Skip to content

Fix port alias mapping in minigraph_facts#830

Closed
wendani wants to merge 1 commit intosonic-net:masterfrom
wendani:pAlias
Closed

Fix port alias mapping in minigraph_facts#830
wendani wants to merge 1 commit intosonic-net:masterfrom
wendani:pAlias

Conversation

@wendani
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@wendani wendani commented Mar 18, 2019

In the case that port alias conflicts with the port name, e.g., a7050-qx-32s

Ethernet36 41,42,43,44 Ethernet14/1 14 40000
Ethernet124 5,6,7,8 Ethernet36 36 40000

Use port name, e.g., Ethernet36's index, as the definitive reference

Signed-off-by: Wenda Ni wenni@microsoft.com

Description of PR

Summary:
Fixes # (issue)

Type of change

  • [] Bug fix
  • [] Testbed and Framework(new/improvement)
  • [] Test case(new/improvement)

Approach

How did you do it?

How did you verify/test it?

Any platform specific information?

Supported testbed topology if it's a new test case?

Documentation

a7050-qx-32s

Ethernet36      41,42,43,44       Ethernet14/1  14      40000
Ethernet124     5,6,7,8           Ethernet36    36      40000

Use port name Ethernet36's index as reference

Signed-off-by: Wenda Ni <wenni@microsoft.com>
@jleveque
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

jleveque commented Mar 18, 2019

I think we need to find a more fundamental fix. The root of the problem here is that this dictionary contains both port names and port aliases as keys, which is why any overlap can cause issues. This dictionary should only contain one or the other as keys.

@lguohan
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

lguohan commented Mar 19, 2019

agree with joe, it is not the right way to solve the problem.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@lguohan lguohan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

fix is not correct

@jleveque
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Closing in favor of #832

@jleveque jleveque closed this Mar 19, 2019
deerao02 pushed a commit to deerao02/sonic-mgmt that referenced this pull request Dec 18, 2025
…s accounting test (sonic-net#830)

<!--
Please make sure you've read and understood our contributing guidelines;
https://github.com/sonic-net/SONiC/blob/gh-pages/CONTRIBUTING.md

Please provide following information to help code review process a bit easier:
-->
### Description of PR
<!--
- Please include a summary of the change and which issue is fixed.
- Please also include relevant motivation and context. Where should reviewer start? background context?
- List any dependencies that are required for this change.
-->

Summary:
Added xfail to tacacs accounting test due to issue: [https://github.com/sonic-net/sonic-mgmt/issues/20452](https://github.com/sonic-net/sonic-mgmt/issues/20452) on Mellanox platforms

### Type of change

<!--
- Fill x for your type of change.
- e.g.
- [x] Bug fix
-->

- [ ] Bug fix
- [x] Testbed and Framework(new/improvement)
- [ ] New Test case
 - [ ] Skipped for non-supported platforms
- [ ] Test case improvement

### Back port request
- [ ] 202205
- [ ] 202305
- [ ] 202311
- [ ] 202405
- [ ] 202411
- [ ] 202505

### Approach
#### What is the motivation for this PR?
Xfail failed test cases

#### How did you do it?

#### How did you verify/test it?

#### Any platform specific information?

#### Supported testbed topology if it's a new test case?

### Documentation
<!--
(If it's a new feature, new test case)
Did you update documentation/Wiki relevant to your implementation?
Link to the wiki page?
-->
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants