Skip to content

[Mellanox] Split buffer queue configuration in the buffer template for SN5610/SN5600/SN5640 SKUs #22474

Merged
kperumalbfn merged 1 commit intosonic-net:masterfrom
stephenxs:per-queue-buffer-profile
Apr 29, 2025
Merged

[Mellanox] Split buffer queue configuration in the buffer template for SN5610/SN5600/SN5640 SKUs #22474
kperumalbfn merged 1 commit intosonic-net:masterfrom
stephenxs:per-queue-buffer-profile

Conversation

@stephenxs
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Why I did it

Split buffer queue configuration in the buffer template for SN5610/SN5600/SN5640 SKUs

Work item tracking
  • Microsoft ADO (number only):

How I did it

How to verify it

Which release branch to backport (provide reason below if selected)

  • 201811
  • 201911
  • 202006
  • 202012
  • 202106
  • 202111
  • 202205
  • 202211
  • 202305

Tested branch (Please provide the tested image version)

Description for the changelog

Link to config_db schema for YANG module changes

A picture of a cute animal (not mandatory but encouraged)

Signed-off-by: Stephen Sun <stephens@nvidia.com>
@mssonicbld
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

/azp run Azure.sonic-buildimage

@azure-pipelines
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@kperumalbfn kperumalbfn merged commit 7197a5a into sonic-net:master Apr 29, 2025
19 checks passed
@stephenxs stephenxs deleted the per-queue-buffer-profile branch April 29, 2025 21:40
@stephenxs
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

stephenxs commented Apr 30, 2025

cherry-pick conflicts due to depending PR not merged #22358
@r12f fyi

@mssonicbld
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Cherry-pick PR to msft-202412: Azure/sonic-buildimage-msft#1098

JibinBao added a commit to JibinBao/sonic-mgmt that referenced this pull request May 12, 2025
Change-Id: I46019fae75e92aab0c78c1cd591628ec2c075928
JibinBao added a commit to JibinBao/sonic-mgmt that referenced this pull request May 12, 2025
JibinBao added a commit to JibinBao/sonic-mgmt that referenced this pull request May 12, 2025
JibinBao added a commit to JibinBao/sonic-mgmt that referenced this pull request May 12, 2025
bingwang-ms pushed a commit to sonic-net/sonic-mgmt that referenced this pull request Jun 4, 2025
mssonicbld pushed a commit to mssonicbld/sonic-mgmt that referenced this pull request Jun 4, 2025
mssonicbld pushed a commit to sonic-net/sonic-mgmt that referenced this pull request Jun 5, 2025
JibinBao added a commit to JibinBao/sonic-mgmt.msft that referenced this pull request Aug 18, 2025
mssonicbld added a commit to mssonicbld/sonic-mgmt.msft that referenced this pull request Aug 19, 2025
…lossy queue only device

<!--
Please make sure you've read and understood our contributing guidelines;
https://github.com/sonic-net/SONiC/blob/gh-pages/CONTRIBUTING.md

Please provide following information to help code review process a bit easier:
-->
### Description of PR
<!--
- Please include a summary of the change and which issue is fixed.
- Please also include relevant motivation and context. Where should reviewer start? background context?
- List any dependencies that are required for this change.
-->

Update qos sai tests due to splitting buffer queue configuration for lossy queue only port. The design PR is: sonic-net/sonic-buildimage#22474

Summary:
Fixes # (issue)

### Type of change

<!--
- Fill x for your type of change.
- e.g.
- [x] Bug fix
-->

- [x] Bug fix
- [ ] Testbed and Framework(new/improvement)
- [ ] New Test case
    - [ ] Skipped for non-supported platforms
- [ ] Test case improvement

### Back port request
- [ ] 202012
- [ ] 202205
- [ ] 202305
- [ ] 202311
- [ ] 202405
- [ ] 202411

### Approach
#### What is the motivation for this PR?
Update qos sai tests due to splitting buffer queue configuration for lossy queue only device

#### How did you do it?
Align qos sai tests according to the PR of sonic-net/sonic-buildimage#22474

#### How did you verify/test it?
Run the qos sai tests related to lossy queue.

#### Any platform specific information?
SN5610/SN5600/SN5640

#### Supported testbed topology if it's a new test case?

### Documentation
<!--
(If it's a new feature, new test case)
Did you update documentation/Wiki relevant to your implementation?
Link to the wiki page?
-->
mssonicbld added a commit to Azure/sonic-mgmt.msft that referenced this pull request Aug 19, 2025
…e configuration for lossy queue only device (#661)

<!--
Please make sure you've read and understood our contributing guidelines;
https://github.com/sonic-net/SONiC/blob/gh-pages/CONTRIBUTING.md

Please provide following information to help code review process a bit easier:
-->
### Description of PR
<!--
- Please include a summary of the change and which issue is fixed.
- Please also include relevant motivation and context. Where should reviewer start? background context?
- List any dependencies that are required for this change.
-->

Update qos sai tests due to splitting buffer queue configuration for lossy queue only port. The design PR is: sonic-net/sonic-buildimage#22474

Summary:
Fixes # (issue)

### Type of change

<!--
- Fill x for your type of change.
- e.g.
- [x] Bug fix
-->

- [x] Bug fix
- [ ] Testbed and Framework(new/improvement)
- [ ] New Test case
 - [ ] Skipped for non-supported platforms
- [ ] Test case improvement

### Back port request
- [ ] 202012
- [ ] 202205
- [ ] 202305
- [ ] 202311
- [ ] 202405
- [ ] 202411

### Approach
#### What is the motivation for this PR?
Update qos sai tests due to splitting buffer queue configuration for lossy queue only device

#### How did you do it?
Align qos sai tests according to the PR of sonic-net/sonic-buildimage#22474

#### How did you verify/test it?
Run the qos sai tests related to lossy queue.

#### Any platform specific information?
SN5610/SN5600/SN5640

#### Supported testbed topology if it's a new test case?

### Documentation
<!--
(If it's a new feature, new test case)
Did you update documentation/Wiki relevant to your implementation?
Link to the wiki page?
-->
opcoder0 pushed a commit to opcoder0/sonic-mgmt that referenced this pull request Dec 8, 2025
…ic-net#18331)

Signed-off-by: opcoder0 <110003254+opcoder0@users.noreply.github.com>
AharonMalkin pushed a commit to AharonMalkin/sonic-mgmt that referenced this pull request Dec 16, 2025
gshemesh2 pushed a commit to gshemesh2/sonic-mgmt that referenced this pull request Dec 21, 2025
venu-nexthop pushed a commit to venu-nexthop/sonic-mgmt that referenced this pull request Jan 13, 2026
gshemesh2 pushed a commit to gshemesh2/sonic-mgmt that referenced this pull request Jan 26, 2026
ytzur1 pushed a commit to ytzur1/sonic-mgmt that referenced this pull request Feb 2, 2026
venu-nexthop pushed a commit to venu-nexthop/sonic-mgmt that referenced this pull request Mar 27, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants