DOC phrasing improvements and typos#16744
Conversation
NicolasHug
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks for the PR @raduspaimoc , made a few comments.
(Just FYI, a few of your suggestions are converting UK spelling to US, we're typically not too strict on these ;) )
|
@NicolasHug thanks for your suggestions. Didn't want to bother you, I just want to contribute and this was the simplest way that I come up with. Viewing the open issues with the good first issue label and their demand, is there any way in which I can contribute without bothering anyone or I just have to wait for new first issues? |
NicolasHug
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
don't worry you're not bothering anyone @raduspaimoc , we always welcome contributions
The PRs will always be reviewed and need approval by 2 core devs (for PRs like this one that only touch the doc, one is often enough)
The best way is to watch out for the "good first issue" label, but you can also browse the docs and submit PRs to clarify things you think could be clearer and / or fix typos!
Last few comments and we're good to go!
Co-Authored-By: Nicolas Hug <contact@nicolas-hug.com>
Co-Authored-By: Nicolas Hug <contact@nicolas-hug.com>
Co-Authored-By: Nicolas Hug <contact@nicolas-hug.com>
Co-Authored-By: Nicolas Hug <contact@nicolas-hug.com>
Co-Authored-By: Nicolas Hug <contact@nicolas-hug.com>
|
THanks @raduspaimoc ! merging |
Reference Issues/PRs
What does this implement/fix? Explain your changes.
Any other comments?