Skip to content

[COPP test]: Send BGP packets with ttl==1. We're emulating EBGP.#212

Merged
lguohan merged 1 commit intosonic-net:masterfrom
pavel-shirshov:pavelsh/copp_bgp_ttl
Jul 18, 2017
Merged

[COPP test]: Send BGP packets with ttl==1. We're emulating EBGP.#212
lguohan merged 1 commit intosonic-net:masterfrom
pavel-shirshov:pavelsh/copp_bgp_ttl

Conversation

@pavel-shirshov
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No description provided.

@lguohan lguohan merged commit d695996 into sonic-net:master Jul 18, 2017
auspham pushed a commit to auspham/sonic-mgmt that referenced this pull request May 30, 2025
…G route-map for upstream LC (sonic-net#212)

<!--
Please make sure you've read and understood our contributing guidelines;
https://github.com/sonic-net/SONiC/blob/gh-pages/CONTRIBUTING.md

Please provide following information to help code review process a bit easier:
-->
### Description of PR
<!--
- Please include a summary of the change and which issue is fixed.
- Please also include relevant motivation and context. Where should reviewer start? background context?
- List any dependencies that are required for this change.
-->

Summary:
Fixes # (issue)
In addition to the fix provided by sonic-net#15962 for the issue sonic-net#9052, this code change is also needed for handling AZNG route map changes on upstream LC.

### Type of change

<!--
- Fill x for your type of change.
- e.g.
- [x] Bug fix
-->

- [x] Bug fix
- [ ] Testbed and Framework(new/improvement)
- [ ] New Test case
 - [ ] Skipped for non-supported platforms
- [x] Test case improvement

### Back port request
- [ ] 202012
- [ ] 202205
- [ ] 202305
- [ ] 202311
- [x] 202405
- [x] 202411

### Approach
#### What is the motivation for this PR?

- '_test_default_route_with_bgp_flap_', for msft specific AZNG route maps on upstream LC fails even with the fix provided by sonic-net#15962

#### How did you do it?

- In addition to the fix provided by sonic-net#15962 , handle the case for all route maps.

#### How did you verify/test it?

- Ran the test on T2 chassis with upstream LC, having different sets of route maps and made sure the tests are passing as expected.

#### Any platform specific information?

#### Supported testbed topology if it's a new test case?

### Documentation
<!--
(If it's a new feature, new test case)
Did you update documentation/Wiki relevant to your implementation?
Link to the wiki page?
-->
![image](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/b7098b57-8225-4039-8ddb-8f3326ba7062)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants