Add new test case to verify MAC address is correct after SONiC to SONiC update#970
Merged
qiluo-msft merged 4 commits intosonic-net:masterfrom Jun 27, 2019
Merged
Conversation
qiluo-msft
reviewed
Jun 24, 2019
| - fail: msg="Please speify URL to the image1" | ||
| when: image1 is not defined | ||
|
|
||
| - fail: msg="Please speify URL to the image2" |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
fai [](start = 4, length = 3)
Also check image1 != image2
1 task
1 task
auspham
pushed a commit
to auspham/sonic-mgmt
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 3, 2026
<!-- Please make sure you've read and understood our contributing guidelines; https://github.com/sonic-net/SONiC/blob/gh-pages/CONTRIBUTING.md Please provide following information to help code review process a bit easier: --> ### Description of PR <!-- - Please include a summary of the change and which issue is fixed. - Please also include relevant motivation and context. Where should reviewer start? background context? - List any dependencies that are required for this change. --> Summary: add vips in f2 t1 topo ### Type of change <!-- - Fill x for your type of change. - e.g. - [x] Bug fix --> - [ ] Bug fix - [ ] Testbed and Framework(new/improvement) - [ ] New Test case - [ ] Skipped for non-supported platforms - [ ] Test case improvement ### Back port request - [ ] 202205 - [ ] 202305 - [ ] 202311 - [ ] 202405 - [ ] 202411 - [ ] 202505 - [ ] 202511 ### Approach #### What is the motivation for this PR? add vips in f2 t1 topo #### How did you do it? #### How did you verify/test it? #### Any platform specific information? #### Supported testbed topology if it's a new test case? ### Documentation <!-- (If it's a new feature, new test case) Did you update documentation/Wiki relevant to your implementation? Link to the wiki page? -->
kazinator-arista
pushed a commit
to kazinator-arista/sonic-mgmt
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 4, 2026
…omatically (sonic-net#21665) #### Why I did it src/sonic-swss-common ``` * 8f47a37 - (HEAD -> 202411, origin/202411) Handle 'bulkget' in consumer_table_pops.lua (sonic-net#970) (25 hours ago) [mssonicbld] ``` #### How I did it #### How to verify it #### Description for the changelog
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description of PR (Draft)
Added new test case to verify MAC address is correct after SONiC-to-SONiC update.
Test case performs:
Test case steps:
In the loop:
Test case parameters:
image1,image2 - URL to the SONIC binary image
iterations - Number of times to switch between two images and perform MAC verification
PASS/FAIL criteria:
After install SONiC image and reboot device:
Summary:
Fixes #
Type of change
Approach
How did you do it?
How did you verify/test it?
Tested on our local testbed.
Test case expect the following parameters:
-e image1=http://IP_ADDR/SERVER_URL/IMAGE_NAME.bin
-e image2=http://IP_ADDR/SERVER_URL/IMAGE_NAME.bin
-e iterations=INT_NUMBER
Any platform specific information?
Supported testbed topology if it's a new test case?
Documentation
Notes
As it is draft PR, new features/improvements are planned to be added: