Skip to content

SI-8251 Remove ListBuffer.readOnly as deprecated#4140

Merged
gkossakowski merged 1 commit intoscala:2.12.xfrom
som-snytt:issue/8251
Nov 21, 2014
Merged

SI-8251 Remove ListBuffer.readOnly as deprecated#4140
gkossakowski merged 1 commit intoscala:2.12.xfrom
som-snytt:issue/8251

Conversation

@som-snytt
Copy link
Contributor

Complete the story arc.

@scala-jenkins scala-jenkins added this to the 2.12.0-M1 milestone Nov 21, 2014
@gkossakowski
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM

gkossakowski added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 21, 2014
SI-8251 Remove ListBuffer.readOnly as deprecated
@gkossakowski gkossakowski merged commit 571616c into scala:2.12.x Nov 21, 2014
@som-snytt som-snytt deleted the issue/8251 branch February 9, 2015 01:09
adriaanm added a commit to adriaanm/sbt that referenced this pull request Jul 9, 2015
It's dangerous, deprecated, and was removed in 2.12.0-M1.
See scala/scala#4140.

`ListBuffer#toList` has equivalent performance,
except it actually returns an immutable copy(-on-write).
@SethTisue
Copy link
Member

This removal is technically in violation of the 2.11/2.12 source compatibility policy.

OTOH, the method is noxious.

adriaanm added a commit to adriaanm/sbt that referenced this pull request Jul 10, 2015
It's dangerous, deprecated, and was removed in 2.12.0-M1.
See scala/scala#4140.

`ListBuffer#toList` has equivalent performance,
except it actually returns an immutable copy(-on-write).
eed3si9n pushed a commit to sbt/util that referenced this pull request Aug 20, 2015
It's dangerous, deprecated, and was removed in 2.12.0-M1.
See scala/scala#4140.

`ListBuffer#toList` has equivalent performance,
except it actually returns an immutable copy(-on-write).
@adriaanm adriaanm added the 2.12 label Oct 29, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants