Skip to content

Deprecate http-spec-fork and http-allow-sync-stalled#5500

Merged
mergify[bot] merged 9 commits intosigp:unstablefrom
eserilev:deprecate-http-spec-fork-and-http-allow-sync-stalled
Apr 12, 2024
Merged

Deprecate http-spec-fork and http-allow-sync-stalled#5500
mergify[bot] merged 9 commits intosigp:unstablefrom
eserilev:deprecate-http-spec-fork-and-http-allow-sync-stalled

Conversation

@eserilev
Copy link
Member

Issue Addressed

#5430

Proposed Changes

Deprecate http-spec-fork
The default spec fork is now always chosen

Deprecate http-allow-sync-stalled
Remove allow_sync_stalled flag. Sync is now allowed by default

The issue description has justifications for these changes

@@ -67,5 +67,4 @@ exec $lighthouse_binary \
--target-peers $((BN_COUNT - 1)) \
--execution-endpoint $execution_endpoint \
--execution-jwt $execution_jwt \
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do we want to remove the backlash in the previous line?

Suggested change
--execution-jwt $execution_jwt \
--execution-jwt $execution_jwt

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

thanks, removed in a3e4f5e

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

no, we need to keep it because $BN_ARGS is on the next line

@eserilev eserilev added the ready-for-review The code is ready for review label Apr 1, 2024
@michaelsproul michaelsproul added waiting-on-author The reviewer has suggested changes and awaits thier implementation. and removed ready-for-review The code is ready for review labels Apr 4, 2024
Copy link
Member

@michaelsproul michaelsproul left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Will merge with these few tiny fixes applied

@michaelsproul michaelsproul added ready-for-merge This PR is ready to merge. and removed waiting-on-author The reviewer has suggested changes and awaits thier implementation. labels Apr 11, 2024
@michaelsproul
Copy link
Member

@Mergifyio queue

@mergify
Copy link

mergify bot commented Apr 11, 2024

queue

🛑 The pull request has been removed from the queue default

Details

The queue conditions cannot be satisfied due to failing checks.

You can take a look at Queue: Embarked in merge queue check runs for more details.

In case of a failure due to a flaky test, you should first retrigger the CI.
Then, re-embark the pull request into the merge queue by posting the comment
@mergifyio refresh on the pull request.

@michaelsproul
Copy link
Member

@Mergifyio requeue

@mergify
Copy link

mergify bot commented Apr 12, 2024

requeue

✅ This pull request will be re-embarked automatically

Details

The followup queue command will be automatically executed to re-embark the pull request

@mergify
Copy link

mergify bot commented Apr 12, 2024

queue

✅ The pull request has been merged automatically

Details

The pull request has been merged automatically at 6bac5ce

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

ready-for-merge This PR is ready to merge.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants