[Diffusion] Move diffusion time embedding to jit kernel#16879
Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello @BBuf, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request streamlines the Highlights
🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console. Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request successfully moves the diffusion time embedding to a JIT CUDA kernel, leading to significant performance improvements as shown in the benchmarks. The implementation is clean and the integration with the existing codebase is well-handled, including a fallback mechanism for robustness. I've provided a few suggestions to further enhance performance, improve API clarity, and increase code robustness. Overall, this is a great contribution.
|
/tag-and-rerun-ci |
|
/rerun-failed-ci |
|
/rerun-failed-ci |
2 similar comments
|
/rerun-failed-ci |
|
/rerun-failed-ci |
|
/tag-and-rerun-ci |
|
/rerun-failed-ci |
|
/rerun-failed-ci |
|
/tag-and-rerun-ci |
|
/tag-and-rerun-ci |
|
/rerun-failed-ci |
2 similar comments
|
/rerun-failed-ci |
|
/rerun-failed-ci |
|
/tag-and-rerun-ci |
|
/rerun-failed-ci |
2 similar comments
|
/rerun-failed-ci |
|
/rerun-failed-ci |
|
https://github.com/sgl-project/sglang/actions/runs/21016169961/job/60596188450?pr=16879 All SGL Diffusion-related tests are passing, except for two tests on b200 that failed due to a cutedsl version issue. Since this change safely removes the time_embed kernel and tests from sgl-kernel, the decision is made to merge it. |
…project#16879)" This reverts commit 2cdd437.
tests
Performance
main
sglang generate --model-path Wan-AI/Wan2.1-T2V-1.3B-Diffusers --prompt "A curious raccoon peers through a vibrant field of yellow sunflowers, its eyes wide with interest." --warmup --perf-dump-path main.jsonpr
sglang generate --model-path Wan-AI/Wan2.1-T2V-1.3B-Diffusers --prompt "A curious raccoon peers through a vibrant field of yellow sunflowers, its eyes wide with interest." --warmup --perf-dump-path pr.jsonbbuf python3 /home/lmsys/bbuf/sglang/python/sglang/multimodal_gen/benchmarks/compare_perf.py main.json pr.json
Performance Comparison Report
1. High-level Summary
2. Stage Breakdown
For TextEncodingStage, it takes almost the same time. This is also expected, didn't modify any code in cuda kernel.
Modifications
Accuracy Tests
Benchmarking and Profiling
Checklist
Review Process
/tag-run-ci-label,/rerun-failed-ci,/tag-and-rerun-ci