Fixed fingerPrinting scheme to work with rehashes, also added finger prints to typedIdent searches.

First of all, GIL should only apply to runtime reflection, because noone
is going to run toolboxes in multiple threads: a) that's impossible, b/c
the compiler isn't thread safe, b) ToolBox api prevents that.

Secondly, the only things in symbols which require synchronization are:
1) info/validTo (completers aren't thread-safe),
2) rawInfo and its dependencies (it shares a mutable field with info)
3) non-trivial caches like in typeAsMemberOfLock

If you think about it, other things like sourceModule or associatedFile
don't need synchronization, because they are either set up when a symbol
is created or cloned or when it's completed.

We can say that symbols can be in four possible states: 1) being created,
2) created, but not yet initialized, 3) initializing, 4) initialized.
single thread. #2 and #4 don't need synchronization either, because the
only mutation symbols in runtime reflection can undergo is init. #3 is
dangerous and needs protection.

First of all, GIL should only apply to runtime reflection, because noone
is going to run toolboxes in multiple threads: a) that's impossible, b/c
the compiler isn't thread safe, b) ToolBox api prevents that.

Secondly, the only things in symbols which require synchronization are:
1) info/validTo (completers aren't thread-safe),
2) rawInfo and its dependencies (it shares a mutable field with info)
3) non-trivial caches like in typeAsMemberOfLock

If you think about it, other things like sourceModule or associatedFile
don't need synchronization, because they are either set up when a symbol
is created or cloned or when it's completed.

We can say that symbols can be in four possible states: 1) being created,
2) created, but not yet initialized, 3) initializing, 4) initialized.
single thread. #2 and #4 don't need synchronization either, because the
only mutation symbols in runtime reflection can undergo is init. #3 is
dangerous and needs protection.

First of all, GIL should only apply to runtime reflection, because noone
is going to run toolboxes in multiple threads: a) that's impossible, b/c
the compiler isn't thread safe, b) ToolBox api prevents that.

Secondly, the only things in symbols which require synchronization are:
1) info/validTo (completers aren't thread-safe),
2) rawInfo and its dependencies (it shares a mutable field with info)
3) non-trivial caches like in typeAsMemberOfLock

If you think about it, other things like sourceModule or associatedFile
don't need synchronization, because they are either set up when a symbol
is created or cloned or when it's completed.

We can say that symbols can be in four possible states: 1) being created,
2) created, but not yet initialized, 3) initializing, 4) initialized.
single thread. #2 and #4 don't need synchronization either, because the
only mutation symbols in runtime reflection can undergo is init. #3 is
dangerous and needs protection.

First of all, GIL should only apply to runtime reflection, because noone
is going to run toolboxes in multiple threads: a) that's impossible, b/c
the compiler isn't thread safe, b) ToolBox api prevents that.

Secondly, the only things in symbols which require synchronization are:
1) info/validTo (completers aren't thread-safe),
2) rawInfo and its dependencies (it shares a mutable field with info)
3) non-trivial caches like in typeAsMemberOfLock

If you think about it, other things like sourceModule or associatedFile
don't need synchronization, because they are either set up when a symbol
is created or cloned or when it's completed. The former is obviously safe,
while the latter is safe as well, because before acquiring init-dependent
state of symbols, the compiler calls `initialize`, which is synchronized.

We can say that symbols can be in four possible states: 1) being created,
2) created, but not yet initialized, 3) initializing, 4) initialized.
in runtime reflection can undergo is init. #3 is dangerous and needs protection

First of all, GIL should only apply to runtime reflection, because noone
is going to run toolboxes in multiple threads: a) that's impossible, b/c
the compiler isn't thread safe, b) ToolBox api prevents that.

Secondly, the only things in symbols which require synchronization are:
1) info/validTo (completers aren't thread-safe),
2) rawInfo and its dependencies (it shares a mutable field with info)
3) non-trivial caches like in typeAsMemberOfLock

If you think about it, other things like sourceModule or associatedFile
don't need synchronization, because they are either set up when a symbol
is created or cloned or when it's completed. The former is obviously safe,
while the latter is safe as well, because before acquiring init-dependent
state of symbols, the compiler calls `initialize`, which is synchronized.

We can say that symbols can be in four possible states: 1) being created,
2) created, but not yet initialized, 3) initializing, 4) initialized.
in runtime reflection can undergo is init. #3 is dangerous and needs protection

First of all, GIL should only apply to runtime reflection, because noone
is going to run toolboxes in multiple threads: a) that's impossible, b/c
the compiler isn't thread safe, b) ToolBox api prevents that.

Secondly, the only things in symbols which require synchronization are:
1) info/validTo (completers aren't thread-safe),
2) rawInfo and its dependencies (it shares a mutable field with info)
3) non-trivial caches like in typeAsMemberOfLock

If you think about it, other things like sourceModule or associatedFile
don't need synchronization, because they are either set up when a symbol
is created or cloned or when it's completed. The former is obviously safe,
while the latter is safe as well, because before acquiring init-dependent
state of symbols, the compiler calls `initialize`, which is synchronized.

We can say that symbols can be in four possible states: 1) being created,
2) created, but not yet initialized, 3) initializing, 4) initialized.
in runtime reflection can undergo is init. #3 is dangerous and needs protection