFC:
https://github.com/sveltejs/rfcs
- [x] This message body should clearly illustrate what problems it
solves.
- [x] Ideally, include a test that fails without this PR but passes with
it.

### Tests
- [x] Run the tests with `pnpm test` and lint the project with `pnpm
lint` and `pnpm check`

### Changesets
- [x] If your PR makes a change that should be noted in one or more
packages' changelogs, generate a changeset by running `pnpm changeset`
and following the prompts. Changesets that add features should be
`minor` and those that fix bugs should be `patch`. Please prefix
changeset messages with `feat:`, `fix:`, or `chore:`.

### Edits

- [x] Please ensure that 'Allow edits from maintainers' is checked. PRs
without this option may be closed.

---------

Co-authored-by: Tee Ming <chewteeming01@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

forms Stuff relating to forms and form actions

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Remote form with .for() duplicate requests exponentially

2 participants