Skip to content

[MRG] MNT Tools for working with what's new#11800

Merged
ogrisel merged 8 commits intoscikit-learn:masterfrom
jnothman:whatsnew_missing
Mar 4, 2019
Merged

[MRG] MNT Tools for working with what's new#11800
ogrisel merged 8 commits intoscikit-learn:masterfrom
jnothman:whatsnew_missing

Conversation

@jnothman
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

No description provided.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@qinhanmin2014 qinhanmin2014 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I've not gone through the script carefully but it seems good.
I somehow remember that a core dev once told contributors to reference the issue instead of the pull request but I cannot find relevant comment.

- |Fix| Fixed a bug in :class:`linear_model.ARDRegression` and
:class:`linear_model.BayesianRidge` which caused NaN predictions when fitted
with a constant target.
:issue:`10195` by :user:`Jörg Döpfert <jdoepfert>`.
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

wrong issue number?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good catch! fixed.


- |Fix| Fixed a bug in :func:`manifold.spectral_embedding` where the
normalization of the spectrum was using a division instead of a
multiplication. :issue:`8129` by :user:`Jan Margeta <jmargeta>`,
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

#9062 ?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah, we're inconsistent all over the place with whether we reference PR or issue. I'm not going to be pedantic about this, especially now that I have a script (included here) which tries to break down the differences with the GitHub AI.

@jnothman
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

On the contrary, I tell people to reference the PR not the issue, in order to make it simple to use a script like this :)

@jnothman
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

I should probably split the maint tools off this PR and just merge the what's new changes.

@jnothman jnothman changed the title DOC add missing entries to what's new [MRG] MNT Tools for working with what's new Aug 15, 2018
@jnothman
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

I've merged the what's new changes and have left this open as a PR focused on tools.

@qinhanmin2014
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Will it be better to put these scripts in a separate repo (e.g., scikit-learn/maint-tools)? It seems that these scripts are for maintainers, not for users.

@jnothman
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

jnothman commented Aug 15, 2018 via email

@amueller
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

amueller commented Oct 1, 2018

I have no strong opinions about having it here vs in a separate repo.

@qinhanmin2014
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I have no strong opinions about having it here vs in a separate repo.

I'll approve if you do :) So feel free to merge.

@ogrisel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

ogrisel commented Mar 4, 2019

Let's merge those scripts in the main repo for simplicity and discoverability.

@ogrisel ogrisel merged commit cd1cb30 into scikit-learn:master Mar 4, 2019
xhluca pushed a commit to xhluca/scikit-learn that referenced this pull request Apr 28, 2019
xhluca pushed a commit to xhluca/scikit-learn that referenced this pull request Apr 28, 2019
xhluca pushed a commit to xhluca/scikit-learn that referenced this pull request Apr 28, 2019
koenvandevelde pushed a commit to koenvandevelde/scikit-learn that referenced this pull request Jul 12, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants