Fix order of operations in codel control law#2479
Conversation
Codecov ReportBase: 43.16% // Head: 43.73% // Increases project coverage by
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #2479 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 43.16% 43.73% +0.56%
==========================================
Files 186 186
Lines 27307 27307
Branches 5417 5417
==========================================
+ Hits 11788 11943 +155
+ Misses 12865 12678 -187
- Partials 2654 2686 +32
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here. ☔ View full report at Codecov. |
stevenengler
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Nice catch! I see you're running a benchmark, so it will be nice to know what the impact is on the tor network performance.
|
Benchmark results show that performance is non-deterministic but not changed too much: |
df2288b to
e513c38
Compare
|
Manually ran a larger 20% Tor network using Based on the results, the CoDel bug didn't appear to affect Tor network performance enough to lead us to believe that previous Tor simulations are invalid. |
Fixes #2478