…ute_check_masic

What I did
Enhanced route_check.py script to cover multi-asic platforms.
Accordingly enhanced the test files as well.
Master Branch PR: sonic-net/sonic-utilities#3077

MSFT ADO: 25416673

How I did it
Enhanced the route_check.py script to take additional optional parameter(--n/namespace). Without this parameter, the check will be run on all asics in multi-asic platforms.
Different connections to DBs are modified accordingly to connect to relevant ns dbs.
Result will be encapsulated under different namespace. For single asic, results will be displayed under Default-Namespace("").

testData and the testfiles are enhanced accordinly.

This reverts commit e7a8def.

* Enhanced route_check.py for multi_asic platforms
* skip eth1 routes for packet-chassis, pytest enhancements

What I did
Cherry pick of PR #3077

MSFT ADO: 25416673

How I did it
Enhanced the route_check.py script to take additional optional parameter(--n/namespace). Without this parameter, the check will be run on all asics in multi-asic platforms.
Different connections to DBs are modified accordingly to connect to relevant ns dbs.
Result will be encapsulated under different namespace. For single asic, results will be displayed under Default-Namespace("").

testData and the testfiles are enhanced accordinly.

How to verify it
Verified that all pytest UT cases are passing.
Verified the route_check_test.sh script on single asic and multi-asic platforms.
Verified Monit routecheck outputs by simulating a failure scenario on both single asic and multi-asic platforms.
output from Monit Check:
Single Asic:
xxx/usr/local/bin# monit status routecheck
Monit 5.20.0 uptime: 1d 20h 32m

Program 'routeCheck'
status Status failed
monitoring status Monitored
monitoring mode active
on reboot start
last exit value 255
last output Failure results: {{
"": {
"missed_ROUTE_TABLE_routes": [
"20c0:d9b8:99:80::/64"
]
}
}}
Failed. Look at reported mismatches above
add: {
"": []
}
del: {
"": []
}
data collected Tue, 12 Dec 2023 20:30:11

'''
Multi Asic:
'''
/bin# monit status routecheck
Monit 5.20.0 uptime: 1d 23h 51m

Program 'routeCheck'
status Status failed
monitoring status Monitored
monitoring mode active
on reboot start
last exit value 255
last output Failure results: {{
"asic0": {
"missed_ROUTE_TABLE_routes": [
"1.0.0.0/16"
]
},
"asic1": {
"missed_ROUTE_TABLE_routes": [
"1.0.0.0/16"
]
},
"asic2": {
"missed_ROUTE_TABLE_routes": [
"1.0.0.0/16"
]
}
}}
Failed. Look at reported mismatches above
add: {
"asic0": [],
"asic1": [],
"asic2": []
}
del: {
"asic0": [],
"asic1": [],
"asic2": []
}
data collected Tue, 12 Dec 2023 23:54:23

* Enhanced route_check.py for multi_asic platforms
* skip eth1 routes for packet-chassis, pytest enhancements