Add editor assignments, permission scheme, and substantive changes #95
Conversation
Solution associated to conversation on solid-contrib/information#48
incorporate substantive-changes into editor-assignment proposal
merge github permissioning changes into editor updates
|
👍 |
kjetilk
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I have written two comments inline.
|
👍 |
kjetilk
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Good! I'm 👍 I'm a bit unsure how large the editorial team will be an if it might grow out of proportion, but lets just see.
This reverts commit 42c0814.
|
What would be great to include as well is:
|
@Mitzi-Laszlo Agree there's value in providing more context around these. Have created a new issue that we can use to track them: #104 |
|
Who will be responsible for moderating the implementation of this process? |
|
The community. It’s self-governing. |
RubenVerborgh
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks a lot, Justin!
csarven
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Mentioned df05c4c#r316179594 .. leaving the response and possible action to your discretion.
timbl
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Two suggestions not crucial
|
Thank you @justinwb for getting this through 🙏 |
This pull request aims to address the concerns raised across the issues and pull requests itemized below. Of particular note, it merges the branches in pulls #82 and #78, and discards #81, which was no longer necessary.
The changes proposed are the result of collaboration with many of the people involved in the issues and pulls listed. Most importantly, the issues have been discussed with @timbl directly, and the proposed approach related to editor assignments and the editorial team is his recommended solution.