Approximate sizes of stack and visisted when collecting accumulated values#622
Merged
MichaReiser merged 2 commits intosalsa-rs:masterfrom Dec 6, 2024
Merged
Conversation
✅ Deploy Preview for salsa-rs canceled.
|
CodSpeed Performance ReportMerging #622 will not alter performanceComparing Summary
|
64620e7 to
4f365da
Compare
Veykril
reviewed
Dec 4, 2024
4f365da to
5314d4c
Compare
carljm
approved these changes
Dec 4, 2024
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR uses the input-output length to approximate the number of items added to
stackand reservesstack.len()additional items invisitedto avoid costly resizes. This reduces the performance regression in astral-sh/ruff#14760 from 10.3% to 9%, which seems worthwhile.The downside is that it can result in a too large
stackif a query has many outputs but only few outputs or in a too largevisitedset if many inputs are overlapping. I think this is acceptable, considering that the data structures are short-lived.Performance
This shows a 9% performance improvement for the accumulator benchmark.