Conversation
73b1f50 to
8b4a053
Compare
jathak
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Is the plan to do something similar for the user-facing documentation in js-api-doc, or is that not feasible since we need the actual documentation to be in comments so it's accessible to TypeDoc?
|
My plan is to leave js-api-doc as-is, for the reason you describe. It also follows a much more typical pattern of "documenting specific types" rather than the spec-style pattern of "specifying behavior which is sometimes but not always attached to types". |
|
@nex3 I think this PR (specifically the removal of |
|
Oops, forgot to land corresponding updates elsewhere. I bet it's also breaking sass-site. |
This fixes a breakage caused by moving the specs to a literate programming style in sass/sass#3552.
This fixes a breakage caused by moving the specs to a literate programming style in sass/sass#3552.
|
@jgerigmeyer Should be fixed now, let me know if it's not. |
|
@nex3 That worked -- thanks! |
No description provided.