Add tgen_port_info to dynamically adjust multidut_port_info fixture#16729
Closed
auspham wants to merge 1 commit intosonic-net:masterfrom
Closed
Add tgen_port_info to dynamically adjust multidut_port_info fixture#16729auspham wants to merge 1 commit intosonic-net:masterfrom
auspham wants to merge 1 commit intosonic-net:masterfrom
Conversation
Collaborator
|
/azp run |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
Contributor
Author
|
@sdszhang verified on T2 that we can create fixture On T0 i have skipped for unknown port, could be my local environment not working To make this work we need to remove all The default value for T0 could be an arbitrary testbed since if we leave it empty it will skip the test. |
Contributor
|
@amitpawar12 @vmittal-msft @rraghav-cisco @kamalsahu0001 @selldinesh this could a solution to retrieve ports based on the selected testbed, and remove the dependencies on the constant MULTIDUT_TESTBED. @abdosi for viz. |
68550e8 to
ee23110
Compare
Collaborator
|
/azp run |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
sdszhang
reviewed
Feb 16, 2025
sdszhang
reviewed
Feb 16, 2025
ee23110 to
1d4551d
Compare
Collaborator
|
/azp run |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
1d4551d to
97757d1
Compare
Collaborator
|
/azp run |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
97757d1 to
9392db3
Compare
Collaborator
|
/azp run |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
sdszhang
reviewed
Feb 17, 2025
sdszhang
approved these changes
Feb 17, 2025
9392db3 to
2bb8558
Compare
Collaborator
|
/azp run |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
sdszhang
reviewed
Feb 19, 2025
Collaborator
|
/azp run |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
sdszhang
reviewed
Feb 20, 2025
21b615b to
57baa92
Compare
Collaborator
|
/azp run |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
sdszhang
approved these changes
Feb 20, 2025
57baa92 to
7425219
Compare
Collaborator
|
/azp run |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
Signed-off-by: Austin Pham <austinpham@microsoft.com> chore: update tgen port info Signed-off-by: Austin Pham <austinpham@microsoft.com>
7425219 to
5d4ac09
Compare
Collaborator
|
/azp run |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
Contributor
Author
|
closes in favor of #18067 |
11 tasks
yejianquan
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 5, 2025
Description of PR Summary: Fixes # (issue) Type of change After #16729 and #15069, existing test cases need to be updated to support dynamic port selection. Bug fix Testbed and Framework(new/improvement) New Test case Skipped for non-supported platforms Test case improvement Back port request 202205 202305 202311 202405 202411 202505 Approach What is the motivation for this PR? Update test case to adopt the new feature How did you do it? How did you verify/test it? snappi_tests/pfc/test_pfc_pause_lossless_with_snappi.py::test_pfc_pause_single_lossless_prio[str3-8800-lc4-1|3-tgen_port_info0] snappi_tests/pfc/test_pfc_pause_lossless_with_snappi.py::test_pfc_pause_single_lossless_prio[str3-8800-lc4-1|3-tgen_port_info1] PASSED [ 50%] snappi_tests/pfc/test_pfc_pause_lossless_with_snappi.py::test_pfc_pause_single_lossless_prio[str3-8800-lc4-1|4-tgen_port_info0] PASSED [ 75%] snappi_tests/pfc/test_pfc_pause_lossless_with_snappi.py::test_pfc_pause_single_lossless_prio[str3-8800-lc4-1|4-tgen_port_info1] PASSED [100%] ------------------------------ live log teardown -------------------------------
mssonicbld
pushed a commit
to mssonicbld/sonic-mgmt
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 5, 2025
Description of PR Summary: Fixes # (issue) Type of change After sonic-net#16729 and sonic-net#15069, existing test cases need to be updated to support dynamic port selection. Bug fix Testbed and Framework(new/improvement) New Test case Skipped for non-supported platforms Test case improvement Back port request 202205 202305 202311 202405 202411 202505 Approach What is the motivation for this PR? Update test case to adopt the new feature How did you do it? How did you verify/test it? snappi_tests/pfc/test_pfc_pause_lossless_with_snappi.py::test_pfc_pause_single_lossless_prio[str3-8800-lc4-1|3-tgen_port_info0] snappi_tests/pfc/test_pfc_pause_lossless_with_snappi.py::test_pfc_pause_single_lossless_prio[str3-8800-lc4-1|3-tgen_port_info1] PASSED [ 50%] snappi_tests/pfc/test_pfc_pause_lossless_with_snappi.py::test_pfc_pause_single_lossless_prio[str3-8800-lc4-1|4-tgen_port_info0] PASSED [ 75%] snappi_tests/pfc/test_pfc_pause_lossless_with_snappi.py::test_pfc_pause_single_lossless_prio[str3-8800-lc4-1|4-tgen_port_info1] PASSED [100%] ------------------------------ live log teardown -------------------------------
11 tasks
mssonicbld
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 5, 2025
Description of PR Summary: Fixes # (issue) Type of change After #16729 and #15069, existing test cases need to be updated to support dynamic port selection. Bug fix Testbed and Framework(new/improvement) New Test case Skipped for non-supported platforms Test case improvement Back port request 202205 202305 202311 202405 202411 202505 Approach What is the motivation for this PR? Update test case to adopt the new feature How did you do it? How did you verify/test it? snappi_tests/pfc/test_pfc_pause_lossless_with_snappi.py::test_pfc_pause_single_lossless_prio[str3-8800-lc4-1|3-tgen_port_info0] snappi_tests/pfc/test_pfc_pause_lossless_with_snappi.py::test_pfc_pause_single_lossless_prio[str3-8800-lc4-1|3-tgen_port_info1] PASSED [ 50%] snappi_tests/pfc/test_pfc_pause_lossless_with_snappi.py::test_pfc_pause_single_lossless_prio[str3-8800-lc4-1|4-tgen_port_info0] PASSED [ 75%] snappi_tests/pfc/test_pfc_pause_lossless_with_snappi.py::test_pfc_pause_single_lossless_prio[str3-8800-lc4-1|4-tgen_port_info1] PASSED [100%] ------------------------------ live log teardown -------------------------------
opcoder0
pushed a commit
to opcoder0/sonic-mgmt
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 8, 2025
Description of PR Summary: Fixes # (issue) Type of change After sonic-net#16729 and sonic-net#15069, existing test cases need to be updated to support dynamic port selection. Bug fix Testbed and Framework(new/improvement) New Test case Skipped for non-supported platforms Test case improvement Back port request 202205 202305 202311 202405 202411 202505 Approach What is the motivation for this PR? Update test case to adopt the new feature How did you do it? How did you verify/test it? snappi_tests/pfc/test_pfc_pause_lossless_with_snappi.py::test_pfc_pause_single_lossless_prio[str3-8800-lc4-1|3-tgen_port_info0] snappi_tests/pfc/test_pfc_pause_lossless_with_snappi.py::test_pfc_pause_single_lossless_prio[str3-8800-lc4-1|3-tgen_port_info1] PASSED [ 50%] snappi_tests/pfc/test_pfc_pause_lossless_with_snappi.py::test_pfc_pause_single_lossless_prio[str3-8800-lc4-1|4-tgen_port_info0] PASSED [ 75%] snappi_tests/pfc/test_pfc_pause_lossless_with_snappi.py::test_pfc_pause_single_lossless_prio[str3-8800-lc4-1|4-tgen_port_info1] PASSED [100%] ------------------------------ live log teardown ------------------------------- Signed-off-by: opcoder0 <110003254+opcoder0@users.noreply.github.com>
gshemesh2
pushed a commit
to gshemesh2/sonic-mgmt
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 21, 2025
Description of PR Summary: Fixes # (issue) Type of change After sonic-net#16729 and sonic-net#15069, existing test cases need to be updated to support dynamic port selection. Bug fix Testbed and Framework(new/improvement) New Test case Skipped for non-supported platforms Test case improvement Back port request 202205 202305 202311 202405 202411 202505 Approach What is the motivation for this PR? Update test case to adopt the new feature How did you do it? How did you verify/test it? snappi_tests/pfc/test_pfc_pause_lossless_with_snappi.py::test_pfc_pause_single_lossless_prio[str3-8800-lc4-1|3-tgen_port_info0] snappi_tests/pfc/test_pfc_pause_lossless_with_snappi.py::test_pfc_pause_single_lossless_prio[str3-8800-lc4-1|3-tgen_port_info1] PASSED [ 50%] snappi_tests/pfc/test_pfc_pause_lossless_with_snappi.py::test_pfc_pause_single_lossless_prio[str3-8800-lc4-1|4-tgen_port_info0] PASSED [ 75%] snappi_tests/pfc/test_pfc_pause_lossless_with_snappi.py::test_pfc_pause_single_lossless_prio[str3-8800-lc4-1|4-tgen_port_info1] PASSED [100%] ------------------------------ live log teardown ------------------------------- Signed-off-by: Guy Shemesh <gshemesh@nvidia.com>
venu-nexthop
pushed a commit
to venu-nexthop/sonic-mgmt
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 13, 2026
Description of PR Summary: Fixes # (issue) Type of change After sonic-net#16729 and sonic-net#15069, existing test cases need to be updated to support dynamic port selection. Bug fix Testbed and Framework(new/improvement) New Test case Skipped for non-supported platforms Test case improvement Back port request 202205 202305 202311 202405 202411 202505 Approach What is the motivation for this PR? Update test case to adopt the new feature How did you do it? How did you verify/test it? snappi_tests/pfc/test_pfc_pause_lossless_with_snappi.py::test_pfc_pause_single_lossless_prio[str3-8800-lc4-1|3-tgen_port_info0] snappi_tests/pfc/test_pfc_pause_lossless_with_snappi.py::test_pfc_pause_single_lossless_prio[str3-8800-lc4-1|3-tgen_port_info1] PASSED [ 50%] snappi_tests/pfc/test_pfc_pause_lossless_with_snappi.py::test_pfc_pause_single_lossless_prio[str3-8800-lc4-1|4-tgen_port_info0] PASSED [ 75%] snappi_tests/pfc/test_pfc_pause_lossless_with_snappi.py::test_pfc_pause_single_lossless_prio[str3-8800-lc4-1|4-tgen_port_info1] PASSED [100%] ------------------------------ live log teardown -------------------------------
gshemesh2
pushed a commit
to gshemesh2/sonic-mgmt
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 26, 2026
Description of PR Summary: Fixes # (issue) Type of change After sonic-net#16729 and sonic-net#15069, existing test cases need to be updated to support dynamic port selection. Bug fix Testbed and Framework(new/improvement) New Test case Skipped for non-supported platforms Test case improvement Back port request 202205 202305 202311 202405 202411 202505 Approach What is the motivation for this PR? Update test case to adopt the new feature How did you do it? How did you verify/test it? snappi_tests/pfc/test_pfc_pause_lossless_with_snappi.py::test_pfc_pause_single_lossless_prio[str3-8800-lc4-1|3-tgen_port_info0] snappi_tests/pfc/test_pfc_pause_lossless_with_snappi.py::test_pfc_pause_single_lossless_prio[str3-8800-lc4-1|3-tgen_port_info1] PASSED [ 50%] snappi_tests/pfc/test_pfc_pause_lossless_with_snappi.py::test_pfc_pause_single_lossless_prio[str3-8800-lc4-1|4-tgen_port_info0] PASSED [ 75%] snappi_tests/pfc/test_pfc_pause_lossless_with_snappi.py::test_pfc_pause_single_lossless_prio[str3-8800-lc4-1|4-tgen_port_info1] PASSED [100%] ------------------------------ live log teardown ------------------------------- Signed-off-by: Guy Shemesh <gshemesh@nvidia.com>
ytzur1
pushed a commit
to ytzur1/sonic-mgmt
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 2, 2026
Description of PR Summary: Fixes # (issue) Type of change After sonic-net#16729 and sonic-net#15069, existing test cases need to be updated to support dynamic port selection. Bug fix Testbed and Framework(new/improvement) New Test case Skipped for non-supported platforms Test case improvement Back port request 202205 202305 202311 202405 202411 202505 Approach What is the motivation for this PR? Update test case to adopt the new feature How did you do it? How did you verify/test it? snappi_tests/pfc/test_pfc_pause_lossless_with_snappi.py::test_pfc_pause_single_lossless_prio[str3-8800-lc4-1|3-tgen_port_info0] snappi_tests/pfc/test_pfc_pause_lossless_with_snappi.py::test_pfc_pause_single_lossless_prio[str3-8800-lc4-1|3-tgen_port_info1] PASSED [ 50%] snappi_tests/pfc/test_pfc_pause_lossless_with_snappi.py::test_pfc_pause_single_lossless_prio[str3-8800-lc4-1|4-tgen_port_info0] PASSED [ 75%] snappi_tests/pfc/test_pfc_pause_lossless_with_snappi.py::test_pfc_pause_single_lossless_prio[str3-8800-lc4-1|4-tgen_port_info1] PASSED [100%] ------------------------------ live log teardown ------------------------------- Signed-off-by: Yael Tzur <ytzur@nvidia.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description of PR
Summary:
Fixes # (issue)
Type of change
Back port request
Approach
What is the motivation for this PR?
How did you do it?
How did you verify/test it?
Any platform specific information?
Supported testbed topology if it's a new test case?
Documentation