[Mellanox] Remove the skip/xfail for the dualtor_io link failure test#18276
Merged
bingwang-ms merged 1 commit intosonic-net:masterfrom May 20, 2025
Merged
[Mellanox] Remove the skip/xfail for the dualtor_io link failure test#18276bingwang-ms merged 1 commit intosonic-net:masterfrom
bingwang-ms merged 1 commit intosonic-net:masterfrom
Conversation
Collaborator
|
/azp run |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
Issue sonic-net#16161 is fixed. And some test cases that were failing in active-standby due to issue sonic-net#8272 have been passing in active-active. Only test_active_link_down_downstream_active_soc[active-active] is still failing, but the behavior is not exactly the same as active-standby. Probably we need to debug the failure again in active-active scenario.
96b91da to
9835dd3
Compare
Collaborator
|
/azp run |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
lolyu
approved these changes
May 20, 2025
Contributor
Author
|
/azpw run |
Collaborator
|
/AzurePipelines run |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
Collaborator
|
@congh-nvidia PR conflicts with 202411 branch |
mssonicbld
pushed a commit
to mssonicbld/sonic-mgmt
that referenced
this pull request
May 27, 2025
…#18276) Issue sonic-net#16161 is fixed. And some test cases that were failing in active-standby due to issue sonic-net#8272 have been passing in active-active. Only test_active_link_down_downstream_active_soc[active-active] is still failing, but the behavior is not exactly the same as active-standby. Probably we need to debug the failure again in active-active scenario.
Collaborator
|
Cherry-pick PR to 202505: #18646 |
Merged
11 tasks
mssonicbld
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 27, 2025
Issue #16161 is fixed. And some test cases that were failing in active-standby due to issue #8272 have been passing in active-active. Only test_active_link_down_downstream_active_soc[active-active] is still failing, but the behavior is not exactly the same as active-standby. Probably we need to debug the failure again in active-active scenario.
11 tasks
Contributor
Author
Manually cherry-picked to 202411: #18712 |
opcoder0
pushed a commit
to opcoder0/sonic-mgmt
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 8, 2025
…#18276) Issue sonic-net#16161 is fixed. And some test cases that were failing in active-standby due to issue sonic-net#8272 have been passing in active-active. Only test_active_link_down_downstream_active_soc[active-active] is still failing, but the behavior is not exactly the same as active-standby. Probably we need to debug the failure again in active-active scenario. Signed-off-by: opcoder0 <110003254+opcoder0@users.noreply.github.com>
AharonMalkin
pushed a commit
to AharonMalkin/sonic-mgmt
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 16, 2025
…#18276) Issue sonic-net#16161 is fixed. And some test cases that were failing in active-standby due to issue sonic-net#8272 have been passing in active-active. Only test_active_link_down_downstream_active_soc[active-active] is still failing, but the behavior is not exactly the same as active-standby. Probably we need to debug the failure again in active-active scenario. Signed-off-by: Aharon Malkin <amalkin@nvidia.com>
gshemesh2
pushed a commit
to gshemesh2/sonic-mgmt
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 21, 2025
…#18276) Issue sonic-net#16161 is fixed. And some test cases that were failing in active-standby due to issue sonic-net#8272 have been passing in active-active. Only test_active_link_down_downstream_active_soc[active-active] is still failing, but the behavior is not exactly the same as active-standby. Probably we need to debug the failure again in active-active scenario. Signed-off-by: Guy Shemesh <gshemesh@nvidia.com>
gshemesh2
pushed a commit
to gshemesh2/sonic-mgmt
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 26, 2026
…#18276) Issue sonic-net#16161 is fixed. And some test cases that were failing in active-standby due to issue sonic-net#8272 have been passing in active-active. Only test_active_link_down_downstream_active_soc[active-active] is still failing, but the behavior is not exactly the same as active-standby. Probably we need to debug the failure again in active-active scenario. Signed-off-by: Guy Shemesh <gshemesh@nvidia.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
6 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description of PR
Summary:
Type of change
Back port request
Approach
What is the motivation for this PR?
How did you do it?
How did you verify/test it?
Any platform specific information?
Supported testbed topology if it's a new test case?
Documentation