Skip to content

fix: add testcase data to package files#3077

Merged
johanneskoester merged 1 commit intomainfrom
fix/testcase-data
Sep 7, 2024
Merged

fix: add testcase data to package files#3077
johanneskoester merged 1 commit intomainfrom
fix/testcase-data

Conversation

@johanneskoester
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@johanneskoester johanneskoester commented Sep 7, 2024 •
edited by coderabbitai bot
Loading

QC

  • The PR contains a test case for the changes or the changes are already covered by an existing test case.
  • The documentation (docs/) is updated to reflect the changes or this is not necessary (e.g. if the change does neither modify the language nor the behavior or functionalities of Snakemake).

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Included reStructuredText (.rst) files in the package distribution, enhancing documentation support.
    • Expanded the setup configuration to recognize additional test case files, improving test coverage.

  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved handling of working directories within the Snakemake framework, optimizing workflow management.

  • Chores

    • Cleaned up unused imports in the codebase for better readability and maintainability.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 7, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Walkthrough

The changes involve updates to the setup.cfg, setup.py, and snakemake/api.py files. The setup.cfg now includes .rst files in the package data, while setup.py adds a pattern for test case files. In snakemake/api.py, a new instance variable for handling the working directory is introduced, alongside the removal of unused imports.

Changes

File Change Summary
setup.cfg Added .rst to the list of included package data files.
setup.py Added "common/tests/testcases/**/*" to the list of file patterns.
snakemake/api.py Introduced _workdir_handler variable in __post_init__ method and removed unused imports.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@johanneskoester johanneskoester mentioned this pull request Sep 7, 2024
Merged
@sonarqubecloud
Copy link
Copy Markdown

sonarqubecloud bot commented Sep 7, 2024

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

@cmeesters
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

cmeesters commented Sep 7, 2024

ah, sneaky!

coderabbitai[bot]
coderabbitai bot reviewed Sep 7, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 378384e and 29526f9.

Files selected for processing (3)
  • setup.cfg (1 hunks)
  • setup.py (1 hunks)
  • snakemake/api.py (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • setup.py
Additional context used
Path-based instructions (1)
snakemake/api.py (1)

Pattern **/*.py: Do not try to improve formatting.
Do not suggest type annotations for functions that are defined inside of functions or methods.
Do not suggest type annotation of the self argument of methods.
Do not suggest type annotation of the cls argument of classmethods.
Do not suggest return type annotation if a function or method does not contain a return statement.

Additional comments not posted (2)
setup.cfg (1)

81-81: Approved: Inclusion of .rst files in package data.

The addition of .rst files to the package data ensures that all relevant documentation is included in the package distribution, aligning with the PR's objectives to enhance the testing framework.

snakemake/api.py (1)

412-412: Approved: Addition of _workdir_handler instance variable.

The introduction of _workdir_handler enhances the class's capability to manage its working directory effectively. This change is crucial for the correct execution of workflows and aligns with the PR's objectives.

Run the following script to verify the integration of _workdir_handler:

Verification successful

Verified: Integration of _workdir_handler is correct.

The _workdir_handler instance variable is properly initialized and utilized within the codebase to manage the working directory, aligning with the PR's objectives. Its integration enhances the class's capability to handle workflow execution effectively.

  • _workdir_handler is initialized and used in snakemake/api.py and snakemake/workflow.py.
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the integration of `_workdir_handler`.

# Test: Search for the usage of `_workdir_handler`. Expect: Proper initialization and usage in relevant methods.
rg --type python -A 5 $'_workdir_handler'

Length of output: 71

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the integration of `_workdir_handler`.

# Test: Search for the usage of `_workdir_handler`. Expect: Proper initialization and usage in relevant methods.
rg '_workdir_handler' -A 5

Length of output: 2318

@johanneskoester johanneskoester merged commit e90b098 into main Sep 7, 2024
@johanneskoester johanneskoester deleted the fix/testcase-data branch September 7, 2024 16:28
@github-actions github-actions bot mentioned this pull request Sep 7, 2024
Merged
johanneskoester pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 7, 2024
@github-actions
chore(main): release 8.20.1 (#3078)
4fb71b3 
🤖 I have created a release *beep* *boop*
---


##
[8.20.1](v8.20.0...v8.20.1)
(2024-09-07)


### Bug Fixes

* add testcase data to package files
([#3077](#3077))
([e90b098](e90b098))

---
This PR was generated with [Release
Please](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please). See
[documentation](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please#release-please).

Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Sep 9, 2024
Merged
2 tasks
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Dec 10, 2024
Merged
2 tasks
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Mar 10, 2025
Merged
2 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@coderabbitai coderabbitai[bot] coderabbitai[bot] left review comments

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@johanneskoester @cmeesters