Fix issue with prod script not found, change the prod signing to work with flags to align to the dev script#14580
Merged
liat-grozovik merged 2 commits intosonic-net:masterfrom May 2, 2023
Conversation
… with flags to align to the dev script
Collaborator
|
@davidpil2002 please review this one pls |
davidpil2002
approved these changes
Apr 13, 2023
Contributor
Author
|
/azpw run |
Collaborator
|
/AzurePipelines run |
|
You have several pipelines (over 10) configured to build pull requests in this repository. Specify which pipelines you would like to run by using /azp run [pipelines] command. You can specify multiple pipelines using a comma separated list. |
Contributor
Author
|
/azpw run Azure.sonic-buildimage |
Collaborator
|
/AzurePipelines run Azure.sonic-buildimage |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
qiluo-msft
approved these changes
Apr 18, 2023
Contributor
Author
|
/azpw run Azure.sonic-buildimage |
Collaborator
|
/AzurePipelines run Azure.sonic-buildimage |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
mssonicbld
pushed a commit
to mssonicbld/sonic-buildimage
that referenced
this pull request
May 15, 2023
… with flags to align to the dev script (sonic-net#14580) - Why I did it Fix issue with signing tool not running due to being call with the path from the host and not the path it is mounted on inside the docker-slave - How I did it Modified the path on the SECURE_UPGRADE_PROD_SIGNING_TOOL flag to the path where it is mounted inside the slave docker - How to verify it Build SONiC using your own prod script
Collaborator
|
Cherry-pick PR to 202211: #15067 |
mssonicbld
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 15, 2023
… with flags to align to the dev script (#14580) - Why I did it Fix issue with signing tool not running due to being call with the path from the host and not the path it is mounted on inside the docker-slave - How I did it Modified the path on the SECURE_UPGRADE_PROD_SIGNING_TOOL flag to the path where it is mounted inside the slave docker - How to verify it Build SONiC using your own prod script
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
6 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Why I did it
Fix issue with signing tool not running due to being call with the path from the host and not the path it is mounted on inside the docker-slave
How I did it
Modified the path on the SECURE_UPGRADE_PROD_SIGNING_TOOL flag to the path where it is mounted inside the slave docker
How to verify it
Build SONiC using your own prod script
Which release branch to backport (provide reason below if selected)
Description for the changelog
Ensure to add label/tag for the feature raised. example - PR#2174 under sonic-utilities repo. where, Generic Config and Update feature has been labelled as GCU.
Link to config_db schema for YANG module changes
A picture of a cute animal (not mandatory but encouraged)