DOC Ensures that sklearn.utils.check_pandas_support passes numpydoc validation#21566
Merged
ogrisel merged 1 commit intoscikit-learn:mainfrom Nov 6, 2021
Merged
Conversation
TomDLT
approved these changes
Nov 5, 2021
ogrisel
approved these changes
Nov 6, 2021
glemaitre
pushed a commit
to glemaitre/scikit-learn
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 29, 2021
samronsin
pushed a commit
to samronsin/scikit-learn
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 30, 2021
glemaitre
pushed a commit
to glemaitre/scikit-learn
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 24, 2021
glemaitre
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 25, 2021
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Reference Issues/PRs
Addresses #21350
What does this implement/fix? Explain your changes.
This PR fixes the following errors that were appearing for numpydoc validation for check_pandas_support():
Any other comments?