Honor more deprecations under separate compilation#10291
Merged
lrytz merged 2 commits intoscala:2.13.xfrom Feb 21, 2023
Merged
Conversation
03a46ad to
4d5849a
Compare
Member
|
This is looking mergeable... Could you attempt to provide a good user-facing PR title and description? |
hamzaremmal
pushed a commit
to hamzaremmal/scala3
that referenced
this pull request
May 2, 2025
…n-deprecation Honor more deprecations under separate compilation
hamzaremmal
pushed a commit
to scala/scala3
that referenced
this pull request
May 7, 2025
…n-deprecation Honor more deprecations under separate compilation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Honor more deprecations under separate compilation.
Fixes scala/bug#12714
Restore that the symbol gets deprecation directly in classfile parser.
Partest files without a group are in group -1, not group 0 or a last group. (I assumed last round.)
The loose partitioning between
jvmtests andrunis unfortunate.I could not decipher the change that is reverted here. That change is also seen in the
jvmtest.