Skip to content

[BEAM-5287] Fail-fast when building RBK with sorted values#31

Merged
VaclavPlajt merged 1 commit intodsl-euphoriafrom
vasek/rbk-sorted-not-supported
Sep 5, 2018
Merged

[BEAM-5287] Fail-fast when building RBK with sorted values#31
VaclavPlajt merged 1 commit intodsl-euphoriafrom
vasek/rbk-sorted-not-supported

Conversation

@VaclavPlajt
Copy link
Copy Markdown

We did not yet succeeded with implementation of withSortedValues in RBK operator. So fail-fast behavior was added when attempt to build RBK withSortedValues.


Follow this checklist to help us incorporate your contribution quickly and easily:

  • Format the pull request title like [BEAM-XXX] Fixes bug in ApproximateQuantiles, where you replace BEAM-XXX with the appropriate JIRA issue, if applicable. This will automatically link the pull request to the issue.
  • If this contribution is large, please file an Apache Individual Contributor License Agreement.

It will help us expedite review of your Pull Request if you tag someone (e.g. @username) to look at it.

Post-Commit Tests Status (on master branch)

Lang SDK Apex Dataflow Flink Gearpump Samza Spark
Go Build Status --- --- --- --- --- ---
Java Build Status Build Status Build Status Build Status Build Status Build Status Build Status
Python Build Status --- Build Status
Build Status
--- --- --- ---

…s ends with `UnsupportedOperationException`.
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@mareksimunek mareksimunek left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@VaclavPlajt VaclavPlajt merged this pull request into dsl-euphoria Sep 5, 2018
@VaclavPlajt VaclavPlajt deleted the vasek/rbk-sorted-not-supported branch September 5, 2018 12:46
dmvk pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 5, 2018
dmvk pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 5, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants