[sonic-mgmt] Add loganalyzer regex to ignore sai_query_attribute_capability related errors by suwinkumar-arista · Pull Request #20596 · sonic-net/sonic-mgmt

suwinkumar-arista · 2025-09-10T06:06:50Z

Description of PR

Summary:
Fixes # (#807)

Type of change

Back port request

Approach

What is the motivation for this PR?

Add regex to skip sai_query_attribute_capability related loganalyzer errors

How did you do it?

Added 2 regex to loganalyzer_common_ignore.txt file to ignore

sai_query_attribute_enum_values_capability "rv=-8", ignoring
non-functional error in swss PR pipeline till
Fix switch capabilities enum query with metadata validation sonic-swss#3866 is merged
sai_query_attribute_capability "error -2", ignoring till it gets
fixed from SAI, CS00012422823 is raised

How did you verify/test it?

Tested on Arista-7050X3 running dualtor-aa topology

Any platform specific information?

Supported testbed topology if it's a new test case?

Documentation

…d errors

mssonicbld · 2025-09-10T06:06:58Z

/azp run

azure-pipelines · 2025-09-10T06:07:13Z

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

Gfrom2016

LGTM

StormLiangMS

LGTM

…d errors (sonic-net#20596) What is the motivation for this PR? Add regex to skip sai_query_attribute_capability related loganalyzer errors How did you do it? Added 2 regex to loganalyzer_common_ignore.txt file to ignore sai_query_attribute_enum_values_capability "rv=-8", ignoring non-functional error in swss PR pipeline till Fix switch capabilities enum query with metadata validation sonic-swss#3866 is merged sai_query_attribute_capability "error -2", ignoring till it gets fixed from SAI, CS00012422823 is raised How did you verify/test it? Tested on Arista-7050X3 running dualtor-aa topology

mssonicbld · 2025-09-10T11:15:52Z

Cherry-pick PR to 202505: #20605

…d errors (#20596) What is the motivation for this PR? Add regex to skip sai_query_attribute_capability related loganalyzer errors How did you do it? Added 2 regex to loganalyzer_common_ignore.txt file to ignore sai_query_attribute_enum_values_capability "rv=-8", ignoring non-functional error in swss PR pipeline till Fix switch capabilities enum query with metadata validation sonic-swss#3866 is merged sai_query_attribute_capability "error -2", ignoring till it gets fixed from SAI, CS00012422823 is raised How did you verify/test it? Tested on Arista-7050X3 running dualtor-aa topology

…d errors (sonic-net#20596) What is the motivation for this PR? Add regex to skip sai_query_attribute_capability related loganalyzer errors How did you do it? Added 2 regex to loganalyzer_common_ignore.txt file to ignore sai_query_attribute_enum_values_capability "rv=-8", ignoring non-functional error in swss PR pipeline till Fix switch capabilities enum query with metadata validation sonic-swss#3866 is merged sai_query_attribute_capability "error -2", ignoring till it gets fixed from SAI, CS00012422823 is raised How did you verify/test it? Tested on Arista-7050X3 running dualtor-aa topology

justin-wong-ce · 2025-09-24T00:34:36Z

Will this be backported to msft-202412?

sdszhang · 2025-10-15T04:33:18Z

@suwinkumar-arista can you open a cherry-pick PR to 202412 branch?

r12f · 2025-10-19T04:44:07Z

hi @suwinkumar-arista , do you mind to help pick this change to 202412?

suwinkumar-arista · 2025-10-19T05:53:15Z

Looking on it

suwinkumar-arista · 2025-10-19T07:43:03Z

Azure/sonic-mgmt.msft#766 PR available for 202412

…ty related errors (#20596) (#771) Cherry-pick sonic-net/sonic-mgmt#20596 What is the motivation for this PR? Add regex to skip sai_query_attribute_capability related loganalyzer errors How did you do it? Added 2 regex to loganalyzer_common_ignore.txt file to ignore sai_query_attribute_enum_values_capability "rv=-8", ignoring non-functional error in swss PR pipeline till Fix switch capabilities enum query with metadata validation sonic-swss#3866 is merged sai_query_attribute_capability "error -2", ignoring till it gets fixed from SAI, CS00012422823 is raised How did you verify/test it? Tested on Arista-7050X3 running dualtor-aa topology

…d errors (sonic-net#20596) What is the motivation for this PR? Add regex to skip sai_query_attribute_capability related loganalyzer errors How did you do it? Added 2 regex to loganalyzer_common_ignore.txt file to ignore sai_query_attribute_enum_values_capability "rv=-8", ignoring non-functional error in swss PR pipeline till Fix switch capabilities enum query with metadata validation sonic-swss#3866 is merged sai_query_attribute_capability "error -2", ignoring till it gets fixed from SAI, CS00012422823 is raised How did you verify/test it? Tested on Arista-7050X3 running dualtor-aa topology

…d errors (sonic-net#20596) What is the motivation for this PR? Add regex to skip sai_query_attribute_capability related loganalyzer errors How did you do it? Added 2 regex to loganalyzer_common_ignore.txt file to ignore sai_query_attribute_enum_values_capability "rv=-8", ignoring non-functional error in swss PR pipeline till Fix switch capabilities enum query with metadata validation sonic-swss#3866 is merged sai_query_attribute_capability "error -2", ignoring till it gets fixed from SAI, CS00012422823 is raised How did you verify/test it? Tested on Arista-7050X3 running dualtor-aa topology Signed-off-by: opcoder0 <110003254+opcoder0@users.noreply.github.com>

…d errors (sonic-net#20596) What is the motivation for this PR? Add regex to skip sai_query_attribute_capability related loganalyzer errors How did you do it? Added 2 regex to loganalyzer_common_ignore.txt file to ignore sai_query_attribute_enum_values_capability "rv=-8", ignoring non-functional error in swss PR pipeline till Fix switch capabilities enum query with metadata validation sonic-swss#3866 is merged sai_query_attribute_capability "error -2", ignoring till it gets fixed from SAI, CS00012422823 is raised How did you verify/test it? Tested on Arista-7050X3 running dualtor-aa topology Signed-off-by: Guy Shemesh <gshemesh@nvidia.com>

…d errors (sonic-net#20596) What is the motivation for this PR? Add regex to skip sai_query_attribute_capability related loganalyzer errors How did you do it? Added 2 regex to loganalyzer_common_ignore.txt file to ignore sai_query_attribute_enum_values_capability "rv=-8", ignoring non-functional error in swss PR pipeline till Fix switch capabilities enum query with metadata validation sonic-swss#3866 is merged sai_query_attribute_capability "error -2", ignoring till it gets fixed from SAI, CS00012422823 is raised How did you verify/test it? Tested on Arista-7050X3 running dualtor-aa topology Signed-off-by: Aharon Malkin <amalkin@nvidia.com>

…d errors (sonic-net#20596) What is the motivation for this PR? Add regex to skip sai_query_attribute_capability related loganalyzer errors How did you do it? Added 2 regex to loganalyzer_common_ignore.txt file to ignore sai_query_attribute_enum_values_capability "rv=-8", ignoring non-functional error in swss PR pipeline till Fix switch capabilities enum query with metadata validation sonic-swss#3866 is merged sai_query_attribute_capability "error -2", ignoring till it gets fixed from SAI, CS00012422823 is raised How did you verify/test it? Tested on Arista-7050X3 running dualtor-aa topology Signed-off-by: Guy Shemesh <gshemesh@nvidia.com>

…d errors (sonic-net#20596) What is the motivation for this PR? Add regex to skip sai_query_attribute_capability related loganalyzer errors How did you do it? Added 2 regex to loganalyzer_common_ignore.txt file to ignore sai_query_attribute_enum_values_capability "rv=-8", ignoring non-functional error in swss PR pipeline till Fix switch capabilities enum query with metadata validation sonic-swss#3866 is merged sai_query_attribute_capability "error -2", ignoring till it gets fixed from SAI, CS00012422823 is raised How did you verify/test it? Tested on Arista-7050X3 running dualtor-aa topology

…d errors (sonic-net#20596) What is the motivation for this PR? Add regex to skip sai_query_attribute_capability related loganalyzer errors How did you do it? Added 2 regex to loganalyzer_common_ignore.txt file to ignore sai_query_attribute_enum_values_capability "rv=-8", ignoring non-functional error in swss PR pipeline till Fix switch capabilities enum query with metadata validation sonic-swss#3866 is merged sai_query_attribute_capability "error -2", ignoring till it gets fixed from SAI, CS00012422823 is raised How did you verify/test it? Tested on Arista-7050X3 running dualtor-aa topology Signed-off-by: Guy Shemesh <gshemesh@nvidia.com>

…d errors (sonic-net#20596) What is the motivation for this PR? Add regex to skip sai_query_attribute_capability related loganalyzer errors How did you do it? Added 2 regex to loganalyzer_common_ignore.txt file to ignore sai_query_attribute_enum_values_capability "rv=-8", ignoring non-functional error in swss PR pipeline till Fix switch capabilities enum query with metadata validation sonic-swss#3866 is merged sai_query_attribute_capability "error -2", ignoring till it gets fixed from SAI, CS00012422823 is raised How did you verify/test it? Tested on Arista-7050X3 running dualtor-aa topology Signed-off-by: Lakshmi Yarramaneni <lakshmi@nexthop.ai>

…d errors (sonic-net#20596) What is the motivation for this PR? Add regex to skip sai_query_attribute_capability related loganalyzer errors How did you do it? Added 2 regex to loganalyzer_common_ignore.txt file to ignore sai_query_attribute_enum_values_capability "rv=-8", ignoring non-functional error in swss PR pipeline till Fix switch capabilities enum query with metadata validation sonic-swss#3866 is merged sai_query_attribute_capability "error -2", ignoring till it gets fixed from SAI, CS00012422823 is raised How did you verify/test it? Tested on Arista-7050X3 running dualtor-aa topology Signed-off-by: Yael Tzur <ytzur@nvidia.com>

…d errors (sonic-net#20596) What is the motivation for this PR? Add regex to skip sai_query_attribute_capability related loganalyzer errors How did you do it? Added 2 regex to loganalyzer_common_ignore.txt file to ignore sai_query_attribute_enum_values_capability "rv=-8", ignoring non-functional error in swss PR pipeline till Fix switch capabilities enum query with metadata validation sonic-swss#3866 is merged sai_query_attribute_capability "error -2", ignoring till it gets fixed from SAI, CS00012422823 is raised How did you verify/test it? Tested on Arista-7050X3 running dualtor-aa topology

… automatically (sonic-net#20596) #### Why I did it src/sonic-platform-common ``` * 7700003 - (HEAD -> 202311, origin/202311) Wait for specified duration during LPmode on/off (sonic-net#503) (22 hours ago) [Anoop Kamath] ``` #### How I did it #### How to verify it #### Description for the changelog

…d errors (sonic-net#20596) What is the motivation for this PR? Add regex to skip sai_query_attribute_capability related loganalyzer errors How did you do it? Added 2 regex to loganalyzer_common_ignore.txt file to ignore sai_query_attribute_enum_values_capability "rv=-8", ignoring non-functional error in swss PR pipeline till Fix switch capabilities enum query with metadata validation sonic-swss#3866 is merged sai_query_attribute_capability "error -2", ignoring till it gets fixed from SAI, CS00012422823 is raised How did you verify/test it? Tested on Arista-7050X3 running dualtor-aa topology (cherry picked from commit 6fa4576)

…d errors (sonic-net#20596) What is the motivation for this PR? Add regex to skip sai_query_attribute_capability related loganalyzer errors How did you do it? Added 2 regex to loganalyzer_common_ignore.txt file to ignore sai_query_attribute_enum_values_capability "rv=-8", ignoring non-functional error in swss PR pipeline till Fix switch capabilities enum query with metadata validation sonic-swss#3866 is merged sai_query_attribute_capability "error -2", ignoring till it gets fixed from SAI, CS00012422823 is raised How did you verify/test it? Tested on Arista-7050X3 running dualtor-aa topology

Add loganalyzer regex to ignore sai_query_attribute_capability relate…

2e831e7

…d errors

suwinkumar-arista requested review from wangxin and yxieca as code owners September 10, 2025 06:06

Gfrom2016 approved these changes Sep 10, 2025

View reviewed changes

StormLiangMS approved these changes Sep 10, 2025

View reviewed changes

StormLiangMS merged commit 6fa4576 into sonic-net:master Sep 10, 2025
17 of 20 checks passed

StormLiangMS added the Request for 202505 branch label Sep 10, 2025

yejianquan added the Approved for 202505 branch label Sep 10, 2025

mssonicbld added the Created PR to 202505 branch label Sep 10, 2025

mssonicbld mentioned this pull request Sep 10, 2025

[action] [PR:20596] [sonic-mgmt] Add loganalyzer regex to ignore sai_query_attribute_capability related errors #20605

Merged

11 tasks

mssonicbld added Included in 202505 branch and removed Created PR to 202505 branch labels Sep 10, 2025

sdszhang added the Request for msft-202412 Branch label Oct 15, 2025

mssonicbld added the Cherry Pick Conflict_msft-202412 label Oct 15, 2025

suwinkumar-arista mentioned this pull request Oct 19, 2025

[202412][sonic-mgmt] Add loganalyzer regex to ignore sai_query_attribute_capability related errors Azure/sonic-mgmt.msft#766

Merged

11 tasks

sdszhang added Included in msft-202412 Branch and removed Cherry Pick Conflict_msft-202412 labels Oct 19, 2025

bingwang-ms mentioned this pull request Oct 21, 2025

[202503] Add loganalyzer regex to ignore sai_query_attribute_capability related errors (#20596) Azure/sonic-mgmt.msft#771

Merged

r12f added the Approved for msft-202412 Branch label Oct 23, 2025

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

[sonic-mgmt] Add loganalyzer regex to ignore sai_query_attribute_capability related errors#20596

[sonic-mgmt] Add loganalyzer regex to ignore sai_query_attribute_capability related errors#20596
StormLiangMS merged 1 commit intosonic-net:masterfrom
suwinkumar-arista:master-skip-sai-query-attribute-capability-errors

suwinkumar-arista commented Sep 10, 2025

Uh oh!

mssonicbld commented Sep 10, 2025

Uh oh!

azure-pipelines bot commented Sep 10, 2025

Uh oh!

Gfrom2016 left a comment

Uh oh!

StormLiangMS left a comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

mssonicbld commented Sep 10, 2025

Uh oh!

justin-wong-ce commented Sep 24, 2025

Uh oh!

sdszhang commented Oct 15, 2025

Uh oh!

r12f commented Oct 19, 2025

Uh oh!

suwinkumar-arista commented Oct 19, 2025

Uh oh!

suwinkumar-arista commented Oct 19, 2025

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

8 participants

Conversation

suwinkumar-arista commented Sep 10, 2025

Description of PR

Type of change

Back port request

Approach

What is the motivation for this PR?

How did you do it?

How did you verify/test it?

Any platform specific information?

Supported testbed topology if it's a new test case?

Documentation

Uh oh!

mssonicbld commented Sep 10, 2025

Uh oh!

azure-pipelines bot commented Sep 10, 2025

Uh oh!

Gfrom2016 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

StormLiangMS left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

mssonicbld commented Sep 10, 2025

Uh oh!

justin-wong-ce commented Sep 24, 2025

Uh oh!

sdszhang commented Oct 15, 2025

Uh oh!

r12f commented Oct 19, 2025

Uh oh!

suwinkumar-arista commented Oct 19, 2025

Uh oh!

suwinkumar-arista commented Oct 19, 2025

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

8 participants