initial idea for canonical version logic#7227
Closed
kevinh-hcl wants to merge 1 commit intosquidfunk:masterfrom
Closed
initial idea for canonical version logic#7227kevinh-hcl wants to merge 1 commit intosquidfunk:masterfrom
kevinh-hcl wants to merge 1 commit intosquidfunk:masterfrom
Conversation
4 tasks
4 tasks
Owner
|
Thanks for the PR. Could I ask you to simplify the control flow and scope the code added to a check for |
ilyagr
added a commit
to ilyagr/mkdocs-material
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 9, 2024
… functionality This is meant to simplify checking correctness of code like squidfunk#7227 and fixing bugs like squidfunk#7226. In fact, I'm hoping to eventually make this code general enough that it runs locally with `mike serve`. I picked `mocha` as the testing library because its Typescript support relies on ts-node, which this project already relies on. I have little experience with `mocha` vs `jest` vs something else beyond this commit. See also https://github.com/mochajs/mocha-examples/tree/main/packages/typescript Instead of using `chai`, I'm using Node's assert package. Its TS types are in `@types/node`. It should be trivial, and might be good, to switch to `chai` or something else. This setup is not perfect, in particular I can't get tests to import the whole `index.ts` file. This is why the function being tested gets its own file. Importing `index.ts` would seem to require writing some DOM shims and be a general headache. For the record, using `tsx` and `jsdom-global` instead of `ts-node` to run `mocha` seemed like the most promising approach, but it still failed since some files imported from this `index.ts` rely on the DOM having some particular structure in their top-level definitions. Here's how to set up `tsx` and `jsdom-global`, for reference: ```diff diff --git a/.mocharc.json b/.mocharc.json index e713305556...33c9adc84d 100644 --- a/.mocharc.json +++ b/.mocharc.json @@ -2,5 +2,5 @@ "$schema": "https://json.schemastore.org/mocharc.json", "extension": ["ts"], "spec": "src/**/**.test.ts", - "require": "ts-node/register" + "require": ["tsx", "jsdom-global/register"] } diff --git a/package.json b/package.json index ecc9f98cf9...10242ca725 100644 --- a/package.json +++ b/package.json @@ -76,6 +76,7 @@ "gitlab": "^14.2.2", "google-fonts-complete": "jonathantneal/google-fonts-complete", "html-minifier": "^4.0.0", + "jsdom-global": "^3.0.2", "material-design-color": "^2.3.2", "material-shadows": "^3.0.1", "mocha": "^10.6.0", @@ -99,6 +100,7 @@ "svgo": "3.0.0", "tiny-glob": "^0.2.9", "ts-node": "^10.9.2", + "tsx": "^4.16.2", "typescript": "^5.5.2" }, "engines": { ``` I can also incorporate the diff into this commit.
ilyagr
added a commit
to ilyagr/mkdocs-material
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 11, 2024
… functionality Following https://www.innoq.com/en/blog/2020/04/ts-jasmine-karma/#executingtestsonnode.js This is meant to simplify checking correctness of code like squidfunk#7227 and fixing bugs like squidfunk#7226. In fact, I'm hoping to eventually make this code general enough that it runs locally with `mike serve`. I picked `mocha` as the testing library because its Typescript support relies on ts-node, which this project already relies on. I have little experience with `mocha` vs `jest` vs something else beyond this commit. See also https://github.com/mochajs/mocha-examples/tree/main/packages/typescript Instead of using `chai`, I'm using Node's assert package. Its TS types are in `@types/node`. It should be trivial, and might be good, to switch to `chai` or something else. This setup is not perfect, in particular I can't get tests to import the whole `index.ts` file. This is why the function being tested gets its own file. Importing `index.ts` would seem to require writing some DOM shims and be a general headache. For the record, using `tsx` and `jsdom-global` instead of `ts-node` to run `mocha` seemed like the most promising approach, but it still failed since some files imported from this `index.ts` rely on the DOM having some particular structure in their top-level definitions. Here's how to set up `tsx` and `jsdom-global`, for reference: ```diff diff --git a/.mocharc.json b/.mocharc.json index e713305556...33c9adc84d 100644 --- a/.mocharc.json +++ b/.mocharc.json @@ -2,5 +2,5 @@ "$schema": "https://json.schemastore.org/mocharc.json", "extension": ["ts"], "spec": "src/**/**.test.ts", - "require": "ts-node/register" + "require": ["tsx", "jsdom-global/register"] } diff --git a/package.json b/package.json index ecc9f98cf9...10242ca725 100644 --- a/package.json +++ b/package.json @@ -76,6 +76,7 @@ "gitlab": "^14.2.2", "google-fonts-complete": "jonathantneal/google-fonts-complete", "html-minifier": "^4.0.0", + "jsdom-global": "^3.0.2", "material-design-color": "^2.3.2", "material-shadows": "^3.0.1", "mocha": "^10.6.0", @@ -99,6 +100,7 @@ "svgo": "3.0.0", "tiny-glob": "^0.2.9", "ts-node": "^10.9.2", + "tsx": "^4.16.2", "typescript": "^5.5.2" }, "engines": { ``` I can also incorporate the diff into this commit.
ilyagr
added a commit
to ilyagr/mkdocs-material
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 11, 2024
… functionality Following https://www.innoq.com/en/blog/2020/04/ts-jasmine-karma/#executingtestsonnode.js This is meant to simplify checking correctness of code like squidfunk#7227 and fixing bugs like squidfunk#7226. In fact, I'm hoping to eventually make this code general enough that it runs locally with `mike serve`. I picked `mocha` as the testing library because its Typescript support relies on ts-node, which this project already relies on. I have little experience with `mocha` vs `jest` vs something else beyond this commit. See also https://github.com/mochajs/mocha-examples/tree/main/packages/typescript Instead of using `chai`, I'm using Node's assert package. Its TS types are in `@types/node`. It should be trivial, and might be good, to switch to `chai` or something else. This setup is not perfect, in particular I can't get tests to import the whole `index.ts` file. This is why the function being tested gets its own file. Importing `index.ts` would seem to require writing some DOM shims and be a general headache. For the record, using `tsx` and `jsdom-global` instead of `ts-node` to run `mocha` seemed like the most promising approach, but it still failed since some files imported from this `index.ts` rely on the DOM having some particular structure in their top-level definitions. Here's how to set up `tsx` and `jsdom-global`, for reference: ```diff diff --git a/.mocharc.json b/.mocharc.json index e713305556...33c9adc84d 100644 --- a/.mocharc.json +++ b/.mocharc.json @@ -2,5 +2,5 @@ "$schema": "https://json.schemastore.org/mocharc.json", "extension": ["ts"], "spec": "src/**/**.test.ts", - "require": "ts-node/register" + "require": ["tsx", "jsdom-global/register"] } diff --git a/package.json b/package.json index ecc9f98cf9...10242ca725 100644 --- a/package.json +++ b/package.json @@ -76,6 +76,7 @@ "gitlab": "^14.2.2", "google-fonts-complete": "jonathantneal/google-fonts-complete", "html-minifier": "^4.0.0", + "jsdom-global": "^3.0.2", "material-design-color": "^2.3.2", "material-shadows": "^3.0.1", "mocha": "^10.6.0", @@ -99,6 +100,7 @@ "svgo": "3.0.0", "tiny-glob": "^0.2.9", "ts-node": "^10.9.2", + "tsx": "^4.16.2", "typescript": "^5.5.2" }, "engines": { ``` I can also incorporate the diff into this commit.
Owner
|
Superseded by #7559. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Initial quick draft of an idea regarding #7226. This is a first draft, so feel free to give any feedback on improvements or misuse of any of the mechanisms of mkdocs or the theme.