Skip to content

[bgpcfgd] Add fix to not require NEIGHBOR_METADATA entries for dynamic peers#5008

Merged
lguohan merged 1 commit intosonic-net:masterfrom
anish-n:dynamic_bgp_config_fix
Jul 21, 2020
Merged

[bgpcfgd] Add fix to not require NEIGHBOR_METADATA entries for dynamic peers#5008
lguohan merged 1 commit intosonic-net:masterfrom
anish-n:dynamic_bgp_config_fix

Conversation

@anish-n
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@anish-n anish-n commented Jul 20, 2020

- Why I did it
Fix for #4972
This fix removes the requirement to have a NEIGHBOR_METADATA for dynamic peers. The change is made since it is not necessary for NEIGHBOR_METADATA entries be present for the dynamic neighbors

- How I did it
Changed bgpcfgd to limit checks for neigh_meta to dynamic peers

- How to verify it
Verified on DUT by creating a dynamic peer without NEIGHBOR_METADATA entries and ensure that bgpcfgd allows the creation of this dynamic peer in the FRR BGP config.

- Description for the changelog

- A picture of a cute animal (not mandatory but encouraged)

@pavel-shirshov
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

retest baseimage please

@lguohan lguohan merged commit 07d5591 into sonic-net:master Jul 21, 2020
abdosi pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 26, 2020
… dynamic peers (#5008)

This fix removes the requirement to have a NEIGHBOR_METADATA for dynamic peers. The change is made since it is not necessary for NEIGHBOR_METADATA entries be present for the dynamic neighbors
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Passive neighbor peering does not come up when configured via BGPPeerPassive config in minigraph

4 participants