Tiny extract ModelRunnerOutput#15400
Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello @fzyzcjy, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request refactors the Highlights
🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console. Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request refactors the return value of ModelRunner.forward to use a ModelRunnerOutput dataclass instead of a tuple. This is a good change that improves code clarity and future extensibility. The changes have been applied consistently across all call sites.
I've added a couple of comments pointing out opportunities to reduce code duplication in bench_one_batch.py and low_confidence.py, which would further improve maintainability.
|
reviewed by @hnyls2002 offline, ci briefly run in #15401, |
(cherry picked from commit ad9616f) # Conflicts: # python/sglang/srt/managers/scheduler_pp_mixin.py # python/sglang/srt/managers/tp_worker.py
Motivation
for easily adding fields in the future (indeed that is the direct reason why I add it), and for consistency and readability
Modifications
Accuracy Tests
Benchmarking and Profiling
Checklist