Description
Currently, when the user supplies a trust_config.json with a certificate chain that does not contain an ["validFor"]["end"] value, sigstore-python will skip that certificate.
|
try: |
|
verifier.verify(timestamp_response, signature) |
|
except Rfc3161VerificationError as e: |
|
_logger.debug("Unable to verify Timestamp with CA.") |
|
_logger.exception(e) |
|
continue |
|
|
|
if ( |
|
certificate_authority.validity_period_start |
|
and certificate_authority.validity_period_end |
|
): |
|
if ( |
|
certificate_authority.validity_period_start |
|
<= timestamp_response.tst_info.gen_time |
|
< certificate_authority.validity_period_end |
|
): |
|
return TimestampVerificationResult( |
|
source=TimestampSource.TIMESTAMP_AUTHORITY, |
|
time=timestamp_response.tst_info.gen_time, |
|
) |
|
|
example
{
"subject": {
"organization": "sigstore.dev",
"commonName": "sigstore-tsa-selfsigned"
},
"certChain": {
"certificates": [
{
"rawBytes": "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"
},
{
"rawBytes": "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"
}
]
},
"validFor": {
"start": "2025-03-28T09:14:06Z",
}
}
I think this may not be the originally intended behavior, given these snippets from sisgtore-go.
Instead, I propose sigstore-python compare against the optional end date only if present, while still always comparing against the mandatory start date.
Description
Currently, when the user supplies a trust_config.json with a certificate chain that does not contain an
["validFor"]["end"]value, sigstore-python will skip that certificate.sigstore-python/sigstore/verify/verifier.py
Lines 144 to 164 in 93545ab
example
{ "subject": { "organization": "sigstore.dev", "commonName": "sigstore-tsa-selfsigned" }, "certChain": { "certificates": [ { "rawBytes": "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" }, { "rawBytes": "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" } ] }, "validFor": { "start": "2025-03-28T09:14:06Z", } }I think this may not be the originally intended behavior, given these snippets from sisgtore-go.
Instead, I propose sigstore-python compare against the optional end date only if present, while still always comparing against the mandatory start date.