[BGP Tests] Enable Tests for LT2 and FT2 Topologies#18669
Merged
yejianquan merged 2 commits intosonic-net:masterfrom Jun 2, 2025
Merged
[BGP Tests] Enable Tests for LT2 and FT2 Topologies#18669yejianquan merged 2 commits intosonic-net:masterfrom
yejianquan merged 2 commits intosonic-net:masterfrom
Conversation
Collaborator
|
/azp run |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
auspham
reviewed
May 28, 2025
4d0e5ca to
f2f2a85
Compare
Collaborator
|
/azp run |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
auspham
approved these changes
May 28, 2025
bingwang-ms
reviewed
May 28, 2025
Collaborator
|
/azp run |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
yxieca
approved these changes
May 29, 2025
bingwang-ms
approved these changes
May 29, 2025
11 tasks
yejianquan
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 2, 2025
…8739) Manual cherry-pick for #18669 Description of PR Summary: Small PR to add support for LT2 in BGP tests, through the use of an appropriate setup function for the platform. Type of change Bug fix Testbed and Framework(new/improvement) New Test case Skipped for non-supported platforms Test case improvement Back port request 202205 202305 202311 202405 202411 202505 Approach What is the motivation for this PR? To ensure that we can run the BGP tests on the Lower T2 platform, we needed to add explicit support and initial testing for these testcases. How did you do it? Added lt2 to the list of topologies that uses the t1 & t2 interface setup function. How did you verify/test it? Running the previously failing tests, we can observe that they pass: image Other than loganalyzer fail, all testcases run successfully: image Any platform specific information? Change is only relevant to the LT2 platform - all others are unaffected by this change. signed-off-by: jianquanye@microsoft.com
Collaborator
|
@matthew-soulsby PR conflicts with 202505 branch |
bachalla
pushed a commit
to bachalla/sonic-mgmt
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 2, 2025
Description of PR Summary: Small PR to add support for LT2 in BGP tests, through the use of an appropriate setup function for the platform. Type of change Bug fix Testbed and Framework(new/improvement) New Test case Skipped for non-supported platforms Test case improvement Back port request 202205 202305 202311 202405 202411 202505 Approach What is the motivation for this PR? To ensure that we can run the BGP tests on the Lower T2 platform, we needed to add explicit support and initial testing for these testcases. How did you do it? Added lt2 to the list of topologies that uses the t1 & t2 interface setup function. How did you verify/test it? Running the previously failing tests, we can observe that they pass: image Other than loganalyzer fail, all testcases run successfully: image Any platform specific information? Change is only relevant to the LT2 platform - all others are unaffected by this change. signed-off-by: jianquanye@microsoft.com
opcoder0
pushed a commit
to opcoder0/sonic-mgmt
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 8, 2025
Description of PR Summary: Small PR to add support for LT2 in BGP tests, through the use of an appropriate setup function for the platform. Type of change Bug fix Testbed and Framework(new/improvement) New Test case Skipped for non-supported platforms Test case improvement Back port request 202205 202305 202311 202405 202411 202505 Approach What is the motivation for this PR? To ensure that we can run the BGP tests on the Lower T2 platform, we needed to add explicit support and initial testing for these testcases. How did you do it? Added lt2 to the list of topologies that uses the t1 & t2 interface setup function. How did you verify/test it? Running the previously failing tests, we can observe that they pass: image Other than loganalyzer fail, all testcases run successfully: image Any platform specific information? Change is only relevant to the LT2 platform - all others are unaffected by this change. signed-off-by: jianquanye@microsoft.com Signed-off-by: opcoder0 <110003254+opcoder0@users.noreply.github.com>
gshemesh2
pushed a commit
to gshemesh2/sonic-mgmt
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 21, 2025
Description of PR Summary: Small PR to add support for LT2 in BGP tests, through the use of an appropriate setup function for the platform. Type of change Bug fix Testbed and Framework(new/improvement) New Test case Skipped for non-supported platforms Test case improvement Back port request 202205 202305 202311 202405 202411 202505 Approach What is the motivation for this PR? To ensure that we can run the BGP tests on the Lower T2 platform, we needed to add explicit support and initial testing for these testcases. How did you do it? Added lt2 to the list of topologies that uses the t1 & t2 interface setup function. How did you verify/test it? Running the previously failing tests, we can observe that they pass: image Other than loganalyzer fail, all testcases run successfully: image Any platform specific information? Change is only relevant to the LT2 platform - all others are unaffected by this change. signed-off-by: jianquanye@microsoft.com Signed-off-by: Guy Shemesh <gshemesh@nvidia.com>
venu-nexthop
pushed a commit
to venu-nexthop/sonic-mgmt
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 13, 2026
Description of PR Summary: Small PR to add support for LT2 in BGP tests, through the use of an appropriate setup function for the platform. Type of change Bug fix Testbed and Framework(new/improvement) New Test case Skipped for non-supported platforms Test case improvement Back port request 202205 202305 202311 202405 202411 202505 Approach What is the motivation for this PR? To ensure that we can run the BGP tests on the Lower T2 platform, we needed to add explicit support and initial testing for these testcases. How did you do it? Added lt2 to the list of topologies that uses the t1 & t2 interface setup function. How did you verify/test it? Running the previously failing tests, we can observe that they pass: image Other than loganalyzer fail, all testcases run successfully: image Any platform specific information? Change is only relevant to the LT2 platform - all others are unaffected by this change. signed-off-by: jianquanye@microsoft.com
gshemesh2
pushed a commit
to gshemesh2/sonic-mgmt
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 26, 2026
Description of PR Summary: Small PR to add support for LT2 in BGP tests, through the use of an appropriate setup function for the platform. Type of change Bug fix Testbed and Framework(new/improvement) New Test case Skipped for non-supported platforms Test case improvement Back port request 202205 202305 202311 202405 202411 202505 Approach What is the motivation for this PR? To ensure that we can run the BGP tests on the Lower T2 platform, we needed to add explicit support and initial testing for these testcases. How did you do it? Added lt2 to the list of topologies that uses the t1 & t2 interface setup function. How did you verify/test it? Running the previously failing tests, we can observe that they pass: image Other than loganalyzer fail, all testcases run successfully: image Any platform specific information? Change is only relevant to the LT2 platform - all others are unaffected by this change. signed-off-by: jianquanye@microsoft.com Signed-off-by: Guy Shemesh <gshemesh@nvidia.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
6 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description of PR
Summary:
Small PR to add support for LT2 in BGP tests, through the use of an appropriate setup function for the platform.
Type of change
Back port request
Approach
What is the motivation for this PR?
To ensure that we can run the BGP tests on the Lower T2 platform, we needed to add explicit support and initial testing for these testcases.
How did you do it?
Added
lt2to the list of topologies that uses the t1 & t2 interface setup function.How did you verify/test it?
Running the previously failing tests, we can observe that they pass:
Other than loganalyzer fail, all testcases run successfully:
Any platform specific information?
Change is only relevant to the LT2 platform - all others are unaffected by this change.
Supported testbed topology if it's a new test case?
N/A
Documentation
N/A